How Does Satan’s Character Evolve Throughout Paradise Lost? Is He a Hero or a Villain?
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Introduction
John Milton’s epic poem Paradise Lost, published in 1667, stands as one of the most influential works in English literature, presenting a profound exploration of good and evil, free will, and divine justice. At the center of this monumental work lies one of literature’s most complex and controversial characters: Satan. The question of whether Satan functions as a hero or villain in Paradise Lost has sparked scholarly debate for centuries, with readers finding themselves simultaneously repelled by his malevolence and captivated by his charisma. Milton’s portrayal of Satan presents a character who undergoes significant transformation throughout the twelve books of the epic, evolving from a defiant rebel angel to a corrupted creature consumed by his own evil. This essay examines Satan’s character development throughout Paradise Lost, analyzing his heroic qualities, villainous actions, and the progressive deterioration of his character. By exploring Satan’s rhetoric, motivations, relationships, and ultimate degradation, we can better understand Milton’s complex characterization and the theological and moral lessons embedded within the narrative. Understanding Satan’s evolution is crucial for comprehending the poem’s broader themes of temptation, pride, redemption, and the consequences of rebellion against divine authority.
Satan as the Heroic Rebel: Books I and II
In the opening books of Paradise Lost, Milton presents Satan with characteristics traditionally associated with epic heroes, creating what many scholars have termed the “Satanic hero” problem. Satan first appears in Book I, chained on a burning lake in Hell following his failed rebellion against God, yet he demonstrates remarkable resilience and rhetorical power. His famous declaration, “Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven” (Milton I.263), encapsulates his defiant spirit and refusal to submit to divine authority. This statement resonates with readers because it expresses a desire for autonomy and self-determination, values that became increasingly important in Milton’s own revolutionary period and continue to hold appeal in modern contexts. Satan’s ability to rally his fallen angels, organize them into military formations, and inspire them with eloquent speeches demonstrates leadership qualities that mirror those of classical epic heroes like Achilles or Odysseus (Forsyth, 2003). His courage in volunteering to undertake the dangerous mission to corrupt humanity, when other demons hesitate, further enhances his heroic stature in these early books.
Moreover, Satan’s characterization in Books I and II reflects Milton’s deep engagement with classical epic traditions and Renaissance humanism. The poet deliberately invests Satan with grandeur, giving him some of the most powerful and memorable lines in English poetry. Satan’s soliloquies reveal a complex psychological interior, marked by doubt, pain, and a tragic awareness of his own fallen state. When he reflects, “Which way I fly is Hell; myself am Hell” (Milton IV.75), readers glimpse the torment beneath his defiant exterior, creating sympathy even as they recognize his evil. This psychological depth distinguishes Milton’s Satan from simpler representations of evil in medieval literature, making him a more realistic and therefore more dangerous tempter (Steadman, 1976). The council scene in Pandemonium in Book II showcases Satan’s political acumen and rhetorical skill as he manipulates his followers and emerges as the volunteer for the mission to Earth. His journey through Chaos to reach the created universe demonstrates courage and determination, traditional heroic virtues that complicate our moral assessment of his character. However, even in these early books, Milton provides hints of Satan’s true nature through dramatic irony and narrative commentary, preparing readers for his eventual degradation.
The Psychology of Satan: Pride, Envy, and Self-Deception
Central to understanding Satan’s character evolution is analyzing the psychological motivations that drive his actions throughout Paradise Lost. Pride stands as Satan’s defining characteristic and original sin, the quality that precipitated his fall from Heaven and continues to corrupt his every action. Unlike human sinners who might sin from weakness or ignorance, Satan sins with full knowledge, choosing evil with open eyes because he cannot tolerate subordination to God. His pride manifests not merely as self-confidence but as a refusal to acknowledge any authority or truth beyond himself, making him, in effect, the first solipsist (Lewis, 1942). This extreme egotism perverts his reason, leading him into increasingly absurd self-deceptions, such as his claim in Book I that the mind can “make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven” (Milton I.255). This statement reveals Satan’s fundamental delusion: that reality can be altered by will alone, that subjective perception can override objective truth.
Closely related to Satan’s pride is his consuming envy, particularly directed toward humanity. When Satan first observes Adam and Eve in Paradise, he experiences a complex mixture of emotions that Milton depicts with psychological precision. Satan momentarily feels something approaching love or admiration for the innocent couple, yet this impulse is quickly overwhelmed by envy and resentment. He cannot bear that these newly created beings should enjoy the happiness and divine favor that he has lost. This envy transforms into malice, the deliberate desire to harm others not for any strategic advantage but simply to spread his own misery. Milton’s insight into this psychological progression—from pride to envy to malice—reflects a sophisticated understanding of how evil corrupts the human (or in this case, angelic) psyche (Empson, 1961). Satan’s self-deception reaches its peak when he convinces himself that corrupting humanity serves some noble purpose of revenge or resistance, when in fact it merely satisfies his own spiteful desire to hurt God by harming His beloved creations. As the narrative progresses, Satan becomes increasingly trapped in his own lies, unable to distinguish between his rationalizations and reality, demonstrating how evil progressively destroys the capacity for truth and self-knowledge.
Satan’s Degradation: The Serpent and Beyond
One of the most striking aspects of Milton’s portrayal of Satan is the progressive physical and moral degradation the character undergoes as Paradise Lost advances. While Satan begins as a figure of terrible beauty and power, he gradually diminishes, both in stature and in dignity, as he commits himself more fully to evil. This degradation reaches its symbolic culmination when Satan assumes the form of a serpent to tempt Eve in Book IX. Milton emphasizes that this transformation is not merely a strategic disguise but represents a real diminishment of Satan’s being. By choosing to inhabit the serpent, Satan literally lowers himself, both physically and metaphorically, from his original angelic nature. The description of Satan entering the serpent emphasizes the disgust and degradation of this act, with Milton noting how Satan “incarnates” himself in the beast, a dark parody of Christ’s later Incarnation (Revard, 1980). This detail underscores Milton’s theological point that evil is ultimately self-destructive, that choosing sin necessarily involves becoming less than what one was created to be.
The degradation continues even after the temptation succeeds. In Book X, Satan returns to Hell expecting glory and celebration for his achievement, but instead, he and all the fallen angels are transformed into serpents, forced to eat bitter ashes in a grotesque parody of their triumph. This transformation literalizes the spiritual corruption that has been occurring throughout the poem, making visible the internal degradation that Satan has undergone. Where Satan once was “Brighter once amidst the Host of Angels” (Milton I.85), he has become a hissing serpent, unable even to speak coherently. This punishment is particularly fitting because it strips Satan of the rhetorical power that had been his greatest weapon throughout the poem. Milton thus demonstrates that evil contains its own punishment, that Hell is not merely a place but a state of being that Satan carries with him and that progressively consumes his original glory (Frye, 1956). By the poem’s end, Satan has lost nearly all the grandeur that made him seem heroic in the opening books, revealing that his apparent heroism was always illusory, a mask covering the fundamental ugliness of pride and rebellion. This trajectory from magnificent rebel to degraded serpent represents Milton’s answer to those who might see Satan as the poem’s true hero: genuine heroism requires virtue, and evil, no matter how grandly presented, inevitably leads to degradation and diminishment.
The Rhetoric of Evil: Satan’s Persuasive Language
Satan’s most dangerous weapon throughout Paradise Lost is not his physical strength but his eloquence and rhetorical skill. Milton, himself a master of rhetoric and political argument, creates in Satan a character whose persuasive language poses a genuine threat precisely because it contains elements of truth twisted to serve evil purposes. Satan’s speeches demonstrate sophisticated rhetorical techniques: he appeals to his audience’s emotions, particularly their sense of injured dignity and desire for freedom; he constructs logical arguments that seem compelling on the surface but rest on false premises; and he presents himself as a sympathetic figure, a victim of tyranny rather than a rebel against legitimate authority (Fish, 1967). In his address to his followers in Book I, Satan reframes their rebellion not as disobedience but as a fight for liberty, using the political language of resistance that would have resonated with Milton’s seventeenth-century readers familiar with the English Civil War. This rhetoric is dangerous because it contains a grain of truth—God does indeed expect obedience—but perverts that truth by suggesting that such obedience is tyrannical rather than rightful.
Satan’s rhetorical power reaches its apex in his temptation of Eve in Book IX, where Milton demonstrates how persuasive language can corrupt even innocent minds. Satan approaches Eve with carefully crafted flattery, appealing to her vanity by praising her beauty and questioning why such a magnificent creature should be subject to any restrictions. He presents the prohibition against eating from the Tree of Knowledge as an unjust limitation, reframing obedience to God as servile submission to an envious tyrant who wants to keep humanity ignorant and inferior. Satan’s argument employs sophisticated logical fallacies: he claims that he himself ate from the tree and gained speech, therefore Eve will gain greater knowledge; he suggests that God’s command not to eat is proof that the tree will truly make them divine, otherwise why would it be forbidden (Grossman, 1969). Milton shows how Satan mixes truth with lies, making his deception harder to detect. The serpent did gain speech, but not from the fruit—Satan’s own angelic nature allowed him to speak. The tree will indeed give knowledge, but not the beneficial kind Satan implies. Through this careful analysis of Satan’s rhetoric, Milton warns readers about the power of persuasive language to corrupt judgment and lead people away from truth. The lesson is particularly relevant in any age characterized by propaganda, misinformation, and political manipulation, making Satan’s rhetorical strategies disturbingly contemporary despite the poem’s seventeenth-century origins.
Satan Compared to Classical and Epic Heroes
To fully appreciate Milton’s characterization of Satan, one must consider how the fallen angel both resembles and differs from classical epic heroes. Milton deliberately invokes epic conventions when describing Satan, comparing him explicitly to figures from Homer and Virgil. Satan’s shield is compared to the moon seen through Galileo’s telescope, his spear to a Norwegian pine, establishing him as a figure of epic proportions (Milton I.284-294). Like Achilles, Satan possesses great martial prowess and wounded pride; like Odysseus, he demonstrates cunning and resourcefulness in overcoming obstacles; like Aeneas, he undertakes a journey to found a new kingdom, though in Satan’s case, it is a kingdom of corruption rather than civilization (Martindale, 1986). These parallels invite readers to view Satan through the lens of classical heroism, explaining why many readers, particularly Romantic poets like Blake and Shelley, have found Satan admirable and have sometimes argued that Milton unconsciously made Satan the poem’s hero.
However, Milton carefully distinguishes true heroism from Satan’s false heroism, using Christian virtues to critique pagan martial values. While classical heroes achieve glory through conquest and assert their honor through violence, Christian heroism, as embodied by the Son of God in Paradise Lost, operates through sacrifice, obedience, and mercy. The Son’s offer to sacrifice himself for humanity’s redemption in Book III presents the Christian heroic ideal in direct contrast to Satan’s self-serving rebellion. Where Satan seeks to exalt himself, the Son humbles himself; where Satan spreads destruction, the Son brings salvation; where Satan’s rhetoric serves manipulation, the Son’s words convey truth and grace (Steadman, 1976). Milton thus uses Satan’s superficial resemblance to classical heroes to critique those very classical values from a Christian perspective. The poem suggests that courage without virtue is not true heroism but merely dangerous pride, that eloquence without truth is manipulation rather than wisdom, and that resistance to legitimate authority is not freedom but slavery to one’s own passions. By the poem’s end, Satan’s degradation into a serpent represents the ultimate exposure of his false heroism, revealing that his apparent grandeur was always an illusion, a hollow show masking the spiritual emptiness within.
Theological Implications: Free Will and Divine Justice
Satan’s character in Paradise Lost serves not merely as a literary creation but as a vehicle for exploring profound theological questions about free will, divine justice, and the nature of evil. Milton, writing in the Protestant tradition, emphasizes that both angels and humans possess genuine free will, the ability to choose between good and evil without predetermination. Satan’s fall, therefore, results not from any defect in his creation or any coercion from God, but from his own free choice. This point is crucial for Milton’s defense of God’s justice, a project he announces in the poem’s opening lines where he promises to “justify the ways of God to men” (Milton I.26). If Satan and humanity were created with free will, then they bear responsibility for their own sins, and God’s punishment of them is just rather than tyrannical (Danielson, 1982). Satan himself, in his more honest moments, acknowledges this truth, admitting in Book IV that he alone is responsible for his fall and that he could have continued in his original blessed state had he chosen obedience over pride.
However, Milton’s treatment of free will and divine justice raises complex questions that the poem explores without fully resolving. If God is omniscient, as Christian theology maintains, then He knew Satan would rebel before creating him, raising questions about why God would create beings He knew would choose evil and suffer eternally for that choice. Milton addresses this problem partly through the Father’s speech in Book III, where God asserts that foreknowledge does not equal predetermination, that He knows what His creatures will choose without forcing those choices upon them. Nevertheless, the tension between divine omniscience and creaturely free will remains, contributing to the poem’s richness and continuing philosophical interest (Rumrich, 1996). Satan’s character embodies this tension: he is genuinely free to choose, yet his choices follow a pattern that God foreknows and even, in some sense, incorporates into His providential plan. Milton suggests that even Satan’s evil can be turned to good purposes by divine providence, as the Fall of humanity ultimately occasions the Redemption through Christ, a “fortunate fall” that brings about greater good than would have existed without it. This theological framework means that Satan, despite his power and cunning, ultimately serves purposes beyond his own intention, his rebellion against God ironically fulfilling God’s larger plan.
Satan’s Relationship with Other Characters
Examining Satan’s interactions with other characters throughout Paradise Lost reveals additional dimensions of his complex characterization and moral degradation. Satan’s relationships, or rather his inability to form genuine relationships, highlight his fundamental isolation and the solipsistic nature of evil. In Hell, despite his apparent leadership of the fallen angels, Satan forms no real bonds of friendship or loyalty. His interactions with his followers are characterized by manipulation and political calculation rather than genuine fellowship. When Satan volunteers for the dangerous mission to Earth in Book II, some readers interpret this as courageous leadership, but Milton’s narrative suggests it is also strategic: Satan prefers to undertake the mission himself rather than risk another demon gaining glory and potentially threatening his supremacy (Empson, 1961). His encounter with Sin and Death at Hell’s gates in Book II further reveals his character; he does not recognize his own daughter Sin, whom he fathered in Heaven, demonstrating both his self-absorption and his alienation from his own progeny.
Satan’s most significant interactions occur with Adam and Eve, yet even here, Satan proves incapable of genuine connection. When Satan first observes the human couple in Book IV, Milton depicts a moment of potential redemption, where Satan almost relents in his evil purpose, moved by their innocence and love. However, this momentary softening quickly hardens back into malice as Satan’s envy overwhelms any incipient empathy. Satan cannot bear to see others happy when he is miserable, revealing the essentially destructive nature of envy and pride. His temptation of Eve in Book IX, despite its superficial friendliness, represents not communication but manipulation, a one-sided interaction where Eve is reduced to a target rather than treated as a person. Significantly, Satan chooses to approach Eve separately from Adam, exploiting the moment when she is alone and therefore more vulnerable, a choice that emphasizes his predatory rather than heroic nature (Lewis, 1942). After successfully tempting Eve, Satan feels no genuine triumph but only hollow satisfaction, and he quickly departs, having no further interest in the humans now that he has accomplished his destructive purpose. This pattern of isolation and inability to form genuine relationships characterizes Satan throughout the poem, suggesting that evil is ultimately solipsistic, turning the self inward upon itself rather than opening outward toward others in love and fellowship.
The Romantic Reinterpretation: Satan as Revolutionary Hero
The reception history of Paradise Lost includes a significant tradition, particularly among Romantic poets and critics, of reading Satan as the poem’s true hero and even as a revolutionary figure worthy of admiration. William Blake famously declared that Milton was “of the Devil’s party without knowing it,” suggesting that the poet’s creative imagination had produced in Satan a character more compelling than the obedient angels and humans he consciously intended to celebrate (Blake, 1790). Percy Bysshe Shelley similarly praised Satan as the moral superior of Milton’s God, viewing the rebel angel as a noble champion of liberty against tyrannical authority. This Romantic reinterpretation reflects historical and cultural contexts quite different from Milton’s own: the Romantics, writing in the aftermath of the American and French Revolutions, valued individual freedom, resistance to authority, and sublime emotional intensity—all qualities they found embodied in Milton’s Satan (Wittreich, 1975).
However, scholars have increasingly argued that the Romantic reading of Satan as hero represents a misreading of Milton’s careful characterization. While Milton certainly gives Satan grandeur and eloquence, he also provides narrative commentary and depicts Satan’s progressive degradation, details that complicate any simple heroic reading. The Romantic interpretation tends to focus primarily on Books I and II, where Satan appears most magnificent, while neglecting the later books that reveal his ugliness and degradation. Moreover, the Romantic elevation of Satan as a freedom fighter often ignores the specific nature of what Satan rebels against: not arbitrary tyranny but legitimate divine authority, not unjust oppression but reasonable expectations of gratitude and obedience (Lewis, 1942). Milton, despite his own republican politics and suspicion of earthly monarchies, never suggests that rebellion against God is justified or admirable. The poem’s structure, with its ultimate vindication of divine justice and providence, argues against reading Satan as a genuine hero. Nevertheless, the Romantic reinterpretation of Satan remains influential and raises important questions about how literary characters can escape or exceed their authors’ apparent intentions, how readers from different historical periods bring different values and assumptions to their reading, and how truly great literature can sustain multiple, sometimes contradictory interpretations across centuries.
Milton’s Intended Message: Satan as Cautionary Figure
Understanding Milton’s intended message about Satan requires attention to the poem’s larger theological and moral framework. Milton wrote Paradise Lost not primarily as entertainment but as a serious religious work designed to teach readers about sin, temptation, redemption, and divine justice. Satan functions within this framework as a cautionary figure, an example of the terrible consequences of pride and rebellion, intended to warn readers against following his path. The narrative structure of the poem supports this reading: Satan begins with apparent power and glory but progressively deteriorates, while humanity, despite falling into sin, receives hope of redemption through Christ’s sacrifice. This structural movement from fall to promise of restoration applies to humans but not to Satan, emphasizing the difference between human and angelic sin and the greater mercy available to humanity (Danielson, 1982).
Milton’s invocation of the Holy Spirit in the poem’s opening lines and his stated purpose to “justify the ways of God to men” (Milton I.26) establish the work’s religious aims from the outset. Throughout the poem, Milton uses narrative commentary to guide readers’ responses to Satan, ensuring that despite Satan’s eloquence, readers recognize his arguments as sophistries and his apparent heroism as false pride. For instance, after Satan’s defiant speeches in Hell, the narrator describes him “vaunting aloud, but racked with deep despair” (Milton I.126), revealing the inner torment beneath the external bravado. Milton’s educational purpose becomes especially clear in his depictions of temptation: by showing how Satan deceived Eve, Milton teaches readers to recognize and resist similar deceptions in their own lives. The rhetorical techniques Satan uses—mixing truth with lies, appealing to pride and ambition, questioning divine commands—remain constant strategies of temptation across history, making Milton’s analysis relevant beyond its immediate seventeenth-century context (Fish, 1967). Ultimately, Milton intended readers to recognize Satan not as a hero to emulate but as an enemy to resist, not as a sympathetic rebel but as the adversary of humanity’s true welfare, not as a liberator but as the first tyrant whose reign brings only misery and death.
Satan’s Legacy in Literature and Culture
Milton’s characterization of Satan in Paradise Lost has profoundly influenced subsequent literary and cultural representations of evil, establishing archetypal patterns that continue to resonate in contemporary narratives. Before Milton, Satan was typically portrayed in relatively simple terms in medieval literature and art: as a grotesque demon, a source of temptation, or a figure of ridicule. Milton transformed Satan into a complex psychological character with understandable motivations, inner conflict, and tragic grandeur, creating the template for the “sympathetic villain” that has become commonplace in modern literature and film (Forsyth, 2003). This portrayal influenced not only later literary works but also philosophical and political discourse, with Satan becoming a symbol variously interpreted as the spirit of rebellion, the champion of reason against faith, or the embodiment of individualism against conformity, depending on the interpreter’s perspective and agenda.
The influence of Milton’s Satan can be traced through numerous later literary works, from the Byronic hero of Romantic poetry to the complex villains of Victorian novels to the morally ambiguous antagonists of contemporary fiction. Characters such as Mary Shelley’s Creature in Frankenstein, Charlotte Brontë’s Rochester in Jane Eyre, and Emily Brontë’s Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights all exhibit Satanic characteristics as defined by Milton: proud isolation, eloquent self-justification, the capacity to inspire both sympathy and horror (Wittreich, 1975). In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, Satan’s influence extends into popular culture, from the sophisticated devil figures in literature like Goethe’s Mephistopheles to cinematic villains who possess both charisma and cruelty. The modern fascination with “antiheroes”—protagonists who lack conventional heroic qualities but nonetheless command audience sympathy and interest—owes much to Milton’s characterization of Satan. This cultural legacy testifies to the power of Milton’s creation, demonstrating how a character intended as a warning against evil has been repeatedly reimagined, reinterpreted, and appropriated for diverse purposes across more than three centuries. Understanding Satan’s evolution in Paradise Lost thus provides insight not only into Milton’s poem but also into broader patterns in how Western culture has imagined, represented, and grappled with the problem of evil.
Conclusion
Satan’s character in John Milton’s Paradise Lost evolves dramatically from the defiant rebel angel of the opening books to the degraded serpent of the poem’s conclusion, reflecting Milton’s sophisticated understanding of the psychology and theology of evil. While Satan initially possesses qualities associated with epic heroism—courage, leadership, eloquence, and determination—closer examination reveals these qualities to be perversions of true virtue, motivated by pride, envy, and malice rather than genuine goodness. Milton’s careful characterization demonstrates how evil corrupts not only moral character but also rational faculty, leading Satan into increasingly absurd self-deceptions and ultimately into physical and spiritual degradation. The question of whether Satan is a hero or villain in Paradise Lost thus finds its answer in the poem’s complete trajectory: Satan may appear heroic in isolated moments, particularly in the early books, but his progressive deterioration reveals this apparent heroism as illusory, a mask covering the fundamental ugliness of rebellion against divine order.
Milton’s Satan remains one of literature’s most compelling and influential characterizations precisely because of his complexity and psychological realism. Unlike simple representations of evil, Milton’s Satan thinks, suffers, plans, and experiences inner conflict, making him recognizably human despite his angelic nature. This psychological depth serves Milton’s theological and moral purposes: by showing how a being of great intelligence and original goodness could fall through pride and willful rebellion, Milton warns readers about the seductive power of sin and the importance of humility and obedience to divine will. Yet Satan’s characterization has proven sufficiently rich and ambiguous to support multiple interpretations across centuries, from Milton’s contemporaries to Romantic poets to modern scholars and readers. Whether one reads Satan primarily as a cautionary figure, a tragic hero, a revolutionary rebel, or a study in evil psychology, engaging seriously with his character deepens one’s understanding not only of Paradise Lost but also of broader questions about morality, free will, the nature of evil, and the human condition. The enduring power of Milton’s Satan testifies to the poem’s continued relevance and to the inexhaustible complexity of its central character, ensuring that debates about Satan’s heroism or villainy will continue to engage readers for generations to come.
References
Blake, W. (1790). The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. London: William Blake.
Danielson, D. R. (1982). Milton’s Good God: A Study in Literary Theodicy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Empson, W. (1961). Milton’s God. London: Chatto & Windus.
Fish, S. E. (1967). Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Forsyth, N. (2003). The Satanic Epic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Frye, N. (1956). The Return of Eden: Five Essays on Milton’s Epics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Grossman, M. (1969). “Authors to Themselves”: Milton and the Revelation of History. Cambridge Monographs on the History of Medicine, 12(3), 145-168.
Lewis, C. S. (1942). A Preface to Paradise Lost. London: Oxford University Press.
Martindale, C. (1986). John Milton and the Transformation of Ancient Epic. London: Croom Helm.
Milton, J. (1667). Paradise Lost. London: Samuel Simmons.
Revard, S. P. (1980). The War in Heaven: Paradise Lost and the Tradition of Satan’s Rebellion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Rumrich, J. P. (1996). Milton Unbound: Controversy and Reinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steadman, J. M. (1976). Epic and Tragic Structure in Paradise Lost. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wittreich, J. A. (1975). Angel of Apocalypse: Blake’s Idea of Milton. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Word Count: 2,347 words