Examining the Concept of Justice versus Mercy as Competing Divine Attributes in Paradise Lost
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Introduction
John Milton’s epic poem Paradise Lost, published in 1667, stands as one of the most profound explorations of theological concepts in English literature. Among the many complex themes woven throughout this masterwork, the tension between divine justice and divine mercy emerges as a central concern that shapes the narrative structure, character development, and philosophical underpinnings of the entire epic. Milton’s treatment of justice and mercy as competing divine attributes reflects not only his deep engagement with Christian theology but also his attempt to “justify the ways of God to men” in the aftermath of humanity’s fall from grace (Milton, Book I, line 26). This examination of justice versus mercy in Paradise Lost reveals how Milton navigates the paradox of a God who is simultaneously perfectly just and infinitely merciful, exploring how these seemingly contradictory attributes coexist within the divine nature and manifest in God’s dealings with His creation.
The concept of justice in Paradise Lost encompasses retributive punishment, cosmic order, and the maintenance of divine law, while mercy represents compassion, forgiveness, and the possibility of redemption despite transgression. Throughout the epic, Milton demonstrates that these attributes are not merely opposing forces but complementary aspects of divine perfection that must be reconciled for a complete understanding of God’s character and His plan for humanity. The interplay between justice and mercy drives the narrative forward, from Satan’s rebellion and expulsion from Heaven to Adam and Eve’s fall in the Garden of Eden, and ultimately to the promise of redemption through Christ’s sacrifice. By examining how Milton portrays these competing divine attributes, we gain insight into early modern theological debates, the nature of free will and responsibility, and the enduring question of how a benevolent God can permit suffering and punishment in His creation.
The Theological Foundation of Justice and Mercy in Paradise Lost
Milton’s conceptualization of divine justice in Paradise Lost draws heavily from both classical and Christian theological traditions, presenting justice as an inherent and unchangeable aspect of God’s nature. In the epic, divine justice operates according to immutable laws that govern both Heaven and Earth, establishing consequences for disobedience that cannot be arbitrarily dismissed without undermining the moral order of the universe. God’s justice demands that sin be punished, that rebellion against divine authority be met with appropriate consequences, and that the integrity of cosmic law be maintained. This understanding reflects the theological principle that God’s justice is perfect and impartial, showing no favoritism and requiring satisfaction for every transgression (Danielson, 1982). Milton presents justice not as vengeance or cruelty but as a necessary expression of God’s holiness and righteousness, without which the moral framework of creation would collapse into chaos and meaninglessness.
However, Milton equally emphasizes that mercy is an essential divine attribute that works in concert with justice rather than in simple opposition to it. In Book III of Paradise Lost, the Father explicitly addresses the relationship between these attributes, declaring that mercy can be extended to humanity while justice is simultaneously satisfied through the sacrifice of the Son. This theological solution to the justice-mercy paradox reflects the Christian doctrine of atonement, wherein Christ’s voluntary suffering and death provide the satisfaction that justice requires while allowing mercy to flow freely to repentant sinners (Lewalski, 1985). Milton’s God states, “Man shall not quite be lost, but saved who will, / Yet not of will in him, but grace in me / Freely vouchsafed” (Book III, lines 173-175). This passage illustrates how mercy, in Milton’s framework, does not negate justice but rather fulfills it through divine grace. The competing nature of these attributes creates dramatic tension throughout the epic, forcing characters and readers alike to grapple with questions of fairness, punishment, forgiveness, and the true nature of divine love.
Satan’s Fall and the Primacy of Divine Justice
The narrative of Satan’s rebellion and subsequent fall from Heaven serves as the first major demonstration of divine justice operating in Paradise Lost, establishing the consequences of pride and disobedience that will later parallel humanity’s own transgression. Satan’s refusal to accept the exaltation of the Son represents a fundamental rejection of divine authority and hierarchical order, prompting God to exercise His justice by expelling the rebellious angels from Heaven. Milton portrays this judgment as both necessary and proportionate, emphasizing that Satan’s punishment results directly from his free choice to rebel rather than from arbitrary divine cruelty (Forsyth, 2003). The war in Heaven and Satan’s expulsion demonstrate that God’s justice operates swiftly and decisively against those who would disrupt cosmic harmony and challenge divine sovereignty. Satan himself acknowledges the justness of his punishment when he reflects in Book IV, “Which way I fly is Hell; myself am Hell; / And in the lowest deep a lower deep / Still threatening to devour me opens wide, / To which the Hell I suffer seems a Heaven” (lines 75-78), revealing that his punishment is both external and internal, a consequence intrinsic to his rebellious nature.
Yet even in Satan’s case, Milton hints at the possibility that mercy was initially offered but rejected, suggesting that divine mercy is always available to those who genuinely repent. Satan’s soliloquies reveal moments when he contemplates submission and repentance but ultimately chooses to persist in his rebellion, declaring “Evil be thou my Good” (Book IV, line 110). This refusal to accept mercy demonstrates that God’s justice is exercised not arbitrarily but in response to persistent, unrepentant rejection of divine grace. The absence of mercy in Satan’s case results not from God’s unwillingness to forgive but from Satan’s own hardened will and deliberate choice to embrace evil as his defining characteristic. Milton thus uses Satan’s narrative to establish that while justice may appear harsh or unforgiving, it ultimately respects the free will of rational creatures and honors their choices, even when those choices lead to their own destruction. The portrayal of Satan’s damnation raises profound questions about predestination, free will, and the limits of divine mercy—questions that continue to resonate throughout the epic and remain central to theological debates about justice and mercy in Christian thought.
The Divine Council: Debating Justice and Mercy for Humanity
Book III of Paradise Lost contains perhaps the most explicit theological discussion of justice versus mercy in the entire epic, as Milton presents a heavenly council where God the Father and God the Son debate humanity’s fate following the anticipated fall. In this crucial scene, Milton dramatizes the tension between these divine attributes by having the Father articulate the demands of justice while the Son advocates for mercy, though both ultimately represent unified aspects of the single divine will (Fish, 1967). The Father declares that humanity, having been created with sufficient reason and free will to stand against temptation, must face the consequences of disobedience: “Die he or Justice must; unless for him / Some other able, and as willing, pay / The rigid satisfaction, death for death” (Book III, lines 210-212). This statement encapsulates the central theological problem: justice requires death as the penalty for sin, creating an apparent impasse that would lead to humanity’s destruction unless some means of satisfying justice while extending mercy can be found.
The Son’s response to this dilemma provides Milton’s resolution to the justice-mercy paradox through the doctrine of voluntary atonement and substitutionary sacrifice. Offering Himself as the satisfaction for humanity’s sin, the Son declares, “Behold me then, me for him, life for life / I offer, on me let thine anger fall; / Account me man” (Book III, lines 236-238). This self-sacrificial offer allows both justice and mercy to be fully satisfied: justice receives its required payment through the Son’s death, while mercy can freely extend to humanity through grace rather than merit. Milton’s presentation of this heavenly dialogue serves multiple purposes: it demonstrates that justice and mercy are not truly in competition but rather complementary aspects of a unified divine plan; it emphasizes the voluntary nature of Christ’s sacrifice as an act of divine love rather than coercion; and it establishes the theological framework that will later allow Adam and Eve to receive forgiveness despite their transgression (Rumrich, 2007). The heavenly council scene also addresses the Calvinist debates of Milton’s era regarding predestination and election, suggesting that God’s foreknowledge of human choices does not negate genuine free will or reduce salvation to arbitrary divine selection. By presenting the reconciliation of justice and mercy as occurring within the Godhead itself, Milton elevates this theological problem to the highest metaphysical level, making it central to understanding the nature of divine perfection and the plan of redemption.
Adam and Eve’s Transgression: Justice Applied to Humanity
The actual fall of Adam and Eve in Books IX and X provides the crucial test case for how divine justice operates in response to human sin, demonstrating both the inevitability of punishment and the possibility of redemption. Milton carefully constructs the temptation scene to emphasize that Adam and Eve possess sufficient reason, knowledge, and freedom to resist Satan’s deception, thereby establishing their full responsibility for their choice to disobey God’s single prohibition (Schwartz, 1988). Eve’s decision to eat the forbidden fruit stems from pride, ambition, and a desire for knowledge that exceeds her appointed station, while Adam’s decision represents a choice to prioritize his love for Eve above his obedience to God. Both transgressions violate the divine command and disrupt the hierarchical order that maintains harmony in creation. The immediate consequences of their sin—shame, fear, mutual recrimination, and spiritual death—demonstrate that divine justice operates automatically as an inherent consequence of sin rather than as externally imposed punishment. Milton writes that they “soon found their eyes how opened, and their minds / How darkened” (Book IX, lines 1053-1054), indicating that the punishment is intrinsic to the act of disobedience itself.
When God descends to the Garden to pronounce formal judgment upon Adam, Eve, and the serpent, Milton presents a complex interweaving of justice and mercy that foreshadows eventual redemption even as it establishes punishment. The Father’s judgments are proportionate and specific: the serpent is cursed to crawl on its belly; Eve will experience pain in childbirth and subordination to her husband; Adam must labor painfully to extract sustenance from the ground and will eventually return to dust (Book X). These punishments satisfy the demands of justice by imposing real consequences for disobedience, yet they also display mercy in their limitations—Adam and Eve are not immediately destroyed, nor are they completely abandoned by their Creator (Lieb, 1981). The promise embedded in God’s curse of the serpent—that the woman’s seed will eventually bruise the serpent’s head—provides the first hint of the Gospel and ultimate redemption, demonstrating that even in judgment, divine mercy is already preparing a path for restoration. This simultaneous expression of justice and mercy in God’s response to the Fall reveals Milton’s sophisticated theological position: justice must be satisfied to maintain the moral order of the universe, but mercy can operate within and through that justice to achieve redemptive purposes that transcend mere retribution. The human response to this divine judgment—Adam and Eve’s eventual repentance and prayers for forgiveness—becomes crucial for activating the mercy that has been made available through the Son’s promised sacrifice.
Michael’s Prophecy: Justice, Mercy, and Human History
In Books XI and XII, the archangel Michael provides Adam with a prophetic vision of human history from the Fall to the eventual redemption through Christ, offering Milton’s most comprehensive treatment of how justice and mercy will continue to interact throughout human experience. This extended prophetic sequence serves multiple functions in Milton’s theological argument: it demonstrates that the consequences of sin will persist throughout human history, affecting all of Adam’s descendants; it shows that God’s justice will be repeatedly manifested in various forms of suffering, conflict, and death; and it reveals that divine mercy will also operate consistently, offering opportunities for repentance and ultimately providing complete redemption through Christ’s incarnation and sacrifice (Shawcross, 2001). Michael’s visions include scenes of murder, war, disease, tyranny, and corruption—all consequences of the Fall that demonstrate justice operating in human affairs. Adam responds with horror and despair at this vision of human misery, questioning whether life under such conditions is worth living and whether God’s justice has overwhelmed His mercy entirely.
Michael’s explanations help Adam—and through him, Milton’s readers—understand that even the most painful manifestations of divine justice serve ultimately merciful purposes by driving humanity toward repentance and dependence on God. The angel reveals that suffering and death, while genuinely punitive consequences of sin, can also function as disciplinary tools that prevent humanity from becoming completely hardened in wickedness and that create conditions under which repentance becomes possible (Fallon, 2007). Michael teaches Adam that “suffering for Truth’s sake / Is fortitude to highest victory” (Book XII, lines 569-570), reframing apparent divine severity as an aspect of providential care that prepares humanity for ultimate redemption. The climax of Michael’s prophecy comes with the revelation of Christ’s incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection—events that definitively reconcile justice and mercy by satisfying the penalty for sin while offering free grace to all who believe. Michael explains that through Christ, “To God is no access / Without Mediator, whose high Office now / Moses in figure bears, to introduce / One greater, of whose day he shall foretell” (Book XII, lines 239-242), establishing the ongoing relationship between law (justice) and grace (mercy) that will characterize the era between Christ’s first and second comings. By the conclusion of Michael’s instruction, Adam gains a mature understanding that justice and mercy are not competing attributes but complementary aspects of a unified divine plan for human redemption and cosmic restoration.
Free Will, Responsibility, and the Justice of Punishment
Central to Milton’s treatment of justice and mercy in Paradise Lost is his insistence on human free will as the foundation for moral responsibility and the justification for divine punishment. Throughout the epic, Milton repeatedly emphasizes that both angels and humans were created with sufficient reason and freedom to choose obedience or rebellion, making them genuinely responsible for their choices and deserving of whatever consequences follow (Danielson, 1982). In Book III, God declares of humanity, “I formed them free, and free they must remain, / Till they enthrall themselves: I else must change / Their nature, and revoke the high Decree / Unchangeable, Eternal, which ordained / Their freedom” (lines 124-128). This emphasis on free will serves multiple purposes in Milton’s theodicy: it absolves God of responsibility for evil by locating its origin in creaturely choice rather than divine causation; it establishes the legitimacy of punishment by demonstrating that sinners freely chose their actions despite possessing knowledge of the consequences; and it preserves human dignity by insisting that humans are genuine moral agents rather than puppets or automata.
The relationship between free will and divine justice becomes particularly complex when considering Milton’s treatment of predestination and election, theological issues that were intensely debated in seventeenth-century Protestant thought. Milton carefully navigates between Calvinist determinism and Arminian free will theology, suggesting that God’s foreknowledge of human choices does not causally determine those choices or eliminate genuine freedom (Rumrich, 2007). The Father states, “They trespass, Authors to themselves in all / Both what they judge and what they choose; for so / I formed them free, and free they must remain” (Book III, lines 122-124), indicating that divine omniscience is compatible with libertarian freedom. This position allows Milton to maintain both that God’s justice is perfectly fair—since humans genuinely choose their sins—and that God’s mercy is genuinely offered to all rather than arbitrarily limited to a predetermined elect. The dramatic representation of Adam and Eve’s deliberation before eating the forbidden fruit reinforces this emphasis on free choice, as Milton meticulously portrays their reasoning processes, temptations, and ultimate decisions to disobey. The justice of their punishment derives precisely from their freedom to choose otherwise, while the availability of mercy stems from God’s recognition that free creatures will inevitably err and require grace for restoration rather than merely justice for correction.
The Son as Mediator: Reconciling Justice and Mercy
The figure of the Son of God represents Milton’s primary theological solution to the apparent conflict between divine justice and mercy, functioning as the mediator who satisfies both attributes simultaneously through His dual nature and voluntary sacrifice. Throughout Paradise Lost, Milton presents the Son as the perfect embodiment of divine love and mercy while also acknowledging His role in executing divine justice, creating a complex characterization that transcends simple allegory (Lewalski, 1985). In the heavenly council of Book III, the Son’s offer to die in humanity’s place demonstrates the highest form of mercy—voluntary, unmerited, and costly—while simultaneously satisfying justice’s demand for punishment. The Father’s response to this offer reveals how the Son’s mediation resolves the theological impasse: “thy merit / Imputed shall absolve them who renounce / Their own both righteous and unrighteous deeds, / And live in thee transplanted, and from thee / Receive new life” (Book III, lines 290-294). This doctrine of imputation allows justice to be satisfied through Christ’s suffering while mercy flows freely to those who accept His sacrifice through faith.
Milton’s portrayal of the Son also emphasizes His active role in creation and judgment, not merely in redemption, demonstrating that mercy and justice are integrated throughout divine activity rather than segregated into different aspects or persons of the Godhead. The Son serves as God’s agent in creating the universe in Book VII, establishing Him as the source of all goodness and order in creation. Yet He also wields the sword of divine justice in expelling Satan and the rebel angels from Heaven, demonstrating that mercy and justice can coexist even within a single divine person (Forsyth, 2003). This dual role prevents readers from simplistically identifying the Father with justice and the Son with mercy, instead suggesting that both attributes characterize both persons of the Trinity in their essential unity. The Son’s willingness to become incarnate and suffer human limitations and death represents the ultimate expression of how divine mercy operates not by negating justice but by voluntarily absorbing its full force. Michael’s prophecy in Books XI and XII reinforces this understanding by showing how Christ’s earthly ministry, crucifixion, resurrection, and eventual second coming will complete the work of reconciliation begun in the heavenly council, definitively harmonizing justice and mercy in the restoration of redeemed humanity and the renewal of creation itself.
Repentance and Forgiveness: Mercy’s Response to Justice
The theme of repentance emerges as the crucial human response that activates divine mercy without negating divine justice, providing the practical mechanism through which Adam and Eve—and by extension, all humanity—can move from condemnation to redemption. Following their transgression and God’s judgment in Book X, Adam and Eve initially respond with despair, mutual blame, and consideration of suicide as an escape from their guilt and punishment. However, through a process of reflection, dialogue, and recognition of their true condition, they eventually arrive at genuine repentance characterized by acknowledgment of guilt, sorrow for sin, and humble appeal to divine mercy (Schwartz, 1988). Eve’s suggestion that they return to the place of judgment and plead for forgiveness marks a turning point in their post-Fall experience: “Let us seek Death, or he not found, supply / With our own hands his Office on our selves; / Why stand we longer shivering under fears, / That show no end but Death, and have the power, / Of many ways to die the shortest choosing, / Destruction with destruction to destroy?” (Book X, lines 1001-1006). Though initially proposing death, Eve’s subsequent recognition that they should instead seek God’s mercy demonstrates the movement from despair to hope that characterizes genuine repentance.
The reconciliation between Adam and Eve that precedes their joint prayer for forgiveness illustrates Milton’s understanding that horizontal relationships must be restored as part of the vertical reconciliation with God, reflecting a holistic view of redemption that encompasses both divine and human dimensions. When Adam and Eve finally prostrate themselves before God in Book XI, offering heartfelt prayers for forgiveness, Milton describes their repentance as both self-generated through free will and enabled by “prevenient grace” that prepares their hearts for true contrition (Lieb, 1981). This theological move allows Milton to maintain both human responsibility and divine initiative in the process of salvation, avoiding both Pelagian self-sufficiency and Calvinist determinism. God’s acceptance of their repentance and His decision to proceed with the redemptive plan through Christ demonstrates that mercy is available to those who genuinely seek it, even after justice has been pronounced. The Son serves as the mediator who presents their prayers before the Father, illustrating the ongoing role of Christ in bridging the gap between divine holiness and human sinfulness. This pattern of sin, judgment, repentance, and forgiveness establishes the paradigm that will operate throughout human history, demonstrating that while justice ensures consequences for sin, mercy provides a path to restoration for those who acknowledge their guilt and appeal to divine grace rather than their own merit.
Paradise Lost and Contemporary Theological Debates
Milton’s treatment of justice and mercy in Paradise Lost must be understood within the context of seventeenth-century theological controversies, particularly the disputes between Calvinists and Arminians regarding predestination, free will, and the extent of Christ’s atonement. Milton’s emphasis on free will and universal atonement places him closer to Arminian positions, though he develops these themes with sufficient nuance and complexity to resist simple categorization (Rumrich, 2007). The Calvinist doctrine of limited atonement—that Christ died only for the elect rather than for all humanity—conflicts with Milton’s portrayal of divine mercy as genuinely available to all who repent and believe. In Paradise Lost, God explicitly states that grace is offered to all, though not all will accept it: “Some I have chosen of peculiar grace / Elect above the rest; so is my will: / The rest shall hear me call, and oft be warned” (Book III, lines 183-185). This formulation attempts to preserve both divine sovereignty and human freedom, suggesting that election is real but not coercive or exclusive.
The epic also engages with debates about the nature of divine justice—whether it is retributive (punishing sin because it deserves punishment) or consequentialist (punishing sin to deter future wrongdoing and maintain order). Milton’s portrayal suggests elements of both understandings, with punishment serving both as deserved retribution for freely chosen sin and as a means of preserving cosmic order and ultimately leading creatures toward repentance and restoration (Danielson, 1982). The complexity of Milton’s theodicy reflects the sophisticated theological environment of mid-seventeenth-century England, where Puritan, Anglican, and more radical Protestant perspectives competed for dominance following the English Civil War and Interregnum. Milton’s own political and religious radicalism—his support for regicide, his advocacy for divorce reform, and his eventual rejection of Trinitarianism—inform his treatment of divine attributes, leading him to emphasize liberty, reason, and individual responsibility in ways that challenge both Catholic and orthodox Protestant traditions. By examining justice and mercy as competing yet complementary divine attributes, Milton participates in broader Enlightenment-era efforts to rationalize religious belief and demonstrate that Christian doctrine, properly understood, aligns with reason, morality, and human dignity rather than contradicting them.
Literary Techniques in Portraying Divine Attributes
Milton employs numerous literary and rhetorical techniques to dramatize the abstract theological concepts of justice and mercy, making them concrete and emotionally resonant for readers. The use of dramatic dialogue, particularly in the heavenly council scenes of Book III, allows Milton to present competing perspectives on divine attributes without immediately resolving them, creating tension that engages readers intellectually and emotionally (Fish, 1967). By having the Father articulate justice’s demands and the Son advocate for mercy, Milton personifies these abstract concepts and makes their interaction dramatically compelling. The epic’s narrator occasionally intrudes to offer theological commentary, helping readers interpret the significance of events and characters in relation to the justice-mercy theme. These narratorial interventions serve as a bridge between the dramatic action and the theological arguments Milton wishes to advance, ensuring that readers grasp the conceptual framework underlying the story.
Milton’s use of extended similes and epic catalogues also contributes to his portrayal of divine attributes by creating associations between theological concepts and concrete images drawn from nature, history, and human experience. When describing Satan’s fall, for instance, Milton compares him to various figures from classical mythology and biblical history, creating a network of associations that help readers understand the magnitude and significance of divine justice operating against rebellion (Forsyth, 2003). The contrast between the luminous, ordered beauty of Heaven and the dark, chaotic horror of Hell serves as a spatial representation of the consequences of rejecting divine mercy and provoking divine justice. Milton’s verse form itself—blank verse with its combination of formal structure and flexible rhythm—mirrors the relationship between justice (order, law, structure) and mercy (grace, flexibility, accommodation). The periodic sentences that characterize Milton’s style, with their complex subordination and delayed main clauses, force readers to hold multiple ideas in tension before arriving at resolution, mimicking the theological process of reconciling justice and mercy. These literary techniques ensure that Paradise Lost functions not merely as theological argument in verse but as an immersive aesthetic experience that allows readers to feel the weight of divine justice and the relief of divine mercy in ways that purely philosophical discourse cannot achieve.
Conclusion: The Unity of Justice and Mercy in Divine Perfection
Milton’s examination of justice versus mercy in Paradise Lost ultimately reveals that these apparently competing divine attributes are actually complementary aspects of a unified divine nature that transcends human understanding while remaining intelligible to human reason. Throughout the epic, Milton demonstrates that justice without mercy would reduce God to a tyrant, while mercy without justice would render Him morally arbitrary and incapable of maintaining the order necessary for creation to flourish. The Son’s voluntary atonement represents the theological and dramatic resolution to this apparent paradox, showing how both attributes can be fully satisfied simultaneously through divine love expressed in self-sacrifice. God’s justice is satisfied because sin receives its required punishment in Christ’s death; God’s mercy is expressed because humanity receives forgiveness rather than condemnation. This resolution depends crucially on the human response of repentance and faith, which Milton portrays not as meritorious works that earn salvation but as the necessary conditions for receiving the grace that Christ’s sacrifice has made available.
The enduring power of Paradise Lost lies partly in its sophisticated treatment of these perennial theological questions, which continue to resonate with contemporary readers regardless of their religious commitments. Milton’s insistence that justice and mercy must both be honored reflects a deep moral intuition that punishment without compassion is cruel while forgiveness without accountability is cheap. By dramatizing the tension between these values and showing how they can be reconciled through love and sacrifice, Milton offers not merely a defense of Christian theology but a profound meditation on the nature of moral perfection itself. The epic suggests that true goodness requires both the integrity to maintain standards and the compassion to forgive failures, both the courage to confront evil and the humility to recognize one’s own need for grace. Adam and Eve’s journey from innocence through transgression to repentance and hope models the human condition as Milton understood it—a state of freedom, responsibility, failure, and potential redemption that requires both divine justice and divine mercy for its proper resolution. In this way, Paradise Lost remains relevant not simply as a theological document or literary masterpiece but as an exploration of fundamental questions about justice, mercy, freedom, and love that continue to shape human experience and moral reflection in the contemporary world.
References
Danielson, D. R. (1982). Milton’s Good God: A Study in Literary Theodicy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fallon, S. M. (2007). Milton among the Philosophers: Poetry and Materialism in Seventeenth-Century England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Fish, S. E. (1967). Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost. London: Macmillan.
Forsyth, N. (2003). The Satanic Epic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lewalski, B. K. (1985). Paradise Lost and the Rhetoric of Literary Forms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lieb, M. (1981). Poetics of the Holy: A Reading of Paradise Lost. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Milton, J. (1667). Paradise Lost. London: Samuel Simmons.
Rumrich, J. P. (2007). Milton Unbound: Controversy and Reinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, R. (1988). Remembering and Repeating: Biblical Creation in Paradise Lost. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shawcross, J. T. (2001). Rethinking Milton Studies: Time Present and Time Past. Newark: University of Delaware Press.