What Does the Train Station Symbolize in “Hills Like White Elephants”? Understanding Transition and Decision-Making
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Direct Answer
The train station in Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” symbolizes a liminal space of transition, choice, and irreversible decision-making where the characters must choose between two fundamentally different life paths. Situated between Barcelona and Madrid, the station represents the crossroads where Jig and the American man stand before making a life-altering decision about her pregnancy. The physical structure of the station—with tracks leading in opposite directions, a junction between two landscapes, and a temporary waiting area—mirrors the couple’s existential position between their carefree past and an uncertain future. The station is neither origin nor destination but rather an in-between space where time is suspended, forcing confrontation with choices that cannot be postponed indefinitely. The forty-minute wait for the express train creates temporal pressure that intensifies the urgency of their decision while highlighting that some choices must be made within limited timeframes. As a symbol of transition, the train station represents the impossibility of remaining static—whether they choose abortion or parenthood, departure or arrival, their relationship cannot continue unchanged. The station thus functions as a powerful metaphor for decisive moments in human life where individuals must choose paths that will determine their futures, knowing that once the train departs, return to the previous state becomes impossible.
Introduction: Hemingway’s Geography of Decision
Ernest Hemingway’s 1927 short story “Hills Like White Elephants” unfolds entirely at a train station in Spain’s Ebro valley, where an American man and a woman named Jig wait for a train to Madrid while discussing a decision they must make about her pregnancy. The choice of setting is far from arbitrary—Hemingway, known for his economical prose and carefully selected details, uses the train station as the story’s central symbolic framework. Every element of the setting contributes to the story’s exploration of choice, consequence, and the transitional moments that define human lives. The station is described with precise attention to its physical features: the junction of rail lines, the contrast between landscapes on either side of the tracks, the bar where the couple waits, and the temporal structure of their forty-minute wait.
The train station as literary symbol has rich precedent in literature and film, often representing journey, departure, reunion, or the transience of human connection. However, Hemingway’s use of the station goes beyond conventional travel symbolism to explore more complex themes of existential choice and irreversible transition. Hannum (1992) observes that Hemingway’s settings are never merely backdrop but rather integral components of meaning, with physical geography reflecting psychological and emotional landscapes. The train station in “Hills Like White Elephants” exemplifies this principle: its physical structure, geographical position, and temporal constraints all contribute to a symbolic architecture that reinforces the story’s themes of decision-making under pressure, the impossibility of remaining in liminal spaces indefinitely, and the irreversibility of certain life choices. Understanding how the train station functions symbolically illuminates not only this specific story but also broader questions about how physical spaces can embody abstract concepts and how setting contributes to literary meaning.
The Liminal Space: Between Past and Future
Defining Liminality and Threshold Experiences
The concept of liminality, derived from the Latin word “limen” meaning threshold, refers to transitional states between two conditions—neither fully one thing nor another. Anthropologist Victor Turner (1969) developed the concept to describe ritual passages where individuals exist temporarily outside normal social structures before emerging with new identities or statuses. The train station in Hemingway’s story functions as precisely this kind of liminal space: Jig and the American are between their past life of carefree traveling and drinking, and whatever future they will create through their decision about the pregnancy. They are neither at their point of origin (Barcelona) nor their destination (Madrid), but suspended in the in-between space of the junction.
This liminality creates both freedom and anxiety. In liminal spaces, Turner argues, normal rules and structures are temporarily suspended, creating potential for transformation but also disorientation and uncertainty. The train station embodies this ambiguous condition—it is a public yet anonymous space, familiar yet temporary, a place of constant movement where nothing stays fixed. Renner (1995) notes that the couple’s conversation circles repetitively without resolution, much as travelers circle within a station while waiting, unable to settle but not yet departed. The station’s liminality mirrors the couple’s relationship status: they are not married but traveling together, not committed to separation but clearly in conflict, not decided about the pregnancy but unable to avoid deciding much longer. This symbolic correspondence between physical and emotional liminality intensifies the story’s psychological realism. The discomfort of existing in liminal spaces—the desire to resolve uncertainty and move forward—creates pressure toward decision even when all available choices seem problematic. The station thus symbolizes not just a moment of choice but the uncomfortable condition of being forced to choose, the impossibility of remaining indefinitely in transitional states that by definition cannot be permanent.
The Temporal Dimension of Transition
The story’s temporal structure reinforces the station’s symbolism of transition and deadline. The couple has exactly forty minutes to wait for the express train to Madrid, creating a precise timeframe within which their conversation and decision must occur. This temporal constraint is mentioned early—”The train comes in five minutes”—and recurs throughout, creating urgency and pressure (Hemingway, 1927, p. 211). The forty-minute wait is long enough for extended conversation but too short for indefinite postponement, symbolizing how some decisions must be made within specific windows of opportunity. The pregnancy itself operates on a biological timeline that cannot be extended indefinitely—if they choose abortion, it must happen soon; if they choose to continue the pregnancy, that decision also has temporal consequences that will unfold over months and years.
Johnston (1987) argues that Hemingway’s attention to train schedules and precise timeframes creates existential pressure reminiscent of Sartre’s philosophy of choice and commitment. Existentialist thought emphasizes that human freedom is accompanied by anxiety because choices must be made without perfect knowledge and with full responsibility for consequences. The train station’s temporal structure—the approaching departure, the limited wait, the scheduled arrival in Madrid—symbolizes this existential condition of forced choice within temporal constraints. The American repeatedly emphasizes the simplicity and immediacy of the abortion: “It’s really an awfully simple operation… It’s not really an operation at all,” suggesting it can be done quickly in Madrid (Hemingway, 1927, p. 212). His focus on speed and simplicity attempts to minimize the decision’s significance, treating it as merely a brief delay rather than a transformative choice. However, Jig’s responses—”And if I do it you’ll be happy and things will be like they were and you’ll love me?”—reveal her awareness that time’s arrow moves only forward, that they cannot actually return to a previous state despite completing the operation quickly (Hemingway, 1927, p. 213). The temporal dimension of the station thus symbolizes both the urgency of decision and the irreversibility of time itself.
Geographic Symbolism: The Junction and Two Paths
Physical Division and Symbolic Choice
The train station is specifically described as a junction between two rail lines, with the characters positioned between contrasting landscapes. On one side of the station, the hills are “long and white” with “no shade and no trees”; on the other side, visible when the American walks around to the bar, the landscape is fertile with “fields of grain and trees along the banks of the Ebro” (Hemingway, 1927, p. 211, 214). This geographic division creates visual symbolism for the choice facing the couple: the barren, exposed hills represent the path of abortion and continued childless traveling, while the fertile fields represent the path of parenthood and settled life. The station itself, positioned between these contrasting landscapes, symbolizes the decision point where they must choose which direction to take.
The junction’s symbolism operates through multiple associations. Railroad junctions are decision points where trains diverge onto different tracks, making them natural metaphors for life choices where paths separate and cannot converge again. O’Brien (1990) notes that the story’s geography creates a symbolic binary—barren/fertile, shade/sun, east/west—that structures the couple’s choice between fundamentally different futures. The fact that the station sits between these contrasting environments emphasizes that choosing either path means abandoning the other; they cannot have both the freedom of childlessness and the fulfillment of parenthood, cannot maintain their current lifestyle while also starting a family. The junction thus symbolizes the mutual exclusivity of certain life choices and the impossibility of compromise on fundamental questions. When Jig walks to the end of the station and looks at the hills, then returns through the barroom to see the fertile valley, her physical movement between the two landscapes enacts the mental weighing of alternatives that the couple’s conversation circles around. The geographic symbolism makes abstract choices concrete and visible, allowing readers to see the decision’s stakes in the contrasting landscapes that surround the liminal station space.
The Rails as Symbols of Direction and Commitment
The railroad tracks themselves carry symbolic weight as representations of chosen paths and committed directions. Unlike roads where vehicles can turn around or change course relatively easily, trains follow fixed tracks toward predetermined destinations. Once a train departs on a particular track, returning to the starting point requires completing the journey, arriving at a destination, and boarding another train back—a process that cannot simply reverse the original journey. This irreversibility makes railroad tracks powerful symbols for life choices that commit individuals to specific directions and make return to previous conditions impossible or fundamentally different.
Weeks (1990) observes that the story emphasizes the train’s status as an “express”—a direct service that will not stop between the junction and Madrid, accelerating toward its destination without pause. This detail reinforces the symbolism of irreversible commitment: once they board the express to Madrid (where the abortion will presumably occur), they cannot change their minds or stop the process midway. The American’s plan requires boarding this specific train, arriving in Madrid, completing the abortion, and continuing their travels—a sequence of actions that, once initiated, will carry its own momentum. The railroad tracks thus symbolize how certain choices, once made, create consequences that unfold with mechanical inevitability. Jig’s statement “once they take it away, you never get it back” acknowledges this irreversibility, recognizing that the abortion will set them on a track from which they cannot return to their current condition of being pregnant with possibilities (Hemingway, 1927, p. 213). The rails symbolize both the clarity of defined paths and the constraint of limited options—the couple can only board trains going to available destinations on existing tracks, much as their life choices are constrained by social, economic, and biological realities that limit available options. The train station and its rails thus represent how human freedom operates within structures and limitations, how choices are both freely made and constrained by circumstances beyond individual control.
The Waiting Room: Suspension and Anticipation
Temporal Suspension in Liminal Space
The bar and platform where the couple waits create a space of temporal suspension—they are neither engaged in meaningful activity nor able to move forward, but rather marking time until the train’s arrival forces departure and decision. This waiting condition is symbolically significant because it represents the psychological state of anticipating consequential decisions while hoping to postpone them. The couple orders drinks—beer, Anis del Toro, more beer—not because they are particularly thirsty but because drinking provides activity that fills the waiting time and perhaps dulls the anxiety of their situation. The repetitive ordering and consumption of drinks creates a pattern of small, inconsequential decisions that contrasts with the major decision they must make.
Kozikowski (1987) argues that the couple’s drinking and superficial conversation about the drinks’ taste represents avoidance behavior—filling silence and time with trivial matters to postpone confronting the serious issue they must decide. The woman’s comment that the Anis tastes like licorice and the extended discussion of whether to drink it with or without water exemplify this avoidance, as does her observation about the hills looking like white elephants, which initiates a conversational detour away from the abortion discussion. The waiting room thus symbolizes the human tendency to procrastinate on difficult decisions, to fill time with distractions rather than confronting choices that provoke anxiety. However, the temporal limit of the forty-minute wait ensures that avoidance can only be temporary—the train’s scheduled arrival will force them to either board (implicitly accepting the plan to go to Madrid for the abortion) or make alternative arrangements. The waiting room’s symbolism thus encompasses both the desire to remain in suspended animation, avoiding commitment, and the impossibility of indefinite suspension. Time continues passing despite attempts to ignore it, and the train will arrive regardless of whether they feel prepared to board. This symbolic function makes the waiting room represent the tension between human wishes for unlimited deliberation time and reality’s imposition of deadlines that force choice.
Public Space and Private Crisis
The train station’s public nature creates symbolic tension with the intimate, private decision the couple discusses. They are surrounded by other travelers, the bartender, and the constant movement of public space, yet they attempt to have a deeply personal conversation about pregnancy and abortion—topics that 1920s social norms would consider inappropriate for public discussion. This tension between public setting and private subject creates the need for the euphemistic, indirect language that characterizes their conversation. They never name “abortion” directly but refer to “it,” “the operation,” “perfectly simple,” because articulating the decision explicitly in public space would violate social propriety.
Link (1999) suggests that the station’s public nature symbolizes how supposedly private decisions about reproduction actually occur within social contexts that constrain and shape choices. Abortion in the 1920s was illegal in most places, socially stigmatized, and dangerous, making it something that could not be discussed openly despite affecting many women. The couple’s need to speak in code at the public station reflects these social constraints on reproductive decisions and language. Furthermore, the station’s transient, anonymous quality—a place where strangers pass without connection—symbolizes the isolation and loneliness that surround their decision. Despite being surrounded by other people, Jig and the American are fundamentally alone with their crisis, unable to seek advice or support from the strangers around them. The public station thus paradoxically intensifies their isolation, symbolizing how certain life decisions must be made privately even when they occur in social contexts. The waiting room represents the space where private crisis and public life intersect uncomfortably, where intimate questions must be resolved under the observation of an indifferent world that continues its normal operations regardless of individual dramas. This symbolic function highlights the existential loneliness of human decision-making—ultimately, despite social contexts and relationships, individuals must take responsibility for choices that will shape their own lives.
The Station as Crossroads: Mythological and Literary Resonance
The Crossroads in Literary Tradition
The image of the crossroads where paths diverge carries deep resonance in mythology, folklore, and literature as a site of consequential decision and encounter with destiny. In Greek mythology, Oedipus kills his father at a crossroads, setting in motion the tragic events of his life; in Robert Frost’s “The Road Not Taken,” the speaker confronts diverging paths in a wood and must choose one, understanding that choice will determine his future. The train station as junction functions as a modern, technological version of this ancient symbol—a crossroads where characters must choose directions that will separate permanently, making return to the moment of choice impossible.
Tetlow (1992) explores how Hemingway adapts classical and folkloric symbolism to modern settings, with train stations, cafés, and hotels serving similar symbolic functions to mythological locations while reflecting contemporary experience. The crossroads traditionally represents not just choice but fate—the place where one encounters one’s destiny and must respond, where the trajectory of life changes irrevocably. In “Hills Like White Elephants,” the station functions as this kind of fateful crossroads: the couple has arrived at a moment that will determine their future regardless of which choice they make. If they proceed to Madrid for the abortion, their relationship may continue but will be fundamentally changed by that shared experience and decision. If they choose not to have the abortion, they will likely have the child, which will transform their lives even more dramatically. The crossroads symbolism emphasizes that this moment is not just one decision among many but a defining moment that will create the context for all their future choices and experiences. The station as crossroads thus symbolizes how certain decisions function as pivot points in human lives—moments when the paths available multiply or narrow, when futures diverge, and when the weight of choice becomes most apparent and unavoidable.
Religious and Spiritual Dimensions
The liminal nature of the station and its function as a decision point also carry spiritual symbolism related to themes of soul, conscience, and moral choice. Religious traditions often frame important moral decisions as crossroads where individuals choose between righteous and sinful paths, salvation and damnation, the narrow way and the broad way. While Hemingway’s story avoids explicit religious language, the station’s symbolism evokes these spiritual dimensions of choice, particularly given that abortion raises moral and religious questions for many people.
Hannum (1999) argues that readers must resist imposing simple moral judgments on the characters’ situation, yet acknowledges that the decision they face has moral dimensions that cannot be entirely bracketed. The station as liminal space becomes a site where the couple must confront not just practical consequences but also questions of value, meaning, and what kind of life they believe is worth living. Jig’s comment “And we could have all this… And we could have everything” suggests spiritual or existential yearning for meaning beyond their current lifestyle of superficial pleasures (Hemingway, 1927, p. 213). The American’s insistence that the abortion is “perfectly natural” and will allow them to “be fine afterward, just like we were before” attempts to frame the decision in purely practical terms, stripped of moral significance. However, Jig’s resistance to this framing—her recognition that they cannot return to a previous state—implies awareness of the decision’s deeper significance. The station thus symbolizes the space where practical and spiritual dimensions of choice intersect, where decisions about action require prior decisions about values and meaning. Whether consciously religious or not, the couple confronts questions about what matters, what has value, and what kind of life they want to create—questions that have traditionally been considered spiritual or philosophical rather than merely practical. The station as symbolic crossroads thus encompasses not just which train to board but which values to affirm and which vision of good life to pursue.
Architectural Symbolism: Structure and Meaning
The Platform Between Two Sides
The story emphasizes the station’s structure as having two sides with different views—the side facing the barren hills and the side facing the fertile valley. This architectural division creates spatial symbolism that reinforces the binary nature of the couple’s choice. The platform itself is the neutral ground between these contrasting views, the position of undecided suspension where they currently stand. When Jig walks to the end of the station to look at the hills, she physically moves toward one symbolic option; when she walks through the bar to the other side, she moves toward the alternative. These movements enact the process of imaginatively trying on different futures, attempting to see what each path might look like.
The architectural symbolism extends to the concept of perspective and vantage point. From one position at the station, only the barren hills are visible; from another position, the fertile valley comes into view. This structural feature symbolizes how perspective shapes perception and how what one sees depends on where one stands—both literally and metaphorically. Wyche (2001) observes that the couple’s conflict stems partly from occupying different perspectives: the American, focused on maintaining their current lifestyle, sees the pregnancy from the perspective of burden and obstacle, while Jig, contemplating the possibility of motherhood, sees potential meaning and fulfillment. The station’s architecture, requiring physical movement to see both landscapes, symbolizes the difficulty of holding multiple perspectives simultaneously and the tendency for position to determine vision. The couple cannot occupy the same physical position at the same time, just as they cannot seem to adopt each other’s perspectives emotionally and psychologically. The platform between the two sides thus represents both the possibility of seeing multiple options and the impossibility of avoiding the choice between them—they can look at both landscapes, but they must eventually board a train going in one direction or another.
The Bar as Neutral Ground
The bar within the station functions as a microcosm of the liminal space—a place of temporary refuge and hospitality within the larger transitional environment. Bars in Hemingway’s fiction often serve as important settings where characters interact, revealing themselves through dialogue while surrounded by the rituals of ordering, drinking, and temporary companionship with strangers. The bar in “Hills Like White Elephants” provides shelter from the sun—”there was no shade and no trees… The American and the girl with him sat at a table in the shade, outside the building”—creating a slightly more comfortable environment for their difficult conversation (Hemingway, 1927, p. 211).
The bar’s symbolic function relates to its status as a social space governed by conventions of hospitality and temporary community. The bartender serves them drinks without judgment or involvement in their conversation, representing the indifferent professionalism of service workers who facilitate travelers’ transitions without becoming invested in their stories. When the American goes into the bar to arrange for their luggage to be moved, this practical transaction symbolizes the mechanical, logistical aspects of transition—the mundane arrangements that must be made regardless of emotional turmoil. Svoboda (1987) notes that Hemingway’s bars often represent “clean, well-lighted places” that provide temporary order and comfort against the chaos and darkness of existence beyond their walls. The station bar serves this function while remaining fundamentally a transitional space—not a destination or home but a waystation where travelers pause briefly before continuing their journeys. The bar thus symbolizes both the human need for temporary refuge during transitions and the impossibility of remaining in such refuges permanently. The couple can order another round of drinks, can extend their time in the bar’s shelter, but eventually the train will arrive and they must leave this neutral ground to board and travel toward whatever decision they have made or will make.
Decision Theory and Existential Choice
Forced Choice and False Dilemmas
The train station symbolizes the structure of forced choice where not deciding is itself a decision with consequences. Decision theory distinguishes between situations where individuals can postpone choices indefinitely and those where temporal or circumstantial constraints force decision within specific timeframes. The pregnancy and its biological timeline create this kind of forced choice: not deciding about abortion is, in practical terms, a decision to continue the pregnancy, since abortion becomes more difficult, dangerous, and (in many jurisdictions) illegal as pregnancy progresses. The train station, with its scheduled departures and limited waiting time, makes this forced choice structure visible and concrete.
However, the station also symbolizes what philosophers call false dilemmas—situations where limited options are presented as the only possibilities when additional alternatives might exist. The American frames the choice as binary: have the abortion and continue their current lifestyle, or have the baby and lose everything they value. His repeated insistence that they will be “fine” after the abortion and “just like we were before” presents this path as simple and consequence-free, while implying that continuing the pregnancy would be catastrophic for their relationship. Jig’s responses suggest she recognizes this framing as inadequate—her questions about whether they will really be “fine” and really be able to “have everything” express doubt about both options as the American presents them. Smiley (1988) argues that the couple’s conflict stems partly from the American’s insistence on a false binary that erases complexity: in reality, having the abortion might not restore their relationship, and having the baby might not necessarily destroy it. The station symbolizes both the reality of forced choice (they must decide something) and the danger of false dilemmas that present limited options as the only possibilities. This symbolic function makes the station represent the complex relationship between freedom and constraint in human decision-making—people must choose, but the options available and the frameworks for understanding those options are often determined by social, economic, and relational factors beyond individual control.
Sartrean Responsibility and Bad Faith
The train station’s symbolism resonates with Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialist philosophy, particularly his concepts of radical freedom, responsibility, and “bad faith.” Sartre (1943) argued that human beings are “condemned to be free”—we must make choices that define our existence without any external authority or objective values to guide us, and we bear complete responsibility for our choices and their consequences. The train station represents this existential condition: the couple stands at a juncture where they must choose, where no authority can make the decision for them, and where they will bear the consequences of whatever they decide.
Sartre’s concept of “bad faith” (mauvaise foi) refers to self-deception where individuals deny their freedom and responsibility by pretending external factors determine their choices. The American exhibits bad faith when he presents the abortion as merely practical necessity rather than a choice reflecting his values and priorities, and when he insists that external circumstances (their lifestyle, their happiness, their relationship) require this decision rather than acknowledging that he wants Jig to have the abortion because it serves his interests. His language attempts to deny agency and responsibility: “It’s the only thing that’s made us unhappy” externalizes the problem, treating the pregnancy as an outside force rather than a situation requiring their response (Hemingway, 1927, p. 213). The train station, as a symbol of unavoidable choice, exposes this bad faith—standing at the junction makes clear that they must actively choose a direction rather than being passively carried by circumstances. Jig’s final statement “I feel fine” can be read as either resignation to the American’s pressure (bad faith where she denies her own desires to preserve the relationship) or as ironic assertion of autonomy (refusing to continue the conversation but not necessarily accepting his position). The station thus symbolizes the existential reality that human beings must make choices that define their lives, that these choices cannot be avoided by pretending external forces determine everything, and that responsibility for choices cannot be escaped even when options are constrained or unsatisfying.
Gender Dynamics and Power: The Station as Contested Space
Masculine Control of Direction and Movement
The train station’s symbolism operates within gendered power dynamics that structure the couple’s interaction. Throughout the story, the American controls the practical arrangements of their journey—he carries their bags, speaks to the bartender in Spanish (which Jig apparently does not speak), arranges for their luggage to be transferred, and has clearly planned their route to Madrid for the abortion. This masculine control over travel logistics symbolizes broader control over their relationship’s direction and major decisions. The train station, as a space of movement and travel, becomes symbolic terrain where masculine authority over direction and destination manifests.
Fletcher and Catalano (1988) analyze how the story explores gendered power through spatial dynamics, with the American’s mobility and linguistic competence contrasting with Jig’s more limited agency. She cannot communicate with the bartender directly, depends on the American to arrange their travel, and appears to have limited financial resources of her own. The train station thus symbolizes how gender inequality constrains women’s freedom of movement and choice—Jig cannot simply board a different train or refuse to travel to Madrid without practical and economic consequences. The station as symbol of choice becomes ironic when one character has significantly more power than the other to determine which choice will be made. The American’s control over travel arrangements symbolizes his assumption that he will control the abortion decision as well, treating it as within his sphere of authority despite it being Jig’s body and pregnancy. The station thus represents not just abstract choice but choice within asymmetrical power relations where masculine authority has historically controlled women’s mobility, reproduction, and life options. This gendered dimension of the station’s symbolism makes it represent both the possibility of female agency and the constraints that limit that agency within patriarchal structures.
The Station as Escape Route or Trap
For Jig, the train station carries ambiguous symbolic meaning as potentially both escape route and trap. On one hand, the station represents mobility and the possibility of departure—she could theoretically board a train going somewhere other than Madrid, could refuse to accompany the American, could use the station’s resources to travel toward an independent future. The station’s function as a hub of multiple destinations symbolizes the multiplicity of life paths theoretically available. On the other hand, the station also symbolizes being trapped in transit, unable to settle or refuse movement, carried along by momentum not entirely of one’s own making. Jig appears to have no home or stable residence, no mentioned family or support network, and limited resources independent of the American—for her, the station may represent rootlessness rather than freedom.
Renner (1995) argues for reading the story from “the girl’s side,” attending to how Jig’s experience of the situation differs from the American’s. From this perspective, the train station symbolizes the precarity of her position—she is literally between places with no clear home, financially dependent on a man who pressures her to have an abortion she may not want, in a foreign country whose language she does not speak. The station’s liminality, which might represent freedom and possibility for someone with resources and autonomy, represents vulnerability and constraint for someone without secure social or economic position. The train’s scheduled arrival creates deadline pressure that serves the American’s interests (he wants the decision made quickly so they can proceed to Madrid) while limiting Jig’s time to consider alternatives or resist his pressure. The station thus symbolizes how the same physical space can carry different meanings depending on one’s social position and power—what represents advantageous mobility for men with resources may represent constraint and vulnerability for women with limited options. This gendered reading of the station’s symbolism makes it represent not universal human condition of choice but specifically the constraints and pressures that shape women’s reproductive decisions within patriarchal social structures where masculine power significantly determines available options and their consequences.
Conclusion: The Multivalent Symbol of Transit and Transformation
The train station in “Hills Like White Elephants” functions as a rich, multivalent symbol that operates simultaneously on multiple levels of meaning. As liminal space, it represents the transitional condition between past and future, the uncomfortable suspension where decisions must be made but can temporarily be postponed. As geographic junction, it symbolizes the crossroads where paths diverge and choices commit individuals to specific directions with limited possibility of return. As public space, it represents the intersection of private crisis with social context, the isolation of individual decision-making within indifferent public worlds. As architectural structure with contrasting views from different positions, it symbolizes how perspective shapes perception and how difficult perspectives are to reconcile when they conflict fundamentally.
The station’s temporal dimension—the forty-minute wait, the approaching departure, the express train’s direct route—symbolizes how decision-making operates within temporal constraints that force choice even when individuals feel unprepared. Its function as crossroads connects to ancient mythological and literary traditions of fateful choices at junctions while adapting these symbols to modern, technological environments. The station’s symbolism operates within gender dynamics that make it represent both possibility and constraint depending on social position and power, both escape route and trap depending on one’s resources and autonomy. Through all these symbolic dimensions, the train station represents the irreversibility of consequential choices, the impossibility of indefinite suspension in liminal states, and the existential condition of human freedom operating within constraints. Hemingway’s choice to set the entire story at this single location demonstrates how a carefully selected and precisely described setting can carry complex thematic meanings, making physical space an active participant in narrative significance rather than passive backdrop. The train station endures as a powerful symbol because it captures essential features of human experience—the necessity of choice, the weight of consequences, the anxiety of transition, and the profound moments when individuals stand at junctures that will determine their futures in ways they can anticipate but not fully control or predict.
References
Fletcher, J., & Catalano, G. (1988). The woman reader and the death of the heart: “Hills Like White Elephants.” The Hemingway Review, 8(1), 16-24.
Hannum, H. (1992). Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises. In M. J. Bruccoli (Ed.), New essays on The Sun Also Rises (pp. 47-74). Cambridge University Press.
Hannum, H. (1999). “Jig” should not be a “poor girl” in Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants.” The Hemingway Review, 18(2), 41-55.
Hemingway, E. (1927). Hills like white elephants. In Men without women (pp. 69-77). Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Johnston, K. G. (1987). “Hills Like White Elephants”: Lean, vintage Hemingway. Studies in American Fiction, 15(2), 233-238.
Kozikowski, S. (1987). Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants.” The Explicator, 45(2), 50-51.
Link, F. (1999). The meaning of a name in Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants.” Studies in Short Fiction, 36(2), 161-165.
O’Brien, T. (1990). Allusion, word-play, and the central conflict in “Hills Like White Elephants.” The Hemingway Review, 9(2), 19-25.
Renner, S. (1995). Moving to the girl’s side of “Hills Like White Elephants.” The Hemingway Review, 15(1), 27-41.
Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Philosophical Library.
Smiley, P. (1988). Gender-linked miscommunication in “Hills Like White Elephants.” The Hemingway Review, 8(1), 2-12.
Svoboda, F. J. (1987). Landscapes real and imagined: Big Two-Hearted River. The Hemingway Review, 6(2), 2-15.
Tetlow, W. (1992). Hemingway’s In Our Time: Lyrical dimensions. Bucknell University Press.
Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine Publishing.
Weeks, L. (1990). Hemingway hills: Symbolism in “Hills Like White Elephants.” Studies in Short Fiction, 27(1), 75-77.
Wyche, D. (2001). New critical approaches to the short stories of Ernest Hemingway. In J. Nagel (Ed.), Critical essays on Ernest Hemingway’s short fiction (pp. 77-104). G. K. Hall.