How is Mr. Wickham Portrayed as a Villain in Pride and Prejudice?
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Introduction
Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, first published in 1813, is renowned for its incisive social commentary, memorable characters, and exploration of love, marriage, and morality in Regency England. Among the novel’s cast of characters, Mr. George Wickham stands out as one of literature’s most effectively portrayed villains—not through obvious malevolence or dramatic evil, but through charm, deception, and calculated manipulation. Unlike the traditional villains of Gothic novels popular in Austen’s time, Wickham represents a more realistic and therefore more dangerous type of antagonist: the charismatic predator who uses social grace and attractive appearance to mask his true character and prey upon the vulnerable. This essay examines how Austen portrays Mr. Wickham as a villain in Pride and Prejudice, analyzing the techniques she employs to reveal his villainous nature, the specific actions that mark him as the novel’s primary antagonist, and the broader implications of his character for the novel’s themes of appearance versus reality, moral judgment, and social vulnerability.
Wickham’s villainy is particularly significant because it operates within the realm of social respectability rather than outside it. He does not rob people at gunpoint or commit obviously criminal acts; instead, he exploits the conventions and vulnerabilities of polite society to pursue his selfish ends. His weapons are charm, plausible lies, and an understanding of how to manipulate social perceptions and individual vanities. Austen’s portrayal of Wickham thus serves multiple purposes: he functions as a plot device to create complications and reveal character, as a thematic element highlighting the dangers of judging by appearances, and as a social critique exposing the vulnerabilities that Regency society created for women and the insufficiency of conventional standards for judging character (Johnson, 1988). Understanding how Austen constructs Wickham’s villainy provides insight not only into this particular character but also into Austen’s broader artistic methods and moral vision.
The Art of First Impressions: Wickham’s Deceptive Charm
Austen introduces Mr. Wickham into the novel with careful attention to the elements that make him immediately attractive and believable to other characters and, importantly, to readers. When he first appears in Meryton, Wickham possesses all the superficial qualities valued in Regency society: a handsome appearance, military uniform, pleasing manners, and easy conversation. Austen writes that he had “all the best part of beauty, a fine countenance, a good figure, and very pleasing address” (Austen, 1813, p. 72). This emphasis on external attractions is crucial to understanding Wickham’s method of operation—he understands that in a society that places enormous importance on first impressions and surface appearances, an attractive exterior provides significant advantages and can mask less admirable realities. His military position as an officer in the militia adds to his appeal, conferring respectability and suggesting qualities of honor and courage that he does not actually possess.
The immediate contrast between Wickham and Darcy serves Austen’s purposes in multiple ways, allowing her to explore themes of prejudice and hasty judgment while also demonstrating Wickham’s skill at manipulation. When Elizabeth Bennet encounters both men in Meryton, Wickham’s warmth and openness stand in stark contrast to Darcy’s reserved and apparently proud demeanor. This contrast predisposes Elizabeth and the reader to favor Wickham, making his subsequent deceptions more effective and the eventual revelation of his true character more striking. Wickham’s ability to read social situations and adjust his behavior accordingly is evident from this first meeting—he recognizes Darcy and sees an opportunity to establish himself as a wronged party while simultaneously ingratiating himself with the Meryton society (Tanner, 1986). His calculated friendliness, particularly toward the Bennet sisters, demonstrates a predatory awareness of where vulnerability and influence lie. By befriending Elizabeth, who is intelligent and well-regarded, he gains credibility and access to local society, using her good opinion as a shield against any doubts others might have about him.
The Calculated Confession: Manipulation Through Apparent Honesty
One of Wickham’s most effective villainous techniques, and one of Austen’s most sophisticated methods of revealing his character, is his carefully staged “confession” to Elizabeth about his history with Darcy. This scene, which occurs relatively early in the novel during a social gathering at Mrs. Philips’s house, represents a masterclass in manipulation disguised as openness. Wickham tells Elizabeth a story that is designed to accomplish multiple goals: it explains his presence in Meryton and apparent lack of means, it casts Darcy as the villain of the piece, it establishes Wickham himself as a virtuous victim of injustice, and it flatters Elizabeth by treating her as a confidante worthy of such intimate revelations (Hardy, 1979). The timing and setting of this revelation are carefully chosen—it occurs in a private conversation that creates a sense of intimacy and trust, yet it happens early enough in their acquaintance that Elizabeth has no reason to question his motives.
The content of Wickham’s story is a mixture of truth and lies, making it particularly difficult to detect and particularly effective as deception. He does not invent the entire narrative out of whole cloth; instead, he takes real facts—his godfather’s relationship with him, the elder Mr. Darcy’s affection for him, the existence of a promised living—and distorts them to suit his purposes while adding complete fabrications about Darcy’s behavior. This technique of mixing truth with lies is characteristic of skilled deceivers and makes Wickham particularly dangerous (Mudrick, 1952). Elizabeth, who prides herself on her discernment, is completely taken in by this performance because Wickham provides her with an explanation that confirms her existing prejudices against Darcy. He exploits her wounded pride from Darcy’s earlier slight at the assembly and her general tendency to judge quickly based on surface impressions. Austen’s portrayal of this scene demonstrates how villains like Wickham succeed not merely through their own cunning but through their ability to identify and exploit the weaknesses, vanities, and prejudices of their targets.
Pattern of Predatory Behavior: A History of Exploitation
As the novel progresses and more information about Wickham emerges, Austen reveals that his deception of Elizabeth and the Meryton society is not an isolated incident but part of a consistent pattern of predatory behavior. The full extent of Wickham’s villainy becomes clear through Darcy’s letter to Elizabeth and subsequent revelations about his past. Wickham’s history shows a man who has repeatedly exploited the advantages given to him by his godfather’s affection and position, squandering opportunities through dissipation and attempting to secure his future through calculated seductions and manipulation rather than honest work. His attempt to elope with Georgiana Darcy, then only fifteen years old and worth thirty thousand pounds, reveals the depths of his mercenary nature and his willingness to ruin a young girl’s reputation and happiness for financial gain (Austen, 1813). This attempted seduction is particularly villainous because it involves deliberate targeting of someone vulnerable due to age, inexperience, and emotional susceptibility.
The revelation of Wickham’s debts throughout various towns and his practice of forming attachments to young women of fortune demonstrates a systematic approach to villainy rather than impulsive wrongdoing. In Meryton, he initially pays attention to Miss King, who has recently inherited ten thousand pounds, before abandoning his pursuit of Elizabeth when it becomes clear she brings no financial advantage. This mercenary behavior, combined with his trail of unpaid debts to local tradespeople, shows a man with no regard for his obligations or for the harm his actions cause to others (Collins, 2009). The shopkeepers and merchants he defrauds are people of limited means for whom such losses represent genuine hardship, yet Wickham feels no compunction about leaving these debts behind when he moves on to his next target. This pattern of behavior establishes that Wickham is not simply a flawed character who makes mistakes but rather someone who deliberately and repeatedly chooses to exploit others for his own benefit, marking him clearly as the novel’s villain.
The Seduction of Lydia: Villainy at Its Peak
Wickham’s villainy reaches its climax in his seduction and elopement with Lydia Bennet, an act that threatens to ruin not only Lydia but all her sisters by association. This episode demonstrates the full extent of Wickham’s moral bankruptcy and his disregard for the consequences his actions have on others. Unlike his attempted elopement with Georgiana Darcy, which at least had the mercenary motive of her substantial fortune, his involvement with Lydia has no such justification—she brings no money, no connections, and no advantages beyond immediate physical gratification. His willingness to ruin a fifteen-year-old girl (in some editions) or sixteen-year-old girl with no fortune and no prospects demonstrates a complete lack of moral restraint or consideration for others (Kirkham, 1983). The fact that he has no intention of marrying her until Darcy’s intervention compels him to do so reveals that he is willing to destroy her life entirely for his temporary convenience and pleasure.
The Lydia episode also demonstrates Wickham’s cowardice and his understanding of how to exploit the vulnerabilities that Regency society created for women. He knows that while such a scandal would damage his reputation somewhat, the primary harm would fall on Lydia and her family, particularly her sisters, whose marriage prospects would be destroyed by association with such disgrace. His calculation that he could escape the consequences while leaving devastation behind reveals a particularly contemptible form of villainy—one that exploits existing social structures that place the burden of sexual morality almost entirely on women while allowing men relatively more freedom (Johnson, 1988). Wickham’s willingness to allow Lydia to be ruined rather than marry her without financial inducement shows that his villainy is not merely a matter of weakness or poor judgment but represents a fundamental lack of honor, responsibility, and basic human decency. Austen’s portrayal of this episode leaves no ambiguity about Wickham’s character—he is revealed as truly villainous in his complete disregard for the welfare of a vulnerable young woman and the family who trusted him.
The Mask of Respectability: Social Villainy
What makes Wickham particularly effective as a villain in Austen’s social world is his ability to maintain a facade of respectability even as he engages in thoroughly disreputable behavior. He understands the forms and conventions of polite society and uses them as camouflage for his true character and intentions. His manners are always correct, his conversation appropriate, and his appearance that of a gentleman—these surface qualities allow him to move through society without immediately raising suspicions. This ability to wear the mask of respectability makes him far more dangerous than an obvious villain would be, because it allows him to get close to his victims and gain their trust before exploiting them (Tanner, 1986). Austen’s portrayal emphasizes that true gentility is a matter of character rather than appearance or social performance, and that society’s tendency to judge by surfaces rather than substance creates opportunities for villains like Wickham to thrive.
The contrast between Wickham’s social success and Darcy’s initial social difficulties highlights Austen’s critique of conventional standards for judging character. Wickham, who possesses the superficial social graces valued by society, is readily accepted and believed despite being fundamentally dishonorable. Darcy, who is genuinely honorable but reserved and sometimes awkward in social situations, is initially misjudged and disliked. This inversion of appearance and reality serves as a central theme of the novel and demonstrates the dangers of relying on first impressions and surface charm to evaluate character (Hardy, 1979). Wickham’s ability to maintain his respectable appearance even after his villainy is exposed—he remains in the militia, receives the money Darcy provides for marrying Lydia, and eventually gains Lydia’s family’s grudging acceptance—shows how social structures sometimes protect rather than punish villains, particularly when they possess the right external attributes and social connections.
Methods of Manipulation: The Psychology of Deception
Austen’s portrayal of Wickham reveals sophisticated understanding of psychological manipulation and the techniques that skilled deceivers use to achieve their ends. Wickham is an expert at identifying what people want to hear and telling them exactly that. With Elizabeth, he provides a narrative that confirms her existing prejudices against Darcy and flatters her sense of discernment by treating her as someone worthy of confidence. With the Meryton society, he presents himself as an agreeable officer who shares their interests and values. With young women of fortune, he displays romantic interest and suggests possibilities of marriage. In each case, he adapts his approach to suit his audience and his objectives, demonstrating the chameleon-like quality that characterizes successful con artists and manipulators (Mudrick, 1952).
Another key element of Wickham’s manipulative technique is his use of apparent vulnerability and victimhood to gain sympathy and trust. By presenting himself as the injured party in his relationship with Darcy—someone who has been unjustly deprived of his inheritance and opportunities—he elicits protective and sympathetic responses from others, particularly women. This victim narrative serves multiple purposes: it explains his relative lack of means without raising questions about his character, it casts Darcy as the villain and therefore deflects scrutiny from himself, and it creates a sense of intimacy with those he tells, making them feel they are supporting someone who has suffered injustice. The effectiveness of this technique demonstrates Austen’s insight into human psychology and her recognition that people are often more ready to believe someone who claims to be wronged than to question whether such claims are true (Johnson, 1988). Wickham’s success at manipulation thus depends not only on his own skills but on the human tendencies toward credulity, sympathy for apparent victims, and reluctance to believe that someone so charming could be thoroughly false.
The Role of Money: Mercenary Motivation
Money is central to understanding Wickham’s villainy and his motivations throughout the novel. Unlike villains driven by passion, revenge, or ideology, Wickham is motivated primarily by financial self-interest. His entire pattern of behavior—from squandering the three thousand pounds that Darcy’s father left him and the additional three thousand pounds he received in lieu of the promised living, to his pursuit of women with fortunes, to his accumulation of debts, to his attempted seduction of Georgiana Darcy—can be understood as the actions of someone determined to secure financial comfort through the easiest means possible, regardless of ethics or honor (Copeland, 1997). This mercenary quality makes his villainy particularly calculating and cold, as he is willing to manipulate, deceive, and ruin others purely for monetary gain.
The fact that Wickham requires financial incentive even to marry Lydia after ruining her demonstrates the centrality of money to his character and the extent of his moral bankruptcy. He is willing to let her be entirely disgraced rather than accept the burden of marriage without adequate compensation. Darcy must not only pay off Wickham’s substantial debts but also provide him with money to purchase his commission in the regular army and settle a sum on Lydia—in total, thousands of pounds—to convince him to do what any honorable man would consider his clear duty (Austen, 1813). This mercenary quality distinguishes Wickham from characters who might be weak or impulsive but who retain some sense of honor or responsibility. His refusal to marry Lydia without payment reveals that he recognizes no obligations beyond his own financial interest, marking him as thoroughly villainous in his priorities and values. Austen’s portrayal of this mercenary villainy serves as a critique of a society that made money so central to marriage and social position that characters like Wickham could cynically exploit these values for personal gain.
The Contrast with Darcy: Revealing True Gentility
Austen’s portrayal of Wickham as a villain is significantly enhanced through his contrast with Darcy, the novel’s hero. This contrast operates on multiple levels and serves to highlight the distinction between true gentility and its mere appearance. Where Wickham is immediately charming and approachable, Darcy is initially reserved and seemingly proud. Where Wickham readily shares confidences and complaints, Darcy maintains proper discretion even when it would benefit him to speak. Where Wickham accumulated debts and irresponsibly squandered his opportunities, Darcy conscientiously manages his estate and fulfills his obligations. These contrasts demonstrate that true worth lies in character and actions rather than in superficial charm or social performance (Tanner, 1986).
The most significant contrast emerges in how each man responds to difficult situations and moral tests. When Wickham attempts to seduce Georgiana and fails, he simply moves on to his next scheme with no sense of shame or accountability. When his seduction of Lydia succeeds, he is willing to abandon her to disgrace rather than take responsibility. In contrast, Darcy takes responsibility even for situations not of his making—he blames himself for not exposing Wickham’s character earlier, and he expends considerable money and effort to resolve the Lydia scandal despite having no obligation to do so (Hardy, 1979). This contrast between Wickham’s irresponsibility and Darcy’s sense of duty highlights the moral framework of Austen’s novel, in which true gentility consists of taking responsibility for one’s actions and their consequences, maintaining honor and integrity regardless of personal cost, and protecting those who are vulnerable. Wickham’s villainy is thus defined not merely by his specific harmful actions but by his complete absence of these positive qualities that characterize the novel’s moral exemplars.
The Revelation Process: Austen’s Narrative Technique
Austen’s method of revealing Wickham’s villainy is itself a key element of how he is portrayed as the novel’s villain. Rather than exposing his character immediately or through an omniscient narrator’s direct commentary, Austen allows the revelation to unfold gradually through multiple sources and in a way that mirrors Elizabeth’s own journey from prejudice to accurate judgment. The reader initially encounters Wickham through Elizabeth’s admiring eyes and is likely to share her positive impression. This technique of controlled revelation serves multiple purposes: it demonstrates how easily even intelligent, perceptive people can be deceived by appearances; it creates dramatic irony as readers gradually realize what Elizabeth has not yet understood; and it generates narrative suspense about when and how the truth will emerge (Mudrick, 1952).
The primary revelation of Wickham’s character comes through Darcy’s letter to Elizabeth following his rejected proposal, but even this disclosure is not immediately accepted at face value. Elizabeth’s initial resistance to believing Darcy’s account, her gradual reconsideration of the evidence, and her ultimate recognition of her misjudgment create a psychologically realistic portrait of how difficult it is to abandon first impressions and acknowledge that one has been deceived. This gradual revelation also allows Austen to demonstrate that understanding character requires more than snap judgments based on appearances—it requires consideration of evidence, attention to patterns of behavior, and willingness to revise one’s opinions when new information emerges (Johnson, 1988). The later confirmation of Wickham’s villainy through the Lydia episode, the information provided by Mrs. Gardiner, and eventually even through his own behavior after marriage creates a complete portrait built through multiple perspectives and pieces of evidence. This method of revelation makes Wickham’s villainy more convincing and realistic than it would be if simply asserted by the narrator, and it reinforces the novel’s thematic concern with the difficulty and importance of accurate judgment.
The Aftermath: Wickham’s Fate and Austen’s Moral Vision
Interestingly, Wickham does not receive the dramatic punishment that villains in more conventional novels might suffer. He is not killed in a duel, transported for crimes, or publicly disgraced and expelled from society. Instead, he is essentially bought off by Darcy, compelled to marry Lydia, provided with enough money to purchase a commission in the regular army, and allowed to continue his life with relative comfort. Some critics have seen this as a weakness in Austen’s plotting, a failure to adequately punish villainy. However, this resolution actually serves Austen’s realistic and satirical purposes more effectively than a melodramatic punishment would. Wickham’s fate demonstrates that in real social systems, charming villains often escape dramatic consequences, particularly when they possess the right superficial qualities and when others with resources are willing to pay to resolve the problems they create (Kirkham, 1983).
Moreover, Wickham’s fate includes its own forms of punishment, though these are more subtle than dramatic downfall. He is trapped in marriage to Lydia, a woman whose silliness and vulgarity he cannot respect and who brings him no fortune or social advantage. He has been entirely dependent on Darcy’s money to establish this marriage, and he knows that Darcy knows the full extent of his villainy, destroying any possibility of Wickham maintaining pride or dignity in that relationship. His debts have been paid this time, but his fundamental character has not changed, and the novel suggests that he will continue to accumulate debts and move from one financial difficulty to another throughout his life. Perhaps most significantly, he is known for what he is by the people whose good opinion matters most—the Darcys, the Gardiners, and Elizabeth—and must live with the knowledge that he is accepted only out of family obligation rather than respect or affection (Collins, 2009). This more realistic form of consequence—being trapped in the results of one’s own villainy without redemption or real happiness—serves Austen’s moral vision more effectively than melodramatic punishment would, suggesting that the natural consequences of bad character are themselves a form of punishment.
Social Commentary: Wickham as Systemic Critique
Wickham’s villainy and his ability to operate successfully for much of the novel serve as vehicles for Austen’s critique of various aspects of Regency society. His success at deception highlights the dangers of a social system that places enormous emphasis on surface accomplishments—appearance, manners, and agreeable conversation—while providing insufficient means for evaluating actual character. The fact that Wickham can move through society deceiving people until he overreaches with Lydia demonstrates the inadequacy of conventional social safeguards and the vulnerability of women in particular to exploitation by unscrupulous men (Armstrong, 1987). His ability to accumulate debts and leave them unpaid as he moves from place to place reveals weaknesses in the economic structures of the time, particularly regarding credit and debt collection.
Furthermore, Wickham’s ultimate escape from serious consequences through Darcy’s intervention highlights both the arbitrary nature of justice in a class-based society and the dependence of victims on the intervention of wealthy protectors. Without Darcy’s money and determination, Wickham would have escaped entirely unpunished while leaving Lydia and her family to bear the full consequences of his actions. This dependence on individual wealth and initiative rather than systematic social or legal remedies demonstrates the inadequacy of existing structures to protect the vulnerable or punish wrongdoers (Johnson, 1988). Austen’s portrayal of Wickham thus functions not only as character study and plot device but as social commentary on the systemic vulnerabilities and inadequacies of her society, making his villainy representative of broader social problems rather than merely individual moral failing.
Wickham in Literary Context: The Realistic Villain
When considered in the context of early nineteenth-century literature, Wickham represents an innovative type of villain quite different from the Gothic villains popular in novels of the period. Rather than being a mysterious, brooding figure of obvious malevolence like the villains of Ann Radcliffe’s novels or the passionate, Byronic anti-heroes that would become popular later, Wickham is thoroughly ordinary in his villainy. He commits no murders, imprisons no heroines in castles, and engages in no supernatural evil. Instead, his crimes are social and financial: seduction, fraud, irresponsibility, and manipulation. This realistic approach to villainy makes Wickham more relevant to readers’ actual lives and more effective as a cautionary figure (Tanner, 1986). Readers are unlikely to encounter Gothic villains in their own experience, but they might well encounter charming, plausible deceivers like Wickham who exploit social conventions and human credulity for personal gain.
Austen’s portrayal of Wickham also anticipates later developments in literary realism and psychological fiction. His character is not simply evil for the sake of being evil or to provide obstacles for the hero and heroine; rather, his villainy emerges from understandable if contemptible motivations—desire for comfort without work, resentment at having to earn his way, and willingness to exploit others rather than accept his own responsibilities. This psychological realism makes Wickham a more complex and interesting villain than the stock villains of melodrama or Gothic fiction (Mudrick, 1952). His ability to deceive others stems not from supernatural powers or incredible schemes but from ordinary human weaknesses—the tendency to judge by appearances, the desire to believe attractive people, and the difficulty of detecting lies mixed with truth. In this way, Wickham represents a significant development in the portrayal of literary villainy, pointing toward the more psychologically complex antagonists of later nineteenth and twentieth-century fiction.
Conclusion
Jane Austen’s portrayal of Mr. Wickham as a villain in Pride and Prejudice represents a sophisticated achievement in characterization and social commentary. Through Wickham, Austen creates a realistic, psychologically convincing antagonist whose villainy emerges gradually through the revelation of his pattern of manipulation, exploitation, and irresponsibility. Unlike the melodramatic villains of Gothic fiction, Wickham’s evil is ordinary and social—he is a charming predator who exploits the conventions and vulnerabilities of Regency society to pursue his selfish, primarily financial interests. His weapons are attractiveness, plausible lies, and an understanding of human psychology that allows him to tell people what they want to hear while manipulating them for his own benefit. The contrast between his appealing surface and his contemptible character serves as a powerful illustration of the novel’s central theme regarding the dangers of judging by appearances rather than through careful evaluation of character and behavior.
Wickham’s specific villainous actions—his false accusations against Darcy, his attempted seduction of the fifteen-year-old Georgiana Darcy for her fortune, his trail of unpaid debts, and especially his seduction and near-abandonment of Lydia Bennet—demonstrate a consistent pattern of selfishness and irresponsibility that marks him as thoroughly villainous despite his superficial charm. His mercenary motivations, revealed through his consistent pursuit of financial gain regardless of the cost to others, show a character entirely lacking in honor, responsibility, or basic human decency. The fact that he requires financial payment even to marry the young woman he has ruined demonstrates the depths of his moral bankruptcy and his complete subordination of all other considerations to his own material interest.
Austen’s method of gradually revealing Wickham’s character through multiple sources and perspectives creates a narratively effective and thematically significant portrait of villainy. The reader’s journey from favorable first impression to full understanding of his character mirrors Elizabeth’s own development and reinforces the novel’s concern with the difficulty and importance of accurate judgment. The contrast between Wickham and Darcy—between superficial charm and true gentility, between irresponsibility and duty, between exploitation and protection—serves to define the moral framework of the novel and to demonstrate that genuine worth consists of character and action rather than appearance and social performance.
Finally, Wickham’s fate and the social implications of his character serve Austen’s purposes as a social critic as well as a novelist. His relative escape from dramatic punishment reflects the realistic observation that charming villains often avoid the consequences of their actions, particularly in a society that values appearance over substance and that lacks adequate systematic protections for the vulnerable. The fact that resolving the crisis he creates requires the intervention of a wealthy man willing to spend thousands of pounds highlights the inadequacy of existing social and legal structures to provide justice or protection. Through Wickham, Austen critiques not only individual moral failing but also the systemic vulnerabilities of her society—its excessive valuation of surface qualities, its inadequate means of evaluating character, and its particular failure to protect women from exploitation by unscrupulous men.
Mr. Wickham thus functions as far more than a simple plot device or stock villain. He represents Austen’s sophisticated understanding of how villainy actually operates in social contexts, her insight into the psychology of manipulation and deception, and her critique of the social structures that enable such villainy to flourish. His portrayal as a realistic, psychologically convincing antagonist whose villainy consists of ordinary exploitation rather than melodramatic evil makes him one of the most effective villains in English literature—dangerous precisely because he is plausible, successful precisely because he understands human weakness, and memorable precisely because readers recognize that such villains exist in reality and not merely in fiction. Through Wickham, Austen demonstrates that the most dangerous villains are often those who wear the mask of respectability most convincingly, and that protecting oneself from such predators requires moving beyond superficial judgments to careful evaluation of character based on patterns of behavior rather than attractive appearances.
References
Armstrong, N. (1987). Desire and domestic fiction: A political history of the novel. Oxford University Press.
Austen, J. (1813). Pride and prejudice. T. Egerton.
Collins, I. (2009). Jane Austen and the clergy. In E. Copeland & J. McMaster (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Jane Austen (2nd ed., pp. 157-172). Cambridge University Press.
Copeland, E. (1997). Money. In E. Copeland & J. McMaster (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Jane Austen (pp. 131-148). Cambridge University Press.
Hardy, B. (1979). A reading of Jane Austen. Peter Owen.
Johnson, C. L. (1988). Jane Austen: Women, politics, and the novel. University of Chicago Press.
Kirkham, M. (1983). Jane Austen, feminism and fiction. Harvester Press.
Mudrick, M. (1952). Jane Austen: Irony as defense and discovery. Princeton University Press.
Tanner, T. (1986). Jane Austen. Harvard University Press.