Book Review: Ethnic Entrepreneurs, Crony Capitalism, and the Making of the Franco-Mexican Elite by José Galindo

Galindo, José. Ethnic Entrepreneurs, Crony Capitalism, and the Making of the Franco-Mexican Elite. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2021. 240 pp. $54.95 (cloth/e-book). ISBN: 978-0-8173-2080-5.

Introduction

José Galindo’s Ethnic Entrepreneurs, Crony Capitalism, and the Making of the Franco-Mexican Elite represents a significant contribution to the fields of business history, migration studies, and the political economy of development in Latin America. Published by the University of Alabama Press in 2021, this meticulously researched monograph examines the rise of French immigrant entrepreneurs, particularly the Barcelonnettes, and their transformation from modest textile merchants into a powerful economic and political elite that shaped Mexican institutional development from the Porfiriato through the twentieth century. Galindo’s work is particularly timely, as it illuminates historical patterns of crony capitalism that continue to resonate in contemporary debates about economic development, institutional quality, and the relationship between ethnic entrepreneurship and political power.

The book’s central argument is both provocative and rigorously documented: the success of the Barcelonnette network in Mexico cannot be understood solely through the lens of entrepreneurial acumen or ethnic solidarity, but rather through their strategic cultivation of political relationships that allowed them to circumvent institutional weaknesses and secure preferential treatment from the Mexican state. In doing so, Galindo challenges romanticized narratives of immigrant entrepreneurship while providing a nuanced case study of how crony capitalism becomes embedded in national economic structures. The Jean family, whose descendants would become connected to major Mexican institutions including Banamex and the Televisa media network, serves as Galindo’s primary case study, though the analysis extends to the broader Barcelonnette community and their integration into Mexico’s economic elite.

Theoretical Framework and Methodological Approach

Galindo situates his study within multiple scholarly traditions, including migration history, business network theory, institutional economics, and political economy. His theoretical framework draws heavily on concepts of social capital, ethnic entrepreneurship, and rent-seeking behavior, synthesizing these approaches to explain how ethnic networks can both overcome institutional deficiencies and perpetuate institutional weakness through crony capitalist practices. This dual character of ethnic business networks—simultaneously compensating for and contributing to institutional failures—represents one of the book’s most important theoretical contributions.

The author employs an impressive array of archival sources, including business records, personal correspondence, government documents, and contemporary periodicals, to reconstruct the business strategies and political connections of the Barcelonnette community. This methodological rigor is evident throughout the work, as Galindo moves seamlessly between micro-level analysis of individual business decisions and macro-level examination of institutional change in Mexico. The genealogical approach, tracing family connections across generations, proves particularly effective in demonstrating how economic power was consolidated and transmitted through strategic marriages, business partnerships, and political alliances.

Galindo’s methodology also incorporates comparative perspectives, occasionally referencing other immigrant entrepreneurial communities in Latin America and beyond. This comparative dimension strengthens the analysis by suggesting that the patterns observed among the Barcelonnettes may represent broader phenomena in contexts where weak formal institutions create opportunities for politically connected business networks. However, some readers may wish for more sustained comparative analysis to clarify which aspects of the Barcelonnette experience were unique and which represent more general patterns.

Historical Context: The Barcelonnettes in Mexico

The empirical heart of the book lies in its detailed reconstruction of Barcelonnette migration to Mexico and the community’s economic ascent. The Barcelonnettes hailed from a small town in the French Alps and began arriving in Mexico in significant numbers during the mid-nineteenth century, initially establishing themselves in the textile retail trade. As Galindo documents, these immigrants brought commercial experience, access to European capital and goods, and—crucially—strong ethnic solidarity that facilitated trust-based business relationships in an environment of weak contractual enforcement.

The timing of Barcelonnette migration coincided with the Porfiriato (1876-1911), the period of authoritarian modernization under President Porfirio Díaz. Galindo argues persuasively that the Porfirian state’s development strategy created particular opportunities for well-connected entrepreneurs. The regime sought to attract foreign capital and expertise to modernize the Mexican economy while maintaining political control through selective distribution of privileges and concessions. The Barcelonnettes, with their European credentials and willingness to cultivate relationships with political authorities, were ideally positioned to benefit from this system.

Galindo’s account reveals how the Barcelonnettes expanded from retail into manufacturing, finance, and eventually into positions of direct political power. The first generation established department stores that became icons of modernity in Mexican cities, including the famous Liverpool and Palacio de Hierro chains. Subsequent generations leveraged the capital accumulated through commerce to invest in textile manufacturing, taking advantage of protectionist policies that limited foreign competition. By the early twentieth century, members of the Barcelonnette community had secured positions in banking, served in government, and intermarried with prominent Mexican families, completing their integration into the national elite.

The Jean family receives particular attention as an exemplary case of this trajectory. Galindo traces the family’s evolution from immigrant merchants to major industrialists and ultimately to their connections with institutions that would become central to twentieth-century Mexican capitalism. The contemporary relevance is underscored by connections to Banamex, one of Mexico’s largest banks, and Televisa, the dominant media conglomerate, though Galindo is careful to trace the complex genealogies and business relationships rather than making simplistic claims of direct descent.

Crony Capitalism and Institutional Development

The book’s most significant theoretical contribution lies in its analysis of the relationship between ethnic entrepreneurship, crony capitalism, and institutional development. Galindo demonstrates that the Barcelonnettes’ success depended heavily on their ability to secure favorable treatment from political authorities. This included access to government contracts, exemptions from regulations, protective tariffs that benefited their industries, preferential access to credit from state banks, and even direct participation in policy-making that affected their business interests.

Galindo is careful to contextualize these relationships within Mexico’s broader institutional environment. The weakness of formal institutions—including unreliable courts, ambiguous property rights, and arbitrary regulatory enforcement—meant that political connections became essential for business success. The Barcelonnettes’ ethnic solidarity facilitated their organization into effective lobbying groups, while their status as European immigrants granted them prestige in a society that valorized European culture. They joined exclusive social clubs, such as the French Club of Mexico, where business was conducted alongside leisure and where relationships with Mexican political and economic elites were cultivated.

However, Galindo argues that this adaptation to institutional weakness perpetuated the very problems it addressed. The success of politically connected entrepreneurs reduced pressure for institutional reform, as those with power had little incentive to support more impersonal, rule-based systems that might diminish their advantages. The Mexican state, meanwhile, maintained its ability to distribute patronage and extract resources from economic elites through the same personalistic relationships. This created a path-dependent trajectory wherein crony capitalism became increasingly entrenched in Mexican political economy.

The book provides concrete examples of this dynamic. During the Mexican Revolution and its aftermath, some Barcelonnette enterprises successfully navigated political upheaval through strategic alliances with revolutionary leaders. Post-revolutionary governments, while rhetorically committed to social reform, continued to rely on relationships with established economic elites, including the Franco-Mexican community. The import-substitution industrialization policies of the mid-twentieth century, while ostensibly promoting national development, in practice often benefited politically connected industrialists, including descendants of the Barcelonnettes, through protective tariffs, subsidized credit, and captive markets.

Galindo’s analysis challenges both celebratory narratives of immigrant entrepreneurship and simplistic denunciations of crony capitalism. He recognizes that the Barcelonnettes’ business acumen, work ethic, and mutual support networks were genuine and contributed to their success. Their enterprises created employment, introduced modern retail and manufacturing practices, and contributed to Mexico’s economic modernization. Yet he insists that these achievements cannot be separated from the privileged political relationships that structured market competition in their favor and created barriers to entry for less-connected competitors.

Comparative and Theoretical Implications

While focused on Mexico, Galindo’s findings have broader implications for understanding economic development and the role of ethnic entrepreneurship in developing economies. The book contributes to debates about social capital and economic performance, suggesting that strong social networks can have ambivalent effects on institutional development. Networks that facilitate trust and cooperation within communities may simultaneously enable rent-seeking behavior and entrench inequality between insiders and outsiders.

The work also speaks to literature on the persistence of inequality and the political economy of development. Galindo’s historical analysis demonstrates how economic elites, once established, can perpetuate their position across generations through strategic adaptation to political changes. The Barcelonnette community’s successful navigation of multiple regime transitions—from the Porfiriato through the Revolution to the post-revolutionary state—illustrates the resilience of entrenched economic power.

Furthermore, the book engages with debates about institutions and growth in Latin America. Scholars have long debated whether Latin America’s relatively weak economic performance compared to North America can be attributed to institutional differences rooted in colonial heritage. Galindo’s work suggests that post-independence institutional development has been shaped by domestic political economy dynamics, including the strategic behavior of economic elites who benefited from institutional weakness. This perspective emphasizes agency and choice rather than deterministic path dependence from colonial institutions.

Critical Assessment

Ethnic Entrepreneurs, Crony Capitalism, and the Making of the Franco-Mexican Elite is an impressive work of historical scholarship that makes important contributions to multiple fields. Its primary strengths include its archival depth, theoretical sophistication, and willingness to challenge conventional wisdom about both immigrant entrepreneurship and Mexican development. Galindo writes with clarity and presents complex historical material in an accessible manner without sacrificing analytical nuance.

However, the book is not without limitations that suggest directions for future research. First, while Galindo effectively demonstrates the crony capitalist practices of the Barcelonnettes, the counterfactual question remains somewhat open: would Mexico’s institutional development have been substantially different without this particular group? The broader system of political capitalism in Mexico appears to have persisted across different actors and sectors, suggesting that the Barcelonnettes may have been symptoms rather than causes of deeper institutional problems. A more explicit discussion of alternative developmental paths and their plausibility would strengthen the argument.

Second, the book focuses heavily on the perspective of the Barcelonnettes and their elite associates, with less attention to how their economic dominance affected other social groups. While Galindo acknowledges that crony capitalism creates costs for society, more systematic analysis of these distributional consequences would enhance the work. How did the Barcelonnettes’ market power affect workers, consumers, and competing entrepreneurs? How did their political influence shape policy debates around labor rights, industrial regulation, or trade policy? These questions receive limited attention.

Third, the temporal scope of the analysis, while spanning from the Porfiriato into the twentieth century, becomes less detailed in later periods. The book is strongest on the foundational period from 1876 to 1940, but the evolution of the Franco-Mexican elite in more recent decades receives less sustained attention. Given the book’s claims about path dependence and the enduring influence of crony capitalism, more extensive treatment of the contemporary period would be valuable. The connections to institutions like Banamex and Televisa are mentioned but not fully explored, leaving readers curious about how these historical patterns manifest in Mexico’s neoliberal era.

Fourth, while Galindo’s focus on a single ethnic entrepreneurial community allows for deep historical analysis, it limits the ability to assess how typical the Barcelonnette experience was. Were other immigrant groups or domestic entrepreneurs operating under similar constraints and adopting similar strategies? A more systematic comparison with other business elites in Mexico would help clarify whether ethnic solidarity was crucial to crony capitalist success or whether political connections mattered more than ethnic identity per se.

Finally, the book could engage more explicitly with normative questions about economic development and institutional reform. Galindo documents how crony capitalism became entrenched but offers limited analysis of how such systems might be reformed. Given ongoing debates about corruption, state capacity, and market reform in Mexico and throughout Latin America, explicit consideration of policy implications would enhance the book’s contemporary relevance.

Contributions to Scholarship and Future Directions

Despite these limitations, Galindo’s book makes several important scholarly contributions. First, it provides the most comprehensive historical analysis to date of the Barcelonnette community in Mexico, drawing on previously underutilized archival sources to reconstruct their business strategies and political relationships. This empirical contribution alone justifies the book’s publication, as it fills a significant gap in Mexican business history.

Second, the book advances theoretical understanding of the relationship between ethnic entrepreneurship and institutional development. By demonstrating how ethnic networks can simultaneously overcome and perpetuate institutional weaknesses, Galindo complicates simplistic narratives about either the benefits of immigrant entrepreneurship or the costs of crony capitalism. This nuanced perspective represents an important corrective to scholarship that treats these as separate phenomena.

Third, the work contributes to political economy literature on Mexico by tracing the historical origins of contemporary patterns of business-state relations. Understanding how crony capitalism became embedded in Mexican institutions during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries provides essential context for analyzing Mexico’s recent economic trajectory, including both the persistence of concentrated economic power and ongoing struggles for institutional reform.

Fourth, Galindo’s methodology—combining genealogical analysis, business history, and political economy—offers a model for studying elite formation and reproduction that could be applied to other contexts. The careful tracing of family relationships, business partnerships, and political connections demonstrates how economic power is consolidated and transmitted across generations.

The book opens several avenues for future research. First, comparative studies of other immigrant entrepreneurial communities in Latin America could test whether the patterns Galindo identifies among the Barcelonnettes represent broader phenomena. Second, more extensive analysis of the contemporary period could examine whether crony capitalist relationships established in earlier eras continue to shape Mexican business-state relations in the neoliberal period. Third, research examining the perspectives of those disadvantaged by crony capitalism—including workers, small businesses, and consumers—would provide a more complete picture of its social consequences. Finally, policy-oriented research could explore how countries with histories of crony capitalism can transition toward more competitive, rule-based market systems.

Conclusion

José Galindo’s Ethnic Entrepreneurs, Crony Capitalism, and the Making of the Franco-Mexican Elite is an important and timely contribution to scholarship on Mexican economic history, migration studies, and the political economy of development. By tracing the rise of the Barcelonnette community from immigrant merchants to a powerful economic elite, Galindo illuminates how ethnic entrepreneurship, social networks, and political connections intersected to shape institutional development in Mexico. His central argument—that the Barcelonnettes’ success depended heavily on crony capitalist relationships that ultimately perpetuated institutional weakness—challenges romanticized narratives of immigrant entrepreneurship while avoiding simplistic denunciations of corruption.

The book’s greatest strength lies in its meticulous archival research and its theoretical sophistication in analyzing the ambivalent relationship between ethnic business networks and institutional development. Galindo demonstrates convincingly that strong social networks can facilitate economic success while simultaneously enabling rent-seeking behavior that undermines broader institutional quality. This insight has relevance far beyond Mexico, speaking to ongoing debates about development, governance, and inequality throughout the developing world.

The work would be strengthened by more sustained comparative analysis, greater attention to the perspectives of those disadvantaged by crony capitalism, and more extensive treatment of the contemporary period. Nevertheless, these limitations do not diminish the book’s substantial contributions. Galindo has produced a model of rigorous historical scholarship that speaks to contemporary policy concerns, combining empirical depth with theoretical insight.

For scholars of Mexican history, the book is essential reading, providing the most comprehensive account available of an important but understudied immigrant community and its role in Mexican economic development. For political economists and development scholars, the book offers valuable insights into how crony capitalism becomes institutionalized and persists across generations. For students of migration and ethnic entrepreneurship, it provides a sobering reminder that immigrant business success cannot be understood apart from the political and institutional contexts in which it occurs.

In an era of renewed attention to corruption, state capture, and institutional quality in Latin America and beyond, Galindo’s historical analysis provides crucial context for understanding how contemporary problems have deep historical roots. By demonstrating how economic elites cultivated political relationships that served their interests while perpetuating institutional weakness, the book illuminates persistent obstacles to more inclusive and competitive economic development. This alone makes Ethnic Entrepreneurs, Crony Capitalism, and the Making of the Franco-Mexican Elite an important contribution to scholarship and an essential resource for anyone seeking to understand the historical foundations of contemporary Latin American political economy.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.

Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press.

Coatsworth, J. H. (1981). Growth against development: The economic impact of railroads in Porfirian Mexico. Northern Illinois University Press.

Galindo, J. (2017). A French migrant business network in the period of export-led growth (ELG) in Mexico: The case of the Barcelonnettes. Business History, 61(4), 679-702.

Galindo, J. (2021). Ethnic entrepreneurs, crony capitalism, and the making of the Franco-Mexican elite. University of Alabama Press.

Haber, S. (1989). Industry and underdevelopment: The industrialization of Mexico, 1890-1940. Stanford University Press.

Haber, S., Razo, A., & Maurer, N. (2003). The politics of property rights: Political instability, credible commitments, and economic growth in Mexico, 1876-1929. Cambridge University Press.

Knight, A. (1986). The Mexican Revolution (2 vols.). Cambridge University Press.

Kuntz Ficker, S. (2010). The export boom of the Mexican Revolution: Characteristics and contributing factors. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(3), 551-581.

Light, I., & Gold, S. J. (2000). Ethnic economies. Academic Press.

North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press.

Pérez Siller, J., & Cramaussel, C. (Eds.). (1998). México Francia: Memoria de una sensibilidad común, siglos XIX-XX. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.

Proal, M., & Charpenel, H. (1998). Los Barcelonnettes en México. Clío.

Topik, S., & Wells, A. (Eds.). (1998). The second conquest of Latin America: Coffee, henequen, and oil during the export boom, 1850-1930. University of Texas Press.

Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(3), 224-232.

Wasserman, M. (1984). Capitalists, caciques, and revolution: The native elite and foreign enterprise in Chihuahua, Mexico, 1854-1911. University of North Carolina Press.