Analyzing Power Dynamics Within Family Structures in The Joy Luck Club
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Introduction
Amy Tan’s groundbreaking novel The Joy Luck Club offers a nuanced and complex exploration of power dynamics within family structures, particularly focusing on the relationships between Chinese immigrant mothers and their American-born daughters. Published in 1989, this influential work examines how power operates across generational, cultural, and gender lines within the immigrant family context, revealing the intricate ways authority is negotiated, contested, and transformed. The power dynamics in The Joy Luck Club are never simple or unidirectional; instead, Tan presents family relationships as sites of ongoing struggle where power shifts depending on context, cultural framework, and individual agency. Through the interwoven narratives of four mother-daughter pairs—Suyuan and Jing-mei Woo, An-mei and Rose Hsu, Lindo and Waverly Jong, and Ying-ying and Lena St. Clair—the novel demonstrates how power within families is shaped by factors including patriarchal tradition, immigration experiences, language barriers, cultural assimilation, economic circumstances, and personal trauma (Tan, 1989). This essay provides a comprehensive analysis of the various forms of power dynamics operating within the family structures depicted in The Joy Luck Club, examining how these dynamics reflect broader issues of cultural identity, gender relations, and intergenerational conflict in immigrant communities.
The significance of analyzing power dynamics in The Joy Luck Club extends beyond understanding individual family relationships to illuminating larger patterns of how power functions in immigrant and diaspora communities. The novel reveals how families serve as microcosms where larger cultural conflicts and power struggles play out, as characters navigate between Chinese and American value systems, each offering different models of authority, hierarchy, and family relations. The mothers carry with them Chinese cultural traditions that emphasize filial piety, parental authority, and family collectivism, while their American-born daughters have internalized American values of individual autonomy, egalitarianism, and self-determination (Bow, 2001). The resulting power struggles within families thus represent not merely personal conflicts but cultural collisions between competing systems of authority and relationship. By examining these power dynamics in detail, we can better understand the complex negotiations that immigrant families undertake as they attempt to preserve cultural heritage while adapting to new social contexts, and how individuals within these families resist, accommodate, and ultimately transform traditional power structures.
Maternal Authority and Cultural Transmission
The power dynamics between mothers and daughters in The Joy Luck Club are fundamentally shaped by the mothers’ attempts to exercise authority through cultural transmission, using their knowledge of Chinese tradition and life experience as sources of power within the family structure. The mothers view themselves as cultural guardians responsible for passing on Chinese values, wisdom, and identity to their American-born daughters, and this role grants them a specific form of authority rooted in cultural knowledge and generational seniority. In Chinese cultural tradition, parental authority, particularly maternal authority, is sanctioned by the concept of filial piety, which obligates children to respect, obey, and care for their parents (Chao, 1994). The mothers in the novel frequently invoke this traditional authority, expecting their daughters to defer to their judgment and accept their guidance without question. Lindo Jong’s expectations that Waverly will respect her opinions and acknowledge her mother’s superior wisdom exemplifies this traditional maternal authority, as Lindo believes that her life experience and cultural knowledge entitle her to exercise power over her daughter’s decisions and life direction (Tan, 1989).
However, the effectiveness of this traditional maternal authority is significantly complicated by the immigrant context and the cultural gap between mothers and daughters. The daughters, raised in American society and educated in American schools, often view their mothers’ traditional Chinese values and expectations as outdated, oppressive, or simply irrelevant to their contemporary American lives. This cultural dissonance creates a fundamental challenge to maternal authority, as the daughters question the legitimacy of power structures that seem foreign to their own cultural framework. Rose Hsu Jordan’s rejection of her mother An-mei’s advice about her failing marriage illustrates this pattern: Rose initially dismisses her mother’s Chinese wisdom as superstitious nonsense that has no bearing on her modern American relationship problems (Tan, 1989). The power struggle here is not simply between individuals but between competing cultural systems of authority, with the mothers attempting to exercise power through Chinese cultural frameworks while the daughters resist from their position within American cultural norms. This dynamic reveals how immigration and cultural displacement can destabilize traditional family power structures, creating spaces where parental authority becomes negotiable rather than absolute, and where children can challenge traditional hierarchies by invoking alternative cultural standards.
Language as Power and Limitation
Language functions as both a source of power and a significant limitation within the family structures depicted in The Joy Luck Club, creating complex dynamics where fluency and linguistic competence determine who can exercise authority in different contexts. The mothers’ limited English proficiency places them in positions of relative powerlessness when dealing with American institutions, schools, and social systems, forcing them to rely on their daughters as interpreters and cultural mediators. This linguistic dependency inverts traditional family hierarchies, granting daughters practical power over their mothers in public spaces and institutional contexts. Jing-mei’s role as her mother’s translator and cultural broker exemplifies this dynamic, as she gains power through her linguistic competence while her mother, despite her intelligence and strong personality, finds herself dependent on her daughter’s English skills to navigate American society (Tan, 1989). This linguistic power imbalance creates what sociolinguists call “language brokering,” a phenomenon common in immigrant families where children gain premature authority and responsibility by serving as linguistic and cultural intermediaries for their parents (Tse, 1995).
Yet language operates as a more complex power dynamic than simple English proficiency might suggest, as the mothers also wield linguistic power through their command of Chinese and their ability to communicate in culturally specific ways that their daughters cannot fully access or understand. The mothers frequently use Chinese words, concepts, and indirect communication styles that their daughters struggle to comprehend, creating a linguistic realm where maternal authority remains intact and even enhanced. When Lindo Jong speaks to Waverly in Chinese or uses Chinese concepts that have no easy English translation, she asserts a form of cultural and linguistic authority that her daughter cannot challenge through English fluency (Tan, 1989). This dynamic illustrates what sociolinguist Amy Chua describes as “bilingualism as resistance,” where immigrant parents maintain power through their heritage language even as they struggle with the dominant language of their new society (Chua, 2003). The mothers’ use of Chinese also functions as a gatekeeping mechanism, controlling access to family history, cultural knowledge, and emotional intimacy by keeping certain narratives in a language their daughters only partially understand. This linguistic strategy allows mothers to maintain power over family narratives and cultural transmission even when they lack power in broader American society, demonstrating how multiple languages create multiple sites of power and resistance within immigrant family structures.
Economic Power and Material Dependencies
Economic factors play a crucial role in shaping power dynamics within the families portrayed in The Joy Luck Club, as financial independence or dependence significantly affects family members’ relative positions of authority and autonomy. In traditional Chinese family structures, economic power typically resided with male heads of households, but the immigrant context and the novel’s focus on mother-daughter relationships reveal more complex economic dynamics. The mothers in The Joy Luck Club often occupy ambiguous economic positions: some have achieved financial stability or even prosperity in America, while others remain economically vulnerable, and all remember experiences of economic powerlessness in China. An-mei Hsu’s memories of her mother’s economic dependence on her wealthy husband and his family illustrate how economic vulnerability compounds women’s powerlessness within patriarchal family structures, as An-mei’s mother had no financial resources to escape her abusive situation (Tan, 1989). These memories inform how the mothers in America think about economic power and their determination that their daughters should achieve financial independence rather than relying entirely on husbands or families.
The daughters’ economic situations significantly shape their power dynamics both within their families and in their own marriages and relationships. Lena St. Clair’s equal financial contribution to her household initially seems to represent economic equality with her husband Harold, but the novel reveals how this apparent equality masks deeper power imbalances when Harold insists on splitting every expense despite his higher income and controlling the couple’s financial decisions (Tan, 1989). This scenario demonstrates how economic power in families extends beyond simple income levels to include control over financial decision-making, access to resources, and the ability to determine how money is spent and shared. The mothers recognize these subtle economic power dynamics and attempt to teach their daughters to be alert to financial manipulation and to maintain economic autonomy as a form of power within relationships. Lindo Jong’s emphasis on Waverly’s career success and financial independence reflects this understanding that economic power provides women with options, security, and the ability to resist unfavorable family dynamics. The novel thus reveals how economic power intersects with gender and generation in immigrant families, as mothers who experienced economic powerlessness in China seek to secure economic agency for their daughters in America, recognizing that financial independence is inseparable from personal autonomy and power within family structures.
Generational Hierarchies and Filial Obligations
The power dynamics between generations represent one of the most fundamental and contested aspects of family structures in The Joy Luck Club, as the novel explores the tension between traditional Chinese generational hierarchies and American egalitarian values. Chinese cultural tradition, influenced by Confucian philosophy, establishes clear hierarchies based on age and generation, with younger family members expected to demonstrate respect, obedience, and deference toward elders (Yeh & Bedford, 2003). The mothers in the novel carry these expectations with them from China, assuming that their daughters will honor traditional filial obligations including respecting parental wisdom, prioritizing family harmony over individual desires, and eventually caring for aging parents. An-mei Hsu’s attempts to guide Rose’s decisions about her marriage reflect this traditional expectation that children will seek and follow parental advice, viewing such deference as a natural expression of filial piety rather than an infringement on personal autonomy (Tan, 1989). The mothers’ insistence on these traditional generational hierarchies represents their attempt to maintain Chinese family structures even within the American context, using age and generational status as sources of legitimate authority over their daughters.
However, the daughters’ American upbringing has instilled values that fundamentally challenge these traditional generational hierarchies, creating ongoing power struggles over whose authority should prevail in family decision-making. American culture emphasizes individual autonomy, personal choice, and the idea that adult children should make their own decisions independent of parental approval, directly contradicting Chinese models of filial obligation and parental authority. Waverly Jong’s assertion of her right to make her own decisions about marriage and career, despite her mother’s disapproval, exemplifies this clash between American individualism and Chinese generational hierarchy (Tan, 1989). The daughters view their mothers’ expectations of obedience as unreasonable attempts to control their lives, while the mothers interpret their daughters’ independence as disrespectful rejection of family bonds and cultural values. This generational power struggle is particularly poignant because it reflects genuine cultural differences about how families should function rather than simple willfulness or misunderstanding. The novel suggests that these conflicts over generational hierarchy cannot be resolved simply by one side capitulating to the other, but rather require negotiation and the creation of hybrid family structures that honor both Chinese values of generational respect and American values of individual autonomy, allowing power to be shared rather than concentrated in a single generation.
Patriarchal Power and Female Resistance
Although The Joy Luck Club focuses primarily on mother-daughter relationships, patriarchal power remains a significant force shaping family dynamics both in the mothers’ memories of China and in their daughters’ contemporary American marriages. The mothers’ narratives frequently reveal how patriarchal family structures in China granted nearly absolute power to male family members, particularly fathers, husbands, and sons, while relegating women to subordinate positions with little agency or authority. An-mei’s memories of her mother’s situation as a fourth wife, subjected to the control of both her husband and the first wife in a hierarchical polygamous household, illustrate the extreme powerlessness that patriarchal family structures could impose on women (Tan, 1989). Similarly, Lindo Jong’s arranged marriage as a child bride demonstrates how daughters had no power over their own destinies but were instead treated as property to be transferred between families according to patriarchal arrangements. These memories of female powerlessness under patriarchal structures profoundly shape how the mothers understand family power dynamics and inform their determination to secure greater power and agency for their daughters in America.
Yet the mothers’ narratives also emphasize female resistance to patriarchal power, revealing how women found ways to exercise agency and subvert male authority even within highly restrictive patriarchal structures. Lindo’s clever manipulation of superstition and cultural beliefs to escape her arranged marriage represents a form of tactical resistance that allowed powerless women to achieve their goals by working within and exploiting the contradictions of patriarchal systems (Tan, 1989). An-mei’s mother’s suicide, while tragic, is presented as a final assertion of agency and a form of resistance against the patriarchal family structure that had trapped her, as her death according to Chinese belief would haunt and curse those who had wronged her. These stories of female resistance serve important functions in the mothers’ relationships with their daughters, modeling strategies of indirect power and demonstrating that women need not accept powerlessness even in patriarchal structures. The daughters, growing up in America with greater legal rights and social opportunities than their mothers had, nonetheless face patriarchal power in their own relationships, as Rose’s submissive role in her marriage and Lena’s financially manipulative husband demonstrate. The novel suggests that patriarchal power dynamics persist even in seemingly egalitarian American contexts, requiring continued vigilance and resistance from women who might otherwise find themselves in subordinate positions within family structures despite changed cultural circumstances.
Cultural Identity as Contested Power
The struggle over cultural identity within the families of The Joy Luck Club represents a significant arena of power dynamics, as mothers and daughters contest the right to define what Chinese American identity means and how much authority Chinese cultural traditions should exercise over family members’ lives. The mothers view cultural preservation as essential, attempting to instill Chinese values, language, and identity in their daughters as a way of maintaining continuity with their heritage and ensuring that their daughters remain connected to Chinese culture despite growing up in America. This cultural project represents an exercise of parental power, as the mothers seek to shape their daughters’ identities, values, and worldviews according to Chinese cultural models (Shih, 1998). Suyuan Woo’s insistence that Jing-mei learn piano and become a prodigy reflects not just maternal ambition but a cultural imperative to succeed and excel that carries Chinese cultural values about family honor and achievement (Tan, 1989). The mothers’ attempts to transmit Chinese cultural identity represent efforts to maintain power over their daughters’ self-concepts and life directions, using culture as a form of authority that extends beyond individual maternal preference to encompass ancestral tradition and ethnic heritage.
The daughters, however, often resist their mothers’ cultural authority, asserting their right to define their own identities as Americans rather than simply accepting Chinese identities imposed by their mothers. This resistance to cultural authority represents a fundamental challenge to maternal power, as daughters claim the autonomy to choose which aspects of Chinese culture to embrace and which to reject, rather than wholesale acceptance of their mothers’ cultural values. Waverly’s embarrassment about her mother’s Chinese behaviors in American contexts illustrates this dynamic, as she attempts to distance herself from Chinese identity to fit into American society, essentially rejecting the cultural identity her mother seeks to instill (Tan, 1989). Yet the novel reveals that this rejection of Chinese cultural identity leaves the daughters with a sense of incompleteness and disconnection, suggesting that their mothers’ cultural power derives from a genuine need that the daughters eventually recognize. By the end of the novel, most daughters move toward embracing hybrid Chinese American identities that honor both their Chinese heritage and their American experiences, representing a resolution to the cultural power struggle that neither fully validates maternal cultural authority nor completely endorses the daughters’ early rejection of Chinese identity. This negotiated outcome suggests that power over cultural identity in immigrant families must ultimately be shared, with younger generations claiming the right to adapt and reinterpret cultural traditions rather than simply preserving or rejecting them wholesale.
Emotional Manipulation and Psychological Power
Beyond obvious forms of authority and control, the families in The Joy Luck Club demonstrate how emotional manipulation and psychological tactics function as significant forms of power within family structures. The mothers frequently employ guilt, indirect criticism, and emotional pressure as means of influencing their daughters’ behavior and decisions, utilizing what psychologists call “psychological control” as distinct from behavioral control (Barber, 1996). These emotional tactics represent forms of power that do not rely on formal authority or economic resources but rather on intimate knowledge of family members’ vulnerabilities, desires for approval, and emotional needs. Lindo Jong’s ability to undermine Waverly’s confidence with subtle criticisms and disappointed looks exemplifies this form of psychological power, as Lindo manipulates Waverly’s emotions to influence her behavior without ever directly forbidding or commanding (Tan, 1989). The mothers’ expertise in emotional manipulation derives partly from their own experiences in Chinese family structures where indirect communication and emotional pressure often substituted for direct confrontation, and partly from their intimate knowledge of their daughters’ personalities and insecurities developed through years of close relationship.
The daughters are not passive victims of maternal emotional manipulation but often employ their own psychological tactics to resist or counter their mothers’ power. Silence, withdrawal, and withholding of affection or communication function as forms of power that daughters use to punish their mothers or assert independence from maternal control. Jing-mei’s years of refusing to fulfill her potential or pursue excellence can be understood as a form of passive resistance to her mother’s ambitions and pressures, asserting her autonomy by refusing to conform to maternal expectations (Tan, 1989). This pattern of emotional resistance and counter-manipulation creates complex psychological power dynamics where neither party fully dominates but both continually maneuver for advantage in an ongoing emotional contest. The novel reveals how these psychological power struggles, while sometimes productive in establishing boundaries and negotiating relationships, also create lasting pain and alienation within families. The mothers’ and daughters’ eventual reconciliations typically involve acknowledging these patterns of emotional manipulation and moving toward more direct, honest communication, suggesting that genuine family intimacy requires relinquishing certain forms of psychological power and control. The transformation of emotional power dynamics thus represents an important dimension of the novel’s overall arc toward greater mutual understanding and respect between mothers and daughters.
Authority Through Storytelling and Narrative Control
The power to tell stories and control family narratives represents a crucial form of authority within the family structures of The Joy Luck Club, as those who shape the family’s stories exercise power over how identity, history, and relationships are understood. The mothers initially control family narratives, possessing knowledge of family history, cultural traditions, and personal experiences that their daughters lack. This narrative authority grants mothers significant power to shape their daughters’ self-understanding and worldviews, as the stories mothers tell about their own lives, about Chinese culture, and about their daughters themselves become foundational narratives through which daughters interpret their own identities and experiences (Huntley, 1998). Suyuan’s narrative about Jing-mei’s “best quality” functions as an attempt to shape her daughter’s self-concept and life direction through storytelling, exercising power over identity formation through narrative authority (Tan, 1989). The mothers’ monopoly on family history and cultural knowledge initially places them in powerful positions as the sole sources of information about Chinese heritage and family background, making their daughters dependent on maternal narratives for understanding their own origins and identities.
However, the novel also demonstrates how narrative authority can shift and be contested, particularly as daughters gain the ability to tell their own stories and reinterpret the narratives they have inherited from their mothers. The structure of The Joy Luck Club itself, with chapters narrated by both mothers and daughters, represents a sharing of narrative authority that allows multiple perspectives on family events and relationships. When daughters narrate their own chapters, they claim power over their own stories and offer alternative interpretations of family dynamics that may contradict or complicate their mothers’ narratives. Rose’s account of her marriage and divorce presents her perspective on events that her mother An-mei might narrate differently, asserting Rose’s authority over her own story (Tan, 1989). This sharing of narrative authority represents a democratization of power within family structures, moving away from models where parents alone control family stories toward more egalitarian structures where multiple family members can contribute their perspectives. The novel suggests that healthy family dynamics require this kind of shared narrative authority, where no single family member monopolizes the power to define truth or identity, but rather different voices and perspectives coexist in productive tension. By the novel’s conclusion, the most successful family relationships are those where mothers and daughters have learned to listen to each other’s stories and grant each other the authority to narrate their own experiences, representing a transformation from hierarchical narrative control to dialogical narrative exchange.
Physical and Spatial Power in Domestic Settings
Physical space and domestic arrangements in The Joy Luck Club function as sites where power dynamics are enacted and contested, with control over physical environments reflecting and reinforcing other forms of family power. The mothers’ homes serve as spaces where they can exercise authority, establishing rules, routines, and expectations that govern behavior within the domestic sphere. The Joy Luck Club meetings themselves take place in the mothers’ homes on a rotating basis, and these domestic spaces become arenas where mothers exercise hospitality but also judgment, creating environments where Chinese cultural norms and maternal authority prevail (Tan, 1989). The physical arrangement of these gatherings—with mothers playing mahjong while daughters serve or remain peripheral—spatially enacts generational hierarchies and maternal authority, using physical positioning to reflect and reinforce power relationships. Control over domestic space represents a form of power that has historically been available to women even in patriarchal societies, as the home constituted a realm where female authority could operate even when women lacked power in public or economic spheres.
Yet physical and spatial power dynamics extend beyond simply who controls domestic space to include questions about presence and absence, proximity and distance, as family members use physical location to assert independence or maintain connection. The daughters’ choices about where to live—how far from their mothers, whether they visit regularly, whether they maintain Chinese elements in their own homes—represent assertions of autonomy and negotiations of familial obligation. Lena’s choice to live in a house that her mother immediately recognizes as unstable and improperly balanced reflects both Lena’s attempt at independence and her unconscious reproduction of imbalanced power dynamics from her childhood (Tan, 1989). The mothers’ visits to their daughters’ homes represent moments when maternal authority enters spaces that daughters control, creating complex negotiations about whose norms and expectations should govern behavior in these encounters. Ying-ying’s visit to Lena’s house and her intervention in Lena’s marriage illustrate how mothers can exercise power even in their daughters’ domestic spaces through the authority of presence and observation. The novel suggests that physical proximity and domestic arrangements in immigrant families must balance competing needs for independence and connection, with both mothers and daughters needing to negotiate how much physical and spatial separation supports healthy autonomy versus how much proximity maintains family bonds and allows for continued mutual influence and support.
Transformation and Evolution of Power Structures
Throughout The Joy Luck Club, family power dynamics undergo significant transformations as mothers and daughters move toward more balanced, reciprocal relationships that honor both generational authority and individual autonomy. The novel charts a progression from conflictual power struggles characterized by misunderstanding, resentment, and resistance toward more mature negotiations that acknowledge each party’s legitimate needs and perspectives. This transformation typically involves daughters gaining new appreciation for their mothers’ experiences, wisdom, and love, while mothers learn to respect their daughters’ American identities and autonomous choices. Jing-mei’s journey from resentment of her mother’s expectations to understanding and honoring her mother’s legacy through traveling to China to meet her half-sisters represents this transformation, as she moves from resisting maternal authority to voluntarily fulfilling maternal wishes (Tan, 1989). This evolution suggests that power dynamics in families need not remain static but can transform as family members mature, communicate more effectively, and develop greater empathy for each other’s positions.
The transformation of power dynamics in The Joy Luck Club does not represent simple resolution where all conflicts disappear, but rather the establishment of more flexible, negotiated power structures that can accommodate both Chinese and American values. The novel’s conclusion suggests that healthy immigrant families develop hybrid power structures that combine respect for parental wisdom and generational authority with recognition of individual autonomy and American egalitarian values. These hybrid structures allow power to flow in multiple directions rather than residing solely with one generation, as daughters can offer their own forms of knowledge and support to mothers while still receiving maternal guidance and cultural wisdom (Wong, 1995). Rose’s eventual ability to stand up to her husband while also accepting her mother’s support illustrates this more balanced power dynamic, where Rose exercises her own authority while remaining in productive relationship with maternal guidance rather than viewing autonomy and family connection as mutually exclusive. The novel thus offers a hopeful vision of how immigrant families can transform power struggles into power sharing, creating family structures that honor cultural heritage while embracing change, respect generational difference while maintaining connection, and allow all family members to exercise appropriate authority over their own lives while remaining accountable to family relationships and obligations.
Conclusion
The power dynamics within family structures in The Joy Luck Club reveal the extraordinary complexity of immigrant family relationships, where traditional hierarchies, cultural differences, generational conflicts, and gender dynamics intersect to create intricate webs of authority, resistance, and negotiation. Amy Tan’s novel demonstrates that power in families is never simple or monolithic but operates through multiple channels including cultural authority, linguistic competence, economic resources, emotional manipulation, narrative control, and physical presence. The mothers in the novel exercise power through their cultural knowledge, life experience, and parental authority, while also experiencing powerlessness as immigrants struggling with language barriers and cultural displacement. The daughters possess power through their American cultural competence and linguistic fluency while simultaneously struggling against maternal expectations and Chinese cultural pressures they do not fully understand. These competing forms and sources of power create family dynamics that are simultaneously conflictual and deeply loving, characterized by both struggle and profound connection.
The significance of Tan’s exploration of family power dynamics extends beyond its literary artistry to offer important insights into the experiences of immigrant families and the challenges of negotiating identity, authority, and relationships across cultural boundaries. The novel reveals how families serve as crucial sites where larger cultural conflicts are negotiated and where individuals must balance competing loyalties, values, and visions of good life. The transformation of power dynamics throughout The Joy Luck Club—from rigid hierarchies and painful conflicts toward more flexible, reciprocal relationships—offers hope that immigrant families can successfully navigate the challenges of cultural adaptation while preserving meaningful connections across generations. By analyzing the power dynamics in The Joy Luck Club, we gain deeper understanding not only of this particular literary text but of the broader experiences of immigrant communities, the resilience of family bonds across cultural divides, and the possibilities for creating new family structures that honor multiple cultural traditions while allowing all family members to exercise appropriate autonomy and authority. Tan’s novel ultimately suggests that the most successful families are those that can transform power struggles into opportunities for mutual understanding, creating relationships where power is shared rather than hoarded, where authority is earned rather than simply claimed, and where love and respect coexist with healthy boundaries and individual autonomy.
References
Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296-3319.
Bow, L. (2001). Betrayal and other acts of subversion: Feminism, sexual politics, Asian American women’s literature. Princeton University Press.
Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111-1119.
Chua, A. (2003). World on fire: How exporting free market democracy breeds ethnic hatred and global instability. Doubleday.
Huntley, E. D. (1998). Amy Tan: A critical companion. Greenwood Press.
Shih, S. (1998). Globalisation and the (in)significance of China. Postcolonial Studies, 1(3), 305-328.
Tan, A. (1989). The Joy Luck Club. G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Tse, L. (1995). Language brokering among Latino adolescents: Prevalence, attitudes, and school performance. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17(2), 180-193.
Wong, S. C. (1995). Sugar sisterhood: Situating the Amy Tan phenomenon. In D. Palumbo-Liu (Ed.), The ethnic canon: Histories, institutions, and interventions (pp. 174-210). University of Minnesota Press.
Yeh, K. H., & Bedford, O. (2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 215-228.