ExxonMobil’s Asset Portfolio Optimization through Papua New Guinea LNG Divestiture

Abstract

This paper examines ExxonMobil’s strategic asset portfolio optimization through its Papua New Guinea (PNG) LNG divestiture, analyzing the complex interplay between capital allocation efficiency, geographical diversification, and operational excellence in the global energy sector. ExxonMobil’s decision to divest from PNG LNG represents a paradigmatic shift in the company’s strategic approach to asset management, prioritizing high-return, low-cost opportunities while maintaining its position as a global LNG leader. The research investigates the strategic rationale behind this divestiture, examining how it aligns with ExxonMobil’s broader portfolio optimization strategy that has involved $15 billion in asset sales and a concentrated focus on the Permian Basin, Guyana, and selective LNG projects. Through comprehensive analysis of financial performance metrics, operational efficiency indicators, and strategic positioning factors, this study demonstrates how the PNG LNG divestiture exemplifies modern portfolio theory applications in the energy sector. The findings reveal that ExxonMobil’s strategic repositioning represents a sophisticated approach to maximizing shareholder value through selective asset optimization, operational excellence, and capital discipline in an increasingly competitive global energy landscape.

Keywords: ExxonMobil, Papua New Guinea LNG, asset portfolio optimization, divestiture strategy, LNG market, strategic asset management, capital allocation, energy sector optimization, portfolio theory

1. Introduction

The global energy industry has witnessed unprecedented transformation in recent decades, characterized by volatile commodity prices, evolving regulatory frameworks, and shifting investor expectations regarding capital efficiency and environmental sustainability. Within this dynamic environment, major integrated oil companies have increasingly adopted sophisticated portfolio optimization strategies to maximize shareholder value while maintaining operational excellence and strategic flexibility (Inkpen & Moffett, 2022). ExxonMobil Corporation, as one of the world’s largest publicly traded energy companies, has exemplified this strategic evolution through its comprehensive asset portfolio restructuring initiatives, including the strategic divestiture of its Papua New Guinea LNG operations.

The concept of asset portfolio optimization in the energy sector encompasses a multidimensional framework that integrates financial performance analysis, operational efficiency assessment, strategic positioning evaluation, and risk management considerations. This holistic approach requires energy companies to continuously assess their asset portfolios against evolving market conditions, technological developments, and strategic objectives to ensure optimal capital allocation and returns maximization (Favennec & Lorentz, 2021). ExxonMobil’s strategic decision to divest from Papua New Guinea LNG operations represents a compelling case study in how major energy companies apply sophisticated portfolio optimization principles to enhance long-term shareholder value.

ExxonMobil’s oil and gas portfolio has undergone significant transformation over recent years, including divestiture of $15 billion in assets and refocusing spending on the Permian Basin, Guyana, and LNG operations. This strategic repositioning reflects a fundamental shift toward capital discipline and operational excellence that prioritizes high-return, low-cost opportunities while maintaining competitive positioning in key strategic markets. The Papua New Guinea LNG divestiture serves as a critical component of this broader optimization strategy, demonstrating how major energy companies can enhance portfolio performance through selective asset management.

The research significance of this study extends beyond the specific case of ExxonMobil’s PNG LNG divestiture to encompass broader implications for strategic asset management in the global energy sector. The analysis provides valuable insights into how major integrated oil companies can successfully navigate complex divestiture processes while maintaining operational excellence and strategic positioning. Furthermore, the study contributes to the academic literature on portfolio optimization theory applications in the energy sector, providing empirical evidence of how theoretical frameworks can be successfully implemented in practice.

2. Literature Review

2.1 Portfolio Theory in Energy Sector Applications

The application of modern portfolio theory to energy sector asset management has evolved significantly since Markowitz’s foundational work on portfolio optimization, adapting to address the unique characteristics and challenges of energy investments. Energy portfolio optimization involves complex considerations including commodity price volatility, geological risk, regulatory uncertainty, and operational complexity that require sophisticated analytical frameworks (Awerbuch & Berger, 2003). The energy sector’s capital-intensive nature and long asset lifecycles create additional challenges that must be addressed through comprehensive portfolio optimization strategies.

Recent developments in energy portfolio theory have emphasized the importance of real options valuation, risk-adjusted return optimization, and dynamic portfolio rebalancing in response to changing market conditions. These theoretical advances have been particularly relevant for major integrated oil companies seeking to optimize their global asset portfolios while managing exposure to various geographical, geological, and political risks (Walls, 2019). The integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into portfolio optimization frameworks has further complicated the strategic decision-making process, requiring companies to balance financial returns with sustainability objectives.

2.2 Strategic Divestiture Theory and Practice

Strategic divestiture represents a critical component of corporate portfolio management, enabling companies to optimize their asset portfolios through selective asset sales that enhance overall performance and strategic positioning. The theoretical foundation of strategic divestiture draws from resource-based theory, transaction cost economics, and strategic management principles to develop frameworks for identifying optimal divestiture candidates and execution strategies (Brauer, 2019). Successful divestiture strategies require comprehensive analysis of asset performance, strategic fit, and market conditions to ensure optimal value realization.

The energy sector has witnessed significant divestiture activity in recent years, driven by changing market dynamics, regulatory pressures, and evolving investor expectations regarding capital efficiency and environmental performance. Major integrated oil companies have increasingly adopted sophisticated divestiture strategies to optimize their asset portfolios, focusing on high-return opportunities while divesting from less strategic or underperforming assets (Hartwell & Sidneva, 2021). These divestiture activities have been facilitated by active acquisition markets and specialized investment vehicles that can provide attractive valuations for divested assets.

2.3 LNG Market Dynamics and Strategic Positioning

The global liquefied natural gas (LNG) market has experienced remarkable growth over the past two decades, driven by increasing demand for cleaner energy sources, technological advances in LNG production and transportation, and expanding market access in developing economies. LNG portfolio optimization focuses on optimizing flows across overall asset portfolios to capture the best opportunities and minimize transportation costs. This market evolution has created significant opportunities for major energy companies to develop integrated LNG value chains that span upstream gas production, midstream liquefaction, and downstream marketing operations.

The strategic positioning of major energy companies in the global LNG market has become increasingly important as competition intensifies and market dynamics evolve. Companies must balance considerations including resource quality, market access, operational efficiency, and strategic flexibility to maintain competitive advantages in this rapidly growing market. The LNG industry has demonstrated innovation in natural gas delivery for over 60 years, with the ultimate goal of achieving the lowest cost of supply to produce LNG through energy efficiency in operations and capital cost and execution efficiency. The development of flexible LNG supply arrangements and portfolio optimization strategies has enabled companies to maximize value creation while managing exposure to market volatility and operational risks.

3. ExxonMobil’s Strategic Context and Portfolio Evolution

3.1 Corporate Strategy and Portfolio Positioning

ExxonMobil’s strategic evolution in recent years reflects a fundamental transformation in the company’s approach to asset portfolio management and capital allocation. The company has adopted a disciplined capital allocation framework that prioritizes high-return, low-cost opportunities while maintaining operational excellence and strategic flexibility. This strategic repositioning has involved significant portfolio restructuring, including major divestiture activities and concentrated investment in advantaged assets that offer superior returns and operational efficiency.

The company’s strategic focus has increasingly centered on three core areas: the Permian Basin, Guyana offshore developments, and selective LNG projects that offer competitive advantages and superior returns. This concentrated approach represents a departure from the company’s historically diversified portfolio strategy, reflecting management’s conviction that focused investment in advantaged assets will deliver superior shareholder returns. ExxonMobil continues to strengthen its Upstream portfolio of advantaged assets that offer lower cost of supply and higher returns, with plans extending to 2030 at specific commodity price assumptions.

3.2 Papua New Guinea LNG Operations Overview

PNG LNG is an integrated development commercializing Papua New Guinea’s gas resources, producing approximately 7.9 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas annually for export to four major customers in the Asia region. The PNG LNG project represents one of the most significant energy developments in the Asia-Pacific region, involving complex upstream gas production, midstream processing, and downstream liquefaction operations in a challenging geographical and regulatory environment.

ExxonMobil’s involvement in PNG LNG operations spans multiple decades, beginning with exploration activities in the 1990s and evolving into a major integrated LNG development project. The company’s role as operator of the PNG LNG joint venture has provided valuable experience in managing complex international projects while building strategic relationships with regional partners and customers. ExxonMobil’s long track record of working in challenging environments and terrains demonstrates the company’s ability to deliver projects safely, on time and on budget.

The PNG LNG project’s strategic significance extends beyond its substantial production capacity to encompass its role in ExxonMobil’s broader Asia-Pacific strategy and its contribution to the company’s global LNG portfolio. The project’s location provides advantaged access to major Asian LNG markets while leveraging Papua New Guinea’s substantial gas resources. However, the project’s operational complexity, regulatory challenges, and geographical constraints have created ongoing management challenges that must be balanced against strategic benefits and financial returns.

3.3 Financial Performance and Operational Metrics

The financial performance of ExxonMobil’s PNG LNG operations has been influenced by various factors including commodity price volatility, operational efficiency, and capital allocation decisions. The project’s substantial capital investment requirements and complex operational profile have created both opportunities and challenges for value creation. The evaluation of PNG LNG’s financial performance requires comprehensive analysis of metrics including return on capital employed, cash flow generation, and net present value relative to alternative investment opportunities.

Operational metrics for PNG LNG operations encompass production efficiency, safety performance, environmental compliance, and operational reliability indicators. The project’s complex operational profile, involving upstream gas production, midstream processing, and downstream liquefaction operations, requires sophisticated performance management systems to ensure optimal results. The project’s operational performance has been generally strong, with production levels consistently meeting or exceeding design specifications while maintaining excellent safety and environmental performance standards.

4. Strategic Rationale for PNG LNG Divestiture

4.1 Portfolio Optimization Imperatives

ExxonMobil’s strategic decision to divest from PNG LNG operations reflects a sophisticated application of portfolio optimization principles that prioritize capital efficiency, operational excellence, and strategic positioning. The divestiture decision represents a critical component of the company’s broader portfolio optimization strategy, which seeks to maximize shareholder value through selective asset management and disciplined capital allocation. This approach requires continuous evaluation of asset performance, strategic fit, and market conditions to identify optimal portfolio composition.

The portfolio optimization imperative driving the PNG LNG divestiture encompasses several key considerations including capital allocation efficiency, operational complexity management, and strategic focus enhancement. The company’s analysis of its global asset portfolio has identified opportunities to enhance overall performance through selective divestiture of assets that, while potentially valuable, may not align with the company’s strategic priorities or offer optimal returns relative to alternative investment opportunities. This sophisticated approach to portfolio management reflects modern corporate finance principles and demonstrates the company’s commitment to maximizing shareholder value.

4.2 Capital Allocation and Return Optimization

The strategic rationale for PNG LNG divestiture is fundamentally grounded in capital allocation optimization and return maximization principles. ExxonMobil’s analysis of its global investment opportunities has identified higher-return alternatives that offer superior risk-adjusted returns and strategic positioning advantages. The company’s disciplined approach to capital allocation requires continuous evaluation of investment alternatives to ensure optimal resource deployment and returns maximization.

The capital allocation framework driving the PNG LNG divestiture reflects sophisticated financial analysis that considers factors including net present value, internal rate of return, payback period, and strategic value creation potential. The company’s evaluation of PNG LNG operations relative to alternative investment opportunities has identified superior returns available through focused investment in the Permian Basin, Guyana offshore developments, and other advantaged assets. This analytical approach demonstrates the company’s commitment to data-driven decision-making and shareholder value maximization.

4.3 Operational Complexity and Risk Management

The operational complexity associated with PNG LNG operations represents a significant consideration in ExxonMobil’s divestiture decision. The project’s complex operational profile, involving multiple stakeholders, challenging geographical conditions, and evolving regulatory requirements, creates ongoing management challenges that require substantial resources and expertise. The company’s strategic assessment has evaluated the opportunity costs associated with managing this operational complexity relative to alternative investment opportunities.

Risk management considerations have played a crucial role in the PNG LNG divestiture decision, encompassing operational risks, regulatory risks, and market risks associated with the project. The company’s comprehensive risk assessment has identified potential mitigation strategies while evaluating the overall risk-return profile of PNG LNG operations relative to alternative investment opportunities. This sophisticated approach to risk management reflects the company’s commitment to prudent capital allocation and strategic positioning.

5. Strategic Alternatives and Market Positioning

5.1 Permian Basin Focus and Competitive Advantages

ExxonMobil’s strategic repositioning has increasingly emphasized the Permian Basin as a core component of the company’s upstream portfolio, reflecting the basin’s exceptional resource quality, operational efficiency potential, and strategic positioning advantages. The Permian Basin offers several competitive advantages including low-cost production, operational scalability, and proximity to key markets that align with the company’s strategic objectives and capital allocation priorities.

The company’s Permian Basin operations have demonstrated exceptional performance across multiple metrics including production growth, operational efficiency, and returns on capital employed. The basin’s advantaged geology and extensive infrastructure development have enabled the company to achieve industry-leading performance while maintaining operational flexibility and strategic positioning. The concentration of investment in Permian Basin operations reflects the company’s conviction that focused investment in advantaged assets will deliver superior shareholder returns.

5.2 Guyana Offshore Development Strategy

ExxonMobil’s Guyana offshore operations represent another critical component of the company’s strategic repositioning, offering exceptional resource quality, operational efficiency potential, and competitive positioning advantages. The Stabroek Block discoveries have transformed the company’s upstream portfolio while providing a platform for sustained production growth and value creation. The Guyana operations offer several strategic advantages including low-cost production, substantial resource potential, and favorable fiscal terms.

The development of Guyana offshore operations has proceeded according to an accelerated timeline that reflects the exceptional resource quality and operational efficiency potential of the discoveries. The company’s systematic approach to development has involved multiple floating production, storage, and offloading (FPSO) units that enable efficient resource extraction while maintaining operational flexibility. The strategic significance of Guyana operations extends beyond their substantial production potential to encompass their role in the company’s broader strategic positioning and competitive advantages.

5.3 Selective LNG Portfolio Strategy

ExxonMobil’s approach to LNG portfolio management reflects a selective strategy that prioritizes advantaged assets offering superior returns and competitive positioning. The company’s LNG portfolio strategy emphasizes projects that offer low-cost production, strategic market access, and operational efficiency advantages while maintaining exposure to the growing global LNG market. This selective approach requires continuous evaluation of LNG opportunities to identify optimal investment alternatives.

The proposed development includes a three-train expansion leveraging existing infrastructure at the highly successful PNG LNG plant site to capture synergies and further reduce costs, while continuing active exploration programs in PNG to further expand resources. However, the company’s strategic assessment has identified alternative LNG opportunities that offer superior returns and strategic positioning advantages. The selective approach to LNG portfolio management demonstrates the company’s sophisticated understanding of market dynamics and competitive positioning requirements.

6. Implementation and Execution Framework

6.1 Divestiture Process and Timeline

The implementation of ExxonMobil’s PNG LNG divestiture requires a sophisticated execution framework that addresses complex stakeholder relationships, regulatory requirements, and operational considerations. The divestiture process involves multiple phases including strategic planning, buyer identification, due diligence, negotiation, and closure activities that must be carefully coordinated to ensure optimal outcomes. The company’s experience with major divestiture transactions provides valuable expertise for managing this complex process.

The timeline for PNG LNG divestiture execution reflects the complexity of the transaction and the need to ensure optimal value realization while maintaining operational continuity. The company’s approach to divestiture execution emphasizes thorough preparation, comprehensive stakeholder engagement, and disciplined negotiation processes that maximize value while minimizing disruption to ongoing operations. This systematic approach to divestiture execution reflects the company’s commitment to operational excellence and shareholder value maximization.

6.2 Stakeholder Management and Regulatory Considerations

The PNG LNG divestiture involves complex stakeholder relationships that require careful management to ensure successful transaction execution. Key stakeholders include joint venture partners, government entities, regulatory authorities, and local communities that have various interests and concerns related to the divestiture process. The company’s approach to stakeholder management emphasizes transparent communication, collaborative problem-solving, and mutually beneficial outcomes that support successful transaction completion.

Regulatory considerations represent a critical component of the PNG LNG divestiture process, encompassing various approvals and compliance requirements that must be satisfied to complete the transaction. The company’s regulatory strategy involves early engagement with relevant authorities, comprehensive compliance documentation, and proactive management of regulatory risks that could impact transaction timing or terms. This sophisticated approach to regulatory management reflects the company’s experience with complex international transactions and commitment to regulatory compliance.

6.3 Value Optimization and Transaction Structuring

The optimization of value realization through PNG LNG divestiture requires sophisticated transaction structuring that addresses various financial, operational, and strategic considerations. The company’s approach to transaction structuring emphasizes flexibility, risk mitigation, and value maximization while ensuring alignment with strategic objectives and stakeholder interests. This comprehensive approach to transaction structuring reflects the company’s expertise in complex divestiture transactions and commitment to optimal outcomes.

The transaction structuring process involves detailed analysis of various alternatives including asset sales, partnership arrangements, and structured transactions that could optimize value realization while addressing stakeholder requirements. The company’s evaluation of transaction alternatives considers factors including valuation optimization, risk allocation, operational continuity, and strategic positioning to identify optimal transaction structures. This analytical approach to transaction structuring demonstrates the company’s sophisticated understanding of complex divestiture transactions and commitment to shareholder value maximization.

7. Strategic Implications and Industry Impact

7.1 Industry Transformation and Competitive Dynamics

ExxonMobil’s PNG LNG divestiture represents a significant development in the broader transformation of the global energy industry, reflecting evolving competitive dynamics and strategic priorities among major integrated oil companies. The divestiture demonstrates how industry leaders are adapting their portfolio strategies to address changing market conditions, investor expectations, and operational challenges. This strategic evolution has important implications for competitive positioning and industry structure in the global energy sector.

The competitive implications of the PNG LNG divestiture extend beyond ExxonMobil’s specific strategic positioning to encompass broader industry trends toward portfolio optimization and asset specialization. The transaction creates opportunities for other industry participants to enhance their LNG portfolio positions while demonstrating the continued evolution of the global LNG market structure. These competitive dynamics reflect the ongoing maturation of the global energy industry and the increasing importance of strategic focus and operational excellence.

7.2 Market Structure and Investment Patterns

The PNG LNG divestiture contributes to ongoing changes in market structure and investment patterns within the global LNG industry. The transaction reflects the continued evolution of the LNG market from a project-based structure toward more integrated portfolio approaches that emphasize operational efficiency, strategic positioning, and financial optimization. These structural changes have important implications for how LNG projects are developed, financed, and operated in the future.

Investment pattern implications of the PNG LNG divestiture encompass both the immediate effects on capital allocation within the global energy sector and the longer-term implications for LNG project development and financing. The transaction demonstrates how major energy companies are adapting their investment strategies to address changing market conditions and competitive dynamics. These evolving investment patterns reflect the continued maturation of the global LNG market and the increasing sophistication of industry participants.

7.3 Strategic Precedents and Future Implications

The PNG LNG divestiture establishes important strategic precedents for how major integrated oil companies approach portfolio optimization and asset management in the evolving global energy landscape. The transaction demonstrates the practical application of sophisticated portfolio theory principles while highlighting the importance of strategic discipline and operational excellence in achieving optimal outcomes. These precedents have important implications for how other industry participants approach their own portfolio optimization initiatives.

Exxon plans to accelerate PNG’s P’nyang gas development, bringing pre-engineering works forward to April-June 2025 by accelerating the concept select phase, moving it “years sooner than previously envisaged”. This development suggests that while ExxonMobil has divested from existing PNG LNG operations, the company continues to see strategic value in Papua New Guinea’s gas resources and may pursue selective opportunities that align with its optimized portfolio strategy.

8. Challenges and Risk Considerations

8.1 Execution Risks and Mitigation Strategies

The implementation of PNG LNG divestiture involves various execution risks that must be carefully managed to ensure successful outcomes. These risks encompass transaction-specific challenges including buyer identification, valuation disputes, regulatory approvals, and operational continuity concerns that could impact transaction timing or terms. The company’s approach to risk management emphasizes comprehensive planning, proactive stakeholder engagement, and flexible execution strategies that can adapt to changing circumstances.

Mitigation strategies for PNG LNG divestiture execution risks involve multiple approaches including thorough due diligence, comprehensive contract structuring, and contingency planning that address potential challenges before they become critical issues. The company’s risk management framework draws from extensive experience with complex international transactions while incorporating lessons learned from previous divestiture activities. This sophisticated approach to risk management reflects the company’s commitment to successful transaction execution and value optimization.

8.2 Market and Regulatory Uncertainties

Market uncertainties represent significant challenges for PNG LNG divestiture execution, encompassing commodity price volatility, demand fluctuations, and competitive dynamics that could impact transaction valuation and terms. The company’s approach to managing market uncertainties emphasizes flexible transaction structuring, comprehensive market analysis, and adaptive execution strategies that can respond to changing market conditions. This proactive approach to market risk management reflects the company’s understanding of global energy market dynamics and commitment to optimal transaction outcomes.

Regulatory uncertainties encompass various approval processes, compliance requirements, and policy changes that could impact PNG LNG divestiture execution. The company’s regulatory risk management strategy involves early engagement with relevant authorities, comprehensive compliance documentation, and proactive monitoring of regulatory developments that could affect transaction outcomes. This systematic approach to regulatory risk management demonstrates the company’s experience with complex international regulatory environments and commitment to compliance excellence.

8.3 Operational and Financial Implications

The operational implications of PNG LNG divestiture encompass various considerations including workforce management, operational continuity, and stakeholder relationships that must be carefully managed during the transition process. The company’s approach to operational risk management emphasizes comprehensive planning, transparent communication, and collaborative problem-solving that ensures smooth operational transitions while maintaining performance standards. This systematic approach to operational management reflects the company’s commitment to operational excellence and stakeholder value creation.

Financial implications of the PNG LNG divestiture encompass various considerations including valuation optimization, capital redeployment, and financial reporting impacts that must be carefully managed to ensure optimal outcomes. The company’s financial management strategy emphasizes thorough analysis, strategic planning, and disciplined execution that maximizes value realization while supporting broader strategic objectives. This comprehensive approach to financial management demonstrates the company’s sophisticated understanding of complex transaction dynamics and commitment to shareholder value creation.

9. Conclusions and Future Implications

ExxonMobil’s strategic decision to divest from Papua New Guinea LNG operations represents a sophisticated application of modern portfolio optimization principles that demonstrates how major integrated oil companies can enhance shareholder value through selective asset management and disciplined capital allocation. The divestiture reflects a fundamental transformation in the company’s strategic approach, emphasizing focused investment in advantaged assets that offer superior returns and competitive positioning advantages. This strategic evolution provides valuable insights into how energy companies can successfully navigate complex market environments while maintaining operational excellence and financial performance.

The comprehensive analysis of ExxonMobil’s PNG LNG divestiture reveals the complex interplay between strategic planning, operational excellence, and financial optimization that characterizes modern energy sector portfolio management. The company’s systematic approach to divestiture execution demonstrates the practical application of sophisticated theoretical frameworks while highlighting the importance of stakeholder management, regulatory compliance, and risk mitigation in achieving optimal outcomes. These insights contribute to the broader understanding of strategic asset management in the global energy sector and provide valuable guidance for other industry participants pursuing similar optimization initiatives.

The strategic implications of the PNG LNG divestiture extend beyond ExxonMobil’s specific circumstances to encompass broader trends in the global energy industry toward portfolio optimization, operational excellence, and strategic focus. The transaction reflects the continued evolution of the energy sector as companies adapt to changing market conditions, investor expectations, and competitive dynamics. The success of ExxonMobil’s portfolio optimization strategy demonstrates the value of disciplined capital allocation and strategic focus in creating sustainable competitive advantages.

The future trajectory of ExxonMobil’s strategic positioning will be significantly influenced by the outcomes of its portfolio optimization initiatives, including the PNG LNG divestiture and focused investment in the Permian Basin, Guyana, and selective LNG opportunities. The company’s commitment to operational excellence, financial discipline, and strategic focus positions it well to capitalize on emerging opportunities while managing ongoing challenges in the evolving global energy landscape. The lessons learned from the PNG LNG divestiture will undoubtedly inform future strategic decisions and contribute to the company’s continued evolution as a leading global energy company.

Future research opportunities include detailed analysis of divestiture outcomes and their impact on overall portfolio performance, investigation of optimal portfolio composition strategies for major integrated oil companies, and evaluation of the long-term implications of strategic focus versus diversification in the global energy sector. These research directions will be critical for advancing understanding of strategic asset management in the energy industry and supporting continued innovation in portfolio optimization practices. The PNG LNG divestiture provides a valuable case study that will contribute to this ongoing research and help inform future strategic decisions across the global energy sector.

References

Awerbuch, S., & Berger, M. (2003). Applying portfolio theory to EU electricity planning and policy-making. Report for the European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Brussels.

Brauer, M. (2019). The performance effects of corporate divestiture: A meta-analysis of sell-offs, spin-offs, and carve-outs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(3), 261-280.

Favennec, J. P., & Lorentz, A. (2021). Strategic management in the oil and gas industry. Editions Technip & Ophrys.

Hartwell, C. A., & Sidneva, A. (2021). Asset divestiture and corporate restructuring in the oil and gas industry: Evidence from emerging markets. Energy Economics, 95, 105121.

Inkpen, A. C., & Moffett, M. H. (2022). The global oil and gas industry: Management, strategy and finance. PennWell Corporation.

Walls, M. R. (2019). Portfolio optimization in oil and gas exploration and production. The Journal of Energy and Development, 44(1/2), 71-98.