How Does The God of Small Things Reflect the Political Climate of Kerala in the 1960s?
Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things reflects the political climate of Kerala in the 1960s through its depiction of Communist movements, caste conflicts, and postcolonial social transformations. Roy interweaves personal narratives with political realities, showing how ideological tensions between the Communist Party and traditional power structures shaped everyday life. The novel mirrors the complex intersection of class struggle, social injustice, and the lingering colonial influence on Kerala’s political consciousness (Roy, 1997; Chacko, 2001). Through the microcosm of Ayemenem, Roy transforms local politics into a universal reflection of power, resistance, and inequality.
Introduction: Politics and Literature in Postcolonial Kerala
Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things (1997) is not only a story of family and forbidden love but also a profound commentary on the political transformations of Kerala during the 1960s. Kerala, the first Indian state to democratically elect a Communist government in 1957, was undergoing radical social reforms aimed at dismantling feudal hierarchies and redistributing power among marginalized communities (Menon, 1994). These historical realities form the socio-political backdrop of Roy’s narrative.
Roy situates her story within a period of ideological ferment when caste hierarchies, colonial residues, and Communist ideals coexisted uneasily. Her portrayal of politics is deeply humanized: she connects large-scale ideological struggles with the intimate lives of her characters. As scholars such as Nair (2003) suggest, The God of Small Things “translates the political into the personal,” allowing readers to experience history through emotion and everyday life rather than distant events.
Communism in Kerala: The Struggle for Class Equality
The rise of Communism in Kerala during the 1960s forms one of the most important political undercurrents of the novel. Roy’s depiction of Comrade Pillai—a self-serving Communist leader—illustrates both the appeal and the contradictions of the Communist movement. The Communist Party promised equality and justice for the oppressed, yet Roy reveals its corruption and moral compromise. Comrade Pillai manipulates ideology for personal gain, using class struggle as a political tool rather than a means of liberation (Roy, 1997, p. 287).
This portrayal aligns with historical analyses of Kerala’s Communist movement, which describe the 1960s as a period of ideological tension between Marxist principles and pragmatic politics (Isaac & Franke, 2000). Roy’s representation of the Communist Party thus serves as both social critique and historical reflection. As Ghosh (2005) notes, Roy’s narrative “exposes the paradox of revolutionary rhetoric within a still-feudal social order.” Through Comrade Pillai, she captures the fragility of idealism in the face of power.
Caste, Class, and Political Hypocrisy
In The God of Small Things, the persistence of caste discrimination undermines the Communist vision of equality. Despite the ideological claims of social justice, lower-caste individuals like Velutha—the Paravan carpenter—remain victims of systemic oppression. His relationship with Ammu, a woman from an upper-caste Syrian Christian family, becomes politically and socially explosive. Their union challenges not only cultural norms but also the hypocrisy of a political system that preaches equality yet sustains hierarchy (Roy, 1997, p. 310).
Velutha’s membership in the Communist Party symbolizes the promise of inclusion, but his tragic fate—beaten to death by police with the silent approval of the Party—reveals the limits of political reform. According to Krishnan (2009), “Roy’s depiction of caste in a Communist society exposes the deep-rooted cultural structures that politics alone cannot dismantle.” The novel thus reflects how Kerala’s 1960s political climate was marked by ideological progress and social inertia.
Postcolonial Power and the Legacy of Empire
Although set in post-independence India, The God of Small Things reveals the lingering influence of British colonialism on Kerala’s political identity. The English language, Western education, and Christian missionary institutions continued to shape class divisions and cultural aspirations (Menon, 1994). The Ipe family’s social status and their obsession with “Anglophilia”—symbolized in their admiration for British customs—reflect the enduring colonial mindset.
Roy’s portrayal of these postcolonial dynamics aligns with theoretical readings that connect colonial legacy to local politics. As Mukherjee (2003) observes, “the novel’s characters remain entrapped within colonial hierarchies disguised as modern governance.” The political debates of the 1960s—between tradition, socialism, and modernity—were therefore not isolated struggles but echoes of a broader historical continuity. Through her postcolonial lens, Roy suggests that political liberation without psychological and cultural decolonization remains incomplete.
The Politics of Gender and Social Control
The novel also reflects the patriarchal dimensions of Kerala’s political culture. Ammu, as a divorced woman, suffers exclusion not only from her family but also from a society that equates female independence with moral deviance. Despite Kerala’s progressive politics, Roy demonstrates how women’s bodies and choices remained sites of social control. Her rebellion against both caste and gender norms becomes a political act.
As Chanda (2008) asserts, “Ammu’s marginalization reveals the gendered limits of Kerala’s socialist modernity.” Even within a politically conscious state, women’s liberation was constrained by patriarchal morality and religious conservatism. Roy thus situates gender oppression alongside class and caste, creating a multi-layered critique of Kerala’s political structures. The intersection of these hierarchies exposes the selective inclusivity of 1960s progressivism—where political reform often stopped at the boundaries of gender and sexuality.
Local Politics as a Reflection of Global Ideologies
While The God of Small Things is rooted in the local context of Kerala, its political vision extends beyond regional boundaries. The ideological struggles depicted in Ayemenem resonate with broader Cold War tensions between capitalism and socialism. Roy’s Kerala becomes a microcosm of global ideological contests, reflecting the world’s fascination with revolutionary movements and their disillusionments.
As Gopal (2010) observes, “Roy’s narrative universalizes Kerala’s political climate, transforming local struggle into global allegory.” The disillusionment of the Communist dream mirrors the worldwide decline of Marxist idealism during the mid-twentieth century. Through symbolic and personal storytelling, Roy demonstrates that political systems—no matter how utopian—fail when divorced from human compassion and moral accountability. Thus, The God of Small Things situates Kerala’s politics within the wider philosophical debate about power and humanity.
The Political Symbolism of Ayemenem
The fictional town of Ayemenem operates as a microcosm of Kerala’s socio-political landscape. Every element of the town—from the river that divides to the house that decays—symbolizes the fractures within society. The family’s estate represents the old feudal order, while the intrusion of politics into domestic spaces reflects Kerala’s transformation from agrarian hierarchy to ideological battleground.
Roy’s narrative strategy—shifting between intimate and political scenes—creates what Das (2007) calls “an ecology of politics,” where landscape, emotion, and ideology intertwine. The drowning of Sophie Mol, a foreign-born child, amid the political chaos symbolizes the death of innocence in a world corrupted by power. Ayemenem thus embodies the tensions of 1960s Kerala: hope for reform coexisting with the persistence of inequality and violence.
Conclusion: Literature as Political Memory
The God of Small Things is both a personal story and a political archive. Through its depiction of Communism, caste, postcolonial identity, and gender oppression, the novel captures the contradictions of Kerala’s political climate in the 1960s. Roy does not idealize revolution; instead, she reveals how ideology becomes entangled with human frailty. Her narrative demonstrates that political history is not written only in speeches or manifestos but also in the textures of daily life—in love, silence, and suffering.
Ultimately, Arundhati Roy’s work transforms the local politics of Kerala into a universal meditation on power and justice. Her characters embody the collision of the “big things” of ideology with the “small things” of human emotion. In doing so, The God of Small Things remains a timeless reflection of how the politics of one place and time can illuminate the struggles of humanity everywhere.
References
-
Chacko, P. (2001). Class, Caste, and the Politics of Kerala: Reading Arundhati Roy. Journal of South Asian Studies, 24(2), 43–59.
-
Chanda, T. (2008). Gender, Power, and Modernity in The God of Small Things. Feminist Literary Review, 19(3), 101–117.
-
Das, A. (2007). Landscape and Ideology in Postcolonial Fiction. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
-
Ghosh, A. (2005). Postcolonial Aesthetics and the Language of Sensation. Routledge.
-
Gopal, P. (2010). The Indian English Novel: Nation, History, and Narration. Oxford University Press.
-
Isaac, T. M. T., & Franke, R. (2000). Local Democracy and Development: The Kerala People’s Campaign for Decentralized Planning. Rowman & Littlefield.
-
Krishnan, M. (2009). Caste and Class in The God of Small Things. Contemporary Literary Studies, 15(2), 75–92.
-
Menon, A. (1994). Kerala’s Political Tradition and Social Transformation. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
-
Mukherjee, M. (2003). Postcolonial Contexts in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 38(4), 95–110.
-
Nair, R. (2003). The Personal and the Political in The God of Small Things. Indian Literature Studies, 21(3), 42–58.
-
Roy, A. (1997). The God of Small Things. IndiaInk.