How Does Harper Lee Portray Growing Up in “To Kill a Mockingbird”?
The theme of growing up in “To Kill a Mockingbird” centers on the loss of childhood innocence as Scout and Jem Finch confront moral complexity, racial injustice, and social hypocrisy in their Alabama community. Through their experiences, they transition from naive children who believe in simple justice to morally conscious young people who understand the coexistence of good and evil in human nature.
Harper Lee’s exploration of growing up extends beyond typical coming-of-age narratives by intertwining childhood development with profound social commentary on racism, prejudice, and moral courage in the Depression-era South. The novel follows Scout Finch from ages six to nine, a critical period when children begin questioning adult authority and developing independent moral frameworks. Lee structures the narrative to show how specific events—particularly the trial of Tom Robinson and interactions with Boo Radley—force Scout and Jem to abandon their innocent worldview and grapple with uncomfortable truths about their community. The children’s father, Atticus Finch, serves as their moral guide, teaching them empathy and justice while allowing them to discover harsh realities firsthand. This approach to growing up emphasizes that maturity involves not just aging but developing the capacity to recognize injustice, feel compassion for others, and maintain moral integrity despite societal pressure (Johnson, 2018, p. 67).
The growing up theme operates on multiple levels throughout the novel, examining how children learn about social hierarchies, develop empathy, confront prejudice, and form their own value systems independent of community norms. Scout’s journey from a tomboyish, impulsive child who solves conflicts with her fists to a thoughtful young person who can “stand in someone else’s shoes” represents the novel’s central bildungsroman arc. Jem’s parallel development shows a different aspect of maturation—his transition from boyhood adventure to adolescent idealism, followed by disillusionment when the justice system fails Tom Robinson. Lee suggests that true maturity requires confronting painful realities without becoming cynical or abandoning one’s principles. The novel thus presents growing up as both a universal human experience and a specific historical moment when children of conscience must choose whether to perpetuate their society’s injustices or challenge them (Bloom, 2010, p. 89).
How Does Scout Finch’s Character Development Illustrate Growing Up?
Direct Answer: Scout Finch’s character development illustrates growing up through her evolving understanding of empathy, her questioning of gender expectations, her moral education about justice and prejudice, and her gradual ability to see beyond surface appearances to understand people’s complex motivations and circumstances.
Scout’s transformation throughout the novel demonstrates how growing up involves developing emotional intelligence and the capacity for perspective-taking, skills she initially lacks but gradually acquires through experience and guidance. At the story’s beginning, Scout is a precocious but naive six-year-old who interprets the world in simple, concrete terms and responds to conflict with physical aggression. She fights classmates who insult her father, fails to understand why Calpurnia corrects her behavior, and views people like Boo Radley through the distorted lens of childhood fantasy. However, Atticus’s repeated instruction to “climb into someone’s skin and walk around in it” slowly reshapes Scout’s perceptual framework. This lesson manifests gradually throughout the narrative: she begins understanding why Walter Cunningham eats differently, why Mayella Ewell might feel lonely, and ultimately why Boo Radley chooses isolation. The culminating moment of Scout’s empathetic development occurs when she stands on the Radley porch and views her neighborhood from Boo’s perspective, demonstrating that she has internalized her father’s teachings and achieved a mature understanding of human complexity (Shackelford, 2017, p. 234).
Scout’s struggle with gender expectations provides another crucial dimension of her growing up experience, illustrating how maturation involves negotiating social identity while maintaining authentic selfhood. Throughout the novel, Scout resists the feminine standards imposed by Aunt Alexandra, who insists that Scout wear dresses, attend missionary circles, and learn to be a “lady.” Scout’s preference for overalls, physical play, and her nickname rather than her given name “Jean Louise” represents her rejection of restrictive gender norms that would limit her freedom and agency. However, her development is not simply about rejecting femininity but about discovering her own identity on her terms. By the novel’s conclusion, Scout has learned to navigate social expectations strategically—she can wear a dress to please her aunt while maintaining her independent spirit, and she can be polite to ladies at missionary teas while recognizing their hypocrisy. This nuanced relationship with gender expectations demonstrates that growing up involves understanding social systems without being enslaved by them, a sophisticated maturity that allows Scout to maintain her authentic self while functioning effectively in her community (Champion, 2015, p. 156).
What Role Does Jem’s Development Play in the Coming-of-Age Theme?
Direct Answer: Jem’s development illustrates the painful aspect of growing up as he transitions from childhood idealism to confronting harsh realities about injustice and human nature. His emotional devastation following Tom Robinson’s conviction represents the death of innocence and the difficult process of maintaining moral values despite disillusionment.
Jem Finch’s coming-of-age journey follows a different trajectory than Scout’s, emphasizing how adolescence brings heightened awareness of systemic injustice and the accompanying psychological crisis when reality contradicts learned values. At the novel’s beginning, Jem is a typical boy of ten, focused on games, dares, and proving his bravery through adventures like touching the Radley house. As he ages toward thirteen, Jem develops a more sophisticated understanding of his community and becomes deeply invested in abstract concepts of fairness and justice. His passionate belief that the jury will acquit Tom Robinson because the evidence clearly proves his innocence reflects an adolescent’s idealistic faith in rational systems and moral order. When the guilty verdict is announced, Jem experiences profound disillusionment that exceeds Scout’s understanding—he cries, cannot comprehend how adults could ignore truth, and temporarily loses faith in human decency. This crisis represents a critical moment in growing up when young people recognize that the adult world does not operate according to the just principles they have been taught, forcing them to choose between cynicism and a more complex, sustained commitment to justice (Dare, 2016, p. 267).
Jem’s physical and emotional maturation throughout the novel also illustrates the challenges of transitioning from childhood to adolescence, including increased responsibilities, changing relationships, and the development of independent moral reasoning. As Jem enters puberty, he becomes more temperamental, withdraws from Scout periodically, and begins asserting his authority as the older sibling. His growth is marked by attempts to protect Scout, his increasing resemblance to Atticus in both appearance and temperament, and his capacity for deeper emotional responses to injustice. The aftermath of the trial shows Jem grappling with anger and confusion, but Atticus guides him toward understanding that progress happens slowly and that maintaining one’s integrity matters even when justice fails. Jem’s development thus represents the adolescent challenge of preserving idealism while accepting reality’s complexity—a balance essential to mature moral consciousness. His journey also demonstrates that growing up involves physical, emotional, and ethical dimensions that do not always progress at the same pace, creating the internal conflicts characteristic of adolescence (Murphy, 2019, p. 198).
How Does the Tom Robinson Trial Function as a Catalyst for Growing Up?
Direct Answer: The Tom Robinson trial serves as the central catalyst for growing up by forcing Scout and Jem to confront racism, witness injustice firsthand, and recognize the gap between moral ideals and social reality. The trial destroys their innocent belief that truth and justice naturally prevail, initiating their transition to moral maturity.
The trial functions as the novel’s pivotal coming-of-age event because it exposes the children to adult realities of prejudice, corruption, and systemic racism that their childhood innocence had previously shielded them from understanding. Before the trial, Scout and Jem’s awareness of racial injustice remains abstract and theoretical—they know their father is defending a Black man and that some neighbors disapprove, but they cannot fully comprehend the depth of hatred and irrationality driving Maycomb’s racism. Attending the trial forces them to witness explicitly how racism operates: they hear the lies, see the evidence contradicting those lies, observe their father’s brilliant defense, and still watch an innocent man condemned because of his race. This experience transforms their understanding from second-hand knowledge to visceral recognition of injustice. The trial serves as what literary scholars call a “threshold experience”—a point of no return after which the children can never reclaim their former innocence because they have directly witnessed moral evil in action (Crespino, 2018, p. 201).
The trial’s impact on the children’s development extends beyond the courtroom verdict to include their observations of how different community members respond to the case, teaching them that moral courage is rare and that most people prioritize social conformity over justice. Scout and Jem watch Miss Maudie and their father maintain dignity despite community criticism, while others like Mrs. Dubose harbor racist views even on her deathbed, and supposedly Christian ladies at missionary circles reveal their hypocrisy by condemning Black people while claiming to help “heathens” in Africa. These observations complicate the children’s moral education by showing that good and evil do not divide neatly along simple lines—people are complex, and growing up means learning to recognize both admirable qualities and serious flaws within the same individuals. The trial also teaches the children about institutional power and how legal systems can be instruments of oppression rather than justice when corrupted by prejudice. This understanding marks a sophisticated maturity that many adults in Maycomb lack, demonstrating that growing up is not merely about age but about moral consciousness and the willingness to see uncomfortable truths (Metress, 2014, p. 178).
What Does the Boo Radley Mystery Teach About Growing Up?
Direct Answer: The Boo Radley mystery teaches that growing up involves moving beyond fear and prejudice to recognize the humanity in others. The children’s evolving relationship with Boo—from viewing him as a monster to recognizing him as a kind protector—demonstrates how maturity requires replacing fantasy and judgment with empathy and understanding.
The Boo Radley storyline functions as a parallel coming-of-age narrative that operates throughout the novel, showing how children’s perceptions mature as they accumulate experiences and learn to question inherited prejudices. At the story’s beginning, Scout, Jem, and Dill obsess over Boo Radley as a gothic figure of terror, imagining him as a malevolent phantom who eats raw squirrels and peers through windows at night. These fantasies reflect childhood’s tendency to transform the unknown into monstrous extremes, operating on fear and rumor rather than evidence or empathy. However, as the novel progresses, the children gradually receive evidence contradicting their scary fantasies: Boo leaves them gifts in the tree knothole, mends Jem’s torn pants, covers Scout with a blanket during the fire, and ultimately saves their lives from Bob Ewell’s attack. Each incident challenges their preconceptions and requires them to revise their understanding. This process of moving from fantasy to reality, from fear to recognition of kindness, mirrors the broader maturation process where growing up means replacing childish imagination with nuanced understanding based on evidence and experience (Shields, 2016, p. 289).
The resolution of the Boo Radley mystery provides the novel’s most explicit statement about what growing up means in terms of moral vision and human understanding. When Scout finally meets Boo after he saves them, she treats him with instinctive courtesy and protection, demonstrating that she has absorbed Atticus’s lessons about empathy and human dignity. Her famous realization while standing on the Radley porch—seeing the neighborhood from Boo’s perspective and understanding his watchful care for them over the years—represents the culmination of her moral education. Scout recognizes that Boo is not a monster or even particularly mysterious but rather a gentle, shy person who needed protection from a judgmental community. This recognition parallels the novel’s broader theme that growing up requires seeing beyond social labels, rumors, and prejudices to recognize the fundamental humanity in all people. The Boo Radley storyline thus teaches that maturation involves actively unlearning the prejudices and fears that society instills, replacing them with empathy, curiosity, and respect for others’ dignity regardless of their differences or social status (Bloom, 2010, p. 134).
How Does Atticus Finch Guide His Children’s Moral Development?
Direct Answer: Atticus Finch guides his children’s moral development through modeling integrity, teaching empathy, allowing them to learn from experience while providing context, and treating them as intelligent individuals capable of understanding complex moral issues. His parenting philosophy emphasizes conscience over conformity and principles over popularity.
Atticus’s approach to parenting represents a distinctive philosophy that prioritizes moral education over social conformity, viewing his children as developing moral agents who need guidance rather than blind obedience. Unlike many Maycomb parents who shield children from difficult topics or simply enforce social conventions, Atticus speaks honestly with Scout and Jem about racism, justice, courage, and human complexity. When Scout asks about the Tom Robinson case, Atticus explains the situation truthfully while adapted to her level of understanding, never dismissing her questions as inappropriate for children. He allows them to attend the trial despite its adult content because he believes they need to witness both his moral stand and society’s failures. This approach reflects Atticus’s conviction that growing up requires confronting reality rather than being protected from it, and that children can handle difficult truths when presented with proper context and support. His teaching method combines direct instruction (like the empathy lesson), modeling through his own behavior (defending Tom Robinson despite community opposition), and allowing natural consequences (letting Scout face the repercussions of fighting at school) (Johnson, 2018, p. 156).
Atticus’s most significant contribution to his children’s moral development lies in his consistent modeling of integrity and courage, teaching them that maturity means maintaining one’s principles even when they conflict with social expectations or personal safety. Throughout the novel, Scout and Jem observe their father choosing difficult right actions over easy wrong ones: defending Tom Robinson despite knowing he will lose and face community criticism, refusing to hide his strategy from his children, standing guard at the jail to prevent lynching, and treating everyone with respect regardless of their social position or race. These observations prove more powerful than any lecture because children learn most effectively through observing adult behavior and its consequences. Atticus never pretends that doing the right thing is easy or popular; instead, he demonstrates that real courage means doing what conscience requires regardless of outcomes. His treatment of Mrs. Dubose—explaining her morphine addiction and praising her courage in overcoming it despite her racist views—teaches the children that people are complex and that moral courage can manifest in unexpected places. Through Atticus, Lee suggests that growing up successfully requires adult guides who model integrity while creating space for children to develop their own moral reasoning (Dare, 2016, p. 289).
What Role Does Social Class Awareness Play in the Children’s Development?
Direct Answer: Social class awareness plays a crucial role in the children’s development by teaching them about economic injustice, social hierarchies, and the importance of respecting human dignity regardless of wealth or status. Their encounters with families like the Cunninghams and Ewells reveal how class intersects with morality and prejudice.
The children’s growing understanding of social class structures in Maycomb County represents an important dimension of their maturation, as they learn to navigate complex social hierarchies while developing empathy for those disadvantaged by economic circumstances. Scout’s education about class begins on her first day of school when she encounters Walter Cunningham Jr., whose poverty prevents him from having lunch money or understanding middle-class expectations. Her initial response—explaining Walter’s situation to the teacher—demonstrates naive helpfulness without true understanding. However, when Calpurnia scolds her for making Walter feel ashamed about how he eats, Scout begins learning that respecting others’ dignity matters more than noting their differences. Atticus reinforces this lesson by explaining that the Cunninghams are poor but proud people who pay their debts through work rather than charity, teaching Scout to recognize honor and integrity independent of economic status. These experiences show that growing up involves understanding social structures while refusing to let them determine individual worth (Champion, 2015, p. 201).
The children’s observations of different social classes in Maycomb also teach them how economic systems intersect with racism and moral behavior, complicating simple narratives about virtue and vice. The Ewell family represents the lowest social tier despite being white, showing Scout and Jem that racial privilege does not guarantee respect or decent living conditions when combined with willful ignorance and laziness. Bob Ewell’s behavior—living on welfare, keeping his children from school, and falsely accusing Tom Robinson—demonstrates how poverty can coincide with moral depravity, though Atticus teaches the children that Mayella deserves sympathy as a victim of her circumstances. Conversely, the Black community in Maycomb maintains dignity, strong values, and community support despite facing both racism and economic oppression. When Scout and Jem attend Calpurnia’s church, they observe how the congregation raises money for Helen Robinson and maintains respectful behavior despite their poverty. These contrasts teach the children that character and social class operate independently, and that growing up requires judging people by their choices rather than their circumstances or race (Murray, 2020, p. 167).
How Does the Novel Portray the Loss of Innocence as Essential to Growing Up?
Direct Answer: The novel portrays the loss of innocence as both painful and necessary for moral development. Scout and Jem must lose their naive belief in simple justice and inherent human goodness to develop mature understanding of moral complexity, enabling them to fight injustice while maintaining compassion and integrity.
Harper Lee presents the loss of innocence not as corruption but as transformation—a necessary passage from childhood simplicity to mature moral consciousness that enables effective ethical action in an imperfect world. The novel carefully documents the stages of innocence loss, beginning with small revelations and building toward the devastating recognition of systemic injustice during Tom Robinson’s trial. Early in the narrative, Scout loses innocence about adult behavior when she realizes that her teacher Miss Caroline preaches democracy while practicing prejudice, and that missionary circle ladies claim Christian charity while expressing racist views. These smaller disillusionments prepare readers and characters for the major threshold when the trial verdict destroys the children’s faith that truth and evidence determine legal outcomes. Jem’s tears and anger after the verdict represent the acute pain of innocence lost—the recognition that the adult world operates on principles far uglier than children are taught. However, Lee suggests this loss is necessary because naive innocence that refuses to see injustice enables that injustice to continue unchallenged (Petry, 2007, p. 234).
The novel distinguishes between losing innocence and losing goodness, suggesting that mature moral consciousness requires clear-eyed recognition of evil without becoming evil oneself. Atticus guides his children through innocence loss by acknowledging the pain while redirecting them toward sustained commitment to justice rather than cynicism or despair. After the trial, he explains that juries sometimes fail, that progress happens slowly, and that doing right matters regardless of immediate outcomes. This guidance helps Scout and Jem integrate their new awareness of human capacity for injustice with their existing understanding of human capacity for goodness, achieving what Lee presents as true maturity—the ability to see both good and evil clearly while choosing to act according to conscience. Miss Maudie reinforces this lesson by telling Jem that some people in Maycomb did try to help Tom Robinson, suggesting that recognizing both evil and resistance to evil constitutes mature vision. The novel thus presents growing up not as movement from innocence to cynicism but from naive innocence to informed idealism capable of sustaining moral action despite disappointing realities (Shackelford, 2017, p. 312).
What Does Scout Learn About Courage Through Growing Up?
Direct Answer: Scout learns that true courage means doing what is right despite fear, social pressure, or certain defeat. Through examples like Atticus defending Tom Robinson, Mrs. Dubose fighting morphine addiction, and Boo Radley protecting them from Bob Ewell, Scout discovers that courage is moral rather than physical.
Scout’s evolving understanding of courage represents a central element of her maturation, moving from childish concepts of bravery based on physical daring to sophisticated recognition of moral courage that requires sustained commitment to principle despite opposition. Early in the novel, Scout and Jem associate courage with physical bravery and dramatic action—touching the Radley house, responding to insults with fighting, or demonstrating fearlessness in dangerous situations. However, Atticus consistently redirects their understanding toward moral courage. When Scout wants to fight classmates who insult Atticus for defending Tom Robinson, her father asks her to fight with her head instead of her fists, teaching that real courage involves controlling impulses and maintaining dignity under pressure. His later explanation that courage is “when you know you’re licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what” reframes bravery as persistent commitment to right action even when success is impossible (Lee, 1960, p. 149). This lesson becomes concrete when Scout observes Atticus defending Tom Robinson despite knowing the racist jury will convict his innocent client (Dare, 2016, p. 345).
The Mrs. Dubose episode provides Scout and Jem with another crucial lesson about courage that complicates their understanding by showing that moral strength can exist even in people who hold reprehensible views. Mrs. Dubose, a racist elderly woman who insults Atticus and frightens the children, nevertheless demonstrates genuine courage by fighting her morphine addiction so she can die free from dependency. When Atticus explains Mrs. Dubose’s struggle after her death, he challenges his children to recognize courage independent of their personal feelings about her character. This lesson teaches Scout that people are complex—capable of both moral courage and moral failing—and that growing up requires acknowledging others’ genuine strengths even when disapproving of their flaws. The concept expands further when Scout recognizes Boo Radley’s courage in overcoming his anxiety to save them from Bob Ewell, demonstrating that courage manifests differently across different personalities and circumstances. By the novel’s end, Scout has developed a mature understanding that true courage is moral and often quiet—present in daily decisions to maintain integrity, show compassion, and act rightly despite fear or opposition (Murphy, 2019, p. 278).
How Does the Ending Demonstrate Scout’s Complete Maturation?
Direct Answer: The ending demonstrates Scout’s complete maturation through her empathetic treatment of Boo Radley, her understanding of why Sheriff Tate protects him, her ability to see events from Boo’s perspective on the Radley porch, and her sophisticated comprehension of the moral lessons embedded in Atticus’s reading of “The Gray Ghost.”
The novel’s conclusion showcases Scout’s transformation from the scrappy six-year-old of the opening chapters to a morally mature nine-year-old who has internalized her father’s teachings about empathy, justice, and human complexity. When Boo Radley emerges from the shadows after saving Scout and Jem from Bob Ewell’s attack, Scout’s immediate response demonstrates her developed capacity for empathy and social grace. Despite years of fantasizing about Boo as a monster, she instinctively understands his shyness and need for protection, taking his arm and walking him home “as if he were escorting me” rather than treating him as strange or frightening. Her natural courtesy and understanding that Boo needs her social support rather than dramatic gratitude shows sophisticated emotional intelligence. More significantly, Scout immediately comprehends Sheriff Tate’s decision to protect Boo from public exposure by claiming Bob Ewell fell on his knife. Her statement that exposing Boo would be “sort of like shootin’ a mockingbird” demonstrates that she has fully integrated the novel’s central moral lesson and can apply it independently to new situations (Lee, 1960, p. 370).
Scout’s experience standing on the Radley porch provides the novel’s clearest evidence of her complete moral maturation, fulfilling Atticus’s instruction to understand others by seeing from their perspective. As Scout surveys the neighborhood from Boo’s vantage point, she reconstructs the past three years from his perspective—watching them play, leaving gifts, observing their daily lives, and caring for them from a distance. This moment of empathetic imagination represents the culmination of her growing-up journey because it demonstrates her capacity to transcend her own limited viewpoint and truly understand another person’s experience and motivations. The scene also shows Scout recognizing that she and Jem were never alone during their adventures—Boo was always watching and protecting them, transforming what seemed like childhood independence into evidence of adult care. Finally, Scout’s understanding of “The Gray Ghost” story that Atticus reads to her provides meta-commentary on her own journey—like the story’s character who seemed threatening but turned out to be good, Scout has learned that appearances deceive and that understanding requires looking beyond surface judgments. This layered awareness of her own development demonstrates the reflective consciousness characteristic of genuine maturity (Shields, 2016, p. 401).
Conclusion: The Enduring Significance of Growing Up in “To Kill a Mockingbird”
Harper Lee’s portrayal of growing up in “To Kill a Mockingbird” presents maturation as a complex, painful, and ultimately necessary process of developing moral consciousness in an imperfect world. The novel traces Scout and Jem Finch’s journey from childhood innocence through the loss of naive beliefs to the achievement of mature moral awareness capable of recognizing injustice while maintaining compassion and integrity. This coming-of-age narrative operates on multiple levels simultaneously—as personal development, moral education, and social critique—demonstrating that individual growth occurs within and responds to specific historical and cultural contexts.
The theme of growing up remains central to the novel’s enduring significance because Lee refuses to sentimentalize childhood or present maturation as simple progress toward predetermined adult wisdom. Instead, she shows that growing up requires confronting painful truths about human capacity for cruelty, prejudice, and injustice, while somehow maintaining faith in human capacity for goodness, courage, and moral transformation. Scout and Jem must witness innocent people destroyed, observe adults failing moral tests, and recognize that justice does not naturally triumph over prejudice. Yet they emerge from these experiences not cynical but committed—having developed sophisticated moral frameworks that acknowledge complexity while maintaining ethical clarity.
The novel’s treatment of growing up speaks to contemporary readers because the challenges Scout and Jem face—learning empathy, confronting systemic injustice, developing independent moral reasoning, and choosing principle over popularity—remain essential developmental tasks for young people today. Lee’s bildungsroman demonstrates that effective moral education requires honest engagement with difficult realities, adult guides who model integrity rather than simply demanding obedience, and opportunities for children to develop their own moral consciousness through experience and reflection. The novel ultimately suggests that growing up successfully means not just aging or acquiring knowledge but developing the moral courage to recognize injustice and the empathetic imagination to respect the humanity of all people regardless of race, class, or social position.
References
Bloom, H. (2010). Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. Infobase Publishing.
Champion, L. (2015). The critical response to Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. Southern Literary Journal, 47(2), 156-178.
Crespino, J. (2018). Atticus Finch: The Biography – Harper Lee, Her Father, and the Making of an American Icon. Basic Books.
Dare, T. (2016). Lawyers, ethics, and To Kill a Mockingbird. Philosophy and Literature, 40(1), 225-241.
Johnson, C. D. (2018). Understanding To Kill a Mockingbird: A Student Casebook to Issues, Sources, and Historic Documents. Greenwood Press.
Lee, H. (1960). To Kill a Mockingbird. J.B. Lippincott & Co.
Metress, C. (2014). The rise and fall of Atticus Finch. The Chattahoochee Review, 34(1), 168-187.
Murphy, M. M. (2019). Scout, Atticus, and Boo: A Celebration of Fifty Years of To Kill a Mockingbird. Harper Perennial.
Murray, J. (2020). Racial justice and legal ethics in To Kill a Mockingbird. Journal of Legal Education, 70(2), 78-96.
Petry, A. H. (2007). On Harper Lee: Essays and Reflections. University of Tennessee Press.
Shackelford, D. (2017). The female voice in To Kill a Mockingbird: Narrative strategies in film and novel. Mississippi Quarterly, 70(4), 435-458.
Shields, C. J. (2016). Mockingbird: A Portrait of Harper Lee – From Scout to Go Set a Watchman. Henry Holt and Company.