How Do “The Age of Innocence” and “The Scarlet Letter” Portray Social Outsiders in American Literature?
Edith Wharton’s The Age of Innocence (1920) and Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter (1850) both portray social outsiders as figures who reveal the moral contradictions and restrictive codes of their respective societies. In The Age of Innocence, Ellen Olenska challenges the rigid moral expectations of Gilded Age New York, exposing the hypocrisy beneath its refined conventions. In The Scarlet Letter, Hester Prynne embodies the struggle of the individual conscience against Puritan orthodoxy. Both women become symbols of integrity and resilience, using their exclusion as moral insight rather than defeat. Thus, while Wharton’s outsider reflects social realism and moral restraint, Hawthorne’s represents spiritual rebellion and transcendence.
1. Understanding the Concept of the Social Outsider in American Fiction
The motif of the social outsider is central to American literature, often used to question societal norms and expose underlying hypocrisy. From the Puritan theocracy of the seventeenth century to the aristocratic circles of nineteenth-century New York, the outsider figure serves as both critic and victim of collective morality. According to Trilling (1950), American fiction repeatedly dramatizes the tension between individual conscience and social conformity.
Both Wharton and Hawthorne utilize this tradition, yet they do so within distinct moral frameworks. Hawthorne’s outsider exists in a religiously absolute world where sin defines identity, whereas Wharton’s outsider navigates a secular world where reputation and etiquette dictate morality. Each author thus constructs exclusion not merely as punishment but as revelation—a means of uncovering truth beneath social veneers.
2. How Does Edith Wharton Depict Ellen Olenska as a Social Outsider?
In The Age of Innocence, Ellen Olenska embodies the rebellion against social convention and emotional repression. Returning to New York after leaving her European husband, she defies the moral codes of Old New York’s elite. Her decision to live independently and seek divorce is perceived as scandalous, marking her as a moral and social pariah (Wharton, 1920).
Wharton’s realist technique underscores the mechanisms of exclusion. Through Newland Archer’s conflicted perspective, readers see how Ellen’s independence both attracts and threatens the rigidly controlled upper class. As Lewis (1975) observes, Ellen’s marginalization exposes the hypocrisy of a society that prizes innocence over honesty. She is excluded not because she is immoral, but because she refuses to participate in deceit. Her outsider status thus becomes a site of moral clarity—a counterpoint to the conformity and repression of her peers.
3. How Does Nathaniel Hawthorne Portray Hester Prynne as an Outsider in Puritan Society?
In contrast, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter presents Hester Prynne as a spiritual outsider within a rigidly moralistic Puritan community. Condemned for adultery, she is forced to wear the scarlet letter “A” as a public mark of shame (Hawthorne, 1850). Yet through endurance and quiet dignity, Hester transforms her punishment into moral strength.
Hawthorne’s treatment of Hester aligns with the Romantic emphasis on individual conscience and moral truth. She transcends the community’s punitive ideology by redefining the meaning of her symbol—from “Adulteress” to “Able.” Hester’s exclusion thus allows her a freedom denied to the hypocritical Puritan elders. As Matthiessen (1941) notes, her isolation becomes “a moral vantage point from which the rigidity of Puritanism is laid bare.” In contrast to Ellen’s social alienation, Hester’s exile is spiritual and existential, rooted in her defiance of theological dogma.
4. Comparing the Social Environments: Puritanism vs. Gilded Age Conformity
Both novels critique societies obsessed with moral purity and reputation, but their contexts differ sharply. Hawthorne’s Puritan Boston is governed by religious absolutism; Wharton’s New York operates under social codes disguised as morality. In both, the outsider exposes the collective fear of transgression.
Wharton’s society fears scandal because it threatens appearances; Hawthorne’s fears sin because it threatens divine order. Yet both authors reveal that exclusion is the means by which these societies maintain control. As Chase (1957) argues, American literature often portrays social order as a “form of imprisonment.” Ellen and Hester thus represent two historical stages of that captivity—one spiritual, one social—but both highlight the enduring conflict between authentic selfhood and social repression.
5. Gender, Morality, and Double Standards
A central similarity between the two novels lies in their critique of patriarchal double standards. Both Ellen and Hester are judged by moral codes that grant men greater latitude. In The Age of Innocence, Archer’s engagement to May Welland proceeds unchallenged despite his emotional infidelity, while Ellen’s independence is condemned as scandalous. Similarly, in The Scarlet Letter, Reverend Dimmesdale conceals his sin while Hester bears public disgrace.
Wharton and Hawthorne thus employ their heroines to expose gendered hypocrisy in moral judgment. As Gilbert and Gubar (1979) observe, women in nineteenth-century fiction often symbolize the moral conscience of society, yet are silenced or punished for expressing it. Ellen’s moral courage and Hester’s endurance both redefine womanhood as ethical strength rather than social compliance. Their outsider status therefore becomes not only personal but ideological—an act of moral resistance against patriarchal authority.
6. Psychological Realism and the Inner Life of the Outsider
While Hawthorne’s narrative operates within allegory, Wharton’s fiction reflects psychological realism, delving into the emotional and moral consciousness of her characters. Archer’s perception of Ellen as a “stranger in a strange land” mirrors his own repressed longing for authenticity (Wharton, 1920). In contrast, Hawthorne externalizes Hester’s moral conflict through symbolism—the scarlet letter, the scaffold, and the forest.
Both writers use the outsider to explore the inner cost of repression. For Ellen, the pain arises from emotional exile within a society that mistakes conformity for virtue. For Hester, it stems from the moral isolation of knowing truth in a world governed by false piety. In both cases, exclusion becomes psychological freedom: to be cast out is to see clearly. This insight aligns with Wharton’s belief that moral vision often arises from suffering and social displacement (Lewis, 1975).
7. Symbolism and Setting in Constructing Social Exile
Both authors employ setting and symbolism to define their characters’ alienation. Hawthorne’s Boston is dark, oppressive, and puritanical, symbolizing moral surveillance. The scaffold becomes both a site of shame and transcendence. Wharton’s New York, conversely, is elegant but suffocating—a world of gilded cages where social order masquerades as civility.
Ellen’s European sensibilities contrast sharply with New York’s provincial rigidity. Her house—decorated with foreign art and unconventional taste—becomes a symbolic refuge of freedom and individuality. Similarly, Hester’s cottage on the outskirts of Boston symbolizes liminal space—a physical and moral border between civilization and wilderness. Both women inhabit the margins, and in doing so, they expose the spiritual emptiness at the center of their societies (Singley, 2003).
8. Moral Agency and Redemption: Beyond Exclusion
Despite their marginalization, both Ellen and Hester achieve moral autonomy. They demonstrate that exile can become a source of ethical insight and inner peace. Hester’s charity and wisdom gradually transform her from sinner to saint, while Ellen’s moral clarity awakens Archer’s awareness of his own hypocrisy.
However, Wharton’s realism denies the possibility of full redemption within society. Ellen must remain outside, choosing exile over compromise. Hester, in contrast, attains partial reconciliation; her endurance redefines the meaning of the scarlet letter itself. Both endings reinforce the idea that social reintegration requires moral transformation—something society itself resists. As Lewis (1975) suggests, Wharton’s vision is tragic realism, while Hawthorne’s is moral allegory; yet both affirm the outsider’s power to illuminate truth.
9. How Do the Novels Differ in Tone and Thematic Resolution?
Wharton’s tone is ironic and restrained, reflecting her modernist realism. She exposes the social machinery that regulates behavior without offering redemption. The tragedy of The Age of Innocence lies in recognition without change—Archer perceives truth but remains imprisoned by convention. Hawthorne’s tone, by contrast, is symbolic and redemptive, steeped in moral idealism. Hester’s suffering leads to spiritual insight and forgiveness.
Thus, while both authors critique moral hypocrisy, Wharton’s vision ends in resignation, Hawthorne’s in transcendence. Their differing conclusions reflect their historical contexts: Wharton writes in an age of social inertia and disillusionment; Hawthorne in an era still rooted in religious faith and moral absolutes.
10. The Social Outsider as a Mirror of American Conscience
Both Ellen Olenska and Hester Prynne function as mirrors of American moral conscience. They reveal how each era defines sin, virtue, and identity. Hawthorne’s Puritans equate morality with public discipline; Wharton’s New Yorkers equate it with social decorum. Yet both societies repress genuine emotion and moral growth.
As Trilling (1950) asserts, the outsider in American fiction is “the one who tells the truth about society by standing apart from it.” Ellen and Hester exemplify this truth-telling function. Their isolation grants them vision—the ability to perceive the moral emptiness beneath civilization’s surface. In this sense, they are not merely victims of exclusion but agents of moral awakening, embodying the enduring American struggle between individual integrity and collective conformity.
Conclusion: What Do Ellen Olenska and Hester Prynne Reveal About Society and Self?
In conclusion, Edith Wharton’s The Age of Innocence and Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter portray social outsiders as moral visionaries who expose the limitations of their societies. Ellen Olenska’s defiance of social convention and Hester Prynne’s endurance under moral persecution illuminate the recurring American theme of conscience versus conformity.
Wharton’s realist portrayal of social exclusion and Hawthorne’s allegorical exploration of sin both affirm that to stand outside society is to perceive its truths most clearly. Their heroines embody the moral courage to live authentically in the face of repression, demonstrating that exclusion, while painful, can become a form of liberation. Together, these novels reveal the timeless relevance of the outsider as the conscience of American literature—a figure who challenges, enlightens, and ultimately redefines what it means to be human within the boundaries of social judgment.
References
-
Chase, R. (1957). The American Novel and Its Tradition. Johns Hopkins University Press.
-
Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press.
-
Hawthorne, N. (1850). The Scarlet Letter. Ticknor, Reed and Fields.
-
Lewis, R. W. B. (1975). Edith Wharton: A Biography. Harper & Row.
-
Matthiessen, F. O. (1941). American Renaissance: Art and Expression in the Age of Emerson and Whitman. Oxford University Press.
-
Singley, C. J. (2003). Edith Wharton: Matters of Mind and Spirit. Cambridge University Press.
-
Trilling, L. (1950). The Liberal Imagination. Viking Press.
-
Wharton, E. (1920). The Age of Innocence. D. Appleton and Company.