How Do Scout and Jem’s Relationship Evolve in To Kill a Mockingbird?
The relationship between Scout and Jem Finch in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird evolves from a close, playful sibling bond in childhood to a more complex relationship marked by growing distance as Jem matures and Scout struggles to understand his changes. Initially, Scout and Jem are inseparable companions who share adventures, create games, and navigate their world together with their friend Dill. As the novel progresses and Jem enters adolescence, he becomes more withdrawn, moody, and interested in adult matters, particularly the Tom Robinson trial, which creates tension and misunderstanding between the siblings. Despite this growing distance, their relationship ultimately demonstrates deep loyalty, protective love, and an enduring bond that survives the challenges of maturation. Their evolving dynamic serves as a vehicle for exploring themes of growing up, loss of innocence, moral development, and the different ways children process traumatic events and social injustice.
Who Are Scout and Jem Finch?
Scout Finch, whose full name is Jean Louise Finch, is the protagonist and narrator of To Kill a Mockingbird. She tells the story retrospectively as an adult, reflecting on events that occurred when she was between six and nine years old. Scout is a tomboyish, intelligent, and outspoken girl who prefers overalls to dresses and fighting to ladylike behavior. She is curious, quick-tempered, and fiercely loyal to her family and friends. Her narrative voice provides the novel’s perspective, offering both childlike observations and adult insights into the events of Maycomb, Alabama, during the 1930s. Scout’s character embodies innocence confronting prejudice, and her moral education under her father Atticus Finch’s guidance forms a central thread of the narrative. Her relationship with her brother Jem is one of the most important emotional connections in her life, shaping her understanding of family, loyalty, and the complexities of growing up in a society marked by racial injustice and rigid social hierarchies (Lee, 1960).
Jeremy Atticus Finch, known as Jem, is Scout’s older brother by four years. At the beginning of the novel, he is nearly ten years old, and by the end, he is approaching thirteen and entering adolescence. Jem serves as both a companion and a role model for Scout throughout much of their childhood. He is adventurous, brave, and deeply affected by the injustices he witnesses in Maycomb, particularly the trial and conviction of Tom Robinson. Jem is more sensitive and introspective than Scout, and he takes their father’s lessons about courage, empathy, and justice deeply to heart. As he matures, Jem struggles to reconcile the moral principles Atticus teaches with the reality of prejudice and injustice in their community. His journey from childhood innocence to a more complex understanding of human nature parallels Scout’s own development but occurs at a faster pace due to his age. The age difference between Scout and Jem becomes increasingly significant as the novel progresses, creating both connection and distance in their relationship as they navigate different stages of childhood and adolescence simultaneously (Johnson, 2008).
What Is Scout and Jem’s Relationship Like at the Beginning of the Novel?
At the novel’s beginning, Scout and Jem share a close, affectionate sibling relationship characterized by shared adventures, imaginative play, and mutual companionship. Despite their four-year age difference, they are nearly inseparable during the summer months and after school. Together with their friend Dill Harris, who visits Maycomb each summer, they create elaborate games, explore their neighborhood, and embark on adventures that reflect typical childhood curiosity and imagination. Their most sustained shared interest involves their mysterious neighbor, Arthur “Boo” Radley, around whom they construct fantasies and daring challenges. Jem often takes the lead in these adventures, with Scout following along eagerly, though she is never merely a passive participant. She frequently challenges Jem’s authority and refuses to be left behind, even when he suggests that certain activities are not appropriate for girls. This early dynamic establishes Jem as a protective older brother and Scout as a determined younger sister who demands inclusion and equality (Lee, 1960).
The sibling relationship in these early chapters reflects both typical childhood dynamics and the particular circumstances of their upbringing in a motherless household. Since their mother died when Scout was two years old, Jem has been her primary childhood companion and, in many ways, a surrogate parent figure alongside their father Atticus and their housekeeper Calpurnia. Jem remembers their mother and occasionally shares these memories with Scout, creating a connection to their family history that Scout cannot access on her own. In their daily interactions, Jem demonstrates a mixture of typical older sibling behavior—sometimes patient and protective, other times dismissive or bossy. Scout, for her part, both admires and resents Jem’s authority. She looks up to him and seeks his approval, but she also bristles at any suggestion that she is less capable or less brave because she is younger or because she is a girl. Their arguments and reconciliations follow the natural rhythm of sibling relationships, with genuine affection underlying their occasional conflicts. The early chapters establish a foundation of closeness and shared experience that makes the later growing distance between them all the more poignant and significant (Shackelford, 1997).
How Does the Boo Radley Mystery Affect Scout and Jem’s Bond?
The mystery surrounding Boo Radley serves as a crucial bonding experience for Scout and Jem, providing them with a shared imaginative world and a series of adventures that strengthen their sibling connection. The Radley house, with its closed shutters and reclusive inhabitant, becomes the focus of the children’s fascination and fear. Together with Dill, Scout and Jem create elaborate stories about Boo, daring each other to approach the Radley house and devising schemes to make Boo come outside. These shared adventures create a private world of imagination and excitement that belongs exclusively to the children, separate from the adult world. Jem often serves as the leader in these expeditions, accepting dares and taking the greatest risks, while Scout participates fully despite occasional fear. Their collaborative storytelling and shared daring establish patterns of cooperation and mutual support that define their relationship. The Boo Radley adventures also reveal their complementary personalities: Jem’s bravery and willingness to accept challenges, Scout’s determination not to be left out, and their combined curiosity about the unknown (Lee, 1960).
The Boo Radley mystery also creates significant moments of vulnerability and protection between the siblings that deepen their bond. When Jem loses his pants on the Radley fence during a nighttime adventure and must return alone to retrieve them, Scout worries intensely about his safety, revealing the depth of her concern for her brother. When Jem discovers that someone has mended his pants and left them folded on the fence, he is deeply affected and begins to see Boo Radley differently, but he keeps this revelation largely to himself, showing the beginning of his more internal, reflective processing of experiences. Similarly, when they find gifts in the knot-hole of the Radley oak tree, they share the excitement and mystery of these discoveries, creating a secret treasure that bonds them together. However, when Nathan Radley fills the knot-hole with cement, Jem is devastated in a way that Scout does not fully understand, suggesting that he is beginning to form more complex emotional responses than his younger sister can fully comprehend. These experiences with the Boo Radley mystery trace the evolution of their relationship from simple shared adventure to more complicated emotional territory where Jem begins to process experiences at a different level than Scout (Champion, 1999).
What Changes Occur in Their Relationship as Jem Enters Adolescence?
As Jem enters adolescence, the relationship between the siblings undergoes significant strain as he becomes moody, withdrawn, and increasingly dismissive of Scout’s company. This transformation begins subtly but becomes more pronounced as the novel progresses, particularly during and after the Tom Robinson trial. Jem starts to develop interests separate from Scout, spends more time alone, and becomes irritable when Scout tries to engage him in their old games and activities. He begins to assert his maturity and his masculine identity, often telling Scout that she should act more like a girl and sometimes refusing to include her in his activities. This rejection is painful for Scout, who does not understand why her beloved companion is pulling away from her. She interprets his behavior as betrayal and feels hurt by his suggestions that she should behave differently or that certain activities are no longer appropriate for them to share. The narrator Scout describes how Jem becomes unpredictable, sometimes treating her with affection and other times with irritation, creating confusion and insecurity in their relationship (Lee, 1960).
The changes in Jem’s behavior reflect the natural but difficult process of adolescent development, complicated by the traumatic events surrounding the Tom Robinson trial. Jem is reaching an age where he can more fully comprehend the injustice and prejudice in Maycomb society, and this awareness affects him profoundly. His moodiness and withdrawal are not merely typical teenage behavior but responses to his growing disillusionment with the adult world. Scout, being four years younger, processes these events differently and cannot fully understand the depth of Jem’s emotional turmoil. This creates a gap in their shared experience that had previously defined their relationship. Atticus and Calpurnia both recognize what is happening to Jem and counsel Scout to be patient with him, explaining that he is going through a difficult phase. However, this adult understanding does not ease Scout’s sense of loss as her closest companion becomes increasingly distant and incomprehensible to her. The transformation in their relationship reflects a universal experience of siblings growing at different rates and the younger child’s difficulty in understanding and accepting the older sibling’s maturation (Dare, 2014).
How Does the Tom Robinson Trial Impact Scout and Jem’s Relationship?
The Tom Robinson trial serves as a watershed moment in Scout and Jem’s relationship, affecting them differently and creating new distance between them while also revealing the depth of their bond. Throughout the trial, Jem becomes increasingly invested in the outcome, convinced that Atticus’s clear demonstration of Tom Robinson’s innocence will result in an acquittal. He follows the proceedings closely, discusses the case with adults, and develops a sophisticated understanding of the evidence and arguments. Scout, while present at the trial and affected by what she witnesses, does not have the same depth of comprehension or emotional investment as Jem. When the jury returns a guilty verdict despite overwhelming evidence of Tom’s innocence, Jem is devastated in a way that Scout cannot fully grasp. He cries openly, expressing disillusionment with justice and humanity. His faith in the fairness of the legal system and the basic goodness of people has been shattered, while Scout, though disturbed by the verdict, maintains more of her childhood resilience and optimism (Lee, 1960).
In the aftermath of the trial, the siblings process their trauma differently, creating further distance in their relationship. Jem becomes withdrawn and refuses to discuss the trial, spending time alone in his room and avoiding the activities he once enjoyed. When Scout tries to talk to him about it or engage him in conversation, he often snaps at her or tells her she is too young to understand. This dismissal hurts Scout deeply, as she feels excluded from her brother’s inner world. However, the trial also creates moments of protective bonding between them. During the tense confrontation at the jail when Walter Cunningham and other men come to lynch Tom Robinson, Jem refuses to leave Atticus despite being ordered to do so, and Scout’s intervention ultimately defuses the situation. In this moment, the siblings stand together in support of their father and in defense of justice, demonstrating that their fundamental loyalty to each other and their family remains intact despite the growing distance between them. The trial forces both children to confront moral complexity and injustice, but their different ages and temperaments mean they emerge from this experience changed in different ways, affecting how they relate to each other moving forward (Johnson, 2008).
Why Does Jem Try to Distance Himself from Scout?
Jem’s attempts to distance himself from Scout stem from multiple interconnected factors related to adolescent development, gender socialization, and his processing of traumatic experiences. As Jem enters his teenage years, he becomes increasingly aware of social expectations regarding masculine behavior and the gender divide that characterizes Maycomb society. He begins to internalize messages that boys and girls should occupy separate spheres and that his continued close companionship with his younger sister might be seen as childish or inappropriate. When he tells Scout that she should act more like a girl or that she cannot participate in certain activities, he is attempting to establish his own masculine identity by creating distance from feminine association. This distancing is also a way of asserting his maturity and independence, marking himself as entering a new phase of life that is distinct from childhood. While these attempts hurt Scout, they reflect Jem’s struggle to define himself as he moves toward adulthood in a society with rigid gender roles (Lee, 1960).
Beyond gender dynamics, Jem’s withdrawal from Scout is also a protective mechanism related to his emotional processing of difficult experiences. The Tom Robinson trial and its aftermath have affected Jem deeply, forcing him to confront injustice, prejudice, and moral failure in ways that threaten his sense of security and faith in humanity. His moodiness and isolation represent his struggle to process these traumatic realizations. By distancing himself from Scout, Jem may be attempting to protect her from the full weight of his disillusionment, or he may simply lack the emotional tools to share his pain with someone he still perceives as a child. Additionally, Jem’s growing understanding of the dangers their family faces due to Atticus’s defense of Tom Robinson may motivate him to assert a protective, more mature role in the family. His increased seriousness and his withdrawal from childish games reflect his recognition that their world is more dangerous and complex than he previously understood. This maturation, while necessary, creates a gap between him and Scout that neither of them knows how to bridge, resulting in the painful distance that characterizes their relationship during the middle and later portions of the novel (Blackford, 2012).
How Does Scout React to the Changes in Jem?
Scout’s reaction to the changes in Jem is characterized by confusion, hurt, resentment, and a persistent desire to maintain their close relationship. As Jem becomes increasingly moody and withdrawn, Scout struggles to understand what is happening to her beloved brother and companion. She notices his physical changes, his moodiness, and his new dismissive attitude toward her with bewilderment and frustration. Scout’s narrative voice conveys her sense of loss as the sibling who was once her constant companion becomes unpredictable and sometimes hostile. She resents his suggestions that she should act more like a girl and his implications that she is too young to understand important matters. These rejections wound her pride and her sense of belonging, as she has always prided herself on keeping up with Jem despite being younger and female. Scout’s attempts to maintain their old patterns of interaction often meet with irritation from Jem, creating cycles of conflict that leave her feeling rejected and confused about how to relate to this changing version of her brother (Lee, 1960).
Despite her hurt and confusion, Scout also demonstrates loyalty and concern for Jem that reveals the enduring strength of their bond. When adults tell her that Jem is going through a phase and that she should leave him alone, she tries to comply even though she does not fully understand. She worries about him when he is upset, particularly after the trial verdict, and she attempts in her own way to offer comfort and companionship. Scout’s narrative also reveals moments when she recognizes Jem’s pain and struggles, even when she cannot fully comprehend its source. Her resilience in the face of his rejection shows her deep attachment to her brother; despite his sometimes hurtful behavior, she never wavers in her fundamental love and loyalty toward him. Scout’s processing of Jem’s changes also contributes to her own maturation. She begins to recognize that growing up involves loss and change, that relationships evolve, and that people she loves may become temporarily distant or incomprehensible to her. This recognition, while painful, represents an important step in Scout’s own journey toward understanding human complexity and the challenges of maintaining relationships across different life stages (Shackelford, 1997).
What Role Does Atticus Play in Scout and Jem’s Relationship?
Atticus Finch plays a crucial mediating role in Scout and Jem’s relationship, providing guidance, perspective, and stability as they navigate the challenges of their changing dynamic. As a single father raising two children with different temperaments and developmental needs, Atticus demonstrates sensitivity to both Scout and Jem’s emotional states while maintaining consistent moral principles that apply to both. When Scout complains about Jem’s moodiness and withdrawal, Atticus explains to her that Jem is going through a difficult time and encourages her to be patient and understanding. He helps Scout recognize that Jem’s behavior is not a personal rejection but a response to his own internal struggles. Similarly, Atticus provides Jem with opportunities to discuss his feelings and concerns, particularly regarding the trial and issues of justice. He treats Jem’s moral questions seriously and engages with him on an increasingly adult level, acknowledging his growing maturity while still maintaining appropriate parental boundaries. This balanced approach helps both children feel validated in their experiences while also encouraging them to maintain their sibling bond (Lee, 1960).
Atticus also models the kind of relationship he hopes his children will maintain with each other by demonstrating respect, patience, and unconditional love toward both of them. He never plays favorites or encourages competition between them; instead, he emphasizes their shared identity as members of the Finch family and their shared responsibility to uphold moral principles. When the children face danger, such as during the confrontation at the jail or the attack by Bob Ewell, Atticus’s primary concern is for both of them equally, reinforcing their bond as siblings who face challenges together. His consistent presence and his efforts to help each child understand the other’s perspective provide a stabilizing force that helps Scout and Jem maintain their connection even during periods of tension and misunderstanding. Additionally, Atticus’s own moral courage and integrity give both children a shared framework for understanding right and wrong, creating common ground that helps them reconnect even when their immediate experiences and reactions differ. Through his parenting, Atticus demonstrates that family bonds can survive conflict and change, and that patience, understanding, and unconditional love are the foundations of enduring relationships (Champion, 1999).
How Does the Attack by Bob Ewell Affect Their Relationship?
The attack by Bob Ewell on Halloween night represents a traumatic crisis that ultimately reinforces the deep bond between Scout and Jem despite the distance that had developed between them. As the children walk home from the school pageant in the darkness, they are attacked by Ewell, who intends to murder them as revenge against Atticus. During the attack, Jem attempts to protect Scout, yelling at her to run while he struggles with their attacker. This protective instinct, even in the face of mortal danger, demonstrates that Jem’s fundamental love for his sister and his sense of responsibility for her safety remain intact despite the earlier tensions in their relationship. Scout, trapped in her ham costume and unable to see clearly, hears Jem fighting and then realizes he has been injured. Her fear for Jem’s life and her relief when she discovers he is alive, though badly hurt, reveal the depth of her love for her brother and her inability to imagine life without him (Lee, 1960).
The aftermath of the attack brings Scout and Jem closer together through shared trauma and mutual concern. Jem suffers a badly broken arm that requires significant recovery time, during which Scout’s protective feelings toward him intensify. The experience of nearly losing each other forces both siblings to confront the fragility of their relationship and the importance of their bond. While Jem’s recovery occurs mostly off-page in the novel’s conclusion, the narrative suggests that this traumatic event serves as a clarifying experience that helps both children recognize what truly matters. The attack also confirms for Scout that Jem’s earlier protectiveness and his attempts to shield her from certain harsh realities were motivated by love rather than mere dismissiveness. Similarly, Jem’s willingness to fight desperately to protect his sister demonstrates that his earlier withdrawal was never a rejection of their fundamental bond but rather a response to his own developmental challenges. The crisis thus serves to reaffirm the sibling relationship that had been strained by Jem’s adolescence and the traumatic events surrounding the trial, suggesting that their bond is strong enough to survive both external threats and internal developmental challenges (Dare, 2014).
What Does Their Relationship Reveal About Growing Up and Loss of Innocence?
The evolution of Scout and Jem’s relationship serves as a primary vehicle for exploring themes of growing up and loss of innocence that are central to To Kill a Mockingbird. Their journey from inseparable childhood companions engaged in imaginative play to siblings experiencing different developmental stages and processing trauma differently illustrates how maturation inevitably involves loss and change. The early chapters’ depiction of their close, playful relationship represents a kind of childhood Eden—a time of innocence when their primary concerns are games, adventures, and satisfying their curiosity about their mysterious neighbor. As the novel progresses and they are exposed to injustice, prejudice, and violence, both children lose aspects of their innocence, but they do so at different rates and in different ways. Jem’s earlier and more complete disillusionment reflects his greater cognitive capacity to understand the full implications of what he witnesses, while Scout maintains more resilience and optimism despite also being affected by these experiences (Lee, 1960).
The growing distance between Scout and Jem represents not only Jem’s individual maturation but also the inevitable changes that occur in relationships as people develop at different paces. Their experience reflects a universal aspect of growing up: the recognition that people we love will change in ways we cannot control or fully understand, and that relationships must evolve to accommodate these changes. The pain Scout experiences as Jem withdraws from her represents the losses that accompany maturation—the loss of childhood companionship, the loss of shared perspectives, and the loss of the simple, uncomplicated closeness that characterized their early relationship. However, the novel also suggests that these losses, while real and painful, do not negate the fundamental bonds of family and shared experience. Even as Scout and Jem process their experiences differently and exist at different developmental stages, their loyalty to each other remains. Their relationship thus illustrates that growing up involves both loss and adaptation, that relationships can survive transformation, and that maintaining connections across different life stages requires patience, understanding, and continued commitment to each other (Blackford, 2012).
How Do Scout and Jem Support Each Other Despite Their Differences?
Despite the growing distance and tension between them as Jem matures, Scout and Jem continue to support each other in meaningful ways throughout the novel. Their support often manifests in actions rather than words, as both siblings demonstrate loyalty and protective instincts toward each other during moments of crisis. Jem consistently shows physical protectiveness toward Scout, whether by trying to keep her safe during their adventures, standing with her against bullies who mock their father, or ultimately fighting to protect her during Bob Ewell’s attack. He may push her away emotionally at times, but his fundamental sense of responsibility for her safety never wavers. Scout, for her part, demonstrates support for Jem by respecting his need for space even when she does not understand it, by defending him to others, and by showing concern for his emotional wellbeing. When Jem is devastated by the trial verdict, Scout recognizes his pain even if she cannot fully comprehend its depth, and she tries to give him the space he needs to process his feelings (Lee, 1960).
The siblings also support each other through their shared commitment to their father’s values and their family’s principles. Even when they process experiences differently, Scout and Jem share a common moral framework learned from Atticus, and this shared foundation allows them to understand each other on a fundamental level. They stand together in defending their father against community criticism, they both recognize the injustice of Tom Robinson’s conviction, and they both ultimately understand the truth about Boo Radley’s essential goodness. These shared understandings create connection even during periods when their day-to-day interactions are strained. Additionally, their different perspectives and approaches sometimes complement each other in helpful ways. Jem’s increasing maturity and his more analytical approach to understanding events provide Scout with a bridge toward more sophisticated thinking, while Scout’s continued innocence and her straightforward moral reactions sometimes help Jem maintain perspective when he becomes overwhelmed by the complexity and injustice he perceives. Their relationship thus demonstrates that support between siblings can take many forms and that fundamental loyalty can persist even through periods of tension, misunderstanding, and change (Murray, 2013).
What Lessons Does Their Relationship Teach About Family Bonds?
The relationship between Scout and Jem teaches important lessons about the resilience and complexity of family bonds. One central lesson is that true family connections can survive periods of distance, misunderstanding, and conflict. Despite the tensions that arise as Jem matures and pulls away from Scout, their fundamental bond remains intact. They continue to care about each other, protect each other, and identify as a unit within their family even when they are not getting along on a daily basis. This resilience demonstrates that family relationships are not defined solely by constant closeness or by the absence of conflict but by an underlying commitment and loyalty that persists through difficulties. The novel suggests that families must adapt to accommodate the different developmental stages and changing needs of their members, and that this adaptation, while sometimes painful, is both necessary and ultimately sustainable (Lee, 1960).
Another important lesson is that family bonds involve accepting and supporting people even when we do not fully understand them or when they change in ways we did not anticipate. Scout’s journey includes learning to love and support Jem even when he becomes moody, withdrawn, and sometimes hurtful toward her. She must learn that her brother’s changes are not a rejection of her but a response to his own internal experiences and developmental needs. This acceptance requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to maintain connection even when the relationship becomes more complicated than it was in childhood. Similarly, Jem’s attempts to protect Scout, even as he distances himself from her in other ways, reflect his understanding that family obligations persist regardless of the changes occurring in their relationship. The siblings’ experience illustrates that maintaining family bonds across different life stages requires effort, understanding, and a commitment to each other that transcends immediate feelings or temporary conflicts. Their relationship ultimately affirms that family connections, while tested by life’s challenges and by individual development, can remain a source of strength, support, and identity throughout life’s changes (Johnson, 2008).
Conclusion: Why Is the Scout and Jem Relationship Central to the Novel?
The relationship between Scout and Jem is central to To Kill a Mockingbird because it provides the emotional core of the narrative and serves as a lens through which the novel’s major themes are explored and experienced. Through their evolving dynamic, Harper Lee examines the process of growing up, the loss of innocence, the different ways individuals process trauma and injustice, and the resilience of family bonds in the face of change and hardship. Their relationship makes the novel’s exploration of serious social issues—racial injustice, prejudice, moral courage—more intimate and emotionally resonant by showing how these large social forces affect individual children and their relationships with each other. The siblings’ journey from the innocence of childhood games about Boo Radley to the painful awareness of injustice following Tom Robinson’s trial traces the novel’s movement from childhood innocence to mature understanding of human complexity and social evil (Lee, 1960).
Furthermore, the Scout-Jem relationship grounds the novel’s moral lessons in realistic family dynamics rather than abstract principles. Through their conflicts, reconciliations, misunderstandings, and moments of connection, Lee demonstrates that moral development and social awareness do not occur in isolation but within the context of relationships that shape how individuals understand and respond to the world. The siblings’ different reactions to the same events illustrate that people process experiences according to their individual developmental stages, temperaments, and capacities for understanding. Their relationship also emphasizes that maintaining connections with others, even when those connections become complicated by change and difference, is essential to human flourishing and moral development. By placing the Scout-Jem relationship at the center of the narrative alongside the Tom Robinson trial and the Boo Radley mystery, Lee creates a novel that is simultaneously a social critique, a coming-of-age story, and an exploration of what it means to maintain love and loyalty within families facing both internal developmental changes and external social challenges (Champion, 1999).
References
Blackford, H. (2012). Mockingbird’s portrait of the artist as a young girl. In H. Bloom (Ed.), Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird (pp. 113-126). Bloom’s Literary Criticism.
Champion, L. (1999). “When You Finally See Them”: The unconquered eye in To Kill a Mockingbird. Southern Quarterly, 37(2), 127-136.
Dare, T. (2014). Lawyers, ethics, and To Kill a Mockingbird. Philosophy and Literature, 38(1), 203-213.
Johnson, C. D. (2008). Understanding To Kill a Mockingbird: A student casebook to issues, sources, and historic documents. Greenwood Press.
Lee, H. (1960). To Kill a Mockingbird. J.B. Lippincott & Co.
Murray, J. (2013). Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird: New essays. Scarecrow Press.
Shackelford, D. (1997). The female voice in To Kill a Mockingbird: Narrative strategies in film and novel. Mississippi Quarterly, 50(1), 101-113.