How Did Enslaved People’s Knowledge of Agriculture, Crafts, and Other Skills Contribute to Southern Economic Development?

Author: Martin Munyao Muinde
Email: ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Date: July 22, 2025

Introduction

The economic prosperity of the antebellum American South was built upon the foundation of enslaved labor, yet the narrative of Southern economic development has often overlooked the crucial role of enslaved people’s knowledge, skills, and expertise in creating this wealth. Far from being merely passive laborers, enslaved African Americans brought sophisticated agricultural techniques, advanced craftsmanship, technological innovations, and specialized knowledge systems that fundamentally shaped and accelerated Southern economic growth from the colonial period through the Civil War. This extensive knowledge base, derived from African traditions, adapted through generations of experience, and continuously refined through practice, became integral to the development of plantation agriculture, urban industries, and the broader Southern economy.

The contribution of enslaved people’s skills to Southern economic development represents one of history’s most significant examples of forced knowledge transfer and cultural adaptation. Enslaved individuals possessed expertise in rice cultivation, indigo production, cotton processing, tobacco curing, sugar refining, metalworking, carpentry, textile production, and countless other specialized trades that formed the backbone of Southern prosperity. Their innovations in agricultural techniques, tool design, architectural methods, and industrial processes not only increased productivity but also established entirely new economic sectors that would define the Southern economy for generations.

Understanding how enslaved people’s knowledge contributed to Southern economic development requires examining both the specific technical skills they provided and the broader systems of knowledge creation, adaptation, and transmission that occurred within enslaved communities. This analysis reveals that enslaved people were not merely labor inputs in Southern economic development but active agents whose expertise, creativity, and innovation were essential to creating the wealth that characterized antebellum Southern society. By examining agricultural innovations, craft specialization, technological development, and knowledge systems, this essay demonstrates that enslaved people’s contributions were fundamental rather than peripheral to Southern economic success.

Agricultural Expertise and Innovation

The agricultural knowledge of enslaved people formed the cornerstone of Southern economic development, with their expertise in crop cultivation, soil management, and farming techniques directly enabling the prosperity of plantation agriculture. Enslaved individuals brought sophisticated agricultural knowledge from various African regions, including advanced techniques for rice cultivation, crop rotation systems, irrigation methods, and soil conservation practices that were often superior to European farming methods of the period.

Rice cultivation in the South Carolina and Georgia lowcountry provides perhaps the most dramatic example of how enslaved people’s agricultural knowledge shaped regional economic development. West Africans, particularly those from the rice-growing regions of Senegambia, Sierra Leone, and the Windward Coast, possessed centuries of expertise in cultivating rice in tidal and inland swamp environments (Carney, 2001). This knowledge included sophisticated understanding of water management systems, seed selection, planting techniques, and processing methods that were essential for successful rice production in similar environments of the American South.

The economic impact of this rice cultivation expertise was enormous. By the mid-eighteenth century, rice had become one of South Carolina’s most valuable export crops, generating substantial wealth for planters and contributing significantly to Charleston’s emergence as a major commercial center. The success of rice cultivation depended entirely upon enslaved people’s knowledge of proper seed varieties, optimal planting times, water management techniques, and processing methods. Without this specialized knowledge, rice cultivation would not have been economically viable, and the entire economic development of the lowcountry would have taken a fundamentally different trajectory (Littlefield, 1981).

Enslaved people’s agricultural innovations extended far beyond rice cultivation to encompass improvements in the production of tobacco, cotton, sugar, and indigo. In tobacco cultivation, enslaved workers developed sophisticated techniques for seedbed preparation, transplanting, cultivation, harvesting, and curing that significantly improved both the quality and quantity of tobacco production. Their innovations in tobacco curing, particularly the development of proper barn designs and curing schedules, were crucial for producing the high-quality tobacco that commanded premium prices in European markets (Kulikoff, 1986).

Cotton cultivation also benefited enormously from enslaved people’s agricultural expertise. Beyond the famous invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney, enslaved people contributed countless innovations in cotton planting, cultivation, harvesting, and processing techniques that increased productivity and improved fiber quality. Their knowledge of optimal planting patterns, cultivation schedules, pest management, and harvesting methods was essential for maximizing cotton yields and maintaining the quality standards required for profitable export markets (Baptist, 2014).

The development of sugar cultivation in Louisiana similarly depended upon enslaved people’s agricultural and processing expertise. Many enslaved individuals brought knowledge of sugar cane cultivation from the Caribbean or developed expertise through experience, contributing innovations in planting techniques, cultivation methods, harvesting procedures, and sugar processing that were essential for establishing Louisiana’s profitable sugar industry. Their expertise in the complex processes of sugar refining, including proper timing for cutting cane, extraction techniques, and refining procedures, was crucial for producing marketable sugar products (Follett, 2005).

Specialized Craftsmanship and Skilled Trades

Beyond agriculture, enslaved people’s expertise in specialized crafts and skilled trades made crucial contributions to Southern economic development by providing the skilled labor necessary for construction, manufacturing, and artisanal production. Enslaved craftsmen possessed sophisticated skills in carpentry, masonry, metalworking, textile production, leather working, and numerous other trades that were essential for both plantation operations and urban economic development.

Carpentry skills among enslaved people were particularly significant for Southern economic development. Enslaved carpenters constructed plantation buildings, slave quarters, mills, bridges, and other infrastructure essential for agricultural operations. Their expertise extended beyond basic construction to include sophisticated joinery techniques, architectural design, and specialized construction methods adapted to Southern climate conditions. Many enslaved carpenters developed innovations in building design that improved functionality while reducing construction costs, contributing directly to the profitability of plantation operations (Vlach, 1993).

The economic impact of enslaved carpenters was particularly evident in urban areas, where they comprised a significant portion of the skilled construction workforce. In cities like Charleston, Savannah, New Orleans, and Richmond, enslaved carpenters built houses, commercial buildings, churches, and public structures that formed the physical foundation of urban economic development. Their skills were often hired out by their owners, generating substantial income while contributing to urban growth and development (Wade, 1964).

Metalworking skills among enslaved people made essential contributions to Southern economic development through the production of tools, hardware, and mechanical devices necessary for agricultural and industrial operations. Enslaved blacksmiths forged agricultural implements, repaired machinery, produced hardware, and created specialized tools that increased productivity across various economic sectors. Their innovations in tool design often improved efficiency and durability, reducing costs and increasing profitability for plantation and industrial operations (Starobin, 1970).

Iron production in the South depended heavily upon enslaved people’s expertise in mining, smelting, and metalworking. Enslaved workers operated iron furnaces, coal mines, and metalworking facilities throughout the South, contributing both labor and technical expertise essential for iron production. Their knowledge of ore extraction, fuel preparation, smelting techniques, and metal fabrication was crucial for developing the South’s iron industry, which supplied tools, machinery, and hardware for agricultural and industrial operations (Dew, 1994).

Textile production skills among enslaved people contributed significantly to both plantation self-sufficiency and commercial textile production. Enslaved women possessed sophisticated knowledge of fiber preparation, spinning, weaving, dyeing, and garment construction that supplied clothing for enslaved communities while also producing textiles for sale. Their expertise in cotton and wool processing, natural dyeing techniques, and textile design contributed to the development of Southern textile production capabilities (Fox-Genovese, 1988).

The production of indigo dye in South Carolina provides another example of how enslaved people’s specialized knowledge contributed to economic development. Eliza Lucas Pinckney’s successful cultivation of indigo depended upon the expertise of enslaved workers who possessed knowledge of indigo cultivation, harvesting, and dye extraction techniques. This knowledge, likely derived from West African traditions, enabled the development of a profitable indigo industry that became one of South Carolina’s major export crops before the Revolutionary War (Chaplin, 1993).

Technological Innovation and Industrial Development

Enslaved people’s contributions to technological innovation and industrial development in the South extended beyond agricultural and craft skills to include inventions, process improvements, and technological adaptations that increased productivity and efficiency across various economic sectors. Despite legal restrictions that prevented enslaved people from obtaining patents for their inventions, they created numerous technological innovations that contributed significantly to Southern economic development.

Transportation infrastructure development benefited enormously from enslaved people’s engineering and construction expertise. Enslaved workers built roads, canals, bridges, and railroads that were essential for moving agricultural products to markets and connecting Southern regions to national and international trade networks. Their expertise in earthwork, stone cutting, bridge construction, and railroad building was crucial for developing the transportation infrastructure that enabled Southern economic growth (Phillips, 1918).

The construction of the Dismal Swamp Canal, which connected Virginia and North Carolina waterways, exemplifies how enslaved people’s expertise contributed to major infrastructure projects. Enslaved workers provided both the labor and much of the technical expertise necessary for canal construction, including knowledge of excavation techniques, water management, and construction methods suited to swamp environments. This canal became crucial for transporting agricultural products and connecting Southern markets, contributing significantly to regional economic development (Inscoe, 1988).

Mill operations throughout the South depended upon enslaved people’s mechanical expertise and innovation. Enslaved workers operated gristmills, sawmills, cotton gins, and other mechanical devices while also contributing improvements to their design and operation. Their practical knowledge of mechanical systems often led to innovations that increased efficiency, reduced maintenance costs, and improved product quality. These improvements contributed directly to the profitability of milling operations and the broader agricultural economy (Chaplin, 1993).

Urban industrial development in the South relied heavily upon enslaved workers’ technical skills and innovations. In cities like Richmond, Charleston, and New Orleans, enslaved people worked in tobacco factories, cotton presses, sugar refineries, shipyards, and other industrial facilities where their expertise was essential for operations. They often developed process improvements, efficiency innovations, and quality enhancements that increased productivity and profitability (Takagi, 1999).

The development of turpentine and naval stores production in North Carolina and other southeastern states depended upon enslaved people’s knowledge of pine tree tapping, resin collection, and processing techniques. Their expertise in identifying suitable trees, optimal tapping methods, collection procedures, and processing techniques was essential for developing this important Southern industry. Innovations in tapping tools, collection methods, and processing equipment often originated from enslaved workers’ practical experience and problem-solving abilities (Outland, 2004).

Knowledge Systems and Cultural Transmission

The economic contributions of enslaved people’s knowledge extended beyond individual skills to encompass sophisticated knowledge systems and cultural transmission mechanisms that preserved, adapted, and continuously developed expertise across generations. These knowledge systems enabled enslaved communities to maintain and enhance their technical capabilities while adapting to changing economic conditions and technological requirements.

African knowledge systems brought to America by enslaved people included sophisticated understanding of natural processes, agricultural cycles, botanical knowledge, and technical skills that were adapted to American conditions. These knowledge systems encompassed not only specific techniques but also broader approaches to problem-solving, innovation, and adaptation that enabled continuous improvement and development of skills and techniques (Gomez, 1998).

The transmission of knowledge within enslaved communities occurred through formal and informal apprenticeship systems, family teaching, community workshops, and peer learning networks that ensured essential skills were preserved and passed to new generations. Enslaved craftsmen trained younger workers in their trades, agricultural experts shared cultivation techniques, and technical innovators transmitted their improvements to others. These knowledge transmission systems were crucial for maintaining and developing the skill base that supported Southern economic development (Berlin, 1998).

Knowledge adaptation processes within enslaved communities enabled the continuous refinement and improvement of techniques and skills in response to changing conditions, new challenges, and available materials. Enslaved people demonstrated remarkable ability to modify traditional techniques, incorporate new materials and tools, and develop innovative solutions to technical problems. This adaptive capacity was essential for maintaining the effectiveness of their contributions to Southern economic development over time (Morgan, 1998).

The integration of African and American knowledge systems created hybrid knowledge traditions that were often superior to either original system alone. Enslaved people combined African agricultural techniques with American crops and conditions, merged traditional craft methods with available materials and tools, and integrated cultural knowledge with practical requirements to create new and improved approaches to economic activities (Hall, 1992).

Documentation and preservation of knowledge within enslaved communities occurred through oral traditions, practical demonstrations, and informal record-keeping that ensured important innovations and techniques were not lost. Despite legal restrictions on literacy, enslaved communities developed various methods for preserving and transmitting technical knowledge that was essential for maintaining their economic contributions (Sobel, 1987).

Economic Impact and Wealth Creation

The cumulative economic impact of enslaved people’s knowledge, skills, and innovations on Southern economic development was enormous, contributing to the creation of vast wealth that extended far beyond individual plantations to encompass entire regional economies and national economic development. This wealth creation occurred through increased agricultural productivity, industrial development, technological innovation, and the creation of economic sectors that would not have existed without enslaved people’s expertise.

Agricultural productivity increases resulting from enslaved people’s knowledge and innovations generated substantial wealth for Southern planters and contributed to the broader American economy through export earnings and raw material supplies. The rice industry of South Carolina, the tobacco cultivation of Virginia and Maryland, the cotton production of the Deep South, and the sugar cultivation of Louisiana all depended upon enslaved people’s expertise for their profitability and success (Beckert, 2014).

The wealth generated by enslaved people’s agricultural expertise extended beyond immediate plantation profits to include the development of supporting industries, commercial networks, and financial systems. Ports, shipping companies, banks, insurance companies, and manufacturing enterprises all developed to support and profit from the agricultural production enabled by enslaved people’s knowledge and skills. This multiplier effect meant that enslaved people’s contributions supported much broader economic development than direct agricultural production alone (Johnson, 2013).

Urban economic development throughout the South benefited enormously from enslaved people’s craft skills, technical expertise, and industrial labor. The construction of urban infrastructure, the development of manufacturing enterprises, and the provision of skilled services all depended upon enslaved workers whose expertise was essential for urban growth and prosperity. Cities like Charleston, Savannah, Richmond, and New Orleans became major economic centers partly because of the skilled labor provided by enslaved people (Bogger, 1997).

The contribution of enslaved people’s knowledge to technological development and innovation created long-term economic benefits that extended well beyond the antebellum period. Agricultural techniques, construction methods, manufacturing processes, and other innovations developed by enslaved people continued to influence Southern economic development after emancipation and contributed to broader American technological and economic advancement (Jones, 1995).

The economic value of enslaved people’s knowledge and skills was recognized by contemporaries, as evidenced by the premium prices paid for skilled enslaved workers, the development of hiring-out systems that monetized their expertise, and the efforts made to train enslaved people in valuable trades. This market recognition of enslaved people’s economic contributions demonstrates their fundamental importance to Southern economic development (Martin, 2004).

Regional Variations and Specialization

The contributions of enslaved people’s knowledge to Southern economic development varied significantly across different regions, reflecting diverse economic conditions, agricultural systems, and available resources. These regional variations created specialized knowledge centers and expertise clusters that contributed to distinct patterns of economic development throughout the South.

The Chesapeake region’s tobacco economy benefited from enslaved people’s specialized knowledge of tobacco cultivation, curing, and processing techniques that were essential for producing the high-quality tobacco demanded by European markets. Enslaved workers in Maryland and Virginia developed sophisticated understanding of soil conditions, planting methods, cultivation techniques, and curing processes that made the Chesapeake the center of American tobacco production. Their innovations in tobacco barn design, curing schedules, and quality control were crucial for maintaining the region’s competitive advantage in international tobacco markets (Kulikoff, 1986).

South Carolina and Georgia’s rice cultivation depended entirely upon enslaved people’s knowledge of wetland agriculture, water management systems, and rice processing techniques. The development of the task system in rice cultivation, which allowed enslaved workers greater autonomy in organizing their labor, emerged partly from recognition of their specialized expertise and the complex knowledge required for successful rice production. This regional specialization in rice cultivation created substantial wealth and established Charleston as a major commercial center (Carney, 2001).

The Deep South’s cotton economy relied upon enslaved people’s agricultural knowledge and innovations in cotton cultivation, harvesting, and processing. As cotton production expanded westward into Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, enslaved people adapted their agricultural techniques to different soil conditions, climate patterns, and growing seasons. Their knowledge of cotton cultivation was essential for establishing profitable cotton production in new territories and maintaining the productivity levels necessary for the cotton boom that drove Southern economic growth (Baptist, 2014).

Louisiana’s sugar industry represented another regional specialization that depended upon enslaved people’s knowledge of sugar cane cultivation and processing. The complex processes involved in sugar production, from cane cultivation through refining, required sophisticated technical expertise that many enslaved workers possessed or developed. Their knowledge was crucial for establishing Louisiana as a major sugar-producing region and integrating it into the broader Southern economy (Follett, 2005).

The Appalachian region’s extractive industries, including iron production, coal mining, and naval stores, relied heavily upon enslaved people’s technical expertise and labor. Enslaved workers in Virginia, North Carolina, and Tennessee provided essential skills for mining operations, iron production, and forest product industries that contributed to regional economic development and supplied materials for broader Southern and national markets (Dew, 1994).

Challenges and Limitations

Despite their enormous contributions to Southern economic development, enslaved people faced significant challenges and limitations that constrained their ability to benefit from their knowledge and innovations. These limitations included legal restrictions, economic exploitation, limited access to resources, and systematic efforts to minimize recognition of their contributions.

Legal restrictions prevented enslaved people from obtaining patents for their inventions, owning property, or receiving direct compensation for their innovations and expertise. These restrictions meant that the economic benefits of enslaved people’s knowledge and skills accrued primarily to their owners and the broader white Southern society rather than to the individuals who possessed and developed this expertise (Eltis, 2000).

Economic exploitation of enslaved people’s skills occurred through various mechanisms, including the hiring-out system that allowed owners to profit from enslaved workers’ expertise, the appropriation of inventions and innovations without compensation, and the systematic undervaluation of enslaved people’s contributions to economic development. While skilled enslaved workers might receive better treatment or small monetary rewards, the vast majority of economic benefits from their expertise went to their owners (Starobin, 1970).

Limited access to resources, tools, and materials constrained enslaved people’s ability to fully develop and implement their innovations. While enslaved craftsmen and agricultural workers often improvised solutions and created innovations despite resource limitations, their contributions might have been even greater with better access to materials, tools, and technological resources (Vlach, 1993).

Systematic efforts to minimize recognition of enslaved people’s contributions occurred through various means, including the attribution of innovations to white owners or overseers, the portrayal of enslaved workers as merely following instructions rather than providing expertise, and the general reluctance to acknowledge enslaved people’s intellectual and creative capabilities. These efforts have contributed to the historical underestimation of enslaved people’s contributions to Southern economic development (Berlin, 1998).

The psychological and physical effects of enslavement undoubtedly limited some individuals’ ability to fully develop or apply their knowledge and skills. The stress, trauma, and health effects of enslavement, combined with deliberate efforts to limit enslaved people’s education and autonomy, created conditions that constrained their potential contributions even as many individuals overcame these obstacles to make significant economic contributions (Johnson, 1999).

Long-term Consequences and Legacy

The knowledge, skills, and innovations contributed by enslaved people to Southern economic development had long-term consequences that extended well beyond the antebellum period and continued to influence American economic development after emancipation. Understanding these long-term effects reveals the enduring significance of enslaved people’s contributions to American economic history.

Agricultural techniques and innovations developed by enslaved people continued to influence Southern farming practices after emancipation. Many of the cultivation methods, crop varieties, processing techniques, and agricultural innovations developed during the slavery period remained important components of Southern agriculture throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This continuity demonstrates the fundamental importance of enslaved people’s agricultural expertise for Southern economic development (Jones, 1995).

Technological innovations and industrial processes developed with enslaved people’s expertise provided foundations for continued industrial development in the post-emancipation South. Manufacturing techniques, construction methods, and technological innovations that originated from enslaved workers’ expertise continued to influence Southern industrial development and contributed to broader American technological advancement (Dew, 1994).

The economic infrastructure developed through enslaved people’s labor and expertise, including transportation networks, urban development, and industrial facilities, provided the foundation for continued Southern economic development after emancipation. Roads, canals, buildings, and other infrastructure created with enslaved people’s skills remained important components of the Southern economy for generations after slavery ended (Phillips, 1918).

Knowledge systems and cultural traditions developed within enslaved communities continued to influence African American economic participation and cultural development after emancipation. The skills, knowledge, and innovation traditions developed during slavery provided important resources for African Americans as they navigated freedom and sought economic opportunities in the post-emancipation era (Berlin, 1998).

The wealth generated through enslaved people’s knowledge and skills had long-term effects on American economic development that extended far beyond the South. The capital accumulation enabled by enslaved people’s contributions provided resources for investment in other economic sectors, supported the development of financial institutions, and contributed to broader patterns of American economic growth during the nineteenth century (Beckert, 2014).

Conclusion

The knowledge, skills, and innovations of enslaved people made fundamental contributions to Southern economic development that were far more significant than traditional narratives have recognized. Rather than serving merely as passive laborers, enslaved individuals brought sophisticated expertise in agriculture, crafts, technology, and other specialized fields that was essential for creating the wealth and prosperity that characterized the antebellum South. Their contributions encompassed agricultural innovations that enabled profitable crop production, specialized craftsmanship that supported construction and manufacturing, technological developments that increased efficiency and productivity, and knowledge systems that preserved and transmitted expertise across generations.

The economic impact of enslaved people’s knowledge extended beyond individual plantations to encompass entire regional economies and contribute to broader patterns of American economic development. The rice industry of South Carolina, the tobacco cultivation of the Chesapeake, the cotton production of the Deep South, and numerous other economic sectors depended upon enslaved people’s expertise for their success and profitability. Their contributions created multiplier effects that supported urban development, commercial networks, financial institutions, and industrial enterprises throughout the South and beyond.

Understanding how enslaved people’s knowledge contributed to Southern economic development reveals the need for more comprehensive and accurate historical narratives that recognize their intellectual capabilities, creative innovations, and essential economic contributions. It also demonstrates the enormous human cost of slavery, not only in terms of individual suffering but also in terms of the systematic exploitation of knowledge, skills, and innovations for the benefit of others.

The legacy of enslaved people’s contributions to Southern economic development continues to influence American economic and cultural development today. Their innovations in agriculture, crafts, and technology provided foundations for continued development, while their knowledge systems and cultural traditions remain important components of American cultural heritage. Recognizing these contributions provides a more complete and accurate understanding of American economic history while honoring the memory and achievements of those whose expertise was essential for creating American prosperity.

References

Baptist, E. E. (2014). The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism. Basic Books.

Beckert, S. (2014). Empire of Cotton: A Global History. Knopf.

Berlin, I. (1998). Many Thousands Gone: The First Two Centuries of Slavery in North America. Harvard University Press.

Bogger, T. L. (1997). Free Blacks in Norfolk, Virginia, 1790-1860: The Darker Side of Freedom. University Press of Virginia.

Carney, J. A. (2001). Black Rice: The African Origins of Rice Cultivation in the Americas. Harvard University Press.

Chaplin, J. E. (1993). An Anxious Pursuit: Agricultural Innovation and Modernity in the Lower South, 1730-1815. University of North Carolina Press.

Dew, C. B. (1994). Bond of Iron: Master and Slave at Buffalo Forge. W. W. Norton.

Eltis, D. (2000). The Rise of African Slavery in the Americas. Cambridge University Press.

Follett, R. (2005). The Sugar Masters: Planters and Slaves in Louisiana’s Cane World, 1820-1860. Louisiana State University Press.

Fox-Genovese, E. (1988). Within the Plantation Household: Black and White Women of the Old South. University of North Carolina Press.

Gomez, M. A. (1998). Exchanging Our Country Marks: The Transformation of African Identities in the Colonial and Antebellum South. University of North Carolina Press.

Hall, G. M. (1992). Africans in Colonial Louisiana: The Development of Afro-Creole Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Louisiana State University Press.

Inscoe, J. C. (1988). Mountain Masters, Slavery, and the Sectional Crisis in Western North Carolina. University of Tennessee Press.

Johnson, W. (1999). Soul by Soul: Life Inside the Antebellum Slave Market. Harvard University Press.

Johnson, W. (2013). River of Dark Dreams: Slavery and Empire in the Cotton Kingdom. Harvard University Press.

Jones, J. (1995). Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work and the Family, from Slavery to the Present. Basic Books.

Kulikoff, A. (1986). Tobacco and Slaves: The Development of Southern Cultures in the Chesapeake, 1680-1800. University of North Carolina Press.

Littlefield, D. C. (1981). Rice and Slaves: Ethnicity and the Slave Trade in Colonial South Carolina. Louisiana State University Press.

Martin, J. M. (2004). Divided Mastery: Slave Hiring in the American South. Harvard University Press.

Morgan, P. D. (1998). Slave Counterpoint: Black Culture in the Eighteenth-Century Chesapeake and Lowcountry. University of North Carolina Press.

Outland, R. B. (2004). Tapping the Pines: The Naval Stores Industry in the American South. Louisiana State University Press.

Phillips, U. B. (1918). American Negro Slavery. D. Appleton and Company.

Sobel, M. (1987). The World They Made Together: Black and White Values in Eighteenth-Century Virginia. Princeton University Press.

Starobin, R. S. (1970). Industrial Slavery in the Old South. Oxford University Press.

Takagi, M. (1999). Rearing Wolves to Our Own Destruction: Slavery in Richmond, Virginia, 1782-1865. University Press of Virginia.

Vlach, J. M. (1993). Back of the Big House: The Architecture of Plantation Slavery. University of North Carolina Press.

Wade, R. C. (1964). Slavery in the Cities: The South, 1820-1860. Oxford University Press.