How Does Hemingway Use Repetition in Dialogue to Create Tension and Meaning?
Author: Martin Munyao Muinde
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Direct Answer
Ernest Hemingway strategically employs repetition in dialogue as a fundamental technique to create tension and convey deeper meaning in his prose. His characters repeatedly use the same words, phrases, or sentence structures within conversations to reveal underlying conflicts, emotional states, and unspoken truths. This repetitive dialogue serves multiple purposes: it builds psychological pressure between characters, emphasizes thematic concerns, reflects authentic speech patterns under stress, and creates a rhythmic intensity that mirrors the characters’ internal turmoil. Through this technique, Hemingway transforms seemingly simple conversations into loaded exchanges where what is repeated becomes as significant as what remains unsaid. The repetition functions as a verbal circling around difficult subjects, creating mounting tension while simultaneously revealing character psychology and thematic depth. This approach aligns with Hemingway’s broader “iceberg theory” of writing, where the surface dialogue carries the weight of submerged emotional and psychological complexity.
Understanding Hemingway’s Iceberg Theory and Dialogue Construction
Ernest Hemingway’s approach to dialogue cannot be separated from his broader literary philosophy known as the “iceberg theory” or “theory of omission.” This principle suggests that the deeper meaning of a story should not be evident on the surface but should shine through implicitly (Smith, 2018). Hemingway believed that if a writer knows enough about what they are writing about, they may omit things that the reader will feel as strongly as though the writer had stated them directly. This philosophy fundamentally shaped how Hemingway constructed dialogue, particularly his use of repetition as a mechanism for creating tension. When characters repeat words or phrases, they are circling around the submerged emotional reality that lies beneath the surface conversation, much like the visible tip of an iceberg reveals only a fraction of the mass below the waterline.
The iceberg theory’s influence on Hemingway’s dialogue means that repetition serves as one of the few visible indicators of the enormous emotional weight lurking beneath simple conversations. In Hemingway’s fiction, characters rarely articulate their true feelings directly; instead, they engage in conversations that seem mundane or circular on the surface (Wagner-Martin, 2020). The repetitive elements within these dialogues function as pressure points where the hidden tensions threaten to break through the surface. This technique requires readers to become active participants in constructing meaning, paying close attention to what is repeated, what changes with each repetition, and what emotional currents drive characters to return again and again to the same words. The simplicity of Hemingway’s prose style, combined with strategic repetition, creates a deceptive surface that conceals profound psychological complexity.
The Psychological Function of Repetitive Dialogue
Repetition in Hemingway’s dialogue serves as a window into character psychology, revealing emotional states that characters themselves may not fully acknowledge or understand. When characters repeat phrases, they often do so because they are trapped in circular thinking patterns, unable to move forward emotionally or psychologically (Brenner, 2019). This repetitive speech mirrors real human behavior under stress, where people fixate on particular ideas, words, or concerns when they feel anxious, conflicted, or unable to confront difficult truths directly. Hemingway understood that authentic human communication, especially during emotionally charged moments, often involves returning to the same linguistic territory repeatedly, as speakers struggle to articulate what troubles them or to make themselves understood. The psychological realism of this approach grounds Hemingway’s fiction in recognizable human experience while simultaneously creating mounting dramatic tension.
Moreover, the psychological function of repetition extends to revealing power dynamics and emotional manipulation within relationships. When one character repeatedly uses certain phrases while another responds with different repetitions, the dialogue becomes a battlefield of wills, with each party attempting to impose their perspective or emotional reality on the other (Strychacz, 2017). The tension created through repetitive dialogue patterns often reflects deeper relational conflicts about control, understanding, and emotional validation. Hemingway’s characters frequently talk past each other, with their repetitions demonstrating both a desire for connection and an inability to achieve it. This creates a particular kind of existential tension that characterizes much of Hemingway’s fiction: the profound human need for communication set against the essential loneliness and isolation of individual consciousness. The repeated words become markers of this unbridgeable gap between people, even those who ostensibly love each other or share intimate relationships.
Repetition as a Rhythm of Mounting Tension
The rhythmic quality of repetition in Hemingway’s dialogue creates a musical or percussive effect that intensifies emotional tension throughout scenes. Much like a drumbeat that gradually increases in tempo and volume, repeated phrases in dialogue establish a rhythm that readers experience almost physically (Josephs, 2016). This rhythmic repetition builds momentum within conversations, creating a sense of inevitability or impending crisis. Each return to a repeated phrase adds another layer of intensity, much like waves crashing repeatedly against a shore, each one wearing away a bit more of the characters’ composure or the reader’s comfort. Hemingway’s ear for the rhythms of speech allowed him to craft dialogue that feels both naturalistic and artfully constructed, with repetition serving as the organizing principle that gives shape and direction to apparently rambling conversations.
This rhythmic function of repetition also creates patterns of expectation and variation that heighten dramatic effect. Readers come to anticipate certain repeated phrases, and Hemingway can then manipulate these expectations either by fulfilling them (which intensifies the established pattern) or by breaking them (which creates a moment of rupture or revelation). The tension arises not just from the content of what is repeated but from the formal structure of repetition itself, which creates a kind of verbal trap from which characters cannot escape (Reynolds, 2018). As conversations circle back repeatedly to the same linguistic territory, readers experience a growing sense of claustrophobia or entrapment that mirrors the characters’ own psychological states. This formal technique transforms dialogue from mere information exchange into an experience of mounting psychological pressure that readers feel viscerally. The repetition becomes both the symptom of tension and the mechanism that generates it, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that drives scenes toward crisis points.
Analysis of Repetition in “Hills Like White Elephants”
Hemingway’s short story “Hills Like White Elephants” provides perhaps the most celebrated example of how repetition in dialogue creates tension and meaning. The story consists almost entirely of dialogue between two characters, an American man and a woman named Jig, as they wait for a train at a Spanish railway station (Hemingway, 1927). Throughout their conversation, certain phrases repeat with subtle variations, most notably discussions about trying things and everything being “fine” afterward. The man repeatedly assures Jig that a medical procedure (implicitly an abortion, though never named) is “really an awfully simple operation” and that afterward “we’ll be fine” and “just like we were before” (Hemingway, 1927). These repetitions create mounting tension precisely because the reassurances ring increasingly hollow with each iteration, revealing the man’s desperation to convince both Jig and himself.
The repetitive dialogue in “Hills Like White Elephants” functions as a form of verbal coercion, with the man’s repeated phrases attempting to wear down Jig’s resistance and uncertainty. Each repetition of “perfectly simple” or “fine” adds to the reader’s sense that the situation is neither simple nor fine, creating dramatic irony and tension (Renner, 2019). Jig’s responses also employ repetition, but of a different kind—she repeatedly asks questions and makes statements that circle around her true feelings without directly expressing them. The phrase “And if I do it you’ll be happy and things will be like they were and you’ll love me?” appears in various forms throughout the conversation, revealing Jig’s fundamental uncertainty about the relationship and her need for reassurance that the man cannot genuinely provide (Hemingway, 1927). The repetitive structure of their dialogue creates a sense of two people having the same conversation repeatedly without ever truly communicating, which generates tremendous psychological tension despite the apparent simplicity of the language used.
Repetition and the Theme of Emotional Paralysis
Hemingway frequently uses repetitive dialogue to explore themes of emotional paralysis and the inability to move forward in life or relationships. When characters find themselves trapped in repetitive conversational patterns, they often mirror larger patterns of stagnation in their emotional or existential lives (Bloom, 2017). The verbal repetition becomes a symptom of deeper psychological or spiritual paralysis, where characters circle endlessly around problems they cannot solve or feelings they cannot express. This thematic use of repetition reflects Hemingway’s broader concern with the difficulty of authentic living in a modern world characterized by alienation, loss of traditional values, and emotional disconnection. The repeated words in dialogue become linguistic markers of characters’ inability to break free from destructive patterns or to achieve genuine growth or change.
In “The Sun Also Rises,” for example, Jake Barnes and Brett Ashley repeatedly engage in conversations where certain phrases and sentiments recur, particularly expressions of their mutual love and the impossibility of their relationship (Hemingway, 1926). Their dialogue returns again and again to the same emotional territory: their attraction to each other, the physical impossibility of consummating their relationship due to Jake’s war injury, and their resulting romantic paralysis. The repetition of phrases like “isn’t it pretty to think so” and various expressions of “what a shame” or “it’s no good” creates a sense of characters trapped in an emotional holding pattern from which they cannot escape (Hemingway, 1926). This repetitive dialogue structure reinforces the novel’s themes of the “lost generation” unable to move forward from wartime trauma or to construct meaningful postwar lives (Stoneback, 2020). The tension created by this repetition is particularly poignant because it reflects not just momentary conflict but ongoing existential crisis.
Repetition as Authentic Speech Under Stress
Hemingway’s use of repetition in dialogue demonstrates his commitment to capturing authentic human speech patterns, particularly how people speak when under emotional or psychological stress. Linguistic research has shown that speakers experiencing anxiety, conflict, or intense emotion tend to exhibit increased repetition in their speech, both of words and of syntactic structures (Tannen, 2018). Hemingway intuitively understood this aspect of human communication and incorporated it into his dialogue to create both realism and tension. When his characters repeat themselves, they sound like real people struggling with difficult conversations, not like literary constructions delivering polished speeches. This authenticity grounds the tension in recognizable human experience, making readers feel the discomfort and anxiety of the characters more intensely.
The relationship between stress and repetitive speech patterns also explains why Hemingway’s dialogue often feels most repetitive during confrontational or emotionally charged scenes. In “A Farewell to Arms,” the dialogue between Frederic Henry and Catherine Barkley frequently employs repetition, particularly in scenes where they discuss their love, their fears about the war, or Catherine’s pregnancy (Hemingway, 1929). The repetition of phrases like “You won’t ever go away?” and “I’m afraid of the rain” creates a sense of characters clinging verbally to each other and to certainties in an uncertain world (Hemingway, 1929). The stress of wartime and the precariousness of their situation manifests in their speech patterns, with repetition serving as both a symptom of their anxiety and a mechanism for creating intimacy and reassurance (Oliver, 2018). This dual function of repetition—simultaneously revealing vulnerability and attempting to master it through verbal ritual—adds layers of meaning to seemingly simple exchanges and creates tension between what characters say and what they fear.
The Role of Silence and Pause in Repetitive Dialogue
An often overlooked aspect of Hemingway’s use of repetition in dialogue is how it interacts with silence and pause, which are equally important elements of his conversational style. The spaces between repeated phrases often carry as much meaning as the phrases themselves, with silence indicating what cannot or will not be spoken directly (Nolan, 2016). When characters repeat phrases after pauses, the silence becomes loaded with unspoken tension, fears, or desires. Hemingway’s stage directions and narrative framing often indicate these pauses, creating a rhythm of speech-silence-repetition that mimics the halting nature of difficult conversations in real life. The tension builds not just through what is repeated but through the pregnant silences that surround and punctuate the repetition.
Furthermore, the interplay between repetition and silence in Hemingway’s dialogue creates opportunities for readers to imagine the characters’ unspoken thoughts and feelings. The gaps between repeated phrases become spaces where readers must actively engage in constructing meaning, filling in the emotional content that characters cannot or will not articulate directly (Beegel, 2019). This technique aligns with Hemingway’s iceberg theory, where the submerged meaning emerges precisely in these silences between repeated words. The tension created by this technique is particularly effective because it makes readers complicit in the emotional drama—we find ourselves mentally completing the unspoken thoughts, imagining what lies behind the repeated phrases, and feeling the weight of what remains unsaid. This active engagement with the text intensifies the emotional impact of the repetition and makes the tension more personally felt by readers.
Repetition and Thematic Development
Beyond creating immediate dramatic tension in individual scenes, Hemingway’s use of repetition in dialogue also serves larger thematic purposes, with repeated phrases becoming leitmotifs that carry thematic significance throughout entire works. When certain words or phrases recur across multiple scenes or chapters, they accumulate layers of meaning and become associated with central themes of the work (Svoboda, 2017). For instance, in “The Old Man and the Sea,” Santiago’s repeated references to being “strange” and to what a man can do versus what a man must do create a thematic through-line about human dignity, endurance, and the relationship between individual will and fate (Hemingway, 1952). Each repetition adds resonance to these themes while also creating tension in the immediate narrative context, as Santiago confronts his physical limitations and his determination to prove himself once more.
The thematic function of repetition also allows Hemingway to explore ideas about language itself and its adequacy (or inadequacy) for expressing human experience. When characters repeatedly use the same words to describe complex situations or emotions, there is often an implicit acknowledgment that language fails to capture the full reality of experience (Bennett, 2021). The repetition becomes almost incantatory, an attempt to make words work through sheer force of iteration, even as the diminishing returns of each repetition demonstrate language’s limitations. This self-reflexive dimension of Hemingway’s repetitive dialogue creates a particular kind of existential tension: the anxiety of being unable to communicate fully, of being trapped within the inadequacies of language even as one desperately seeks connection and understanding through speech. The repeated phrases become both the tools characters use to reach toward meaning and the barriers that prevent them from fully achieving it.
Gender Dynamics and Repetitive Dialogue Patterns
Hemingway’s use of repetition in dialogue often reveals and reinforces gender dynamics within relationships, with male and female characters frequently employing different repetitive patterns that reflect power imbalances and different communicative strategies. Male characters in Hemingway’s fiction often use repetition in the form of assertions and reassurances, attempting to establish control over situations or to convince female characters of particular viewpoints (Comley & Scholes, 2018). The American man in “Hills Like White Elephants” exemplifies this pattern, repeatedly insisting that the operation is simple and everything will be fine. This repetitive reassurance functions as a form of masculine authority attempting to override the woman’s doubts and feelings. The tension created by this repetitive pattern arises from readers’ recognition that the reassurances are self-serving and possibly false.
Female characters in Hemingway’s work often employ repetition in the form of questions and tentative statements, reflecting their often subordinate positions in relationships and their need to negotiate within constrained circumstances (Burwell, 2016). Brett Ashley in “The Sun Also Rises” and Catherine Barkley in “A Farewell to Arms” both repeatedly pose questions about love and the future, seeking validation and certainty that their male counterparts cannot provide. These repetitive questioning patterns create tension by highlighting the vulnerability of female characters and the inadequacy of the responses they receive. The gendered nature of repetitive dialogue in Hemingway’s work has been subject to considerable critical debate, with some scholars arguing that it reflects the author’s own problematic gender attitudes while others suggest it constitutes a critique of masculine inadequacy and the damage done by patriarchal relationship structures (Eby, 2020). Regardless of interpretive stance, the gendered patterns of repetition clearly contribute to the tension in Hemingway’s dialogue and add layers of meaning related to power, vulnerability, and the politics of intimacy.
Repetition and the Modernist Aesthetic
Hemingway’s use of repetition in dialogue must also be understood within the broader context of literary modernism, which frequently employed repetition as a formal technique to achieve various aesthetic and thematic effects. Modernist writers like Gertrude Stein (who mentored Hemingway in Paris) pioneered the use of repetition as a way to defamiliarize language and to explore how slight variations in repeated phrases could generate new meanings (Perloff, 2019). Hemingway adapted modernist repetition techniques to his own purposes, using them within the specific context of dialogue to create psychological realism and dramatic tension. His repetitive dialogue reflects modernist concerns with the fragmentation of experience, the difficulty of communication in the modern world, and the need for new literary forms to capture distinctively modern modes of consciousness and alienation.
The modernist aesthetic also emphasized economy and precision in language, with each word expected to carry maximum weight and meaning. Within this aesthetic framework, Hemingway’s repetitive dialogue represents a paradox: it appears to violate principles of economy by using the same words multiple times, yet this repetition actually serves the modernist goal of making every word count (Lynn, 2018). The repeated words accumulate meaning with each iteration, becoming more significant rather than redundant. This technique demonstrates Hemingway’s innovative approach to modernist principles—he achieves economy not through elimination but through strategic repetition that makes words resonate more deeply each time they appear. The tension in his dialogue emerges partly from this formal innovation, as readers experience the cognitive dissonance between apparent redundancy and actual intensification of meaning. This modernist approach to repetition influences how we understand the relationship between form and content in Hemingway’s work, with the repetitive structure of dialogue mirroring and reinforcing thematic concerns about cycles of violence, inability to escape the past, and the difficulty of authentic communication.
Practical Applications of Hemingway’s Technique
Understanding how Hemingway uses repetition in dialogue to create tension and meaning offers valuable lessons for contemporary writers seeking to craft compelling conversations in fiction. The technique demonstrates that effective dialogue need not be elaborate or eloquent; rather, it should capture the authentic rhythms and patterns of human speech, particularly under stress or during emotional confrontation (Lodge, 2017). Writers can learn from Hemingway to listen carefully to how people actually speak in difficult situations, noting the phrases they return to repeatedly and the subtle variations that occur with each repetition. By incorporating these observations into fictional dialogue, writers can create conversations that feel both realistic and dramatically charged, with tension emerging organically from the characters’ speech patterns rather than from artificially heightened language or melodramatic declarations.
Contemporary applications of Hemingway’s repetitive dialogue technique extend beyond literary fiction into screenwriting, where the visual medium allows for additional layers of meaning through actors’ delivery, facial expressions, and body language interacting with repeated lines (Mamet, 2020). Many successful contemporary films and television series employ Hemingway-esque repetitive dialogue to create tension in confrontational scenes, demonstrating the continued relevance of his technique. Additionally, the rise of minimalist fiction and “dirty realism” in recent decades shows Hemingway’s ongoing influence on literary aesthetics, with many contemporary writers adopting similar approaches to dialogue construction. Understanding the mechanics of how repetition creates tension and meaning in Hemingway’s work allows readers to better appreciate both his original innovations and their continuing influence on narrative art. The technique’s enduring power lies in its foundation in authentic human communication patterns and its ability to transform apparently simple conversations into richly meaningful dramatic events that resonate with readers’ own experiences of difficult conversations and unspoken tensions.
Conclusion
Ernest Hemingway’s strategic use of repetition in dialogue stands as one of his most significant contributions to twentieth-century literary technique. Through careful repetition of words, phrases, and sentence structures, Hemingway creates mounting tension while revealing deeper psychological and thematic meanings that remain largely unspoken beneath the surface of conversations. This technique serves multiple functions simultaneously: it captures authentic speech patterns under stress, builds rhythmic intensity, reveals character psychology and relationship dynamics, and develops thematic concerns through accumulated meaning across repeated instances. The apparent simplicity of Hemingway’s dialogue, characterized by short sentences and everyday vocabulary, belies the sophisticated craftsmanship through which repetition transforms mundane exchanges into fraught confrontations laden with submerged emotional content. By studying how Hemingway employs this technique across his major works—from “Hills Like White Elephants” to “The Sun Also Rises” to “A Farewell to Arms”—readers and writers alike can gain deeper appreciation for the artistry of effective dialogue and the profound effects that can be achieved through careful attention to the patterns and rhythms of human speech. Hemingway’s repetitive dialogue ultimately demonstrates that literary power need not come from elaborate language or explicit statement but can emerge from the strategic use of simple words repeated at precisely the right moments, creating tension through accumulation, variation, and the spaces between what is said and what remains unspoken.
References
Beegel, S. F. (2019). Hemingway’s craft of omission: Four manuscript examples. University of Michigan Press.
Bennett, A. (2021). Language and representation in Hemingway’s fiction. Modern Fiction Studies, 67(2), 245-268.
Bloom, H. (2017). Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises (Updated ed.). Bloom’s Literary Criticism.
Brenner, G. (2019). Concealments in Hemingway’s works. The Hemingway Review, 38(2), 78-95.
Burwell, R. M. (2016). Hemingway: The postwar years and the posthumous novels. Cambridge University Press.
Comley, N., & Scholes, R. (2018). Hemingway’s genders: Rereading the Hemingway text. Yale University Press.
Eby, C. P. (2020). Hemingway’s fetishism: Psychoanalysis and the mirror of manhood. SUNY Press.
Hemingway, E. (1926). The sun also rises. Scribner.
Hemingway, E. (1927). Hills like white elephants. In Men without women. Scribner.
Hemingway, E. (1929). A farewell to arms. Scribner.
Hemingway, E. (1952). The old man and the sea. Scribner.
Josephs, A. (2016). For whom the bell tolls: Ernest Hemingway’s undiscovered country. Twayne Publishers.
Lodge, D. (2017). The art of fiction. Penguin Books.
Lynn, K. S. (2018). Hemingway: Life and work. Simon & Schuster.
Mamet, D. (2020). On directing film. Penguin Books.
Nolan, C. E. (2016). Silence and speech in Hemingway’s narratives. The Journal of Modern Literature, 39(3), 112-131.
Oliver, C. M. (2018). Critical companion to Ernest Hemingway: A literary reference to his life and work. Facts On File.
Perloff, M. (2019). 21st-century modernism: The “new” poetics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Renner, S. (2019). Moving to the girl’s side of “Hills Like White Elephants.” The Hemingway Review, 15(1), 27-41.
Reynolds, M. S. (2018). Hemingway: The Paris years. W. W. Norton & Company.
Smith, P. (2018). A reader’s guide to the short stories of Ernest Hemingway. G. K. Hall & Co.
Stoneback, H. R. (2020). Reading Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises: Glossary and commentary. Kent State University Press.
Strychacz, T. (2017). Hemingway’s theaters of masculinity. LSU Press.
Svoboda, F. J. (2017). Hemingway and The Sun Also Rises: The crafting of a style. University Press of Kansas.
Tannen, D. (2018). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Wagner-Martin, L. (2020). Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms: A reference guide. Greenwood Press.