How Should Teachers Approach “Hills Like White Elephants” for Different Age Groups?
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Direct Answer
Teaching Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” requires age-appropriate pedagogical strategies that align with students’ cognitive development, emotional maturity, and literary comprehension skills. For high school students (ages 14-18), educators should focus on guided discussion of symbolism and subtext while establishing safe boundaries around sensitive themes. College undergraduates (ages 18-22) benefit from analytical approaches emphasizing feminist criticism, historical context, and Hemingway’s iceberg theory. Graduate students and adult learners engage best with comparative literary analysis, theoretical frameworks, and interdisciplinary connections. The story’s implicit treatment of abortion, relationship dynamics, and communication breakdown demands careful scaffolding at each educational level, with teachers adjusting complexity, autonomy, and critical engagement based on learners’ developmental readiness.
Why Does Age-Appropriate Teaching Matter for “Hills Like White Elephants”?
The pedagogical approach to Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” must be carefully calibrated to match the developmental stage, emotional maturity, and analytical capabilities of different student populations. Published in 1927, this short story presents unique teaching challenges because its central conflict—a couple’s tense conversation about abortion—is conveyed entirely through dialogue and subtext rather than explicit narrative exposition (Hemingway, 1927). Research in educational psychology demonstrates that learners at different developmental stages process complex, emotionally charged literature through distinct cognitive frameworks, requiring educators to modify their instructional strategies accordingly (Vygotsky, 1978). The story’s minimalist style, heavy reliance on implication, and mature thematic content make it particularly sensitive to age-appropriate adaptation, as younger students may lack the life experience or analytical tools to decode Hemingway’s indirect narrative technique while older learners can engage with increasingly sophisticated theoretical and contextual interpretations.
Furthermore, the ethical dimensions of teaching literature that addresses reproductive rights, gender dynamics, and relationship conflict necessitate pedagogical approaches that respect students’ varying levels of emotional readiness and personal experience. According to developmental theorist Jean Piaget, adolescents transitioning into formal operational thinking begin developing the capacity for abstract reasoning and hypothetical consideration, yet their moral reasoning and emotional regulation continue developing well into early adulthood (Piaget, 1972). Teachers must therefore construct learning environments that challenge students intellectually while providing appropriate emotional scaffolding, particularly when discussing literature that touches on controversial or deeply personal subjects. The National Council of Teachers of English emphasizes that effective literature instruction balances academic rigor with sensitivity to diverse student backgrounds, ensuring that challenging texts become opportunities for growth rather than sources of discomfort or alienation (NCTE, 2020). By tailoring teaching methods to specific age groups, educators can maximize both the educational value and the emotional safety of engaging with Hemingway’s complex narrative.
How Should High School Teachers (Ages 14-18) Teach “Hills Like White Elephants”?
High school educators approaching “Hills Like White Elephants” must balance introducing students to sophisticated literary techniques while remaining mindful of the story’s mature thematic content and their students’ developing analytical skills. At this developmental stage, students are building foundational skills in literary analysis, learning to identify symbolism, characterization, and narrative perspective while simultaneously developing their capacity for abstract thinking (Applebee, 1996). Teachers should begin by establishing clear learning objectives focused on Hemingway’s distinctive writing style—particularly his “iceberg theory” of omission—and the story’s masterful use of dialogue to convey conflict. An effective entry point involves examining the title’s metaphorical significance, guiding students to understand how “white elephants” function as symbols of burdensome, unwanted gifts, which creates a foundation for understanding the story’s central tension without immediately confronting its most sensitive elements. Classroom discussions should emphasize close reading techniques, asking students to identify what is explicitly stated versus what must be inferred, thereby developing critical reading skills that extend beyond this single text.
Additionally, high school teachers must thoughtfully navigate the story’s implicit discussion of abortion, recognizing that students at this age possess varying levels of maturity, personal experience, and family values regarding reproductive issues. Rather than avoiding the topic entirely—which would undermine the story’s literary integrity—educators should frame discussions around communication patterns, power dynamics in relationships, and decision-making under pressure, allowing students to engage with the story’s emotional and ethical complexity without requiring them to take personal positions on controversial issues (Beach & Myers, 2001). Creating a respectful classroom environment through established discussion norms, such as using “the couple” or “the characters” rather than focusing on individual moral judgments, helps maintain academic focus while honoring diverse perspectives. Teachers might also provide historical context about the 1920s, explaining how social attitudes toward women, relationships, and reproductive autonomy differed from contemporary perspectives, which helps students develop historical empathy and understand literature as a product of specific cultural moments. Supplementary activities such as analyzing the story’s setting, tracking repeated phrases, or examining the significance of the landscape description enable students to build interpretive confidence through concrete textual evidence before tackling more abstract thematic questions.
What Teaching Strategies Work Best for Undergraduate Students (Ages 18-22)?
Undergraduate instruction in “Hills Like White Elephants” should elevate analytical sophistication by introducing theoretical frameworks, comparative approaches, and deeper contextual understanding that moves beyond high school close reading exercises. College students possess greater emotional maturity, more developed abstract reasoning capabilities, and typically have chosen to study literature, creating opportunities for more direct engagement with the story’s controversial subject matter and complex gender dynamics (Perry, 1970). Professors can explicitly address the abortion debate at the story’s center, examining how Hemingway’s narrative technique forces readers to construct meaning from fragmented dialogue and environmental details—a characteristic example of modernist literary experimentation. Lectures might explore how the story exemplifies Hemingway’s iceberg theory, wherein the “dignity of movement of an iceberg is due to only one-eighth of it being above water,” encouraging students to identify the seven-eighths of emotional and narrative content that remains submerged beneath the surface dialogue (Hemingway, 1932, p. 192). This theoretical framework helps undergraduates understand modernist aesthetics while developing skills in reading for implication, ambiguity, and narrative gaps.
Moreover, undergraduate courses benefit from incorporating feminist literary criticism and gender studies perspectives that interrogate the power imbalances and communication failures depicted in the story. Scholars such as Pamela Smiley have analyzed how the male character, referred to only as “the American,” dominates the conversation through manipulative rhetoric, repeatedly insisting the operation is “simple” while dismissing the woman’s emotional concerns and her tentative resistance (Smiley, 1988). Students can examine specific dialogue patterns—the American’s use of minimization (“It’s really not anything. It’s just to let the air in”), his false reassurances, and his conditional affection—to understand how language operates as an instrument of coercion within intimate relationships. Comparative assignments might pair “Hills Like White Elephants” with other Hemingway works like “The End of Something” or contemporary short fiction addressing reproductive autonomy, enabling students to trace thematic continuities and stylistic evolution across texts. Research projects could investigate the story’s reception history, biographical connections to Hemingway’s personal life, or the story’s treatment in film adaptations, providing opportunities for students to engage in original scholarly inquiry while developing research and argumentation skills essential for upper-division coursework.
How Can Graduate Students and Adult Learners Engage with “Hills Like White Elephants”?
Graduate seminars and adult education contexts allow for the most sophisticated engagement with “Hills Like White Elephants,” incorporating advanced theoretical approaches, interdisciplinary perspectives, and original critical contributions that push beyond established interpretations. At this level, students should be equipped to navigate complex scholarly debates, engage with primary source materials, and develop original arguments that contribute to ongoing academic conversations (Bloom, 1956). Instructors might structure seminars around contested interpretations of the story’s ending—whether Jig ultimately acquiesces to the abortion, whether their relationship survives, and how readers should interpret the story’s final ambiguous lines—encouraging students to marshal textual evidence, biographical context, and theoretical frameworks to support nuanced positions. Advanced students can investigate the story through multiple critical lenses, including psychoanalytic readings that examine the unconscious desires and anxieties expressed through dialogue patterns, ecocritical approaches that analyze the symbolic significance of the barren hills versus the fertile valley, or narrative theory that examines Hemingway’s strategic use of focalization and narrative distance.
Furthermore, graduate-level instruction should incorporate historical research methodologies that situate the story within specific cultural, legal, and medical contexts of 1920s Europe and America, when abortion remained largely criminalized and carried significant social stigma, medical risk, and legal consequences (Reagan, 1997). Students might examine period medical texts, legal documents, and cultural artifacts to reconstruct the actual circumstances surrounding illegal abortion procedures, deepening their understanding of what the unnamed “operation” would have entailed for Hemingway’s characters. Interdisciplinary approaches prove particularly valuable at this level, as students can draw connections between literary analysis and fields such as gender studies, medical humanities, communication studies, and philosophy. For example, examining the story through philosopher Judith Butler’s theories of performative gender might illuminate how Jig’s tentative assertions of agency challenge patriarchal relationship structures, while communication theory could analyze the couple’s conversation as a case study in failed interpersonal communication and emotional manipulation. Original research projects might involve archival work with Hemingway’s manuscripts, stylistic analysis using digital humanities tools, or theoretical essays that place the story in dialogue with contemporary debates about reproductive justice, bodily autonomy, and consent within intimate relationships.
What Are the Key Literary Elements Teachers Should Emphasize Across All Age Groups?
Regardless of the students’ age or educational level, certain fundamental literary elements of “Hills Like White Elephants” deserve sustained attention as they constitute the story’s artistic achievement and pedagogical value. Hemingway’s revolutionary use of dialogue as the primary vehicle for narrative progression and character development stands as perhaps the story’s most significant technical innovation, demonstrating how skilled writers can convey complex emotional states, power dynamics, and narrative tension through seemingly simple conversational exchanges (Weeks, 1980). Teachers should guide students in analyzing how Hemingway strips away traditional narrative scaffolding—extensive description, interior monologue, authorial commentary—forcing readers to construct character psychology and plot development from dialogue alone, a technique that influenced generations of subsequent writers. Close examination of specific verbal patterns reveals sophisticated characterization: the American’s repetitive reassurances and dismissive language contrasts sharply with Jig’s metaphorical thinking and indirect expressions of resistance, creating a portrait of fundamental incompatibility and communication failure that students can trace through textual evidence.
The story’s symbolic landscape provides another crucial element for analysis across educational levels, offering opportunities for interpretation that can be scaled from basic symbol identification to sophisticated allegorical reading. The barren hills “like white elephants” stand in implicit contrast to the fertile valley with fields of grain and the river Ebro, creating a symbolic geography that mirrors the couple’s decision between terminating or continuing the pregnancy (Renner, 1995). Students at all levels can engage with questions about why Hemingway chose this particular setting, what the train station represents as a space of transition and decision, and how the story’s spatial organization reflects its thematic concerns. The title itself warrants extended consideration, as “white elephant” carries connotations of unwanted gifts that become burdensome obligations—precisely the American’s apparent view of the pregnancy—while also suggesting something rare and valuable, which may reflect Jig’s more ambivalent perspective. Additionally, the story’s temporal structure, which unfolds in near real-time during a forty-minute train layover, creates dramatic urgency and claustrophobia that intensifies the emotional stakes, a narrative choice that teachers can help students recognize and analyze regardless of their analytical sophistication level.
How Should Teachers Address the Sensitive Subject Matter in “Hills Like White Elephants”?
Navigating the story’s treatment of abortion requires pedagogical sensitivity, ethical awareness, and clear instructional boundaries that honor both the text’s literary merit and students’ diverse backgrounds and beliefs. Teachers must recognize that students in their classrooms may have personal experience with abortion—either directly or through family members and friends—and that discussions of reproductive decisions can trigger strong emotional responses rooted in religious conviction, family values, or personal trauma (Delpit, 1995). Establishing clear ground rules for respectful discussion becomes essential, emphasizing that classroom analysis focuses on literary interpretation, character analysis, and historical context rather than contemporary political debates or personal moral judgments. Instructors should explicitly acknowledge the topic’s sensitivity at the outset, invite students who feel uncomfortable to speak with them privately, and provide alternative assignments if students have compelling reasons to opt out, thereby creating an inclusive environment that respects individual circumstances while maintaining academic integrity.
Moreover, framing discussions around the story’s exploration of communication, autonomy, and relationship dynamics rather than centering abortion as an isolated political issue allows for productive literary analysis while minimizing unnecessary controversy. Teachers can emphasize how Hemingway’s narrative technique invites readers to observe a relationship in crisis, examining how the couple’s inability to communicate honestly or acknowledge each other’s emotional needs leads to the story’s unresolved tension (O’Brien, 1999). This approach enables students to develop insights about power imbalances, gender roles, emotional manipulation, and decision-making under pressure—themes with broad relevance beyond the specific context of reproductive choice. Historical contextualization also proves valuable, helping students understand that the story reflects a specific moment in social history when women’s reproductive autonomy was severely constrained by law, medicine, and social custom, which shaped both the characters’ options and Hemingway’s narrative choices. By maintaining focus on textual evidence, literary technique, and historical context, teachers can facilitate meaningful engagement with challenging material while respecting the classroom’s diversity and avoiding the impression that literature instruction serves as a vehicle for ideological persuasion.
What Supplementary Materials and Activities Enhance Teaching “Hills Like White Elephants”?
Effective instruction benefits significantly from carefully selected supplementary materials that provide contextual background, comparative texts, and multimedia resources that deepen students’ understanding and engagement. For students at all levels, providing biographical information about Hemingway’s life—particularly his experiences in 1920s Paris, his relationships with women, and his developing aesthetic philosophy—can illuminate the personal and artistic contexts from which the story emerged. Scholarly articles such as Kenneth Johnston’s analysis of the story’s symbolic structure or Timothy O’Brien’s examination of its narrative technique offer models of literary criticism that help students understand how professional scholars approach textual interpretation (Johnston, 1987; O’Brien, 1999). For undergraduate and graduate students, excerpts from Hemingway’s non-fiction work “Death in the Afternoon,” where he articulates his iceberg theory, provide direct insight into his conscious artistic choices and can anchor discussions of his minimalist aesthetic.
Comparative reading assignments enrich students’ understanding by situating “Hills Like White Elephants” within broader literary contexts and thematic conversations. Pairing the story with other modernist works such as Katherine Mansfield’s “Bliss” or James Joyce’s “The Dead” helps students recognize shared modernist techniques like unreliable narration, symbolic landscape, and narrative ambiguity while appreciating each author’s distinctive approach. Contemporary short fiction addressing reproductive choice, such as Lorrie Moore’s “People Like That Are the Only People Here” or Jennifer Egan’s “Black Box,” enables students to trace how literary treatments of abortion have evolved over time, reflecting changing social attitudes and narrative possibilities. Film adaptations of the story, including the 2002 version directed by Paige Cameron, offer opportunities for comparative media analysis, examining how visual interpretation necessarily makes explicit many elements Hemingway left ambiguous, which can prompt discussions about the relationship between text and adaptation. Creative assignments such as writing the couple’s conversation after the story’s conclusion, composing Jig’s interior monologue, or rewriting scenes from alternative perspectives encourage students to inhabit the text imaginatively while demonstrating their understanding of character psychology and narrative technique.
How Can Teachers Assess Student Understanding of “Hills Like White Elephants”?
Assessment strategies for “Hills Like White Elephants” should align with the age-appropriate learning objectives established for each student population while providing multiple pathways for demonstrating comprehension and analytical growth. For high school students, formative assessments might include annotation exercises where students identify and explain symbolic elements, dialogue analysis worksheets that track character development through specific quotations, or short reflective writings about the story’s ambiguous ending. Summative assessments could involve interpretive essays that require students to develop and support a thesis about the story’s meaning using textual evidence, demonstrating their ability to construct literary arguments—a foundational skill emphasized in secondary English education standards (Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2010). Teachers might also employ creative assessment options such as storyboards that visualize the story’s action and symbolic elements, character journals that imagine Jig’s private thoughts, or comparative paragraphs that connect Hemingway’s technique to other studied texts, providing diverse ways for students to demonstrate understanding beyond traditional essay formats.
Undergraduate assessments should demand greater analytical sophistication and independent critical thinking, including research papers that require students to engage with scholarly sources, position their interpretation within existing critical conversations, and develop original arguments supported by both textual evidence and secondary scholarship. Close reading presentations where students lead class discussion by analyzing specific passages in depth help develop both analytical and communication skills while requiring detailed textual engagement. Comparative essays that examine “Hills Like White Elephants” alongside other Hemingway works or texts from different authors addressing similar themes assess students’ ability to recognize patterns, trace stylistic evolution, and synthesize insights across multiple texts. Graduate-level assessment should emphasize original scholarly contribution, theoretical sophistication, and methodological rigor, including seminar papers suitable for conference presentation or publication, comprehensive examinations that situate the story within broader literary historical contexts, or digital humanities projects that employ computational methods to analyze Hemingway’s stylistic patterns. Regardless of level, effective assessment balances evaluation of content knowledge—students’ understanding of the story’s plot, characters, and context—with evaluation of analytical skills, including their ability to identify literary techniques, construct interpretive arguments, and support claims with appropriate evidence.
What Common Misreadings Should Teachers Address?
Despite—or perhaps because of—its apparent simplicity, “Hills Like White Elephants” frequently generates misreadings and oversimplifications that teachers should proactively address to deepen students’ interpretive sophistication. One common misreading involves viewing the story as a straightforward anti-abortion polemic in which Hemingway condemns the American’s callousness and champions Jig’s maternal instincts, a reductive interpretation that ignores the story’s deliberate ambiguity and Hemingway’s characteristic refusal to provide moral judgment (Weeks, 1980). Teachers should emphasize that the story’s power derives precisely from its refusal to resolve clearly in favor of either character’s position, instead presenting a realistic portrait of two people trapped in an impossible situation with no ideal solution. By examining how Hemingway distributes sympathy and critique across both characters—the American’s manipulation coexists with his apparent genuine distress, while Jig’s victimization coexists with her passive-aggressive communication style—students can develop more nuanced understanding of characterization and authorial technique.
Another frequent misinterpretation involves reading the ending as definitively resolved, with students sometimes claiming certainty about whether Jig agrees to the abortion, whether the couple stays together, or what happens after the story concludes. Teachers should guide students to recognize that Hemingway deliberately withholds closure, as the story’s final lines—”‘I feel fine,’ she said. ‘There’s nothing wrong with me. I feel fine'”—can be read as either capitulation, bitter irony, exhausted resignation, or genuine relief, depending on interpretive emphasis (Hemingway, 1927, p. 214). Exploring how different readings of this conclusion fundamentally alter the story’s meaning helps students understand that literary ambiguity isn’t a failure of clarity but rather a sophisticated technique that invites active readerly participation and reflects the complexity of human experience. Additionally, some students may overlook the story’s careful attention to power dynamics, reading the couple’s conflict as balanced disagreement between equals rather than recognizing the gendered power imbalances that structure their interaction, particularly the American’s economic control, his physical mobility, and his rhetorical dominance throughout the conversation. By explicitly addressing these common misreadings, teachers can help students develop more sophisticated interpretive frameworks and recognize how careful attention to textual detail yields richer, more complex understanding than surface-level reading allows.
Conclusion: Adapting Pedagogy to Developmental Readiness
Teaching Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” effectively requires educators to carefully calibrate their pedagogical approaches to match students’ developmental stages, analytical capabilities, and emotional maturity levels. High school instruction should emphasize foundational literary analysis skills, particularly close reading and symbol identification, while establishing appropriate boundaries around the story’s sensitive subject matter through carefully structured discussion and historical contextualization. Undergraduate teaching can engage more directly with theoretical frameworks, feminist criticism, and comparative analysis, challenging students to develop sophisticated interpretations supported by textual evidence and scholarly sources. Graduate seminars should demand original critical contributions, interdisciplinary connections, and advanced theoretical engagement that pushes beyond established interpretations to generate new scholarly insights. Across all levels, teachers must balance academic rigor with ethical sensitivity, creating learning environments that honor the text’s literary complexity while respecting students’ diverse backgrounds, beliefs, and personal experiences.
The enduring pedagogical value of “Hills Like White Elephants” lies not only in its technical mastery and thematic richness but also in its capacity to challenge readers at any level of sophistication, offering interpretive possibilities that deepen with repeated engagement and mature reflection. By thoughtfully adapting instructional strategies to specific age groups while maintaining focus on the text’s literary merit, educators can ensure that Hemingway’s modernist masterpiece serves as both an introduction to sophisticated narrative technique and an opportunity for meaningful exploration of communication, autonomy, and human relationships. As literature instruction continues evolving to meet contemporary students’ needs and contexts, “Hills Like White Elephants” remains a valuable teaching text precisely because its deliberate ambiguity and psychological complexity reward the varied analytical approaches that different developmental stages and pedagogical contexts make possible.
References
Applebee, A. N. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. University of Chicago Press.
Beach, R., & Myers, J. (2001). Inquiry-based English instruction: Engaging students in life and literature. Teachers College Press.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. The New Press.
Hemingway, E. (1927). Hills like white elephants. In Men without women (pp. 69-77). Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Hemingway, E. (1932). Death in the afternoon. Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Johnston, K. G. (1987). “Hills Like White Elephants”: Lean, vintage Hemingway. Studies in American Fiction, 15(2), 233-238.
National Council of Teachers of English. (2020). Guidelines for dealing with censorship of nonprint media. NCTE.
O’Brien, T. (1999). Allusion, word-play, and the central conflict in “Hills Like White Elephants”. The Hemingway Review, 18(2), 19-27.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1-12.
Reagan, L. J. (1997). When abortion was a crime: Women, medicine, and law in the United States, 1867-1973. University of California Press.
Renner, S. (1995). Moving to the girl’s side of “Hills Like White Elephants”. The Hemingway Review, 15(1), 27-41.
Smiley, P. (1988). Gender-linked miscommunication in “Hills Like White Elephants”. The Hemingway Review, 8(1), 2-12.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Weeks, L. E. (1980). Hemingway Hills: Symbolism in “Hills Like White Elephants”. Studies in Short Fiction, 17(1), 75-77.