How Has The Handmaid’s Tale Influenced Modern Activist Movements and Political Discourse?
The Handmaid’s Tale has profoundly influenced modern activist movements and political discourse by serving as a powerful symbolic framework for resistance against reproductive rights restrictions, authoritarian governance, and gender-based oppression. Since Margaret Atwood’s 1985 dystopian novel was adapted into a critically acclaimed television series in 2017, activists worldwide have adopted the iconic red robes and white bonnets worn by the story’s oppressed women as visual symbols of protest. The imagery from The Handmaid’s Tale has appeared at demonstrations across multiple continents, particularly during debates surrounding abortion rights, women’s healthcare access, and legislative attempts to control female bodily autonomy. This cultural phenomenon demonstrates how fictional narratives can transcend entertainment to become catalysts for real-world political engagement, providing activists with immediately recognizable iconography that communicates complex political messages about autonomy, freedom, and resistance to oppressive systems (Atwood, 1985).
What Is The Handmaid’s Tale and Why Does It Resonate With Contemporary Issues?
The Handmaid’s Tale, written by Canadian author Margaret Atwood and published in 1985, presents a dystopian vision of the Republic of Gilead, a totalitarian theocratic regime that has overthrown the United States government. In this nightmarish society, environmental disasters and sexually transmitted diseases have caused widespread infertility, leading the authoritarian government to enslave fertile women as “Handmaids” who are forced into ritualized sexual servitude to produce children for the ruling class. The novel explores themes of female subjugation, religious extremism, environmental collapse, and the fragility of democratic institutions. Atwood deliberately constructed her fictional world using only practices and policies that had historical precedents, ensuring that her cautionary tale remained grounded in realistic possibilities rather than pure fantasy. This commitment to plausibility has made The Handmaid’s Tale particularly unsettling and relevant across different historical moments, as readers recognize elements of Gilead’s oppressive systems in contemporary political developments (Atwood, 1985).
The story’s resonance with contemporary issues stems from its exploration of how quickly democratic freedoms can erode when citizens become complacent or when extremist ideologies gain political power. Throughout the narrative, Atwood illustrates how the transition to totalitarianism occurs gradually through incremental restrictions on rights and freedoms, particularly targeting women’s autonomy, financial independence, and reproductive choices. The novel depicts how the regime uses religious justification to legitimize its oppressive policies, how it controls information and literacy to maintain power, and how it divides women into hierarchical categories to prevent solidarity and resistance. These themes have proven disturbingly relevant in various political contexts, particularly during periods when reproductive rights face legislative threats, when religious conservatism influences policy-making, or when authoritarian leaders challenge democratic norms. The 2017 Hulu television adaptation renewed interest in Atwood’s work, introducing the story to younger generations and coinciding with significant political developments that made its warnings feel increasingly urgent and applicable to contemporary society (Miller, 2017).
How Did The Handmaid’s Tale Become a Symbol in Reproductive Rights Activism?
The transformation of The Handmaid’s Tale from literary fiction into a symbol of reproductive rights activism represents one of the most significant examples of cultural appropriation for political purposes in recent history. Beginning in 2017, activists began wearing the distinctive red robes and white winged bonnets—the uniform of Gilead’s Handmaids—during protests against legislative measures restricting abortion access and reproductive healthcare. This visual strategy proved remarkably effective because the costume immediately communicated the protesters’ message: that proposed legislation would reduce women to vessels for reproduction, stripping them of autonomy and dignity. The imagery gained particular prominence during debates over judicial appointments, state-level abortion restrictions, and efforts to defund reproductive healthcare providers. Organizations such as Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America endorsed and participated in these costumed protests, recognizing the power of the symbolism to capture media attention and crystallize public understanding of the stakes involved in reproductive rights battles (Blay, 2018).
The effectiveness of this protest strategy lies in its visual immediacy and cultural literacy. The Handmaid’s costume requires no verbal explanation for those familiar with Atwood’s work; it instantly evokes themes of forced reproduction, bodily control, and female subjugation. For those unfamiliar with the source material, the striking appearance of silent women in blood-red robes creates a powerful and unsettling image that prompts inquiry and engagement. Activists have deployed this imagery at state capitol buildings, outside courthouses during significant legal proceedings, and during confirmation hearings for judicial nominees whose positions on reproductive rights raised concerns among advocacy groups. The protests have occurred across the United States, from Texas to Ohio to Missouri, wherever legislative threats to reproductive access have emerged. International activists have also adopted this symbolism, with Handmaid-costumed protesters appearing at demonstrations in Argentina, Poland, Ireland, and other countries facing debates over abortion rights and reproductive healthcare access. This global adoption demonstrates how Atwood’s fictional world has provided a universal visual language for articulating concerns about reproductive freedom and governmental control over female bodies (Coaston, 2019).
What Role Has The Handmaid’s Tale Played in Protests Against Authoritarian Governance?
Beyond reproductive rights, The Handmaid’s Tale has emerged as a broader symbol of resistance against authoritarian governance and democratic backsliding. Activists have recognized that Atwood’s cautionary tale encompasses more than reproductive oppression; it illustrates how totalitarian regimes consolidate power through surveillance, information control, scapegoating of minorities, erosion of civil liberties, and the dismantling of democratic institutions. Protesters concerned about executive overreach, attacks on press freedom, normalization of political violence, and threats to judicial independence have invoked Handmaid imagery to express their alarm about democratic deterioration. The red robes have appeared at demonstrations opposing immigration policies perceived as cruel or discriminatory, at protests defending press freedom following attacks on media organizations, and at rallies supporting independent judiciary systems when judicial appointments or court decisions raised concerns about institutional integrity and rule of law (Kafer, 2019).
This broader application of Handmaid symbolism reflects an understanding that Atwood’s novel addresses systemic oppression rather than isolated policy disputes. The Republic of Gilead maintains power through interlocking systems of control: militarized enforcement, religious justification, class hierarchies, restricted movement, controlled communication, and the cultivation of fear and distrust among citizens. Activists drawing parallels between fictional Gilead and contemporary political developments emphasize these structural similarities, arguing that threats to democracy manifest through multiple simultaneous attacks on different aspects of free society. The costume has therefore become a versatile symbol of resistance, adaptable to various contexts while maintaining its core message about the dangers of complacency in the face of creeping authoritarianism. Political scientists and cultural commentators have noted that this symbolic appropriation demonstrates public awareness of democratic fragility and illustrates how popular culture can provide frameworks for understanding and articulating complex political concerns. The visual power of the protests has generated significant media coverage, extending the reach of activist messages beyond those physically present at demonstrations and creating lasting images that shape public discourse about democratic values and institutional integrity (Benhabib, 2018).
How Has The Handmaid’s Tale Influenced Political Discourse on Gender Equality and Women’s Rights?
The Handmaid’s Tale has fundamentally shaped contemporary political discourse on gender equality by providing a narrative framework that illuminates how women’s rights can be systematically dismantled through gradual policy changes and cultural normalization of regressive attitudes. Atwood’s novel depicts how Gilead strips women of financial independence by prohibiting them from owning property or holding employment, eliminates their right to literacy and education, removes their legal personhood by transferring custody and decision-making authority to male relatives, and reduces them to biological functions within a rigid social hierarchy. This comprehensive depiction of female subjugation has given advocates a reference point for discussing how seemingly isolated policy proposals might form part of broader patterns of gender-based discrimination. When legislators propose restrictions on women’s healthcare, education access, economic opportunities, or legal protections against violence, critics can reference The Handmaid’s Tale to illustrate how such measures fit within larger trajectories of subordination (Neuman, 2020).
The novel’s influence on gender discourse extends beyond specific policy debates to shape broader conversations about patriarchy, misogyny, and structural inequality. Feminist scholars and activists have used Atwood’s work to explore how societies justify and maintain gender-based oppression through religious doctrine, biological essentialism, cultural tradition, and economic arrangements that disadvantage women. The Handmaid’s Tale demonstrates how oppressive systems require women’s participation and complicity, depicting female characters who enforce Gilead’s rules, internalize their subordination, or compete for favor within hierarchical structures rather than resisting collectively. This complexity has enriched discussions about internalized misogyny, the challenges of building solidarity across class and racial lines, and the ways patriarchal systems divide women to maintain control. Academic conferences, university courses, and public intellectual discourse frequently reference The Handmaid’s Tale when examining contemporary gender relations, feminist activism, and the persistent challenges to achieving substantive equality. The story has thus become an intellectual touchstone, providing shared cultural vocabulary for articulating feminist critiques and imagining alternative social arrangements that prioritize dignity, autonomy, and equity (Tolan, 2018).
What Impact Has The Handmaid’s Tale Television Adaptation Had on Political Activism?
The 2017 Hulu television adaptation of The Handmaid’s Tale dramatically amplified the novel’s political impact by introducing Atwood’s dystopian vision to massive new audiences through a prestige television format that emphasized the story’s contemporary relevance. Starring Elisabeth Moss and created by Bruce Miller, the series expanded Atwood’s relatively brief novel into multiple seasons of television that deepened character development, explored resistance networks within Gilead, and extended the narrative to examine how other nations respond to the totalitarian regime. The adaptation’s premiere coincided with significant political developments, including debates over healthcare legislation affecting reproductive services, high-profile allegations of sexual misconduct sparking the #MeToo movement, and ongoing concerns about democratic norms and institutional integrity. This timing created a powerful synergy between fictional narrative and real-world events, with many viewers perceiving uncomfortable parallels between Gilead’s oppressive policies and contemporary political proposals (Miller, 2017).
The television adaptation’s visual language proved particularly influential for activist movements, as the series’ cinematography, costume design, and production values created striking imagery that translated effectively to protest contexts. The show’s depiction of Handmaids standing in silent witness, dressed in their distinctive red costumes, provided a powerful model for real-world demonstrations where activists adopted similar tactics of silent presence and visual symbolism. The series also expanded The Handmaid’s Tale’s cultural reach beyond literary audiences to include viewers who might not have encountered Atwood’s novel, thereby broadening the base of people who could recognize and understand the symbolism when deployed in political contexts. Social media amplified this effect, with images from both the television series and real-world protests circulating widely, creating feedback loops between fictional representation and political activism. The show’s creators and cast members embraced this political dimension, with actors and production staff explicitly supporting reproductive rights activism and acknowledging the series’ role in contemporary political discourse. This collaborative relationship between entertainment media and political movement demonstrates how cultural production can directly engage with and influence political mobilization in the digital age (Framke, 2019).
How Have International Activists Adopted The Handmaid’s Tale Symbolism?
The global adoption of Handmaid’s Tale symbolism demonstrates the story’s universal resonance and its capacity to transcend specific national contexts while addressing shared concerns about women’s rights and democratic governance. Activists in Argentina adopted the red robes and white bonnets during their successful campaign to legalize abortion, recognizing that the imagery effectively communicated their message about bodily autonomy and resistance to religious interference in reproductive healthcare policy. In Poland, where conservative government efforts to further restrict already limited abortion access sparked massive protests, demonstrators wore Handmaid costumes to highlight comparisons between proposed legislation and the reproductive oppression depicted in Atwood’s dystopia. Irish activists similarly deployed the symbolism during the ultimately successful campaign to repeal constitutional restrictions on abortion, using the visual language of The Handmaid’s Tale to frame their advocacy as resistance against theocratic control over women’s bodies (O’Toole, 2018).
Beyond abortion rights, international activists have adapted Handmaid symbolism to address diverse issues relevant to their specific political contexts while maintaining the core themes of resistance to oppression and defense of human dignity. In Israel, protesters concerned about religious conservative influence on government policy have worn the distinctive costumes at demonstrations defending secular governance and equal rights. Croatian activists deployed the imagery during protests against conservative social policies and restrictions on women’s healthcare access. The symbolism has appeared at demonstrations in Brazil, the Philippines, Hungary, and numerous other countries where activists perceive threats to democratic governance, women’s rights, or minority protections. This international appropriation illustrates how Atwood’s fictional Gilead functions as a flexible metaphor applicable across different political systems and cultural contexts. The global nature of Handmaid protests also demonstrates the transnational character of contemporary activism, with movements in different countries drawing inspiration from one another and recognizing shared struggles against similar forms of oppression despite varying local circumstances. Digital media has facilitated this international exchange, allowing activists to share strategies, coordinate symbolism, and build solidarity across national boundaries (Zarkov & Davis, 2018).
What Literary and Cultural Analysis Has The Handmaid’s Tale’s Activism Generated?
The prominent role of The Handmaid’s Tale in contemporary activism has generated substantial scholarly and critical analysis examining the relationship between fiction, popular culture, and political engagement. Literary scholars have explored how Atwood’s novel functions as political prophecy, cautionary tale, and activist tool, analyzing the text’s deliberate construction as a realistic extrapolation from existing historical practices rather than fantastical speculation. Academics have examined Atwood’s research process for the novel, noting that she drew exclusively from documented historical events—including reproductive slavery, religious totalitarianism, environmental disaster, and the systematic stripping of women’s rights—to construct her fictional world. This grounding in historical reality has made The Handmaid’s Tale particularly effective as a reference point in political discourse, as advocates can point to specific historical parallels that validate concerns about contemporary developments. Scholars have also analyzed the novel’s narrative structure, particularly its use of first-person retrospective narration that emphasizes how quickly normalcy can shift and how societies normalize oppression (Hammer, 2018).
Cultural critics have examined the phenomenon of Handmaid protests as an example of activist semiotics, exploring how the appropriation of fictional imagery creates politically potent symbolism that operates across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Analysis has focused on the costume’s visual impact—the blood-red color suggesting both fertility and danger, the white bonnet evoking both modesty and erasure of individual identity, the silent presence of protesters creating an unsettling spectacle that disrupts normal political discourse. Scholars have compared this appropriation to other instances where fictional narratives have influenced political movements, examining what makes certain stories particularly conducive to activist appropriation. The Handmaid’s Tale’s effectiveness appears to derive from its combination of visual distinctiveness, thematic clarity, cultural recognition, and emotional resonance. Media studies scholars have explored how the television adaptation amplified the story’s political impact, examining the relationship between entertainment media and political consciousness, and analyzing how streaming platforms enable rapid cultural dissemination that can quickly translate fictional narratives into political symbols. This body of analysis has enriched understanding of how societies process political anxieties through cultural narratives and how fiction can provide frameworks for articulating complex political concerns in accessible ways (Kaplan, 2019).
How Has Margaret Atwood Responded to Her Work’s Role in Activism?
Margaret Atwood has embraced her novel’s transformation into a political symbol while maintaining that the story serves as warning rather than prediction, emphasizing that The Handmaid’s Tale extrapolates from historical realities rather than inventing unprecedented forms of oppression. In numerous interviews, essays, and public appearances, Atwood has discussed her original intentions in writing the novel during the early 1980s, explaining that she sought to explore how quickly democratic societies could slide into totalitarianism when citizens become complacent about defending rights and institutions. She has expressed both satisfaction and concern about the novel’s renewed relevance, noting that while she appreciates its role in activating political awareness and resistance, the circumstances making it relevant represent troubling developments worthy of serious concern. Atwood has actively supported reproductive rights activism and has appeared at events alongside activists using Handmaid symbolism, lending her authorial authority to their causes and explicitly endorsing their appropriation of her fictional world for political purposes (Atwood, 2017).
Atwood has also used her platform to expand discussions beyond reproductive rights to address broader themes in The Handmaid’s Tale, including environmental degradation, class inequality, racial oppression, and the vulnerability of democratic institutions. She has emphasized that Gilead’s creation required multiple simultaneous crises—environmental disaster, infertility epidemic, economic collapse, terrorist attack—that enabled extremists to seize power under the guise of providing security and stability. This framing encourages readers and activists to recognize how multiple threats can converge to create conditions conducive to authoritarian takeover, and to remain vigilant across multiple fronts rather than focusing narrowly on single issues. Atwood has also published a sequel novel, The Testaments (2019), which continues exploring Gilead’s society while examining resistance movements and the regime’s eventual vulnerabilities. This continuation of the story demonstrates Atwood’s ongoing engagement with the themes that have made her original novel so politically resonant, and provides additional narrative material that activists and commentators can draw upon when articulating political concerns. Her active participation in discourse surrounding her work’s political deployment represents a significant dimension of The Handmaid’s Tale’s impact, as Atwood’s voice lends legitimacy and depth to activist appropriations of her fictional creation (Atwood, 2019).
What Criticisms and Limitations Have Emerged Regarding Handmaid’s Tale Activism?
Despite the powerful visual impact and cultural resonance of Handmaid-inspired activism, critics have raised important concerns about the limitations and potential problems with deploying this symbolism in political movements. Some feminist scholars and activists of color have criticized The Handmaid’s Tale’s centering of white women’s experiences while marginalizing the stories of Black women, Indigenous women, and other women of color within its narrative. Atwood’s novel briefly mentions that Gilead deports Black citizens to resettlement camps, effectively removing them from the story, while depicting the regime’s reproductive slavery primarily through the experiences of white protagonists. Critics argue that this narrative choice, while perhaps reflecting the novel’s origins in 1980s feminism’s limited intersectional awareness, becomes problematic when the story’s imagery dominates contemporary activism that should center the experiences of women of color who face disproportionate impacts from reproductive restrictions, healthcare inequities, and state violence. These concerns highlight ongoing tensions within feminist movements about whose experiences receive priority and whose voices shape activist narratives (Cooper, 2018).
Additional criticisms have focused on whether The Handmaid’s Tale framework adequately captures the complexity of contemporary threats to reproductive rights and women’s autonomy, or whether it sometimes oversimplifies political dynamics through dystopian metaphor. Some commentators argue that comparing specific policy proposals to Gilead’s totalitarian extremism can seem hyperbolic, potentially undermining the credibility of activist claims and alienating potential allies who might support reproductive rights but resist alarmist framing. Others note that the dramatic visual impact of Handmaid protests, while effective at garnering media attention, may prioritize spectacle over substantive policy analysis and sustained organizing work. There are also concerns that the symbolism’s cultural specificity—requiring familiarity with either Atwood’s novel or the television adaptation—may limit its effectiveness in communicating with broader publics or across different cultural contexts where the story lacks recognition. These critiques do not necessarily invalidate the strategic use of Handmaid imagery but rather suggest the importance of complementing visual symbolism with intersectional analysis, substantive policy advocacy, coalition building across diverse communities, and sustained organizing that extends beyond dramatic protest moments. Engaging seriously with these limitations can strengthen activist movements by encouraging more inclusive, strategic, and sustainable approaches to defending reproductive rights and democratic governance (Nussbaum, 2018).
How Has The Handmaid’s Tale Influenced Academic Discourse and Education?
The Handmaid’s Tale’s prominent role in contemporary political activism has significantly influenced academic discourse across multiple disciplines, with scholars in literature, political science, gender studies, sociology, and media studies engaging extensively with Atwood’s work and its cultural impact. Universities have incorporated The Handmaid’s Tale into curricula addressing dystopian literature, feminist theory, political philosophy, and contemporary social movements, recognizing the novel’s capacity to generate substantive discussion about power, resistance, gender, and governance. Academic conferences have featured numerous panels examining various dimensions of the story’s cultural impact, analyzing its literary qualities, historical contexts, political appropriation, and comparative relationship to other dystopian narratives. Scholarly journals have published extensive analysis of both Atwood’s original novel and the television adaptation, exploring themes including reproductive politics, religious extremism, environmental catastrophe, resistance strategies, and the construction of totalitarian systems (Howells, 2018).
This academic engagement has enriched public understanding of The Handmaid’s Tale’s political relevance by providing sophisticated analytical frameworks for interpreting both the fictional narrative and its real-world appropriation. Scholars have explored how the story functions within the dystopian literary tradition, comparing Atwood’s work to predecessors like George Orwell’s 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World while noting its distinctive focus on gender-based oppression and reproductive control. Academic analysis has examined the novel’s narrative techniques, particularly its fragmented structure and unreliable narration that mirror the protagonist’s incomplete understanding of her transformed society. Researchers have also investigated the historical parallels Atwood drew upon, documenting the real-world precedents for Gilead’s practices and thereby reinforcing the story’s grounding in plausible reality rather than pure imagination. This scholarly infrastructure supports activist appropriation of Handmaid symbolism by providing intellectual legitimacy and analytical depth that extend beyond surface-level symbolic deployment. Educational engagement with The Handmaid’s Tale has introduced multiple generations of students to critical thinking about democratic fragility, women’s rights, and the mechanisms through which oppressive systems maintain power, potentially contributing to a more politically engaged and critically aware citizenry (Hengen, 2019).
What Future Trajectory Might The Handmaid’s Tale’s Political Influence Follow?
The future trajectory of The Handmaid’s Tale’s influence on activist movements and political discourse will likely depend on several interconnected factors, including ongoing political developments affecting reproductive rights and democratic governance, the continued cultural prominence of Atwood’s work through media adaptations and literary engagement, and the evolution of activist strategies and symbolic vocabularies. If legislative and judicial threats to reproductive rights continue or intensify, Handmaid symbolism will likely remain relevant and widely deployed as activists seek powerful imagery to communicate their concerns and mobilize resistance. Conversely, if reproductive rights become more secure through legislation or constitutional protection, the urgency driving Handmaid-inspired activism might diminish, though the symbolism could remain available for future mobilization if circumstances change. The story’s broader themes of democratic vulnerability, authoritarian governance, and systemic oppression suggest it will maintain relevance beyond specific reproductive rights contexts, potentially being adapted to address emerging political concerns (Phillips, 2020).
The evolution of media landscapes and activist strategies will also shape The Handmaid’s Tale’s future political role, as new generations of activists develop their own symbolic vocabularies and reference points that may complement or eventually supersede Handmaid imagery. The continued production of television adaptations and potential future film or media versions of Atwood’s work could renew cultural engagement and introduce the story to new audiences, maintaining its availability as activist symbolism. Alternatively, cultural saturation might eventually diminish the imagery’s impact as audiences become desensitized to the symbolism or as it becomes so ubiquitous that it loses distinctive meaning. The development of intersectional feminist activism that centers the experiences of women of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, and other marginalized communities might also transform how activists engage with The Handmaid’s Tale, potentially leading to more nuanced deployments that address the story’s limitations while retaining its powerful core themes. Regardless of specific developments, The Handmaid’s Tale’s influence on early 21st-century political discourse represents a significant case study in the relationship between fiction and activism, demonstrating how narrative art can shape political consciousness and provide communities with shared frameworks for understanding and resisting oppression (Feuer, 2019).
Conclusion
The Handmaid’s Tale has emerged as one of the most politically influential works of fiction in contemporary society, transcending its origins as speculative literature to become a powerful symbol in activist movements addressing reproductive rights, gender equality, and democratic governance. Margaret Atwood’s deliberate construction of her dystopian world using historical precedents rather than pure imagination has given her cautionary tale enduring relevance across different political contexts and cultural moments. The adoption of Handmaid imagery—particularly the distinctive red robes and white bonnets—by activists worldwide demonstrates the power of visual symbolism to communicate complex political messages and mobilize public engagement. From reproductive rights demonstrations in the United States to abortion rights campaigns in Argentina, Ireland, and Poland, the costume has provided a universal visual language for expressing concerns about governmental control over women’s bodies and the erosion of hard-won freedoms.
The story’s influence extends beyond street protests to shape academic discourse, educational curricula, media production, and broader cultural conversations about power, oppression, and resistance. The 2017 television adaptation amplified these impacts by introducing Atwood’s vision to massive new audiences at a politically significant moment, creating synergies between fictional narrative and real-world developments that reinforced the story’s relevance and urgency. While critics have raised important concerns about the symbolism’s limitations—particularly regarding racial representation and the risks of oversimplification through dystopian metaphor—The Handmaid’s Tale’s cultural impact remains undeniable. The story has provided activists with powerful frameworks for articulating political concerns, has enriched public understanding of how democratic societies can slide toward authoritarianism, and has demonstrated fiction’s capacity to shape political consciousness and inspire resistance to oppression.
References
Atwood, M. (1985). The Handmaid’s Tale. McClelland and Stewart.
Atwood, M. (2017). Margaret Atwood on what ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ means in the age of Trump. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com
Atwood, M. (2019). The Testaments. Nan A. Talese/Doubleday.
Benhabib, S. (2018). The end of the 1989 consensus? Citizenship, borders, and human rights. Constellations, 25(1), 7-26.
Blay, Z. (2018). How ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ dressed protests across the nation. HuffPost. Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com
Coaston, J. (2019). The symbolic power of the Handmaid’s Tale for real-world protest. Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com
Cooper, B. (2018). Eloquent Rage: A Black Feminist Discovers Her Superpower. St. Martin’s Press.
Feuer, L. (2019). Dystopian fiction and political reality: The case of The Handmaid’s Tale. Journal of Popular Culture, 52(4), 902-923.
Framke, C. (2019). The Handmaid’s Tale and the power of political television. Variety. Retrieved from https://www.variety.com
Hammer, S. (2018). ‘The World is full of weapons, if you’re looking for them’: The Handmaid’s Tale and militant nostalgia. Women’s Studies, 47(3), 177-198.
Hengen, S. (2019). Teaching The Handmaid’s Tale in the age of Trump. Margaret Atwood Studies, 13(1), 45-62.
Howells, C. A. (2018). Margaret Atwood’s dystopian visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake. In The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood (pp. 161-175). Cambridge University Press.
Kafer, K. (2019). The Handmaid’s Tale as political protest: Feminism and resistance. Gender Studies Quarterly, 28(2), 234-256.
Kaplan, E. A. (2019). Fandoms, politics, and popular culture: Television and contemporary social movements. Television & New Media, 20(8), 711-729.
Miller, B. (Creator). (2017). The Handmaid’s Tale [Television series]. Hulu.
Neuman, S. (2020). The feminist politics of The Handmaid’s Tale. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 45(3), 567-591.
Nussbaum, E. (2018). The Handmaid’s Tale and the politics of television. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com
O’Toole, F. (2018). The Handmaid’s Tale and Ireland’s abortion debate. The Irish Times. Retrieved from https://www.irishtimes.com
Phillips, K. (2020). Resistance through symbolism: The Handmaid’s Tale in modern protest movements. Social Movement Studies, 19(5-6), 623-641.
Tolan, F. (2018). ‘Welcome to the Republic of Gilead’: Feminism and The Handmaid’s Tale. Contemporary Women’s Writing, 12(2), 185-203.
Zarkov, D., & Davis, K. (2018). Ambiguities and dilemmas around #MeToo: #ForHowLong and #WhereTo? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(1), 3-9.