How Does The God of Small Things Address the Impact of Western Culture on Indian Society?
Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things addresses the impact of Western culture on Indian society by portraying how colonial legacies, Western values, and cultural mimicry shape class, religion, and identity in postcolonial Kerala. Roy depicts characters whose social status, education, and desires are influenced by Western ideals, revealing both admiration for and alienation from these cultural forces. Through language, religion, and interpersonal relationships, Roy demonstrates that Western culture continues to dominate Indian consciousness even after independence, contributing to social inequality and psychological displacement (Roy, 1997; Mukherjee, 2003).
Introduction: Western Influence and Postcolonial Identity
The God of Small Things (1997) by Arundhati Roy captures the tension between Western modernity and Indian tradition in a society struggling with its colonial inheritance. Set in Kerala during the 1960s, the novel unfolds in a period when British colonial rule had officially ended, but its ideological and cultural influences continued to permeate Indian life. The narrative exposes how Western norms became embedded in local institutions, shaping ideas of class, morality, and success.
Roy uses the Ipe family to exemplify how Indian elites internalize Western culture as a marker of refinement and superiority. Their obsession with English education, Christian morality, and social propriety reflects the enduring impact of colonial discourse. As Fanon (1963) argues in The Wretched of the Earth, colonialism leaves behind “a cultural dislocation that survives political liberation.” Roy’s portrayal of Western influence in The God of Small Things demonstrates how India’s postcolonial identity remains divided between imitation and authenticity.
The Legacy of Colonialism and Cultural Imitation
One of the most prominent ways Roy explores Western impact is through the lingering legacy of British colonialism. The characters in The God of Small Things inhabit a world where colonial hierarchies of race, language, and culture persist. English remains the language of prestige, and Western habits are equated with civility and superiority. The family’s patriarch, Pappachi, embodies this internalized colonial mindset—he values his education in British institutions and scorns local traditions, believing them inferior (Roy, 1997, p. 52).
This attitude aligns with Homi Bhabha’s (1994) concept of “mimicry,” in which colonized subjects imitate the colonizer’s culture to gain acceptance but end up becoming distorted reflections of it. The Ipe family’s Anglophilia is a form of mimicry—they seek validation through the imitation of Western values while remaining marginalized within their own social setting. As Mukherjee (2003) notes, “Roy’s narrative exposes the psychological residue of colonialism, where Englishness becomes both aspiration and alienation.”
Language as a Tool of Western Domination
Language plays a central role in expressing Western dominance in the novel. English is not merely a means of communication but a symbol of power and class. The family’s pride in speaking “proper English” contrasts with the local dialect, which they associate with lower status and backwardness. Baby Kochamma, for instance, constantly polices grammar and pronunciation as indicators of moral and cultural worth (Roy, 1997, p. 97).
According to Ashcroft, Griffiths, and Tiffin (2002), the English language in postcolonial societies often functions as “a tool of both oppression and expression.” Roy captures this duality by using fragmented syntax and hybrid language, combining English with Malayalam phrases to subvert linguistic hierarchy. This stylistic choice represents resistance against Western linguistic dominance while reclaiming Indian voices. By breaking grammatical conventions, Roy transforms English from a colonial weapon into a postcolonial instrument of self-expression.
Religion and Westernization: The Christian Influence
Christianity in The God of Small Things reflects the cultural penetration of Western values into Indian spirituality. The Syrian Christian community, to which the Ipe family belongs, embodies the fusion of Indian and Western belief systems. Yet rather than producing harmony, this hybrid identity creates tension and exclusion. The church upholds social hierarchies, reinforcing caste discrimination despite its supposed egalitarian teachings (Roy, 1997, p. 45).
Baby Kochamma’s religious devotion represents blind adherence to Westernized morality rather than genuine faith. Her Christianity becomes a form of social performance aimed at maintaining status and purity. As Chacko (2001) observes, “Christianity in Roy’s novel symbolizes the colonization of the soul—where salvation is equated with Western conformity.” Roy thus critiques how religion, once a colonial import, became an internalized mechanism of control, shaping moral codes and gender expectations in Indian society.
Gender, Modernity, and Cultural Conflict
Western culture’s impact on gender roles is another central theme in Roy’s novel. Ammu’s life demonstrates the contradictions of modernity imposed by Western ideals. Educated and independent, she represents the influence of Western notions of female freedom. Yet, within her conservative community, her assertiveness is condemned as moral transgression. Her relationship with Velutha, a lower-caste man, defies both caste taboos and patriarchal restrictions, exposing the limitations of cultural modernity in postcolonial India (Roy, 1997, p. 310).
As Chanda (2008) points out, Roy’s portrayal of Ammu “reveals how Western ideals of autonomy collide with indigenous systems of control.” The promise of freedom through Western education and Christian morality remains hollow when social structures continue to oppress women. Thus, Roy presents gender oppression as a hybrid phenomenon—rooted in both indigenous patriarchy and Western moral imperialism.
Consumerism and the Allure of Western Modernity
Roy also critiques the growing consumerism that accompanied Western cultural influence in post-independence India. Characters’ fascination with imported goods, foreign education, and Western films signifies the rise of materialism as a new form of dependency. The Ipe family’s reverence for “London-made” items and their admiration for British culture symbolize how consumer choices became intertwined with identity and self-worth (Roy, 1997, p. 76).
Scholars such as Gopal (2010) argue that postcolonial India’s consumer culture perpetuated “neo-colonial dependencies disguised as modern aspiration.” Roy’s narrative reveals this tension through irony—her characters pursue Western sophistication yet find emptiness in imitation. The imported Coca-Cola bottles and British furniture in the family home serve as metaphors for borrowed identity: shiny, desirable, but hollow at the core. Through this lens, The God of Small Things portrays Westernization as both seductive and corrosive.
Cultural Alienation and the Loss of Indigenous Identity
The most profound consequence of Western influence in the novel is cultural alienation. The Ipe family’s obsession with Western norms leads to estrangement from their roots and from one another. Their social aspirations create emotional voids and moral confusion. The children, Estha and Rahel, inherit a fractured identity, torn between inherited Indian traditions and imported Western ideals.
As Nair (2003) notes, “Roy uses the fragmentation of family and memory to symbolize the broader disintegration of cultural coherence under Western domination.” The result is a society that is neither wholly Western nor authentically Indian—a hybrid culture marked by loss and imitation. This psychological dissonance reflects Frantz Fanon’s (1963) concept of “colonial neurosis,” where the colonized internalize the values of their oppressors, resulting in self-alienation. Roy’s novel poignantly illustrates this dynamic, making cultural displacement the emotional core of the narrative.
Resistance and Reclamation of Cultural Voice
Despite her critique of Western influence, Roy also celebrates resistance through narrative form and language. Her experimental style—nonlinear structure, sensory imagery, and hybrid diction—embodies defiance against Western literary conventions. By integrating Malayalam idioms and breaking grammatical rules, she reclaims storytelling as an act of cultural sovereignty (Roy, 1997; Ghosh, 2005).
As Sharma (2008) argues, “Roy’s stylistic rebellion mirrors the political act of reclaiming the postcolonial voice.” Through art, she redefines what it means to be modern and Indian, suggesting that true independence requires creative and linguistic liberation. In this sense, The God of Small Things is not only a critique of Western cultural dominance but also a manifesto for reclaiming local identity in a globalized world.
Conclusion: Negotiating Identity in a Postcolonial World
Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things offers a profound examination of how Western culture shapes, distorts, and defines Indian society in the aftermath of colonialism. By portraying the effects of Western education, religion, language, and materialism, Roy reveals the complex psychological and social consequences of cultural imperialism. Her characters embody the paradox of postcolonial existence—caught between admiration for Western ideals and the longing for authentic identity.
Ultimately, Roy’s novel invites readers to question the cost of modernity and the meaning of freedom in a world still shadowed by colonial history. Her portrayal of Kerala’s hybrid culture demonstrates that decolonization is not merely political but cultural and emotional. The God of Small Things stands as a reminder that the path to self-definition requires not imitation of the West, but the rediscovery of one’s own “small things”—the intimate, local, and authentic sources of identity.
References
-
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2002). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. Routledge.
-
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
-
Chacko, P. (2001). Religion and the Politics of Cultural Identity in The God of Small Things. Journal of South Asian Studies, 24(2), 45–60.
-
Chanda, T. (2008). Gender and Modernity in Postcolonial India. Feminist Literary Review, 18(4), 89–108.
-
Fanon, F. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press.
-
Ghosh, A. (2005). Postcolonial Aesthetics and the Language of Sensation. Routledge.
-
Gopal, P. (2010). The Indian English Novel: Nation, History, and Narration. Oxford University Press.
-
Mukherjee, M. (2003). Postcolonial Contexts in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 38(4), 91–106.
-
Nair, R. (2003). Cultural Displacement and the Postcolonial Self in Roy’s Fiction. Indian Literary Studies, 22(3), 47–63.
-
Roy, A. (1997). The God of Small Things. IndiaInk.
-
Sharma, P. (2008). Language, Identity, and Resistance in The God of Small Things. Cambridge University Press.