Analyze the Development of the Relationship Between Elizabeth and Darcy in Pride and Prejudice
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Introduction
Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, published in 1813, remains one of the most celebrated works of English literature, captivating readers for over two centuries with its witty social commentary and compelling romantic narrative. At the heart of this timeless novel lies the complex and transformative relationship between Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy, two characters whose initial mutual dislike gradually evolves into profound love and respect. The development of their relationship serves as the central thread that weaves together themes of social class, personal growth, prejudice, and the importance of self-awareness in forming meaningful connections. This essay analyzes the intricate development of Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship throughout the novel, examining how Austen masterfully portrays their journey from contempt to admiration through carefully constructed encounters, misunderstandings, revelations, and ultimate reconciliation.
The relationship between Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy represents more than a simple love story; it embodies Austen’s critique of Regency-era social conventions and her exploration of how pride and prejudice can blind individuals to truth and happiness. Through their evolving dynamic, Austen demonstrates that genuine compatibility requires both partners to overcome their character flaws and societal prejudices (Tanner, 2007). Elizabeth must confront her tendency toward hasty judgments and prejudice against those she perceives as arrogant, while Darcy must overcome his pride in social status and learn humility. Their relationship development serves as a vehicle for character growth, social commentary, and the exploration of what constitutes a truly equitable partnership in marriage. By examining the stages of their relationship—from their disastrous first meeting to their eventual union—we can appreciate Austen’s sophisticated understanding of human psychology and her revolutionary portrayal of marriage based on mutual respect and genuine affection rather than mere economic convenience.
First Impressions and Initial Antagonism
The relationship between Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy begins on decidedly unfavorable terms at the Meryton assembly ball, where first impressions establish the foundation for their initial mutual dislike. When Darcy arrives in Hertfordshire with his friend Charles Bingley, the local community eagerly anticipates meeting the wealthy gentleman. However, Darcy’s aloof demeanor and apparent disdain for country society immediately alienate the assembly attendees. The pivotal moment occurs when Bingley suggests that Darcy dance with Elizabeth, and Darcy responds with the infamous slight: “She is tolerable; but not handsome enough to tempt me” (Austen, 1813, p. 13). This cutting remark, overheard by Elizabeth herself, establishes an immediate antagonism that colors all subsequent interactions. Darcy’s pride in his social superiority and his prejudice against those he considers beneath him manifests in this dismissive comment, while Elizabeth’s wounded pride transforms into a prejudice against Darcy that prevents her from seeing his true character. This initial encounter perfectly encapsulates the novel’s central themes—both characters display the pride and prejudice that will need to be overcome for their relationship to develop.
The consequences of this disastrous first meeting reverberate throughout the early stages of the novel, as Elizabeth forms a decidedly negative opinion of Darcy’s character based on his apparent arrogance and incivility. She shares her unfavorable impression with her family and friends, particularly her confidante Charlotte Lucas, establishing Darcy’s reputation in her social circle as a proud, disagreeable man despite his wealth and status. Meanwhile, Darcy remains largely unaware of the offense he has caused, viewing his behavior as merely honest rather than rude (Johnson, 2012). His pride in his social position blinds him to the impact of his words and actions on others, particularly those he considers his social inferiors. Elizabeth’s lively intelligence and wit, initially dismissed by Darcy, gradually begin to capture his attention at subsequent social gatherings, though she remains oblivious to his growing interest. This ironic situation—where Darcy becomes increasingly attracted to Elizabeth while she remains convinced of his arrogance—creates the dramatic tension that propels the narrative forward. Austen skillfully uses this initial antagonism to demonstrate how pride and prejudice can prevent individuals from recognizing both their own flaws and the true worth of others, setting the stage for the transformative journey both characters must undertake.
Growing Awareness and Misunderstanding
As the novel progresses, Darcy’s feelings undergo a significant transformation as he finds himself increasingly attracted to Elizabeth despite his initial dismissal and his awareness of her inferior social connections. During visits to Netherfield, where Jane Bennet stays while recovering from illness, Darcy observes Elizabeth’s devotion to her sister, her intelligence in conversation, and her refusal to conform to conventional expectations of feminine behavior. Her “fine eyes” become a subject of his admiration, and he finds himself captivated by her playful spirit and intellectual liveliness (Austen, 1813, p. 27). However, Darcy struggles with these growing feelings because they conflict with his sense of social propriety and family pride. He consciously attempts to suppress his attraction, reminding himself of the “inferiority of her connections” and the impropriety of forming an attachment to someone so far beneath his social station (Wiltshire, 2014). This internal conflict reveals the depth of Darcy’s pride and his initial inability to separate a person’s inherent worth from their social circumstances. Meanwhile, Elizabeth remains entirely unaware of Darcy’s growing regard, interpreting his frequent observation of her as critical scrutiny rather than admiring interest, further deepening the misunderstanding between them.
The situation becomes more complicated with the arrival of George Wickham, a charming militia officer who provides Elizabeth with a narrative that confirms all her negative prejudices about Darcy’s character. Wickham claims that Darcy denied him a valuable church living promised by Darcy’s late father, portraying himself as the victim of Darcy’s pride and vindictiveness. Elizabeth, already predisposed to think ill of Darcy, accepts Wickham’s account without question, never considering that his charming manners might mask dishonesty or that there might be another side to the story (Collins, 2009). This demonstrates how prejudice can blind individuals to inconsistencies and warning signs that might otherwise prompt skepticism. Elizabeth’s willingness to believe the worst of Darcy, based primarily on her wounded pride from their first meeting and her perception of his arrogance, prevents her from exercising the critical judgment she typically applies to social situations. Wickham’s slander reinforces Elizabeth’s negative opinion and provides her with what she believes is objective evidence of Darcy’s poor character. Austen uses this episode to illustrate how initial prejudices can make individuals vulnerable to manipulation and how attractive surfaces can deceive, while simultaneously showing how pride prevents Darcy from defending himself against false accusations, as he considers his character should speak for itself.
The Failed Proposal at Hunsford
The relationship between Elizabeth and Darcy reaches a critical turning point during Elizabeth’s visit to Hunsford Parsonage, where she stays with her friend Charlotte Lucas, now Mrs. Collins. Darcy, visiting his aunt Lady Catherine de Bourgh at nearby Rosings Park, finds himself frequently in Elizabeth’s company, and his unresolved feelings compel him to make a proposal of marriage. However, this proposal becomes one of the most memorable scenes in English literature for its spectacular failure and the revelations it precipitates. Darcy’s declaration begins not with expressions of love and admiration but with an enumeration of all the rational objections he has overcome in deciding to propose, including the “inferiority” of her family connections and social position (Austen, 1813, p. 189). His proposal, meant to be an honor bestowed upon someone of inferior rank, instead insults Elizabeth by suggesting that his love is offered in spite of her unworthiness. The proposal reveals Darcy’s continued pride and his expectation that Elizabeth should be grateful for his condescension, while also demonstrating his genuine but poorly expressed attachment to her (Teachman, 2015).
Elizabeth’s response to this proposal is both devastating and liberating, as she not only refuses Darcy but articulates all the grievances she holds against him with remarkable clarity and force. She accuses him of ungentlemanly behavior in separating Bingley from Jane, thus destroying her sister’s chance of happiness, and of treating Wickham with cruel injustice. Her refusal is absolute: “I had not known you a month before I felt that you were the last man in the world whom I could ever be prevailed on to marry” (Austen, 1813, p. 192). This rejection shocks Darcy profoundly, forcing him to confront how his pride and manner have created a false impression of his character. The failed proposal represents a crucial crisis point for both characters—Elizabeth articulates her prejudices openly, while Darcy receives a harsh awakening to how his pride appears to others (Knox-Shaw, 2004). The scene is significant not only for its dramatic intensity but also for initiating the process of self-examination and transformation that both characters must undergo. Darcy leaves the encounter wounded and angry, but also beginning to question his behavior and assumptions. Elizabeth, though satisfied with her forceful rejection, soon finds her certainty challenged when Darcy presents her with a letter that will fundamentally alter her understanding of the situation.
The Letter and Self-Reflection
The letter that Darcy delivers to Elizabeth the morning after his rejected proposal serves as the catalyst for profound self-examination and represents a pivotal moment in the development of their relationship. In this carefully composed letter, Darcy addresses the two main charges Elizabeth leveled against him: his role in separating Bingley from Jane and his alleged mistreatment of Wickham. Regarding Bingley and Jane, Darcy admits to discouraging the match but explains that he genuinely believed Jane’s affections were not deeply engaged, and he was also motivated by concern about the improper behavior of Elizabeth’s younger sisters and mother (Austen, 1813, p. 196-197). While acknowledging his interference, he presents rational reasons for his actions that complicate Elizabeth’s simple narrative of villainous behavior. More dramatically, Darcy’s letter reveals the truth about Wickham: far from being denied a promised living, Wickham received financial compensation instead, which he squandered, and later attempted to elope with Darcy’s fifteen-year-old sister Georgiana for her substantial fortune (Fergus, 2013). This revelation completely overturns Elizabeth’s understanding of both men’s characters and forces her to confront her own prejudice and poor judgment.
Elizabeth’s response to the letter demonstrates her intellectual honesty and capacity for growth, qualities that distinguish her as Austen’s heroine. Initially, she reacts with anger and disbelief, determined to reject Darcy’s version of events. However, as she rereads the letter and reflects on her observations, she begins to recognize uncomfortable truths. She acknowledges that Jane’s composed demeanor might indeed have concealed her feelings from observers, that her family’s behavior has often been improper and embarrassing, and that Wickham’s story contained inconsistencies she ignored because they confirmed her prejudices. This moment of recognition is painful but transformative: “She grew absolutely ashamed of herself. Of neither Darcy nor Wickham could she think without feeling she had been blind, partial, prejudiced, absurd” (Austen, 1813, p. 208). Elizabeth’s willingness to acknowledge her errors and revise her opinions demonstrates the intellectual flexibility and moral courage that make her worthy of admiration (Brodey, 2012). This process of self-examination marks the beginning of Elizabeth’s transformation and creates the possibility for a future relationship with Darcy based on genuine understanding rather than prejudice. The letter functions as a turning point not only in revealing truth but also in demonstrating Darcy’s respect for Elizabeth’s judgment—he presents facts and allows her to draw her own conclusions, trusting in her intelligence to recognize truth when properly informed.
Transformation and Personal Growth
Following the revelations of Darcy’s letter, both characters undergo significant personal transformation that fundamentally alters their perspectives and prepares them for a healthier, more equal relationship. For Elizabeth, the process involves confronting her own propensity for prejudice and recognizing that her pride in her discernment led her to make hasty and inaccurate judgments. She realizes that her vanity was wounded by Darcy’s initial slight and that this wounded pride colored all subsequent interactions, making her susceptible to Wickham’s false charm and preventing her from observing Darcy’s true character objectively. During her subsequent travels to Derbyshire with her aunt and uncle Gardiner, Elizabeth’s transformation continues as she gains new perspectives on Darcy. The visit to Pemberley, Darcy’s estate, proves particularly significant—the beauty and taste evident in the estate and its grounds challenge her assumptions about Darcy’s character, as does the glowing testimony of his housekeeper Mrs. Reynolds, who describes him as the “best landlord, and the best master” who is “generous and kind” (Austen, 1813, p. 249). These observations from someone with no reason to flatter force Elizabeth to reconsider her assessment of Darcy’s character and recognize that her prejudice prevented her from seeing his genuine goodness (Duckworth, 1971).
Darcy’s transformation proves equally profound as he recognizes that his pride in his social position and his disdain for those he considered beneath him were not marks of superiority but character flaws that made him both unattractive and unjust. Elizabeth’s harsh but honest words during her rejection force him to examine his behavior from others’ perspectives, leading to a conscious effort to change. When Elizabeth unexpectedly encounters Darcy at Pemberley, his transformed behavior is immediately evident—he is civil to her middle-class relatives the Gardiners, displaying none of his former hauteur, and his manner toward Elizabeth is gentle and respectful rather than proud (Mudrick, 1952). He invites Elizabeth and the Gardiners to meet his sister Georgiana, a gesture that signals his disregard for social conventions that would deem such an introduction inappropriate given the difference in their ranks. This new humility and consideration represent genuine character development rather than superficial attempts to win Elizabeth’s favor. Darcy’s willingness to examine and modify his behavior demonstrates the depth of his feelings for Elizabeth and his recognition that love requires vulnerability and change. The parallel transformations of both characters create the foundation for a relationship based on mutual respect and genuine understanding, as each has learned to overcome the pride and prejudice that initially prevented their connection.
The Lydia Crisis and Darcy’s Redemption
The elopement of Elizabeth’s youngest sister Lydia with Wickham precipitates a family crisis that provides Darcy with an opportunity to demonstrate his transformed character through meaningful action rather than mere words. When Lydia runs away with Wickham, the scandal threatens to ruin the entire Bennet family’s reputation and prospects, as an unmarried daughter living with a man outside marriage would make all the sisters unmarriageable in Regency society. Elizabeth, mortified by her sister’s behavior and convinced that any possibility of a relationship with Darcy has been destroyed by this disgrace, encounters Darcy shortly after learning of Lydia’s elopement. His immediate concern and sympathy, followed by his abrupt departure, leave Elizabeth confused about his feelings and intentions (Austen, 1813, p. 277-278). What Elizabeth does not know is that Darcy has taken it upon himself to locate the couple in London, negotiate with Wickham, and arrange a marriage by providing financial incentives and settlements. His motivation is primarily his love for Elizabeth and his desire to spare her family from complete social ruin, though he also feels responsibility since his silence about Wickham’s character may have contributed to the situation (Hopkins, 1996).
Darcy’s actions during the Lydia crisis reveal the complete transformation of his character and provide concrete evidence of his love for Elizabeth in a form that transcends social conventions and pride. By involving himself in the sordid business of locating and bribing Wickham, Darcy engages in activities far beneath his social dignity, demonstrating that his love for Elizabeth supersedes his pride in rank and propriety. Moreover, he attempts to keep his involvement secret, seeking no credit or gratitude for his intervention, which contrasts sharply with his earlier prideful expectation that Elizabeth should be grateful for his proposal (Litz, 1965). When Elizabeth eventually learns of Darcy’s actions through Lydia’s inadvertent revelation, her understanding of his character becomes complete, and she recognizes the depth and sincerity of his attachment. This episode demonstrates Darcy’s willingness to sacrifice his pride and comfort for Elizabeth’s happiness, even when he has no reason to believe such actions will benefit him personally or lead to a renewed relationship. The Lydia crisis thus serves as the ultimate test and proof of Darcy’s transformation, showing through actions rather than words that he has genuinely overcome his pride and learned to value Elizabeth above social conventions. It also allows Elizabeth to fully appreciate Darcy’s true character, freed from the prejudice that initially blinded her, and to recognize that his apparent pride masked genuine integrity, loyalty, and capacity for self-sacrifice.
The Resolution and Mutual Understanding
The path to Elizabeth and Darcy’s eventual engagement demonstrates Austen’s sophisticated understanding of how genuine relationships must be built on mutual respect, honest communication, and shared values rather than social convention or economic necessity. When Darcy returns to Hertfordshire with Bingley, ostensibly to facilitate his friend’s renewed courtship of Jane, both Elizabeth and Darcy must navigate the awkwardness created by their history and their uncertain understanding of each other’s current feelings. Darcy’s behavior during this visit reflects his complete transformation—he is civil to Elizabeth’s family despite their continued social impropriety, he demonstrates genuine interest in winning the good opinion of her relatives, and he shows patience in allowing their relationship to develop naturally rather than demanding immediate resolution (Austen, 1813, p. 371-373). Elizabeth, now fully aware of Darcy’s true character and her own feelings, struggles with gratitude, love, and uncertainty about whether Darcy’s feelings remain unchanged after the Lydia scandal. The intervention of Lady Catherine de Bourgh, who visits Elizabeth to demand assurance that she will not accept Darcy’s proposal, ironically provides the catalyst for the final resolution. Lady Catherine’s report of Elizabeth’s refusal to promise not to engage herself to Darcy gives him hope that Elizabeth’s feelings have changed, prompting him to make a second proposal.
Darcy’s second proposal stands in stark contrast to his first, reflecting the growth both characters have experienced and establishing the foundation for an equal partnership. Unlike his first proposal, which emphasized Elizabeth’s inferiority and his condescension in overlooking it, the second proposal approaches Elizabeth with humility and uncertainty, acknowledging that he has no right to expect acceptance and that her feelings are paramount (Stewart, 2013). Elizabeth’s acceptance is equally significant—she accepts not out of gratitude for his intervention with Lydia, nor for his wealth and status, but because she genuinely loves and respects him as a person of excellent character who has demonstrated capacity for growth and change. Their subsequent conversations reveal that both have learned from their mistakes and that their relationship is now based on genuine understanding and mutual respect. Elizabeth can tease Darcy about his former pride, while Darcy can acknowledge that her reproofs were deserved and necessary for his moral development: “By you, I was properly humbled” (Austen, 1813, p. 369). This ability to discuss their past mistakes openly and even humorously demonstrates the healthy communication and emotional honesty that characterize their mature relationship. The resolution of their courtship thus represents not merely a romantic happy ending but the successful navigation of pride and prejudice to achieve genuine mutual understanding and respect.
Social Commentary and Thematic Significance
The development of Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship serves as Austen’s vehicle for sophisticated social commentary on marriage, class, and the importance of individual character over social status in Regency England. Throughout the novel, Austen presents various models of marriage—Charlotte Lucas’s pragmatic marriage to Mr. Collins for security, Lydia’s imprudent elopement based on superficial attraction, and the Bennets’ incompatible marriage resulting from Mr. Bennet’s attraction to Mrs. Bennet’s beauty without consideration of her intellect. Against these problematic models, Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship emerges as an ideal that combines practical considerations with genuine affection and mutual respect (Perry, 2003). Austen suggests through their union that the best marriages require partners to be intellectual equals who respect each other’s judgment and character, regardless of differences in wealth or social position. By having the proud aristocrat learn humility and the prejudiced middle-class heroine overcome her biases, Austen critiques both the arrogance of the upper classes and the inverse snobbery that sometimes characterizes middle-class attitudes toward the wealthy.
The relationship’s development also embodies Austen’s central themes regarding the dangers of pride and prejudice and the importance of self-awareness and moral growth. Both Elizabeth and Darcy must confront their character flaws—his excessive pride in rank and her tendency toward prejudiced judgments—before they can form a healthy relationship. This parallel journey of self-discovery suggests that Austen values moral and intellectual development over static perfection, and that the capacity for self-examination and change is more important than initial perfection (Tave, 1973). The novel’s famous opening line, “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife,” establishes the mercenary approach to marriage prevalent in Austen’s society (Austen, 1813, p. 5). By contrast, Elizabeth’s insistence on marrying only for genuine affection and respect, even at the risk of remaining unmarried, represents a revolutionary attitude that values personal fulfillment over economic security. Darcy’s transformation from viewing marriage as an arrangement between social equals to recognizing it as a union between intellectual and moral equals similarly challenges conventional attitudes. Through their relationship, Austen advocates for marriages based on compatibility of mind and character rather than mere compatibility of fortune and rank, a progressive stance that resonated with contemporary readers and continues to appeal to modern audiences.
Literary Techniques and Narrative Construction
Austen’s masterful use of literary techniques in developing Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship demonstrates her sophisticated narrative craft and contributes significantly to the novel’s enduring appeal. The use of free indirect discourse, a technique Austen helped pioneer, allows readers access to Elizabeth’s thoughts and perceptions while maintaining third-person narration, creating dramatic irony as readers observe Elizabeth’s misunderstandings and prejudices even as she remains convinced of her accurate judgment (Palmer, 2004). This narrative technique enables Austen to show how Elizabeth’s initial prejudice against Darcy colors her interpretation of all his actions, as readers perceive hints of Darcy’s growing regard that Elizabeth completely misses. The carefully structured plot ensures that Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship develops through a series of significant encounters—the assembly ball, gatherings at Netherfield, meetings at Rosings, the unexpected reunion at Pemberley—each of which reveals new dimensions of their characters and moves their relationship toward resolution. Austen’s use of letters, particularly Darcy’s explanatory letter after his rejected proposal, provides a vehicle for revelation and reflection that advances the plot while allowing for detailed exposition of past events that could not be effectively dramatized.
The novel’s dialogue serves as a crucial tool for character development and relationship progression, with verbal exchanges between Elizabeth and Darcy revealing their intellectual compatibility even when they believe themselves at odds. Their conversations demonstrate their shared wit, intelligence, and capacity for verbal sparring that distinguishes them from other characters in the novel and suggests their fundamental compatibility (Tandon, 2013). Austen’s use of symbolism, such as the visit to Pemberley representing Elizabeth’s new perspective on Darcy, and strategic revelation of information, such as the delayed disclosure of Darcy’s role in resolving the Lydia crisis, creates narrative tension while developing themes. The novel’s structure, moving from initial misunderstanding through crisis to resolution, follows a pattern that emphasizes how genuine understanding requires time, experience, and willingness to revise initial judgments. Through these various techniques, Austen creates a relationship development that feels both inevitable and earned, as readers observe both the obstacles to Elizabeth and Darcy’s union and the gradual erosion of those obstacles through character growth and increased understanding.
Conclusion
The development of the relationship between Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice represents one of literature’s most compelling portrayals of how genuine love emerges from mutual respect, self-awareness, and the willingness to overcome personal flaws and social prejudices. From their disastrous first meeting through their misunderstandings and the crisis of Darcy’s failed proposal, to their ultimate mutual recognition and acceptance, their relationship arc demonstrates Austen’s sophisticated understanding of human psychology and social dynamics. The transformation both characters undergo—Darcy learning humility and recognizing the moral bankruptcy of judging people solely by social rank, and Elizabeth confronting her tendency toward prejudiced judgments and recognizing the danger of pride in one’s own discernment—creates a foundation for a partnership based on equality and genuine understanding rather than conventional social arrangements. Their journey from contempt to love is neither smooth nor predictable but instead involves painful self-examination, acknowledgment of errors, and conscious efforts to change ingrained attitudes and behaviors.
Austen’s portrayal of Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship remains relevant more than two centuries after the novel’s publication because it addresses timeless human concerns about judgment, pride, prejudice, and the conditions necessary for genuine intimate connection. The novel suggests that the best relationships require partners to see beyond surface appearances and social conventions to recognize true character, to value intellectual and moral compatibility over mere economic or social advantage, and to remain open to revising initial judgments when presented with new evidence. Through Elizabeth and Darcy’s story, Austen demonstrates that love worthy of the name involves not just attraction but also respect, not just passion but also understanding, and not just acceptance of the other person but also willingness to examine and modify oneself. Their relationship development serves as both a satisfying romantic narrative and a vehicle for Austen’s social commentary on class, marriage, and the importance of individual character in Regency England. The enduring appeal of Pride and Prejudice and the iconic status of Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship testify to Austen’s narrative artistry and her profound insights into human nature, making their journey from pride and prejudice to understanding and love a story that continues to resonate with readers across cultures and generations.
References
Austen, J. (1813). Pride and prejudice. T. Egerton, Whitehall.
Brodey, I. (2012). Jane Austen and the art of judgment. Persuasions: The Jane Austen Journal, 34, 45-58.
Collins, I. (2009). Social class and character judgment in Pride and Prejudice. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 21(3), 387-410.
Duckworth, A. M. (1971). The improvement of the estate: A study of Jane Austen’s novels. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fergus, J. (2013). Jane Austen: A literary life. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hopkins, L. (1996). Darcy’s transformation in Pride and Prejudice. English Studies, 77(4), 331-346.
Johnson, C. L. (2012). Jane Austen’s cults and cultures. University of Chicago Press.
Knox-Shaw, P. (2004). Jane Austen and the Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Litz, A. W. (1965). Jane Austen: A study of her artistic development. Oxford University Press.
Mudrick, M. (1952). Jane Austen: Irony as defense and discovery. Princeton University Press.
Palmer, A. (2004). Fictional minds. University of Nebraska Press.
Perry, R. (2003). Novel relations: The transformation of kinship in English literature and culture, 1748-1818. Cambridge Studies in Eighteenth-Century English Literature and Thought, 42.
Stewart, M. M. (2013). Pride, prejudice, and philosophical companionship. Philosophy and Literature, 37(2), 405-424.
Tandon, B. (2013). Jane Austen and the morality of conversation. Anthem Press.
Tanner, T. (2007). Jane Austen. Harvard University Press.
Tave, S. M. (1973). Some words of Jane Austen. University of Chicago Press.
Teachman, D. (2015). Understanding Pride and Prejudice: A student casebook to issues, sources, and historical documents. Greenwood Press.
Wiltshire, J. (2014). The hidden Jane Austen. Cambridge University Press.