How Does Trust Develop in Voluntary Economic Relationships? (According to James M. Buchanan)
According to James M. Buchanan’s economic philosophy, trust develops in voluntary economic relationships through repeated interactions that demonstrate mutual benefit, constitutional rules that protect individual rights and enforce contracts, and the emergence of reputation mechanisms that reward trustworthy behavior while punishing opportunism. Buchanan argued that trust is not simply an external precondition for economic exchange but rather emerges endogenously from the voluntary exchange process itself, as individuals learn through experience that cooperation yields better outcomes than exploitation, and as institutional frameworks create credible commitments that make trustworthy behavior rational (Buchanan & Tullock, 1962). Trust develops most effectively within small, cohesive groups where repeated interactions allow individuals to observe each other’s behavior, build reputations, and internalize cooperative norms, though these trust relationships can extend to larger societies through intermediate institutions and constitutional structures that align individual incentives with collective well-being (Marciano, 2021).
Understanding Trust in Economic Relationships
What is Trust in Economic Contexts?
Trust in economic contexts refers to the willingness of individuals to place valuable resources, information, or opportunities in the hands of others with the expectation that those others will act in ways that benefit rather than harm the trusting party. Economic trust operates as a form of social capital that reduces transaction costs, facilitates cooperation, and enables exchanges that would otherwise be impossible due to information asymmetries or enforcement difficulties. When trust exists between trading partners, individuals can engage in complex, long-term transactions without requiring exhaustive contracts or costly monitoring mechanisms (Coleman, 1988).
Trust functions as both a precondition and a product of economic exchange. As a precondition, some minimal level of trust must exist for individuals to risk engaging in transactions with others, particularly when those transactions involve deferred performance, quality uncertainty, or vulnerability to exploitation. As a product, trust emerges and strengthens through successful exchange experiences that demonstrate the reliability and good faith of trading partners. This dual nature of trust creates a positive feedback loop in well-functioning economies where initial trust enables exchanges that, when successful, generate further trust and enable even more complex forms of cooperation. The development of trust thus represents a cumulative process of learning and relationship-building that occurs through repeated voluntary interactions (Putnam, 1993).
Buchanan’s Perspective on Trust and Voluntary Exchange
James M. Buchanan approached trust not as an abstract moral virtue but as an emergent property of institutional arrangements and exchange relationships. He emphasized that trust develops when individuals operate within constitutional frameworks that create incentives for trustworthy behavior and impose costs on opportunism. Rather than assuming that individuals possess inherent trustworthiness or altruistic motivations, Buchanan’s public choice perspective analyzed how self-interested individuals can nevertheless develop trusting and cooperative relationships when institutional structures align their personal interests with collective welfare (Buchanan, 1975).
Buchanan viewed trust as fundamentally connected to the voluntary nature of exchange relationships. He argued that voluntary exchange, by definition, involves mutual benefit and reciprocity, which naturally cultivate trust over time. When exchanges are truly voluntary, both parties must believe they will gain from the transaction, which means each party has incentives to behave in ways that encourage future exchanges. This mutual dependence creates conditions favorable to trust development, as individuals recognize that maintaining trustworthy reputations serves their long-term self-interest. Buchanan’s analysis suggested that trust emerges most reliably not from moral exhortation but from institutional arrangements that make trustworthy behavior individually rational and beneficial (Buchanan & Tullock, 1962).
The Role of Repeated Interactions in Building Trust
How Repeated Exchange Creates Trust Relationships
Repeated interactions provide the foundational mechanism through which trust develops in voluntary economic relationships. When individuals engage in multiple exchanges over time with the same partners, they accumulate information about each other’s reliability, honesty, and willingness to honor commitments. Each successful transaction serves as evidence of trustworthiness, gradually building confidence that future transactions will also proceed fairly. This learning process transforms anonymous market encounters into relationship-based exchanges where past performance predicts future behavior (Axelrod, 1984).
Buchanan recognized that repeated interactions fundamentally change the strategic calculus of economic actors. In one-time exchanges, individuals may face temptations to exploit their trading partners through deception, fraud, or shirking, since they will not interact again and therefore face no reputational consequences. However, in repeated exchange relationships, the prospect of future transactions creates a “shadow of the future” that disciplines current behavior. Individuals who exploit partners in the present sacrifice valuable future exchange opportunities, making trustworthy behavior rational even for purely self-interested actors. Buchanan’s constitutional political economy framework emphasized designing institutions that facilitate repeated interactions and long-term relationships, as these naturally generate the trust necessary for complex economic cooperation (Buchanan, 1975).
The Transition from Opportunism to Cooperation
Buchanan’s intellectual development reflected an evolving understanding of how individuals transition from opportunistic behavior to cooperative, trust-based relationships. In his early work on public finance, influenced by Swedish economist Knut Wicksell, Buchanan initially believed that individuals would naturally contribute to public goods without free-riding because they recognized the mutual benefits of cooperation. He viewed individuals as moral beings who would voluntarily pay taxes for public services they valued, much as they pay for private goods (Marciano, 2021).
However, as Buchanan engaged with mainstream economics and observed real-world political behavior, he acknowledged that narrowly self-interested individuals might indeed attempt free-riding or opportunistic behavior when they believe they can benefit without bearing costs. This recognition did not lead Buchanan to abandon his belief in voluntary exchange but rather to emphasize the importance of institutional mechanisms—such as constitutional rules, reputation systems, and social norms—that transform self-interest into cooperation. Buchanan came to understand that trust develops not by assuming individuals are inherently trustworthy but by creating conditions where trustworthy behavior becomes the rational response to institutional incentives. This transition from initial opportunism to sustained cooperation occurs through repeated interactions that demonstrate the personal benefits of maintaining trustworthy reputations (Marciano, 2021).
Constitutional Rules and Institutional Foundations of Trust
How Constitutional Frameworks Support Trust Development
Buchanan’s constitutional political economy emphasized that trust in economic relationships requires foundational constitutional rules that protect individual rights, enforce contracts, and constrain arbitrary power. These constitutional provisions create the predictable institutional environment necessary for trust to emerge and flourish. When individuals know that their property rights will be respected, that contracts will be enforced, and that neither private parties nor government officials can arbitrarily expropriate their resources, they gain confidence to engage in long-term investments and complex exchange relationships that depend on trust (Brennan & Buchanan, 1985).
Constitutional rules function as commitment devices that make trustworthy behavior credible and reliable. By establishing clear rules of the game and enforcement mechanisms, constitutional frameworks reduce uncertainty about how others will behave and what consequences will follow from different actions. This institutional predictability serves as a substitute for personal trust when individuals lack direct knowledge of their trading partners. Buchanan argued that well-designed constitutional rules should minimize opportunities for exploitation while preserving maximum space for voluntary exchange and cooperation. The goal is not to eliminate all risk from economic relationships but to ensure that trust violations result in predictable costs that deter opportunistic behavior while trust fulfillment yields rewards that encourage cooperation (Brennan & Buchanan, 1985).
Property Rights and Contract Enforcement
Secure property rights and reliable contract enforcement represent the most fundamental institutional requirements for trust development in economic relationships. Buchanan emphasized that without clearly defined and protected property rights, individuals cannot confidently enter into exchanges because they lack assurance that they will retain control over the resources they own or receive through trade. Property rights establish the boundaries of individual authority and create the legal foundation upon which voluntary exchange rests. When property rights are insecure or arbitrarily enforced, trust cannot develop because individuals must constantly fear expropriation or violation of their legitimate claims (Buchanan, 1975).
Contract enforcement mechanisms similarly prove essential for trust by ensuring that promises made in exchange relationships will be kept. Even when individuals initially trust their trading partners, the knowledge that contracts can be legally enforced provides additional security that encourages more extensive and complex exchanges. Buchanan viewed contract enforcement not as government intervention in voluntary exchange but as a necessary public good that facilitates voluntary cooperation by reducing the risks of opportunistic breach. The predictability created by effective contract enforcement allows individuals to extend trust to relative strangers, knowing that even if personal trust proves misplaced, legal mechanisms provide recourse and remedies for breach. This institutional backing transforms trust from a purely interpersonal relationship into a feature of the broader economic system (Buchanan, 1975).
Reputation Mechanisms and Social Capital Formation
The Economic Function of Reputation Systems
Reputation mechanisms serve as crucial intermediaries in the development of trust in voluntary economic relationships, particularly in contexts where repeated direct interactions between the same parties are impossible or infrequent. A reputation system aggregates information about individuals’ past behavior and makes that information available to potential future trading partners, effectively extending the shadow of the future even to one-time transactions. When individuals know that their current behavior will affect their reputation and influence future opportunities, they face incentives to behave trustworthily even when interacting with strangers (Greif, 1993).
Buchanan’s framework recognizes reputation as a form of valuable capital that individuals accumulate through consistently trustworthy behavior. Like other forms of capital, reputation requires investment to build—individuals must sometimes forego short-term gains from opportunistic behavior to maintain their trustworthy image. However, this investment pays returns over time as a good reputation attracts better exchange opportunities, more favorable terms, and increased cooperation from others. The economic value of reputation creates market-based incentives for trustworthy behavior without requiring government regulation or moral suasion. Reputation systems effectively privatize the enforcement of trust by making trustworthiness individually profitable rather than relying solely on altruism or duty (Buchanan, 1982).
Information Flow and Trust Networks
Trust develops more effectively in contexts where information about behavior flows freely among potential trading partners. Buchanan recognized that information asymmetries represent serious obstacles to trust, as individuals cannot trust those about whom they know little. Effective information networks—whether informal gossip in small communities or formal rating systems in modern markets—reduce these asymmetries by transmitting knowledge about who has proven trustworthy and who has violated trust in past interactions (Marciano & Ramello, 2023).
The flow of information about reputation creates network effects that amplify the benefits of trustworthy behavior and the costs of trust violations. When someone proves untrustworthy, information about their behavior spreads through the network, potentially excluding them from many future exchange opportunities. Conversely, establishing a reputation for reliability and honesty opens doors throughout the network as others seek to trade with known trustworthy parties. Buchanan emphasized that voluntary associations and intermediate institutions play vital roles in facilitating these information flows. Organizations, clubs, and professional associations create repeated interaction contexts where members observe each other’s behavior and share information, thereby generating the social capital necessary for trust to flourish. These intermediate institutions bridge the gap between the small-scale trust of families and friendships and the larger-scale trust necessary for extended market economies (Buchanan, 1982).
Small Groups and Moral Behavior in Trust Formation
The Special Role of Small, Cohesive Groups
Buchanan placed particular emphasis on small, cohesive groups as the natural setting for trust development in economic relationships. He argued that within small groups where members interact frequently, know each other personally, and share common values or identities, individuals naturally develop moral obligations toward one another that encourage trustworthy behavior. These small-group contexts—such as families, neighborhoods, voluntary associations, and religious congregations—create strong social bonds that both facilitate trust and provide informal mechanisms for sanctioning trust violations (Marciano, 2021).
The advantages of small groups for trust development stem from several factors. First, repeated face-to-face interactions provide extensive information about each member’s character, reliability, and past behavior, reducing the uncertainty that inhibits trust. Second, personal relationships create emotional and social incentives for trustworthy behavior beyond mere economic calculation, as individuals care about maintaining good standing within their community. Third, small-group settings enable informal monitoring and enforcement through social pressure, shame, and ostracism, which can effectively deter opportunism without formal legal mechanisms. Buchanan viewed organizing society around such small, cohesive units as a first and necessary step toward building the trust and social capital required for broader economic cooperation (Marciano, 2021).
Scaling Trust Beyond Face-to-Face Relationships
While Buchanan recognized the natural advantages of small groups for trust development, he also understood that modern economic prosperity requires extending trust and cooperation beyond face-to-face communities to larger and more anonymous market relationships. The challenge lies in finding institutional mechanisms that preserve the trust-generating properties of small groups while enabling coordination across large, diverse populations. Buchanan proposed that this scaling occurs through layered institutional structures that connect small groups into broader networks (Buchanan, 1975).
According to Buchanan’s vision, trust develops first within small groups through intensive personal interaction and moral behavior. These small groups then connect with each other through intermediate institutions—such as trade associations, professional organizations, and civic bodies—that facilitate exchange across group boundaries while maintaining accountability through reputation mechanisms and shared norms. At the highest level, constitutional rules and formal legal institutions provide the framework that enables even anonymous transactions to proceed with reasonable confidence. This nested structure allows trust to extend from intimate personal relationships to impersonal market exchanges without requiring either universal benevolence or perfect formal enforcement. The key insight is that large-scale economic trust builds upon rather than replaces the personal trust developed in small group settings (Buchanan & Tullock, 1962).
The Voluntary Exchange Process as Trust Generator
How Mutual Benefit Cultivates Trust
Buchanan’s most fundamental insight about trust development concerns the inherently trust-generating nature of voluntary exchange itself. When exchanges are genuinely voluntary, both parties must expect to benefit or they would not participate. This mutual benefit orientation creates natural alignment of interests that supports trust development. Unlike zero-sum interactions where one party’s gain represents another’s loss, voluntary exchange represents positive-sum cooperation where both parties improve their situation. This cooperative foundation makes trust rational and sustainable rather than requiring individuals to act against their self-interest (Buchanan, 1964).
The mutual benefit inherent in voluntary exchange generates trust through demonstrated reciprocity. When one party offers value to another in exchange for something they desire, and the other party reciprocates by providing the agreed-upon good or service, both parties experience the benefits of cooperation firsthand. Each successful exchange strengthens expectations of future cooperation and reduces concerns about exploitation. Over repeated exchanges, these positive experiences accumulate into generalized trust that extends beyond specific transactions to embrace the entire relationship. Buchanan emphasized that this trust emerges endogenously from the exchange process itself rather than being imposed externally through regulation or sustained through pure moral obligation (Buchanan, 1964).
Market Exchange as Moral Training Ground
Buchanan, along with economic thinkers like Kenneth Boulding, viewed market exchange not merely as an efficient mechanism for resource allocation but as a moral training ground where individuals learn cooperative behavior and develop trustworthy character. Through regular participation in voluntary exchange, individuals internalize norms of honesty, reliability, and reciprocity because these behaviors prove successful in generating beneficial trading relationships. The market rewards trustworthiness with repeat business, favorable terms, and expanded opportunities, while punishing dishonesty with lost customers, damaged reputation, and reduced prospects (Marciano & Ramello, 2023).
This moral education function of markets operates implicitly through experience rather than explicitly through instruction. Individuals may begin market participation with purely self-interested motivations, but through repeated interactions they discover that self-interest is best served by cultivating trustworthy reputations and maintaining cooperative relationships. The behavioral patterns that succeed in markets—keeping commitments, delivering quality goods, treating customers fairly, honoring contracts—become internalized as habits and may even transfer to non-market relationships. Buchanan and Boulding both emphasized that voluntary exchange relationships, while not as morally praiseworthy as altruistic giving or selfless friendship, prove morally superior to relationships based on threats of violence or coercion, and provide a realistic foundation for organizing peaceful and prosperous societies (Marciano & Ramello, 2023).
Trust as Social Capital in Economic Systems
Understanding Trust as a Form of Capital
Buchanan’s framework recognizes trust as a form of social capital—a valuable resource that facilitates economic activity, reduces transaction costs, and enables cooperation that would otherwise be impossible. Like physical capital or human capital, trust represents accumulated investment that yields ongoing returns. Building trust requires time, effort, and sometimes sacrifice of short-term advantages to establish credibility. However, once established, trust functions as a productive asset that makes future exchanges easier, cheaper, and more beneficial for all parties (Coleman, 1988).
Trust as social capital possesses distinctive characteristics that differentiate it from other capital forms. Unlike physical capital, trust cannot be owned individually but exists relationally between parties. Unlike human capital that resides in individuals, trust emerges from social relationships and networks. Trust also exhibits strong externalities—when two parties develop trust, this often benefits third parties who can observe their trustworthy behavior and learn from their example, or who can free-ride on the information and institutions they create. These characteristics mean that trust, while privately beneficial, also represents a public good that contributes to overall economic prosperity. Societies with high levels of generalized trust enjoy significant economic advantages because their citizens can cooperate more easily and engage in more complex transactions than societies where trust remains low (Putnam, 1993).
The Accumulation and Erosion of Trust Capital
Trust accumulates gradually through consistent trustworthy behavior but can erode quickly when trust is violated. Each instance of keeping commitments, fulfilling obligations, and treating partners fairly adds to an individual’s or institution’s stock of trust capital. Over time, this accumulated capital becomes increasingly valuable as reputation spreads and more people become willing to engage in trusting relationships. Buchanan recognized that this accumulation process requires patience and long-term orientation, as the immediate gains from opportunistic behavior may sometimes exceed the immediate costs, even though long-term costs from reputation damage far outweigh short-term gains (Buchanan, 1982).
The fragility of trust capital creates both opportunities and challenges for economic systems. On one hand, the difficulty of rebuilding lost trust creates strong incentives for maintaining trustworthy behavior—individuals and institutions with valuable trust capital hesitate to jeopardize it through opportunistic actions. On the other hand, this fragility means that trust-based economic systems remain vulnerable to shocks that damage confidence and trigger cascading failures of cooperation. Buchanan’s constitutional approach addresses this vulnerability by emphasizing institutional frameworks that protect trust even when individual actors occasionally fail to live up to expectations. By ensuring that trust violations result in predictable consequences and that trustworthy behavior receives reliable rewards, constitutional rules help stabilize trust capital and prevent its erosion from isolated incidents (Brennan & Buchanan, 1985).
Challenges and Limitations in Trust Development
Information Asymmetries and Strategic Uncertainty
Despite the trust-generating potential of voluntary exchange, Buchanan recognized that significant obstacles can prevent or undermine trust development in economic relationships. Information asymmetries represent a primary challenge, as individuals often lack sufficient information about potential trading partners’ past behavior, current circumstances, or true intentions. When one party knows significantly more than the other about relevant aspects of a transaction, the less-informed party faces increased risk and may hesitate to trust even when the better-informed party actually proves trustworthy. This information problem becomes particularly acute in one-time transactions with strangers, where no prior relationship exists to provide evidence of reliability (Buchanan, 1969).
Strategic uncertainty compounds the information problem by creating situations where even well-intentioned individuals cannot be confident about how others will behave. When multiple equilibria exist in strategic interactions, individuals may fail to coordinate on the mutually beneficial outcome even when all parties prefer cooperation to conflict. Trust development requires not only that individuals be trustworthy but also that they believe others will be trustworthy and that others believe they will be trustworthy, creating multiple layers of uncertainty. Buchanan’s institutional analysis suggested that clear, stable rules and focal points provided by cultural norms and constitutional provisions can reduce this strategic uncertainty by coordinating expectations around cooperative equilibria (Buchanan & Tullock, 1962).
The Free Rider Problem and Trust in Public Goods
Buchanan devoted considerable attention to the challenge of maintaining trust in contexts involving public goods or collective action, where individual incentives diverge from group interests. In such situations, individuals may be tempted to free-ride by enjoying the benefits of others’ contributions without contributing themselves. This free-rider problem can undermine trust because individuals who observe others shirking may lose faith in cooperative arrangements and withdraw their own contributions, triggering a downward spiral of declining trust and cooperation (Buchanan, 1968).
Buchanan’s analysis of the free-rider problem evolved over his career, reflecting deepening understanding of trust dynamics in collective action contexts. While he initially believed moral commitments within small groups would largely prevent free-riding, he came to recognize that even narrowly self-interested individuals can sustain cooperation when appropriate institutional structures create incentives for contribution and punishment for defection. The key insight is that trust in public goods contexts requires more than personal relationships or moral exhortation; it depends on institutional mechanisms—such as selective incentives, monitoring systems, and graduated sanctions—that make contribution rational and detectable while making free-riding costly and visible. These institutional supports allow trust to develop and persist even in larger groups where personal relationships cannot reach (Marciano, 2021).
Practical Implications for Building Trust in Markets
Designing Institutions to Foster Trust
The practical implications of Buchanan’s analysis emphasize the central importance of institutional design in cultivating trust within economic systems. Rather than assuming trust as given or relying on moral appeals to generate trustworthy behavior, policymakers and institutional designers should focus on creating structural conditions that make trust rational and sustainable. This requires attention to property rights security, contract enforcement reliability, information transparency, and accountability mechanisms that reward trustworthiness while sanctioning opportunism (Buchanan, 1975).
Effective institutional design for trust development should minimize barriers to repeated interaction and relationship formation, as these provide the most natural foundation for trust. Policies that facilitate long-term business relationships, encourage membership in voluntary associations, and support community institutions contribute indirectly but powerfully to trust development. Similarly, institutions should promote information flow about reputations while protecting privacy rights, enabling potential trading partners to assess reliability without creating opportunities for strategic manipulation or blackmail. Buchanan’s approach suggests that trust-promoting institutions work best when they remain largely invisible, creating background conditions that enable organic trust development through voluntary exchange rather than attempting to engineer trust through direct intervention (Buchanan, 1982).
The Limits of Government Intervention in Trust Building
Buchanan’s public choice perspective counsels caution about government attempts to mandate or artificially create trust in economic relationships. While government plays essential roles in establishing property rights and enforcing contracts, efforts to regulate trust directly or substitute government guarantees for market-based reputation mechanisms may prove counterproductive. Government intervention can crowd out organic trust development by replacing personal responsibility and reputation effects with external guarantees, reducing individuals’ incentives to cultivate trustworthy behavior or carefully evaluate potential partners (Buchanan & Tullock, 1962).
Moreover, Buchanan emphasized that government actors themselves face trust deficits when they operate outside proper constitutional constraints. Without effective limits on government power and mechanisms for holding officials accountable, political actors may exploit public trust for private gain through rent-seeking, favoritism, and redistribution toward politically powerful groups. This governmental trust problem suggests that building economic trust requires limiting government authority to its core functions of protecting rights and enforcing rules, while preserving maximum space for voluntary institutions and market mechanisms to generate trust through repeated interaction and reputation development. The ultimate goal is creating constitutional structures that make both private and public actors trustworthy by aligning their incentives with the interests of those who must trust them (Brennan & Buchanan, 1985).
Conclusion
James M. Buchanan’s comprehensive analysis demonstrates that trust in voluntary economic relationships develops through multiple interconnected mechanisms operating within appropriate institutional frameworks. Trust emerges endogenously from repeated exchanges that demonstrate mutual benefit, accumulates through reputation systems that reward reliability, and stabilizes under constitutional rules that protect rights and enforce commitments. Rather than viewing trust as an external moral requirement or cultural precondition for market economies, Buchanan revealed how voluntary exchange itself generates the trust necessary for its continuation and expansion (Buchanan, 1964).
The practical wisdom of Buchanan’s approach lies in its emphasis on institutional design rather than moral exhortation as the key to trust development. By creating constitutional frameworks that make trustworthy behavior individually rational, facilitating repeated interactions that enable learning and relationship building, and supporting information systems that maintain reputation accountability, societies can cultivate the trust capital necessary for economic prosperity and human cooperation. Buchanan’s vision suggests that trust develops most reliably not through top-down regulation or compulsory solidarity but through bottom-up emergence from voluntary exchanges occurring within well-designed institutional structures that align individual interests with collective well-being (Buchanan, 1986). Understanding these trust-generating mechanisms remains essential for designing economic and political institutions that enable human flourishing through peaceful and productive cooperation.
References
Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books.
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1985). The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1964). What should economists do? Southern Economic Journal, 30(3), 213-222. https://doi.org/10.2307/1055931
Buchanan, J. M. (1968). The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Rand McNally.
Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and Choice: An Inquiry in Economic Theory. University of Chicago Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. University of Chicago Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1982). Order defined in the process of its emergence. Literature of Liberty, 5(4), 5-18.
Buchanan, J. M. (1986). The constitution of economic policy. American Economic Review, 76(3), 243-250.
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. University of Michigan Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95-S120.
Greif, A. (1993). Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders’ coalition. American Economic Review, 83(3), 525-548.
Marciano, A. (2021). James Buchanan trusted market mechanisms because he trusted individuals. ProMarket. https://www.promarket.org/2021/05/16/james-buchanan-market-individuals-public-choice-nobel-history/
Marciano, A., & Ramello, G. B. (2023). Economics as moral exchange: James Buchanan meets Martin Buber. Public Choice, 195(1-2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01047-y
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Storr, V. H. (2009). Why the market? Markets as social and moral spaces. Journal of Markets & Morality, 12(2), 277-296.