Christian Statesmanship: Biblical Wisdom and Virtuous Skill in Public Administration

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of Christian statesmanship, defined as the exercise of biblical wisdom and virtuous skill in administering government affairs and addressing public issues. Through a comprehensive analysis of scriptural foundations, historical exemplars, theological frameworks, and contemporary applications, this research argues that Christian statesmanship represents a distinct approach to political leadership characterized by the integration of transcendent moral principles with practical governance competencies. The study explores how biblical wisdom informs policy judgment, examines the cardinal and theological virtues essential to effective leadership, and analyzes the tensions inherent in applying religious convictions within pluralistic democratic contexts. By synthesizing theological, philosophical, and political science perspectives, this paper contributes to understanding how faith-informed leadership can serve the common good while maintaining both religious integrity and civic responsibility.

Introduction

The intersection of religious faith and political leadership has generated sustained scholarly and practical interest throughout Western civilization. Within this broader conversation, the specific concept of Christian statesmanship—understood as the application of biblical wisdom and virtuous skill to governmental administration and public problem-solving—deserves careful examination. This paper investigates what distinguishes Christian statesmanship from generic political competence or secular governance expertise, exploring both its theological foundations and practical manifestations.

Statesmanship itself represents more than technical policy expertise or political acumen. Classical political philosophy, from Plato’s philosopher-kings to Aristotle’s practically wise leader (phronimos), has long recognized that exemplary political leadership requires moral character, prudential judgment, and dedication to the common good beyond narrow self-interest or factional advantage (Aristotle, 1999; Cooper, 2012). When modified by the adjective “Christian,” statesmanship acquires additional dimensions rooted in biblical revelation, theological anthropology, and the Christian moral tradition.

The definition of Christian statesmanship as requiring both biblical wisdom and virtuous skill suggests two essential components: a cognitive-moral dimension involving the discernment and application of divine wisdom to political problems, and a performative dimension involving the cultivation and exercise of excellence in the practical arts of governance (Skillen, 1994). This paper examines each dimension while exploring their integration in coherent Christian political leadership.

Biblical Foundations of Wisdom in Governance

The Wisdom Literature Tradition

The Hebrew Bible’s wisdom literature—particularly Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and portions of the Psalms—provides foundational resources for understanding wisdom’s application to governance. Proverbs repeatedly addresses political leadership, declaring that “by wisdom a house is built, and by understanding it is established” (Proverbs 24:3, ESV) and that “by justice a king builds up the land” (Proverbs 29:4, ESV). The book presents wisdom as both a divine gift and a cultivated capacity, accessible through instruction, experience, and above all, reverence for God (Fox, 2000).

The paradigmatic biblical example of divinely granted political wisdom appears in Solomon’s prayer for “an understanding mind to govern your people, that I may discern between good and evil” (1 Kings 3:9, ESV). God’s response—granting Solomon wisdom surpassing all others—and the subsequent narrative demonstrating this wisdom in the famous judgment between two mothers claiming the same child, establishes wisdom as the preeminent qualification for political leadership (Brueggemann, 2000). Solomon’s wisdom combined moral discernment, psychological insight, and practical problem-solving capacity, precisely the attributes required for effective statesmanship.

The wisdom tradition emphasizes several principles relevant to Christian statesmanship. First, wisdom begins with proper orientation toward ultimate reality—”the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10, ESV). This theological foundation prevents the reduction of political judgment to mere utilitarian calculation or raw power dynamics (Murphy, 1996). Second, wisdom requires humility and teachability; the wise leader actively seeks counsel and recognizes the limits of individual understanding (Proverbs 11:14). Third, wisdom manifests in righteousness and justice, particularly concern for the vulnerable—”speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves” (Proverbs 31:8-9, NIV) (Waltke, 2004).

New Testament Transformation of Wisdom

The New Testament both affirms and transforms the Old Testament wisdom tradition. The Apostle Paul distinguishes between “the wisdom of this world” and “God’s wisdom, secret and hidden” (1 Corinthians 2:6-7, ESV), revealed supremely in the crucified Christ. This christological reinterpretation of wisdom suggests that Christian statesmanship cannot simply adopt conventional political wisdom but must be transformed by the radical implications of the gospel (Hays, 1997).

James’s epistle provides particularly relevant instruction for political leaders: “If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him” (James 1:5, ESV). James further distinguishes between earthly wisdom—characterized by “bitter jealousy and selfish ambition”—and wisdom from above, which is “first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere” (James 3:13-17, ESV). These qualities constitute essential virtues for Christian statesmanship: purity of motive, peacemaking rather than inflammatory rhetoric, gentleness in dealing with opponents, openness to persuasion by sound arguments, mercy toward the vulnerable, impartiality in judgment, and authentic integrity (McKnight, 2011).

Prophetic Wisdom and Political Critique

Biblical wisdom includes not only prudential judgment about means and ends but also prophetic insight into moral reality and divine purposes. The Hebrew prophets combined political analysis with theological interpretation, calling rulers to account for injustice, economic exploitation, and religious apostasy. Prophets like Nathan confronted King David’s abuse of power (2 Samuel 12), while Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Amos pronounced judgment on systemic injustice and warned of political consequences for moral failures (Brueggemann, 2001).

Christian statesmanship must integrate both prudential and prophetic wisdom. Prudential wisdom enables effective governance within existing structures, while prophetic wisdom maintains critical distance, recognizing when political arrangements contradict divine justice and require transformation (O’Donovan, 1996). The tension between these modes—between working constructively within systems and critiquing their fundamental premises—creates ongoing challenges for Christian political leaders.

Virtue and Skill in Christian Political Leadership

The Cardinal Virtues in Governance

Classical virtue theory, synthesized with Christian theology by medieval thinkers like Thomas Aquinas, identifies four cardinal virtues—prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance—as foundational to moral excellence (Aquinas, 1981). Each proves essential for effective statesmanship.

Prudence (phronesis or practical wisdom) represents the master virtue for political leadership, enabling leaders to discern appropriate means for achieving good ends in particular circumstances (Pieper, 1966). Prudence requires accurate perception of situations, sound deliberation about options, and wise judgment about action. It differs from mere cleverness or technical rationality by incorporating moral considerations and orienting action toward genuinely good ends (MacIntyre, 1984). Christian statesmen must cultivate prudence through experience, reflection, and attentiveness to divine guidance.

Justice constitutes the primary substantive virtue for political leadership, directing leaders toward rendering to each person their due and structuring society toward the common good (Miller, 1999). Christian conceptions of justice emphasize not only procedural fairness and legal equality but also substantive concern for human dignity, special attention to the vulnerable, and social conditions enabling human flourishing (Wolterstorff, 2008). Christian statesmen must pursue justice while recognizing that perfect justice remains eschatological, achievable only in God’s kingdom.

Fortitude or courage enables leaders to persevere in pursuing good despite obstacles, opposition, and risk. Political leadership inevitably involves conflict, criticism, and potential sacrifice of popularity or power. Christian fortitude draws strength from faith in God’s sovereignty and promises, enabling leaders to act rightly despite personal cost (Hauerwas & Willimon, 1989). This virtue proves particularly crucial when Christian convictions conflict with political expediency or majority opinion.

Temperance moderates desires and ambitions, preventing the corruption that often accompanies political power. The temptations of office—pride, greed, lust, and desire for domination—have destroyed countless leaders. Christian temperance, rooted in humility and recognition of accountability to God, helps leaders maintain proper priorities and resist the seductions of power (DeYoung, 2009).

Theological Virtues and Political Life

Christian theology adds three theological virtues—faith, hope, and love—which transform and elevate the cardinal virtues (Wadell, 2002). While these virtues find their ultimate object in God, they shape Christian engagement with temporal politics.

Faith provides the epistemological and existential foundation for Christian statesmanship. Faith in God’s sovereignty prevents idolatrous expectations of political salvation while maintaining confidence that human efforts toward justice and peace, however imperfect, possess meaning and value (Mouw, 1992). Faith enables Christian leaders to act with conviction while acknowledging uncertainty and trusting outcomes to divine providence.

Hope prevents both naive optimism and cynical despair about political possibilities. Christian hope recognizes the persistence of sin and structural evil while maintaining confidence in redemption’s ultimate triumph (Moltmann, 1967). This theological realism combined with eschatological hope enables sustained engagement with political challenges despite inevitable setbacks and partial successes.

Love (agape)—self-giving concern for others’ wellbeing—must animate Christian political action. Political love manifests not primarily in emotional affection but in commitment to justice, protection of human dignity, and willingness to sacrifice personal advantage for the common good (Niebuhr, 1932). Jesus’s command to love enemies proves especially challenging and relevant for political leaders, calling them to seek even opponents’ genuine good while pursuing different policy visions.

Skills and Competencies

Beyond virtues, effective statesmanship requires cultivated skills and competencies. Biblical wisdom and Christian virtue do not replace but rather inform and direct technical expertise in governance (Koyzis, 2003). Christian statesmen need:

Analytical capability to understand complex policy challenges, evaluate evidence, and assess likely consequences of different courses of action. Wisdom without competence produces well-intentioned but ineffective leadership (Simon, 1997).

Rhetorical skill to articulate visions, persuade diverse audiences, and build coalitions. Effective political leadership requires communication abilities that translate convictions into publicly accessible arguments while maintaining integrity (Garsten, 2006).

Negotiation and compromise abilities essential for achieving progress in pluralistic contexts. Christian statesmen must discern when compromise serves legitimate purposes and when it represents unacceptable moral capitulation (Benjamin, 1990).

Administrative capacity to design, implement, and evaluate policies and programs. Visionary leadership must be accompanied by operational competence to translate ideals into functioning governance (Wilson, 1887).

Emotional intelligence to navigate interpersonal dynamics, understand diverse perspectives, and build productive relationships across differences (Goleman, 1998).

Historical Exemplars of Christian Statesmanship

Joseph in Egypt: Administrative Excellence in Service

The Joseph narrative (Genesis 37-50) provides an instructive case of faith-informed administrative excellence. Elevated to second-in-command in Egypt, Joseph demonstrated exceptional skill in economic planning, resource management, and crisis leadership during famine. His governance benefited both Egypt and his own family, ultimately serving God’s redemptive purposes (Sarna, 1989).

Joseph’s statesmanship combined technical competence with moral integrity and recognition of divine providence. He refused sexual immorality despite personal cost (Genesis 39), exercised forgiveness toward brothers who betrayed him (Genesis 45), and attributed his success to God rather than personal merit (Genesis 41:16). His administrative policies preserved life during crisis while maintaining ethical standards (Walton, 2001). The Joseph story illustrates how biblical wisdom and virtuous skill manifest in competent, morally grounded governance even within pagan political structures.

Daniel: Faithful Service in Imperial Context

Daniel’s career in Babylonian and Persian imperial administration demonstrates how Jewish—and by extension, Christian—leaders can serve with excellence in non-believing governmental contexts while maintaining religious integrity. Daniel combined exceptional administrative ability with unwavering commitment to his faith, refusing to compromise religious practices despite political pressure (Daniel 6) (Goldingay, 1989).

Daniel’s approach offers insights for Christian statesmanship in pluralistic contexts. He served pagan empires faithfully without syncretism, brought wisdom from his religious tradition to bear on political challenges (dream interpretation combining divine revelation with policy counsel), and maintained influence through demonstrated competence and integrity rather than manipulation or coercion (Lucas, 2002). His willingness to face political consequences rather than violate conscience exemplifies the courage required for faithful Christian statesmanship.

Abraham Lincoln: Moral Vision and Political Pragmatism

Abraham Lincoln’s presidency provides a more recent example of leadership integrating moral conviction with political skill. While debates continue about Lincoln’s personal religious commitments, his public theology and political leadership drew heavily on biblical language and principles, particularly regarding slavery, divine judgment, and national purpose (White, 2002; Noll, 2002).

Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address exemplifies Christian statesmanship’s combination of prophetic insight and political humility. He interpreted the Civil War as divine judgment on slavery while extending charity toward both North and South, calling for reconciliation without compromising on slavery’s wrongness (Guelzo, 1999). Lincoln demonstrated prudence in timing the Emancipation Proclamation for maximum political and military effectiveness while maintaining moral clarity about slavery’s injustice. His leadership combined visionary moral purpose with tactical flexibility, showing how Christian convictions can inform rather than paralyze political action (Miller, 2002).

William Wilberforce: Persistent Advocacy for Justice

William Wilberforce’s decades-long campaign against the British slave trade demonstrates Christian statesmanship oriented toward systemic reform. Converted to evangelical Christianity, Wilberforce committed himself to ending slavery, pursuing this goal through parliamentary means over more than twenty years before achieving success in 1807 (Metaxas, 2007; Tomkins, 2007).

Wilberforce’s approach combined moral clarity with strategic sophistication. He built broad coalitions beyond religious circles, documented slavery’s horrors to inform public opinion, pursued incremental legislative victories while maintaining comprehensive abolitionist goals, and balanced leadership on slavery with attention to other social reforms (Hague, 2007). His persistence despite repeated failures, his translation of religious conviction into publicly persuasive arguments, and his integration of prophetic witness with political pragmatism offer important lessons for Christian statesmanship (Lean, 2001).

Tensions and Challenges in Contemporary Contexts

Pluralism and Public Reason

Contemporary democratic societies embrace religious pluralism, raising questions about how Christian statesmen should deploy religious arguments in public deliberation. Some theorists argue that religious reasoning should remain private, with public deliberation restricted to secular rationales accessible to all citizens regardless of religious commitment (Rawls, 1993). Others defend the legitimacy of religious argument in public discourse while encouraging translation into terms engaging diverse audiences (Audi & Wolterstorff, 1997; Eberle, 2002).

Christian statesmen must navigate these tensions with wisdom and prudence. Biblical wisdom and Christian virtue can inform political judgment without requiring explicitly theological justification for every policy position. Many positions rooted in Christian conviction—concern for the poor, protection of human dignity, pursuit of peace—find resonance in other moral traditions and can be defended through multiple rationales (Stout, 2004). Christian leaders should offer publicly accessible reasons for positions while acknowledging religious sources of conviction, respecting pluralism without privatizing faith (Perry, 2003).

Prophetic Witness Versus Pragmatic Governance

Christian statesmen face ongoing tension between prophetic clarity and political compromise. Prophetic witness demands unambiguous proclamation of divine truth and moral absolutes, while effective governance in pluralistic democracies often requires negotiation, compromise, and acceptance of imperfect solutions (Weber, 1946). When should Christian leaders refuse compromise as moral capitulation, and when does refusing compromise represent self-righteous perfectionism that sacrifices achievable progress?

This tension admits no formulaic resolution but requires prudential judgment informed by wisdom. Christian statesmen must distinguish issues of fundamental principle from matters of prudential judgment, recognize that politics characteristically operates through incremental change rather than comprehensive transformation, and accept responsibility for consequences of both action and inaction (Biggar, 2011). Prophetic integrity and political pragmatism need not conflict when leaders maintain clarity about ultimate principles while exercising flexibility about means and timing (Walzer, 1973).

Partisanship and the Common Good

Contemporary democratic politics increasingly involves partisan polarization, raising questions about how Christian statesmen should relate to political parties and partisan conflict. Excessive partisanship can undermine concern for the common good and demonize political opponents, while studied nonpartisanship may represent evasion of necessary political choices (Muirhead & Rosenblum, 2012).

Christian statesmanship requires what might be termed “principled partisanship”—willingness to make partisan commitments when parties align with important values while maintaining independence of judgment, civility toward opponents, and recognition that no party perfectly embodies Christian principles (Monsma & Soper, 2009). Christian leaders should resist both the identification of Christianity with partisan agendas and the pretense that Christian faith provides no guidance on contested political questions. The virtues of justice, temperance, and love should moderate partisan zeal while faith and courage enable clear stands on matters of principle.

Technology, Expertise, and Democratic Accountability

Modern governance increasingly involves complex technical questions requiring specialized expertise in areas like economics, public health, environmental science, and technology regulation. Christian statesmanship must integrate biblical wisdom with scientific and technical knowledge, neither dismissing expertise in favor of biblical proof-texting nor capitulating entirely to technocratic governance that sidelines moral considerations and democratic accountability (Fischer, 1990).

Wisdom requires epistemic humility—recognizing the limits of one’s knowledge and seeking expert counsel—while maintaining ultimate responsibility for political judgment (Jasanoff, 1990). Christian statesmen should cultivate sufficient understanding of technical issues to make informed decisions while respecting legitimate spheres of scientific authority. They must also ensure that technical rationality serves rather than displaces moral reasoning and democratic deliberation (Winner, 1986).

Practical Applications and Contemporary Relevance

Policy Formation and Moral Reasoning

Christian statesmanship brings distinctive resources to policy formation. Biblical wisdom emphasizes concern for vulnerable populations, suggesting that policies should be evaluated partly by their impact on the poor, marginalized, and powerless (Sider, 2005). The doctrine of creation implies stewardship responsibilities regarding environmental policy (Berry, 2000). Theological anthropology’s realistic assessment of human nature informs institutional design and regulatory frameworks (Brunner, 1945). Christian eschatology prevents both naive optimism and fatalistic despair about political possibilities (Moltmann, 1996).

These theological resources inform without determining specific policy positions. Christian statesmen may legitimately disagree about optimal approaches to poverty alleviation, environmental protection, or institutional reform while sharing common theological commitments (Chaplin, 2008). Prudential judgment about means remains necessary even when agreeing about ends.

Crisis Leadership and Moral Courage

Crises test statesmanship particularly severely, requiring decisive action under uncertainty while maintaining ethical standards. Christian resources prove especially valuable during crises: faith provides confidence despite uncertainty, hope prevents despair, fortitude enables difficult decisions, and prudence guides navigation of unprecedented challenges (Boin et al., 2005).

Christian statesmen facing crises should resist both panic and paralysis, maintain transparency while avoiding unnecessary alarm, seek wise counsel across diverse perspectives, attend to crisis impacts on vulnerable populations, and acknowledge limits of human foresight while acting decisively based on available information (Rosenthal et al., 2001). The virtue of humility proves particularly important, preventing the overconfidence that has characterized many failed crisis responses.

Building Consensus Across Differences

Effective governance in pluralistic societies requires building coalitions and consensus across religious, ideological, and demographic differences. Christian statesmen should cultivate abilities to find common ground without compromising principle, articulate shared values underlying diverse traditions, and demonstrate respect for those holding different convictions (Gutmann & Thompson, 1996).

The theological virtue of love, expressed politically through commitment to opponents’ genuine wellbeing, enables constructive engagement across differences. Christian leaders should model civility in discourse, intellectual honesty in representing opposing views, and willingness to acknowledge legitimate concerns in positions they ultimately reject (Carter, 1998).

Conclusion

Christian statesmanship, understood as the exercise of biblical wisdom and virtuous skill in administering government and addressing public issues, represents a distinctive approach to political leadership with both contemporary relevance and deep historical roots. This paper has examined the biblical foundations of wisdom in governance, analyzed the virtues and skills essential for effective Christian political leadership, explored historical exemplars, and addressed challenges facing Christian statesmen in pluralistic democratic contexts.

Several key conclusions emerge from this analysis. First, biblical wisdom provides both cognitive-moral resources for political judgment and normative principles for evaluating governance outcomes. The wisdom tradition emphasizes moral foundations for political authority, concern for justice and vulnerable populations, humility and teachability in leadership, and recognition of divine sovereignty over human affairs.

Second, effective Christian statesmanship requires cultivation of both cardinal virtues (prudence, justice, fortitude, temperance) and theological virtues (faith, hope, love) alongside practical skills in analysis, communication, negotiation, and administration. Virtue without competence produces ineffective leadership, while competence without virtue risks corruption and misdirection toward improper ends.

Third, tensions inevitably arise between religious convictions and requirements of pluralistic democratic governance, between prophetic witness and political pragmatism, between partisan commitment and concern for the common good. These tensions admit no formulaic resolution but require prudential judgment informed by wisdom, guided by virtue, and directed toward the common good.

Fourth, Christian statesmanship in contemporary contexts must engage seriously with technical expertise and complex policy challenges while maintaining moral reasoning and democratic accountability. It must translate religious convictions into publicly accessible arguments while preserving religious integrity. It must pursue justice while accepting political limitations and recognizing that comprehensive redemption transcends political achievement.

Finally, Christian statesmanship serves democratic societies by bringing distinctive resources to public deliberation—theological perspectives on human nature and purpose, moral traditions tested through centuries of experience, and communities committed to truth-telling, justice, and human dignity. When exercised with wisdom, virtue, and skill, Christian statesmanship enriches pluralistic democracies by contributing substantive moral vision while respecting diversity and constitutional constraints.

The vocation of Christian statesmanship remains as relevant today as in biblical times, calling leaders to integrate faith commitment with political responsibility, moral principle with practical judgment, and prophetic witness with civic engagement. This demanding vocation requires leaders who combine deep theological conviction with political sophistication, uncompromising integrity with tactical flexibility, and visionary aspiration with realistic assessment of possibilities. Such leadership enriches political life by exemplifying wisdom and virtue in pursuit of the common good.

References

Aquinas, T. (1981). Summa theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). Christian Classics.

Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed., T. Irwin, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.

Audi, R., & Wolterstorff, N. (1997). Religion in the public square: The place of religious convictions in political debate. Rowman & Littlefield.

Benjamin, M. (1990). Splitting the difference: Compromise and integrity in ethics and politics. University Press of Kansas.

Berry, W. (2000). Life is a miracle: An essay against modern superstition. Counterpoint.

Biggar, N. (2011). Behaving in public: How to do Christian ethics. Eerdmans.

Boin, A., Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge University Press.

Brueggemann, W. (2000). 1 & 2 Kings. Smyth & Helwys.

Brueggemann, W. (2001). The prophetic imagination (2nd ed.). Fortress Press.

Brunner, E. (1945). Justice and the social order. Harper & Brothers.

Carter, S. L. (1998). Civility: Manners, morals, and the etiquette of democracy. Basic Books.

Chaplin, J. (2008). Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian philosopher of state and civil society. University of Notre Dame Press.

Cooper, J. M. (2012). Pursuits of wisdom: Six ways of life in ancient philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton University Press.

DeYoung, R. K. (2009). Glittering vices: A new look at the seven deadly sins and their remedies. Brazos Press.

Eberle, C. J. (2002). Religious conviction in liberal politics. Cambridge University Press.

Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Sage Publications.

Fox, M. V. (2000). Proverbs 1-9: A new translation with introduction and commentary. Anchor Bible.

Garsten, B. (2006). Saving persuasion: A defense of rhetoric and judgment. Harvard University Press.

Goldingay, J. E. (1989). Daniel. Word Biblical Commentary.

Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

Guelzo, A. C. (1999). Abraham Lincoln: Redeemer President. Eerdmans.

Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Harvard University Press.

Hague, W. (2007). William Wilberforce: The life of the great anti-slave trade campaigner. HarperCollins.

Hauerwas, S., & Willimon, W. H. (1989). Resident aliens: Life in the Christian colony. Abingdon Press.

Hays, R. B. (1997). First Corinthians. Westminster John Knox Press.

Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Harvard University Press.

Koyzis, D. T. (2003). Political visions and illusions: A survey and Christian critique of contemporary ideologies. InterVarsity Press.

Lean, G. (2001). God’s politician: William Wilberforce’s struggle. Helmers & Howard.

Lucas, E. C. (2002). Daniel. Apollos.

MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.

McKnight, S. (2011). The letter of James. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Eerdmans.

Metaxas, E. (2007). Amazing Grace: William Wilberforce and the heroic campaign to end slavery. HarperOne.

Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Harvard University Press.

Miller, W. L. (2002). Lincoln’s virtues: An ethical biography. Alfred A. Knopf.

Moltmann, J. (1967). Theology of hope: On the ground and the implications of a Christian eschatology. Harper & Row.

Moltmann, J. (1996). The coming of God: Christian eschatology. Fortress Press.

Monsma, S. V., & Soper, J. C. (2009). The challenge of pluralism: Church and state in five democracies (2nd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.

Mouw, R. J. (1992). Uncommon decency: Christian civility in an uncivil world. InterVarsity Press.

Muirhead, R., & Rosenblum, N. L. (2012). The political theory of parties and partisanship: Catching up. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 439-454.

Murphy, R. E. (1996). The tree of life: An exploration of biblical wisdom literature (2nd ed.). Eerdmans.

Niebuhr, R. (1932). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics. Scribner.

Noll, M. A. (2002). America’s God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln. Oxford University Press.

O’Donovan, O. (1996). The desire of the nations: Rediscovering the roots of political theology. Cambridge University Press.

Perry, M. J. (2003). Under God? Religious faith and liberal democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Pieper, J. (1966). The four cardinal virtues. University of Notre Dame Press.

Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.

Rosenthal, U., Boin, R. A., & Comfort, L. K. (Eds.). (2001). Managing crises: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities. Charles C. Thomas.

Sarna, N. M. (1989). Genesis. Jewish Publication Society.

Sider, R. J. (2005). Just generosity: A new vision for overcoming poverty in America. Baker Books.

Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.

Skillen, J. W. (1994). Recharging the American experiment: Principled pluralism for genuine civic community. Baker Books.

Stout, J. (2004). Democracy and tradition. Princeton University Press.

Tomkins, S. (2007). William Wilberforce: A biography. Eerdmans.

Wadell, P. J. (2002). Happiness and the Christian moral life: An introduction to Christian ethics. Rowman & Littlefield.

Waltke, B. K. (2004). The book of Proverbs, Chapters 1-15. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Eerdmans.

Walton, J. H. (2001). Genesis. NIV Application Commentary. Zondervan.

Walzer, M. (1973). Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(2), 160-180.

Weber, M. (1946). Politics as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds. & Trans.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 77-128). Oxford University Press.

White, R. C. (2002). Lincoln’s greatest speech: The Second Inaugural. Simon & Schuster.

Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222.

Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press.

Wolterstorff, N. (2008). Justice: Rights and wrongs. Princeton University Press.