Why Are Opening and Closing Lines Important in Literature?
Author: Martin Munyao Muinde
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Direct Answer
Opening and closing lines are critically important in literature because they serve as the structural framework that establishes and resolves a narrative’s central themes, character arcs, and philosophical questions. The opening line functions as the reader’s entrance into the fictional world, setting tone, introducing conflict, establishing narrative voice, and creating the initial hook that compels continued reading. The closing line provides resolution, thematic culmination, and lasting impression, often creating circular narrative structures that echo opening imagery or language to demonstrate transformation, irony, or thematic unity. Together, these bookend moments frame the narrative journey and crystallize meaning, with their relationship revealing the story’s essential message about human experience, moral complexity, or existential truth. Masterful opening and closing lines work in concert to create resonance and significance that extends beyond the narrative itself, embedding the story in readers’ consciousness long after the final page.
The Strategic Function of Opening Lines in Narrative Construction
Opening lines carry extraordinary weight in literary construction, serving multiple simultaneous functions that determine reader engagement, establish narrative parameters, and forecast thematic concerns that will develop throughout the work. The first sentence of any story operates as a threshold between the reader’s world and the fictional universe, requiring sufficient intrigue, clarity, or beauty to justify the investment of time and attention that reading demands. Successful opening lines achieve what novelist John Irving called “the voice test,” immediately establishing a distinctive narrative voice that signals the story’s tonal register, stylistic approach, and implied relationship between narrator and reader (Irving, 1998). Beyond voice, opening lines must accomplish practical narrative work—introducing setting, character, conflict, or situation—while simultaneously suggesting the thematic preoccupations that will organize the narrative’s deeper meaning. This dual function creates a unique compositional challenge where writers must balance accessibility with complexity, immediate clarity with suggestive depth, and concrete particularity with universal resonance.
The opening line also establishes what narrative theorist Gerard Genette termed the “narrative contract,” an implicit agreement between author and reader about the kind of story being told and the reading strategies appropriate for engaging with it (Genette, 1980). A story beginning with “Once upon a time” signals different expectations than one opening with “The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed,” which differs again from “Call me Ishmael.” Each opening establishes genre conventions, tonal expectations, and narrative modes that guide reader interpretation throughout the text. The opening line’s relationship to what follows can take various forms—it might introduce a narrator who will guide us through events, present an immediate crisis that drives the plot, establish a contemplative mood for a character study, or offer a philosophical proposition that the narrative will explore. Literary scholars recognize that opening lines frequently employ specific rhetorical strategies: dramatic action (in medias res), compelling character introduction, vivid setting description, thematic statement, or narrative mystery that provokes curiosity (McEwan, 2002). The most effective opening lines often combine multiple strategies, creating dense, multifunctional sentences that reward rereading after the story’s conclusion reveals layers of meaning embedded in the initial words. Understanding opening lines’ strategic function helps readers appreciate how authors craft these crucial moments to shape the entire reading experience.
Thematic Establishment Through Opening Imagery and Language
Opening lines frequently introduce imagery, symbols, or language patterns that establish thematic frameworks organizing the narrative’s deeper meanings and philosophical concerns. These initial images often function as controlling metaphors that resonate throughout the text, gaining complexity and significance as the story develops. Franz Kafka’s opening to “The Metamorphosis”—”As Gregor Samsa awoke one morning from uneasy dreams he found himself transformed in his bed into a gigantic insect”—immediately establishes themes of alienation, transformation, and the grotesque that pervade the entire novella (Kafka, 1915). The matter-of-fact tone with which this impossible event is presented signals the story’s absurdist approach to existential questions about identity and human worth. The opening image of transformation becomes the lens through which readers interpret Gregor’s relationships with family, work, and self, demonstrating how initial imagery can organize thematic interpretation of everything that follows. Similarly, Gabriel García Márquez’s opening to “One Hundred Years of Solitude”—”Many years later, as he faced the firing squad, Colonel Aurelindo Buendía was to remember that distant afternoon when his father took him to discover ice”—introduces themes of time, memory, wonder, and mortality that structure the entire novel’s magical realist exploration of history and human experience (García Márquez, 1967).
The linguistic choices made in opening lines—diction, syntax, rhythm, and style—also establish thematic concerns by signaling the narrative’s relationship to language itself and the philosophical worldview that language embodies. Ernest Hemingway’s opening to “A Farewell to Arms”—”In the late summer of that year we lived in a house in a village that looked across the river and the plain to the mountains”—establishes the sparse, declarative style and the emphasis on concrete physical reality that characterizes his exploration of how language fails to capture war’s trauma and love’s complexity (Hemingway, 1929). The deceptively simple syntax and the vague temporal reference (“that year”) suggest both the difficulty of articulation and the universalizing of particular experience that the novel pursues thematically. Ralph Ellison’s “Invisible Man” opens with a thematic declaration—”I am an invisible man”—that announces the novel’s central concern with racial identity, social visibility, and existential recognition while establishing the first-person confessional mode through which these themes will be explored (Ellison, 1952). The opening’s direct statement of invisibility creates a metaphor that the entire novel elaborates, demonstrating how thematic material can be presented explicitly in opening lines rather than embedded symbolically. These examples illustrate how opening lines function as thematic overtures, introducing the conceptual material that the narrative will develop while establishing the linguistic and stylistic means through which that development will occur.
The Psychological Function of Closing Lines
Closing lines carry profound psychological importance because they provide the final impression that shapes readers’ lasting relationship with the narrative and determines whether the reading experience feels complete, satisfying, and meaningful. The last sentence represents the author’s final opportunity to guide interpretation, create emotional resonance, and ensure that the narrative’s thematic concerns register with full impact. Psychologically, closing lines benefit from what psychologists call the “recency effect”—the tendency for people to remember most vividly the last items in a sequence—making the final words disproportionately influential in shaping overall memory and evaluation of the reading experience (Murdock, 1962). Writers recognize this psychological reality and craft closing lines to maximize emotional and thematic impact, often through striking imagery, rhythmic language, philosophical statements, or surprising revelations that crystallize meaning. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s closing to “The Great Gatsby”—”So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past”—provides a metaphorical summation that elevates the particular story of Jay Gatsby into a universal statement about American aspiration and the impossibility of recapturing lost time (Fitzgerald, 1925). The closing’s lyrical rhythm and maritime imagery create an emotionally resonant ending that readers remember long after forgetting specific plot details.
The psychological function of closing lines also involves providing what literary theorist Frank Kermode called “the sense of an ending,” a feeling of closure and completion that satisfies the human need for pattern and meaning in narrative experience (Kermode, 1967). Humans naturally seek narrative coherence and resolution, and closing lines fulfill this psychological need by signaling that the story’s arc has reached its proper conclusion. However, the nature of this closure varies significantly across different narrative approaches. Some closing lines provide definitive resolution, answering all questions and tying up all narrative threads, offering the psychological satisfaction of complete understanding. Other closing lines deliberately withhold complete closure, leaving questions unanswered or situations unresolved, which can create productive ambiguity that extends the reading experience beyond the text’s physical boundaries as readers continue contemplating possible interpretations. James Joyce’s “The Dead” closes with an image of snow falling across Ireland, a poetic vision that suggests both death’s universality and the obliteration of individual distinction, leaving readers with haunting imagery rather than definitive answers (Joyce, 1914). The psychological effectiveness of closing lines depends on their alignment with the narrative’s overall approach to meaning-making and their success in providing the particular kind of ending—resolved or ambiguous, hopeful or tragic, realistic or symbolic—that the story’s development has prepared readers to receive and value.
Circular Narrative Structures: When Endings Echo Beginnings
Many powerful narratives employ circular structures where closing lines deliberately echo, mirror, or directly respond to opening lines, creating formal symmetry that emphasizes thematic development and character transformation. This technique, sometimes called “ring composition” or “circular narrative,” creates a sense of aesthetic completeness while highlighting the distance traveled between beginning and end. When closing lines return to opening imagery or language, the repetition itself becomes meaningful, inviting readers to compare the two moments and recognize how context has altered significance. García Márquez’s “Chronicle of a Death Foretold” opens with “On the day they were going to kill him, Santiago Nasar got up at five-thirty in the morning” and circles back throughout to this fatal day, with the closing returning to the murder’s inevitability despite everyone’s foreknowledge, emphasizing themes of fate, collective guilt, and the failure of community (García Márquez, 1981). The circular structure reinforces the narrative’s exploration of how societies create and permit violence while claiming helplessness before destiny.
T.S. Eliot’s “East Coker” from “Four Quartets” explicitly employs circular structure with its famous opening and closing: the poem begins “In my beginning is my end” and closes “In my end is my beginning,” creating a perfect circle that embodies the poem’s meditation on time, mortality, and spiritual renewal (Eliot, 1940). This conscious circularity demonstrates how endings that return to beginnings can create philosophical statements about the nature of existence itself, suggesting cyclical rather than linear understandings of time and experience. In fiction, Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” opens with Scout’s adult retrospective voice introducing her brother Jem’s broken arm and closes with Scout standing on the Radley porch, achieving the perspective-taking that Atticus has taught her throughout the novel (Lee, 1960). The ending’s return to the opening’s concern with Boo Radley creates circularity that emphasizes Scout’s moral and emotional growth—she has literally and figuratively moved from her own perspective to seeing from another’s viewpoint. These circular structures demonstrate how the relationship between opening and closing lines can create formal patterns that reinforce thematic concerns, with the very structure of the narrative embodying its philosophical propositions about human experience, growth, and understanding.
Opening Lines and Genre Conventions
Opening lines frequently establish genre expectations by employing conventional formulations that signal to readers the type of story they are entering and the reading protocols appropriate for that genre. Genre fiction—mystery, romance, science fiction, fantasy, horror—often uses recognizable opening strategies that satisfy readers’ expectations while potentially subverting them in sophisticated ways. Mystery novels typically open with the introduction of a crime, a detective, or a situation that will require investigation, as in Raymond Chandler’s “The Big Sleep”: “It was about eleven o’clock in the morning, mid October, with the sun not shining and a look of hard wet rain in the clearness of the foothills” (Chandler, 1939). This opening establishes the noir atmosphere and detective fiction conventions while introducing Chandler’s literary style that elevated the genre. Romance novels conventionally open by introducing protagonists whose eventual romantic union readers anticipate, while science fiction openings often establish futuristic or alien settings through what critic Darko Suvin called “cognitive estrangement”—making the familiar strange to explore contemporary concerns through speculative distance (Suvin, 1979).
Literary fiction often deliberately plays with or subverts genre conventions through opening lines that signal sophisticated awareness of genre expectations. Kurt Vonnegut’s “Slaughterhouse-Five” opens with an explicitly anti-conventional statement: “All this happened, more or less. The war parts, anyway, are pretty much true” (Vonnegut, 1969). This meta-fictional opening acknowledges the fictional contract while claiming documentary truth, signaling the novel’s complex relationship to realism and its status as both personal testimony and imaginative construction. Vladimir Nabokov’s “Lolita” opens with the lyrically obsessive “Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta,” establishing an unreliable narrator whose aesthetic sophistication and moral corruption create the novel’s central tension (Nabokov, 1955). This opening demonstrates how literary fiction uses opening lines not simply to satisfy genre expectations but to establish complex narrative voices and ethical ambiguities that resist simple categorization. Understanding how opening lines negotiate genre conventions helps readers recognize both the comfort of familiar patterns and the artistic achievement involved in transforming or transcending generic limitations. The relationship between opening lines and genre expectations reveals how literature operates within and against established traditions, using conventional formulations as foundations for innovation and commentary on the forms themselves.
Thematic Resolution and Transformation in Closing Lines
Closing lines frequently provide thematic resolution by offering statements, images, or scenarios that synthesize the narrative’s philosophical concerns and suggest conclusions about the human experiences explored. This resolution can take multiple forms: explicit moral statements, symbolic images that crystallize meaning, character actions that demonstrate growth or change, or situational outcomes that embody thematic propositions. George Orwell’s “1984” closes with “He loved Big Brother,” a devastating statement that demonstrates the totalitarian state’s complete victory over individual consciousness and provides thematic resolution to the novel’s exploration of political control, language, truth, and resistance (Orwell, 1949). The closing’s horror derives from its fulfillment of the dystopian trajectory established throughout the novel, offering resolution in the form of total defeat rather than triumph. This demonstrates how thematic resolution need not be positive or hopeful but must provide completion of the thematic arc the narrative has traced.
However, many sophisticated narratives provide thematic resolution through ambiguity rather than certainty, offering closing lines that resist definitive interpretation and instead open multiple possible meanings. Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” closes with the narrator’s declaration “I’ve got out at last…in spite of you and Jane. And I’ve pulled off most of the paper, so you can’t put me back!” This ending can be read as liberation or complete mental breakdown, and the ambiguity itself constitutes the thematic point about women’s limited options under patriarchal constraint (Gilman, 1892). Kate Chopin’s “The Awakening” closes with Edna Pontellier walking into the sea, an act that readers have interpreted variously as suicide, transcendent liberation, or both simultaneously (Chopin, 1899). The closing’s resistance to single interpretation allows the novel to honor the complexity of women’s constrained choices in the late nineteenth century without reducing that complexity to a simple thematic statement. These ambiguous closings demonstrate that thematic resolution can involve opening rather than closing interpretive possibilities, inviting readers to grapple with the complexities the narrative has explored rather than providing comfortable answers. The relationship between opening promises and closing resolutions reveals how narratives construct meaning, whether through definitive statements that provide clarity or through productive ambiguities that extend the reading experience into ongoing contemplation and debate.
The Interplay Between Opening Hooks and Closing Resonance
The artistic relationship between opening lines’ function as “hooks” that capture attention and closing lines’ role in creating lasting “resonance” reveals fundamental truths about narrative structure and reader psychology. Opening lines must compel immediate interest through various strategies: mystery, dramatic action, striking voice, beautiful language, philosophical provocation, or situational intrigue. These hooks operate through what cognitive psychologists call “information gaps”—they present situations or questions that create curiosity and compel readers to continue for answers or resolution (Loewenstein, 1994). Gabriel García Márquez’s opening to “Chronicle of a Death Foretold”—”On the day they were going to kill him, Santiago Nasar got up at five-thirty in the morning to wait for the boat the bishop was coming on”—creates immediate mystery about who will kill Santiago and why, compelling continued reading to resolve this information gap. The hook’s effectiveness depends on establishing sufficient intrigue without revealing so much that curiosity is satisfied, maintaining the delicate balance between too little information (confusion) and too much (predictability).
Closing lines must provide resonance—the quality of lingering in consciousness and continuing to generate meaning after the reading concludes. Resonant endings achieve memorability through various means: striking imagery, rhythmic language, thematic crystallization, emotional power, or philosophical depth. James Baldwin’s “Sonny’s Blues” closes with the narrator watching his brother play piano: “And I was yet aware that this was only a moment, that the world waited outside, as hungry as a tiger, and that trouble stretched above us, longer than the sky,” creating resonance through its acknowledgment of both transcendent artistic moment and ongoing struggle (Baldwin, 1957). The closing’s power derives from its refusal to offer false hope while honoring the genuine solace that artistic expression and fraternal love provide against life’s difficulties. The interplay between opening hooks and closing resonance represents the narrative arc’s fundamental shape—beginning with questions or provocations that draw readers in, developing through complications and revelations, and concluding with moments that satisfy curiosity while creating lasting impression. Masterful narratives calibrate this relationship carefully, ensuring that closings fulfill promises made in openings while often revealing that the initial questions were themselves reductive, and the narrative has explored more complex concerns than the opening alone suggested.
Opening and Closing Lines in Short Fiction versus Novels
The function and significance of opening and closing lines differ between short fiction and novels due to these forms’ distinct structural requirements and reading experiences. Short stories, which readers typically consume in single sittings, depend more heavily on immediately striking opening lines and powerfully resonant closing lines because these bookend moments more directly shape the compressed reading experience. Short story openings must establish situation, character, conflict, and tone with extraordinary economy, often doing in a single sentence what novels accomplish across pages or chapters. Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral” opens “This blind man, an old friend of my wife’s, he was on his way to spend the night,” immediately establishing character relationships, creating mild tension through the narrator’s uncomfortable phrasing, and raising questions that will structure the story’s development (Carver, 1981). Short story closings carry immense weight because they provide the final impression of a compact experience, often employing what critic Charles May called “the epiphanic moment”—a sudden revelation or realization that crystallizes the story’s meaning in its final lines (May, 2002).
Novels, by contrast, distribute the work of engagement and meaning-making across hundreds of pages and multiple reading sessions, which allows opening and closing lines to function differently within larger structural patterns. Novel openings can afford to establish mood or situation more gradually, though many novels still employ striking first lines to create immediate interest. The novel’s closing must synthesize and conclude a much more complex narrative journey, often dealing with multiple characters, plotlines, and thematic concerns. Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice” opens with the famous “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife,” establishing the novel’s ironic narrative voice and thematic concern with marriage and economics (Austen, 1813). The novel’s closing, describing the happiness of Elizabeth and Darcy’s marriage and the fates of other characters, provides extended resolution appropriate to the form’s complexity. The relationship between opening and closing spans much greater narrative distance in novels, creating broader arcs of development and transformation. However, both forms recognize that opening and closing lines carry special significance as threshold moments that shape reader experience, with the specific strategies appropriate to each form reflecting their different structures and reading experiences.
Modernist and Postmodernist Innovations in Opening and Closing Lines
Modernist and postmodernist literature transformed conventions surrounding opening and closing lines, often deliberately frustrating traditional expectations for clear beginnings and definitive endings. Modernist writers like James Joyce and Virginia Woolf experimented with opening lines that plunged readers into streams of consciousness or fragmented perspectives without conventional exposition or narrative orientation. Joyce’s “Ulysses” famously opens mid-sentence—”Stately, plump Buck Mulligan came from the stairhead, bearing a bowl of lather on which a mirror and a razor lay crossed”—presenting action without introduction or explanation, requiring readers to construct context from accumulating details (Joyce, 1922). This modernist technique reflects philosophical commitments to representing consciousness realistically and rejecting the artificial clarity of Victorian narrative conventions. Virginia Woolf’s “Mrs. Dalloway” opens “Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself,” a deceptively simple statement that introduces both the novel’s ordinary domestic focus and the stream-of-consciousness technique through which Woolf will explore the profound significance of ordinary moments (Woolf, 1925).
Postmodernist writers pushed these innovations further, often creating radically unconventional openings and closings that questioned narrative authority, fictional reality, and the possibility of meaningful resolution. Italo Calvino’s “If on a winter’s night a traveler” opens by directly addressing the reader: “You are about to begin reading Italo Calvino’s new novel, If on a winter’s night a traveler. Relax. Concentrate,” creating a metafictional opening that makes the reading experience itself the novel’s subject (Calvino, 1979). Samuel Beckett’s endings often resist closure entirely, as in “The Unnamable,” which closes with “I can’t go on, I’ll go on,” refusing resolution and instead affirming the impossibility of ending (Beckett, 1953). These experimental approaches to opening and closing reflect postmodernist skepticism about grand narratives, fixed meanings, and the authority of authorial voice. Contemporary writers continue experimenting with these boundaries, creating novels that open mid-action, close ambiguously, or deliberately blur the distinction between beginning and ending through circular or fragmented structures. Understanding modernist and postmodernist innovations helps readers recognize how opening and closing lines function not as natural narrative features but as conventional constructions that writers can transform, subvert, or reimagine to create new possibilities for how stories can begin, develop, and conclude. These experimental approaches demonstrate that the significance of opening and closing lines extends beyond their content to encompass their formal properties and their relationship to narrative conventions themselves.
The Craft of Writing Opening and Closing Lines
For writers, crafting effective opening and closing lines represents one of fiction’s most challenging and consequential tasks, requiring simultaneous attention to multiple considerations including voice, tone, information delivery, reader psychology, and thematic resonance. Writers approach these crucial moments through various compositional strategies. Some authors write opening lines only after completing entire drafts, recognizing that they cannot know the true beginning until they understand where the story goes. Gabriel García Márquez reportedly rewrote the opening paragraph of “One Hundred Years of Solitude” numerous times before achieving the version that perfectly introduces the novel’s temporal complexity, magical realist mode, and central character (Bell-Villada, 2010). Other writers begin with opening lines that generate the entire narrative, allowing initial sentences to dictate subsequent development. Ray Bradbury described how “The Illustrated Man” emerged from a single image of a tattooed man whose pictures became stories, demonstrating how opening concepts can organize entire works.
Writing effective closing lines requires equally careful consideration, as writers must balance satisfying readers’ desire for closure with avoiding predictability or reductive simplification. The challenge intensifies because closing lines must work both as immediate culminations of what precedes them and as lasting impressions that readers carry away from the complete work. Many writers report struggling more with endings than beginnings, as closings must honor all the complexity developed throughout the narrative while still providing a sense of completion. Toni Morrison described her approach to endings as finding “the note that the book has been moving toward,” suggesting that effective closings fulfill trajectories established earlier rather than introducing entirely new material (Morrison, 1998). Writers also consider technical aspects of closing lines, including rhythm, imagery, and whether to close with dialogue, action, or reflection. The craft of creating opening and closing lines thus involves both artistic intuition and technical skill, requiring writers to understand how these threshold moments function psychologically, thematically, and aesthetically. Examining how accomplished writers craft these crucial lines provides insight into narrative construction’s fundamental challenges and the various strategies available for meeting them successfully.
Cultural and Historical Variations in Opening and Closing Conventions
Opening and closing conventions vary significantly across cultures and historical periods, reflecting different narrative traditions, philosophical assumptions, and reader expectations. Classical Western literature often employed formulaic openings like Homer’s invocations to the muse at the beginning of “The Iliad” and “The Odyssey,” establishing divine inspiration as the source of poetic authority. Medieval romances frequently opened with seasonal descriptions or explicit moral frameworks that contextualized the narratives to follow. Non-Western narrative traditions developed different conventions—Chinese classical novels like “Journey to the West” often began with cosmological or historical contexts that situated particular stories within vast temporal and spiritual frameworks (Wu, 2012). Japanese literature developed traditions of opening with seasonal imagery that established mood and temporal setting while carrying symbolic significance, as seen in works from “The Tale of Genji” forward. These cultural variations demonstrate that opening and closing strategies reflect not universal narrative laws but historically and culturally specific conventions that writers adapt to their particular contexts and purposes.
The rise of the novel in eighteenth-century Europe established new conventions for openings and closings that balanced emerging realist commitments to verisimilitude with inherited romance and epic traditions. Nineteenth-century novels developed conventions of extensive exposition in opening chapters, establishing social contexts, character backgrounds, and narrative situations before advancing plots. Victorian novels often provided elaborate closing chapters that detailed characters’ subsequent fates, marriages, deaths, and moral outcomes, reflecting these works’ didactic purposes and their serial publication formats that created expectations for comprehensive closure (Hughes & Lund, 1991). Twentieth-century modernism’s rejection of Victorian conventions produced the experimental approaches to opening and closing discussed previously, while contemporary global literature continues developing new conventions reflecting postcolonial perspectives, digital age consciousness, and increasingly transnational literary exchange. Understanding these cultural and historical variations prevents treating any particular approach to opening and closing as universal or necessary, instead recognizing how these narrative moments reflect and construct specific relationships between authors, readers, texts, and the cultural contexts within which they operate. This historical and cultural awareness enriches interpretation by allowing readers to recognize how opening and closing strategies participate in larger conversations about narrative authority, meaning-making, and literature’s social functions.
References
Austen, J. (1813). Pride and Prejudice. T. Egerton.
Baldwin, J. (1957). Sonny’s Blues. In Going to meet the man. Dial Press.
Beckett, S. (1953). The Unnamable. Grove Press.
Bell-Villada, G. H. (2010). García Márquez: The man and his work. University of North Carolina Press.
Calvino, I. (1979). If on a winter’s night a traveler. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Carver, R. (1981). Cathedral. In Cathedral. Alfred A. Knopf.
Chandler, R. (1939). The Big Sleep. Alfred A. Knopf.
Chopin, K. (1899). The Awakening. Herbert S. Stone & Company.
Eliot, T. S. (1940). East Coker. In Four Quartets. Faber and Faber.
Ellison, R. (1952). Invisible Man. Random House.
Fitzgerald, F. S. (1925). The Great Gatsby. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
García Márquez, G. (1967). One Hundred Years of Solitude. Harper & Row.
García Márquez, G. (1981). Chronicle of a Death Foretold. Alfred A. Knopf.
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Cornell University Press.
Gilman, C. P. (1892). The Yellow Wallpaper. The New England Magazine, 11, 647-656.
Hemingway, E. (1929). A Farewell to Arms. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Hughes, L. K., & Lund, M. (1991). The Victorian serial. University Press of Virginia.
Irving, J. (1998). The imaginary girlfriend: A memoir. Arcade Publishing.
Joyce, J. (1914). The Dead. In Dubliners. Grant Richards Ltd.
Joyce, J. (1922). Ulysses. Shakespeare and Company.
Kafka, F. (1915). The Metamorphosis. Kurt Wolff Verlag.
Kermode, F. (1967). The sense of an ending: Studies in the theory of fiction. Oxford University Press.
Lee, H. (1960). To Kill a Mockingbird. J. B. Lippincott & Co.
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98.
May, C. E. (2002). The short story: The reality of artifice. Routledge.
McEwan, I. (2002). Hello, would you like a free book? The Guardian, September 20, 2002.
Morrison, T. (1998). Paradise. Alfred A. Knopf.
Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482-488.
Nabokov, V. (1955). Lolita. Olympia Press.
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. Secker & Warburg.
Suvin, D. (1979). Metamorphoses of science fiction: On the poetics and history of a literary genre. Yale University Press.
Vonnegut, K. (1969). Slaughterhouse-Five. Delacorte Press.
Woolf, V. (1925). Mrs. Dalloway. Hogarth Press.
Wu, C. (2012). The journey to the west (A. C. Yu, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.