How Has The Handmaid’s Tale Influenced Modern Dystopian Literature?
Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale (1985) has profoundly influenced modern dystopian literature by establishing a feminist dystopian framework that centers women’s reproductive rights, bodily autonomy, and systemic oppression as central dystopian themes. The novel pioneered the use of speculative fiction grounded in historical reality, inspiring subsequent authors to create dystopias that extrapolate from contemporary social anxieties rather than distant technological futures. Atwood’s narrative techniques, including the unreliable first-person narrator, fragmented storytelling, and ambiguous endings, have become standard conventions in contemporary dystopian fiction. The novel’s impact extends to young adult dystopian literature, cli-fi (climate fiction), and feminist speculative fiction, with works such as Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games trilogy, Naomi Alderman’s The Power, and Christina Dalcher’s Vox directly echoing Atwood’s thematic concerns and narrative strategies. The sustained cultural relevance of The Handmaid’s Tale, amplified by its television adaptation and political symbolism in feminist activism, continues to shape how authors approach dystopian storytelling in the twenty-first century.
What Is The Handmaid’s Tale and Why Is It Significant?
The Handmaid’s Tale is a dystopian novel published in 1985 by Canadian author Margaret Atwood that depicts the fictional Republic of Gilead, a totalitarian theocracy established in the former United States where women are stripped of all rights and reduced to their reproductive functions. The narrative follows Offred, a Handmaid forced into sexual servitude to bear children for the ruling class, as she navigates surveillance, violence, and the erasure of her former identity. Atwood deliberately constructed this dystopia using only historical precedents, refusing to include any oppression that had not already occurred somewhere in human history, which grounds the novel’s speculative elements in disturbing reality (Atwood, 2017). This methodological approach distinguishes The Handmaid’s Tale from earlier science fiction dystopias that relied heavily on futuristic technology or alien invasions, instead positioning patriarchal control over women’s bodies as the primary mechanism of totalitarian power.
The novel’s significance lies not only in its literary merit but also in its prescient exploration of themes that have become increasingly relevant in contemporary political discourse. Published during the Reagan era when conservative movements in the United States were gaining momentum around reproductive rights and traditional gender roles, Atwood’s work served as a cautionary tale about the fragility of women’s autonomy and the potential for religious fundamentalism to reshape democratic societies (Neuman, 1996). The book won the Arthur C. Clarke Award and was nominated for the Booker Prize, establishing Atwood as a major voice in speculative fiction and feminist literature. Beyond its immediate critical acclaim, The Handmaid’s Tale has maintained cultural relevance for nearly four decades, experiencing renewed popularity following the 2016 United States presidential election and the subsequent rise of political movements advocating for reproductive restrictions. The novel’s enduring impact demonstrates its effectiveness as both a work of literature and a political statement, cementing its position as one of the most influential dystopian texts of the twentieth century.
How Did The Handmaid’s Tale Establish Feminist Dystopian Literature as a Genre?
Before The Handmaid’s Tale, dystopian literature was predominantly concerned with totalitarianism, technological advancement, and surveillance states, with canonical works such as George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World focusing primarily on male protagonists and state control mechanisms that affected society broadly rather than targeting specific gender-based oppression. While earlier feminist science fiction writers like Ursula K. Le Guin and Joanna Russ had explored gender dynamics in speculative settings, Atwood’s novel specifically centered the female body as the primary site of dystopian control, making reproductive rights and bodily autonomy the foundation of totalitarian power rather than peripheral concerns (Howells, 1996). This shift reframed dystopian fiction to foreground women’s experiences and positioned feminist concerns as central rather than tangential to understanding authoritarian systems. Atwood’s work demonstrated that control over women’s reproduction constitutes a fundamental mechanism of totalitarian governance, not merely a side effect, thereby establishing a new paradigm for dystopian storytelling.
The influence of this feminist framework is evident in the proliferation of dystopian novels written after 1985 that explicitly center women’s experiences of oppression and resistance. Works such as Octavia Butler’s Parable series (1993-1998), which explores environmental collapse through the experiences of a Black woman prophet, and P.D. James’ The Children of Men (1992), which imagines a world of universal infertility where women’s bodies become sites of political contestation, demonstrate the lasting impact of Atwood’s approach (Tolan, 2007). More recently, novels like Christina Dalcher’s Vox (2018), which depicts a United States where women are limited to speaking only one hundred words per day, and Sophie Mackintosh’s The Water Cure (2018), which explores extreme patriarchal control in an isolated community, continue to build on the foundation Atwood established. These works share common elements with The Handmaid’s Tale: they ground speculative scenarios in contemporary anxieties about women’s rights, they use bodily autonomy as a measure of freedom, and they explore how patriarchal systems intersect with other forms of oppression to create distinctly gendered dystopias. The feminist dystopian genre that Atwood helped establish has become one of the most vibrant and commercially successful categories in contemporary speculative fiction, demonstrating both the literary and market influence of her pioneering work.
What Narrative Techniques from The Handmaid’s Tale Have Influenced Contemporary Dystopian Fiction?
Atwood employed several distinctive narrative techniques in The Handmaid’s Tale that have since become conventions in contemporary dystopian literature, fundamentally altering how authors construct dystopian narratives. The most significant innovation is her use of a fragmented, first-person narrative voice that reflects the protagonist’s limited knowledge and unreliable perspective, forcing readers to piece together the broader political and social context from incomplete information (Staels, 1995). Unlike the omniscient or limited third-person narration common in earlier dystopian works, Offred’s narration is deliberately subjective, filled with digressions, memories, and uncertainty, which creates an intimate connection between reader and protagonist while simultaneously highlighting how totalitarian systems control information and distort individual perception. This technique emphasizes the lived experience of dystopian oppression rather than providing a comprehensive sociological analysis, making the horror of Gilead more immediate and personal.
The influence of Atwood’s narrative approach is particularly evident in young adult dystopian literature, where first-person narration has become nearly universal. Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games trilogy (2008-2010) employs Katniss Everdeen’s limited first-person perspective to gradually reveal the oppressive structure of Panem, deliberately withholding information from both protagonist and reader to mirror the experience of living under totalitarian control (Henthorne, 2012). Similarly, Veronica Roth’s Divergent series (2011-2013) uses Tris Prior’s subjective narration to explore how individuals internalize dystopian ideologies even as they resist them. Beyond young adult literature, adult dystopian novels such as Naomi Alderman’s The Power (2016) and Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven (2014) employ multiple first-person perspectives and fragmented timelines that echo Atwood’s technique of revealing dystopian realities through subjective, incomplete narratives. Additionally, Atwood’s use of an ambiguous ending, where readers learn about Offred’s fate only through the framing device of a historical symposium two hundred years later, has influenced numerous contemporary dystopian novels that refuse neat resolutions and instead emphasize ongoing struggle and uncertainty. This narrative choice reflects a more realistic understanding of social change as gradual and incomplete rather than revolutionary and definitive, marking a significant departure from earlier dystopian literature that often concluded with clear victories or defeats.
How Has The Handmaid’s Tale Influenced Young Adult Dystopian Literature?
The explosion of young adult dystopian literature in the early twenty-first century owes a significant debt to The Handmaid’s Tale, even though Atwood’s novel was written for adult audiences and addresses explicitly adult themes. The thematic concerns that Atwood introduced—including reproductive rights, bodily autonomy, state control over intimate relationships, and the resistance of individuals against systemic oppression—reappear throughout young adult dystopian fiction, adapted for younger audiences but maintaining the core focus on bodily sovereignty and gendered oppression (Day, Green-Barteet, and Montz, 2014). Suzanne Collins has acknowledged in interviews that contemporary political concerns, including reproductive rights debates, influenced The Hunger Games, and the parallels between Katniss Everdeen’s commodification as both tribute and symbol and Offred’s reduction to a reproductive vessel are striking. Both protagonists are stripped of agency over their own bodies, forced into roles defined entirely by their biological functions and their usefulness to the state, and both must navigate systems designed to eliminate individual identity in favor of functional categories.
The influence extends beyond thematic parallels to narrative structure and world-building conventions. Like Gilead, many young adult dystopias feature societies built on the ruins of recognizable contemporary nations, using familiar geography and cultural references to create a sense of plausible decline rather than distant alien worlds (Basu, Broad, and Hintz, 2013). Ally Condie’s Matched trilogy (2010-2012), which depicts a society where the government controls all aspects of citizens’ lives including romantic partnerships and reproduction, directly echoes Gilead’s regulation of sexuality and intimacy. Lauren DeStefano’s The Chemical Garden trilogy (2011-2013) centers on forced reproduction in a world where women die young, making bodily autonomy and reproductive choice central dystopian concerns in ways that clearly follow Atwood’s template. Even dystopias that do not explicitly focus on gender and reproduction, such as Scott Westerfeld’s Uglies series (2005-2007), which explores compulsory cosmetic surgery, engage with Atwood’s themes of state control over bodies and the ways individuals internalize and resist systemic oppression. The commercial success of these young adult dystopias, many of which became bestsellers and film franchises, demonstrates how Atwood’s feminist dystopian framework has been adapted for new audiences and new political contexts, extending her influence across generations and reading demographics.
What Is the Connection Between The Handmaid’s Tale and Climate Fiction?
While The Handmaid’s Tale is not primarily concerned with environmental catastrophe, the novel’s attention to biological and ecological threats as catalysts for dystopian transformation has significantly influenced the development of climate fiction, or cli-fi, as a literary genre. Gilead emerges in response to widespread infertility caused by environmental pollution and nuclear accidents, making ecological degradation a foundational element of the dystopian scenario rather than merely background detail (Atwood, 1985). This framing establishes environmental damage as a political issue with profound social consequences, particularly for women whose bodies become battlegrounds when fertility declines. Atwood’s approach demonstrated how environmental crises could serve as plausible mechanisms for rapid social and political transformation, providing a template for later climate fiction authors who explore how ecological collapse might reshape human societies.
Atwood herself has continued to explore these connections in her sequel The Testaments (2019) and in her MaddAddam trilogy (2003-2013), which more explicitly engages with genetic engineering, pandemic disease, and environmental catastrophe, establishing her as a significant figure in climate fiction as well as feminist dystopia (DiMarco, 2020). Contemporary cli-fi authors such as Claire Vaye Watkins (Gold Fame Citrus, 2015), Omar El Akkad (American War, 2017), and Lidia Yuknavitch (The Book of Joan, 2017) combine environmental collapse with the feminist dystopian framework Atwood established, depicting worlds where ecological crisis exacerbates existing gender inequalities and creates new forms of bodily control. These works share Atwood’s understanding that environmental and reproductive politics are inseparable, as control over nature and control over women’s bodies represent parallel expressions of patriarchal power. The cli-fi genre has increasingly incorporated feminist analysis in ways that directly reference or build upon The Handmaid’s Tale, recognizing that Atwood’s novel pioneered the connection between ecological concerns and feminist speculative fiction that has become central to contemporary climate literature.
How Has The Handmaid’s Tale Shaped Contemporary Feminist Speculative Fiction?
The Handmaid’s Tale established key conventions that continue to define feminist speculative fiction in the twenty-first century, particularly the practice of grounding speculative scenarios in historical precedent and contemporary political anxieties rather than purely imaginative extrapolation. Atwood’s insistence that every element of Gilead has occurred in some form in actual human history—from reproductive slavery to compulsory religious observance—created a model for speculative fiction that functions as political commentary and social criticism (Atwood, 2017). This approach has influenced a generation of feminist speculative fiction writers who use dystopian and science fiction frameworks to explore pressing contemporary issues including reproductive rights, sexual violence, economic inequality, and racial injustice. The result is a body of literature that resists categorization as either “realistic” fiction or “escapist” genre writing, instead occupying a space where speculative elements serve to illuminate and critique actual social conditions.
Naomi Alderman’s The Power (2016), which imagines a world where women develop the ability to generate electrical charges and subsequently dominate men, explicitly engages with The Handmaid’s Tale through its structure, which frames the narrative as a historical manuscript being evaluated by future scholars in a manner directly paralleling Atwood’s “Historical Notes” epilogue (Alderman, 2016). Alderman has publicly acknowledged Atwood’s influence and even received mentorship from Atwood during the novel’s composition, making The Power a direct literary descendant of The Handmaid’s Tale. Similarly, Louise O’Neill’s Only Ever Yours (2014), set in a school where girls are bred and trained to become either wives, concubines, or teachers, and Jenni Fagan’s The Sunlight Pilgrims (2015), which explores gender identity in the context of climate crisis, demonstrate the continued relevance of Atwood’s feminist dystopian framework. These contemporary works share Atwood’s concern with bodily autonomy, systemic misogyny, and the ways individuals navigate oppressive systems, while also expanding the framework to address intersectional identities and contemporary political developments. The influence of The Handmaid’s Tale on feminist speculative fiction extends beyond direct thematic borrowing to include a broader understanding of speculative fiction as a vehicle for feminist political thought and social critique.
What Role Has the Television Adaptation Played in Extending the Novel’s Literary Influence?
The critically acclaimed Hulu television adaptation of The Handmaid’s Tale, which premiered in 2017 and has continued for multiple seasons extending beyond Atwood’s original novel, has significantly amplified the book’s cultural presence and literary influence. The timing of the adaptation’s premiere, shortly after the 2016 United States presidential election and amid renewed debates over reproductive rights, abortion access, and women’s healthcare, positioned the show as a cultural touchstone for contemporary feminist resistance (Mead, 2018). The visual iconography of the show, particularly the red robes and white bonnets worn by Handmaids, became symbols of feminist protest worldwide, with activists wearing these costumes at demonstrations concerning reproductive rights, religious freedom, and women’s autonomy. This cultural visibility has driven renewed interest in dystopian literature generally and feminist dystopian fiction specifically, creating commercial opportunities for both new authors working in similar modes and reissues of earlier feminist speculative fiction.
The television adaptation’s influence on literature extends beyond simply increasing readership of Atwood’s novel to shaping how contemporary authors approach dystopian storytelling. The show’s expansion of supporting characters’ narratives, its exploration of life in Gilead beyond Offred’s limited perspective, and its continued story beyond the novel’s ambiguous ending have demonstrated possibilities for extended dystopian world-building that subsequent novels have adopted (Grubisic, 2020). Authors writing feminist dystopias after 2017 are aware that readers may approach their work through the lens of the television adaptation, leading to more cinematic narrative techniques, more attention to visual symbolism and costume, and more explicit engagement with contemporary political movements. The adaptation has also sparked renewed academic and critical interest in The Handmaid’s Tale, resulting in new scholarly work that examines both the novel and its legacy, further cementing its position as a central text in dystopian literature. The symbiotic relationship between the television adaptation and the novel has created a feedback loop where the show’s popularity drives literary interest, which in turn validates continued investment in the adaptation, ensuring that Atwood’s influence on dystopian literature remains robust and dynamic rather than merely historical.
How Does The Handmaid’s Tale Compare to Earlier Dystopian Literature?
To fully appreciate The Handmaid’s Tale‘s influence on subsequent dystopian literature, it is essential to understand how Atwood’s novel departed from earlier dystopian conventions established by canonical works such as George Orwell’s 1984 (1949), Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World (1932), and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 (1953). These earlier dystopias primarily concerned themselves with totalitarian political structures, technological control, and the suppression of intellectual freedom, typically featuring male protagonists whose resistance centered on preserving individual thought and authentic human connection against mechanized state surveillance (Baccolini and Moylan, 2003). While these works occasionally addressed gender, they rarely centered women’s experiences or examined patriarchal control as a fundamental mechanism of dystopian oppression. Women in these earlier dystopias often appeared as symbols of either corruption or redemption rather than fully realized characters with their own narrative agency and political consciousness.
Atwood’s innovation was to demonstrate that gender oppression and reproductive control could serve as the primary architecture of dystopia rather than secondary concerns. In Gilead, the state’s power derives fundamentally from its control over women’s bodies and reproductive capacity, making the personal explicitly political in ways that earlier dystopias had not explored (Neuman, 1996). This shift influenced subsequent dystopian authors to recognize that effective dystopian critique must address intersecting systems of oppression including gender, race, class, and sexuality rather than treating totalitarianism as an abstract or universal phenomenon affecting all citizens equally. Contemporary dystopian literature after The Handmaid’s Tale tends to feature more diverse protagonists, more attention to how dystopian systems differentially affect various populations, and more explicit engagement with real-world political movements and historical atrocities. Octavia Butler’s Parable series, written after The Handmaid’s Tale, exemplifies this shift by centering a Black woman protagonist and explicitly addressing how race and gender intersect in dystopian contexts. The movement from universal dystopian subjects to particularized, embodied experiences of oppression represents one of The Handmaid’s Tale‘s most significant contributions to the evolution of dystopian literature.
What Are the Key Thematic Contributions of The Handmaid’s Tale to Dystopian Literature?
The Handmaid’s Tale introduced several thematic concerns that have become central to contemporary dystopian literature, fundamentally expanding the range of issues that dystopian fiction addresses. The most significant thematic contribution is the foregrounding of reproductive rights and bodily autonomy as sites of political struggle and totalitarian control. By depicting a society where women’s value is reduced entirely to their reproductive capacity and where the state claims absolute authority over pregnancy, childbirth, and sexuality, Atwood demonstrated that control over reproduction represents a fundamental form of political power (Atwood, 1985). This theme has proven remarkably resonant in subsequent decades as debates over abortion rights, contraception access, surrogacy regulation, and reproductive technology have intensified globally. Contemporary dystopian novels regularly feature reproductive control as a central mechanism of oppression, from forced pregnancy to compulsory sterilization to the commodification of reproductive labor, indicating the lasting impact of Atwood’s thematic focus.
Additionally, The Handmaid’s Tale pioneered the exploration of how religion and fundamentalism can serve as justifications for totalitarian control, particularly over women. Gilead’s theocratic structure, which uses selective biblical interpretation to legitimize patriarchal oppression, rape, and slavery, has influenced numerous subsequent dystopias that examine the intersection of religious authority and political power (Stillman and Johnson, 1994). Margaret Atwood has noted that she drew on various historical examples of religious theocracy, from Puritan New England to contemporary Iran, to construct Gilead’s ideological foundations. This attention to religious fundamentalism as a dystopian mechanism has become increasingly relevant in contemporary global politics, as movements seeking to impose religious law have gained influence in various contexts. Recent dystopian novels such as Christina Dalcher’s Vox (2018) and Sophie Mackintosh’s The Water Cure (2018) continue to explore theocratic patriarchy in ways that clearly reference The Handmaid’s Tale, demonstrating the continued relevance of this thematic contribution. The novel also introduced sustained attention to language, naming, and identity as mechanisms of control, showing how totalitarian systems work to erase individual identity and replace it with functional categories—a theme that has influenced countless subsequent dystopian works concerned with surveillance, categorization, and the politics of naming.
How Has The Handmaid’s Tale Influenced Academic Scholarship on Dystopian Literature?
The Handmaid’s Tale has not only influenced creative writers but has also profoundly shaped academic scholarship on dystopian literature, establishing new frameworks for analyzing and theorizing dystopian texts. The novel prompted scholars to develop the concept of “critical dystopia,” which distinguishes contemporary dystopian literature from earlier “classical” dystopias by emphasizing sustained critique, ambiguous endings, and the possibility of resistance within dystopian systems (Baccolini and Moylan, 2003). Unlike classical dystopias that often ended with the triumph of the totalitarian state over individual resistance, critical dystopias maintain utopian hope and emphasize ongoing struggle rather than definitive defeat. The Handmaid’s Tale‘s ambiguous ending, where Offred’s fate remains unknown and readers must rely on the historical symposium for limited information about Gilead’s eventual collapse, exemplifies this critical dystopian approach and has influenced both subsequent fiction and scholarly analysis.
The novel has also generated extensive feminist scholarship examining the relationship between dystopian fiction and feminist political theory, establishing dystopian literature as a significant site for exploring feminist concerns (Howells, 1996). Academic studies of The Handmaid’s Tale have examined issues including reproductive rights, surrogacy ethics, religious fundamentalism, environmental degradation, and the politics of memory and testimony, demonstrating the novel’s richness as an object of scholarly inquiry. This body of scholarship has legitimized dystopian fiction, and speculative fiction more broadly, as worthy of serious academic attention rather than dismissing it as mere genre entertainment. The academic interest in The Handmaid’s Tale has created opportunities for other feminist speculative fiction writers to receive scholarly attention, contributing to the broader recognition of speculative fiction as a valuable mode of political and philosophical inquiry. Contemporary scholarship continues to engage with The Handmaid’s Tale in new contexts, examining its relationship to digital surveillance, biopolitics, neoliberalism, and climate crisis, ensuring that the novel remains relevant to current theoretical conversations and continues to shape how scholars approach dystopian literature.
What Is the Global Impact of The Handmaid’s Tale on International Dystopian Literature?
While The Handmaid’s Tale was written by a Canadian author and primarily addresses concerns relevant to North American political contexts, its influence extends globally, affecting dystopian literature in diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. The novel has been translated into more than forty languages and has inspired dystopian fiction addressing region-specific concerns about women’s rights, religious fundamentalism, and authoritarianism (Atwood, 2017). In Latin America, authors such as Claudia Piñeiro (Elena Knows, 2007) have written dystopian and speculative fiction addressing reproductive rights and bodily autonomy in ways that engage with Atwood’s themes while addressing specific regional contexts including abortion criminalization and femicide. In the Middle East and South Asia, writers have explored theocratic oppression and women’s resistance in dystopian frameworks that reference both local political realities and the literary precedent established by The Handmaid’s Tale.
European dystopian literature has similarly engaged with Atwood’s work, particularly in addressing resurgent nationalism, religious conservatism, and threats to reproductive rights within European contexts. British author Naomi Alderman’s The Power (2016) represents an explicit engagement with The Handmaid’s Tale from a British perspective, while German, French, and Scandinavian authors have produced dystopian literature addressing women’s rights and authoritarianism in ways informed by Atwood’s framework. The global circulation of The Handmaid’s Tale through translation, academic study, and popular culture has created a common reference point for international conversations about women’s rights, reproductive justice, and resistance to authoritarianism. The novel’s influence demonstrates how literary works can transcend their original cultural contexts to provide frameworks for understanding and critiquing diverse political situations, while also highlighting the universality of certain forms of gender-based oppression. The television adaptation’s global distribution through streaming platforms has further amplified this international impact, ensuring that new generations of readers and writers worldwide engage with Atwood’s vision and incorporate its lessons into their own creative and political work.
Conclusion
Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale has exerted an extraordinary and multifaceted influence on dystopian literature since its publication in 1985, fundamentally reshaping how authors approach dystopian storytelling and what themes dystopian fiction addresses. By centering women’s experiences, reproductive rights, and bodily autonomy as the primary mechanisms of dystopian control, Atwood established feminist dystopian literature as a vital genre and demonstrated that gender oppression represents a fundamental rather than peripheral concern for understanding totalitarian systems. The novel’s narrative innovations, including its fragmented first-person narration, unreliable perspective, and ambiguous ending, have become standard conventions in contemporary dystopian fiction, influencing both literary and young adult dystopian works.
The influence of The Handmaid’s Tale extends across multiple genres and audiences, shaping young adult dystopian literature, climate fiction, and feminist speculative fiction while also generating extensive academic scholarship that has legitimized speculative fiction as a site of serious political and philosophical inquiry. The novel’s continued cultural relevance, amplified by its television adaptation and its adoption as a symbol of feminist resistance, ensures that Atwood’s influence on dystopian literature remains dynamic rather than merely historical. Contemporary authors continue to engage with the themes, narrative techniques, and political concerns that The Handmaid’s Tale introduced, adapting them to address current political contexts while building on the foundation Atwood established. As debates over reproductive rights, religious fundamentalism, environmental crisis, and authoritarianism intensify globally, The Handmaid’s Tale remains an essential reference point for dystopian literature, demonstrating the power of speculative fiction to illuminate contemporary political struggles and imagine alternative futures.
References
Alderman, N. (2016). The Power. Viking Press.
Atwood, M. (1985). The Handmaid’s Tale. McClelland and Stewart.
Atwood, M. (2017). The Handmaid’s Tale (Television series). Hulu.
Baccolini, R., & Moylan, T. (Eds.). (2003). Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. Routledge.
Basu, B., Broad, K. R., & Hintz, C. (Eds.). (2013). Contemporary Dystopian Fiction for Young Adults: Brave New Teenagers. Routledge.
Day, S. K., Green-Barteet, M. A., & Montz, A. L. (Eds.). (2014). Female Rebellion in Young Adult Dystopian Fiction. Ashgate Publishing.
DiMarco, D. (2020). Revisiting Atwood’s Dystopias in the Context of Climate Change. In Margaret Atwood and the Poetics of Dystopia (pp. 89-112). Palgrave Macmillan.
Grubisic, B. J. (2020). Watching The Handmaid’s Tale: Television, Feminism, and the Dystopian Present. University of Toronto Press.
Henthorne, T. (2012). Approaching The Hunger Games Trilogy: A Literary and Cultural Analysis. McFarland.
Howells, C. A. (1996). Margaret Atwood. Macmillan.
Mead, R. (2018). Dystopian Fiction Speaks to Our Current Political Moment. The New Yorker, January 18.
Neuman, S. C. (1996). “Just a Backlash”: Margaret Atwood, Feminism, and The Handmaid’s Tale. University of Toronto Quarterly, 75(3), 857-868.
Staels, H. (1995). Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: Resistance Through Narrating. English Studies, 76(5), 455-464.
Stillman, P. G., & Johnson, A. S. (1994). Identity, Complicity, and Resistance in The Handmaid’s Tale. Utopian Studies, 5(2), 70-86.
Tolan, F. (2007). Margaret Atwood: Feminism and Fiction. Rodopi.