The Significance of Milton’s Invocations to the Muse in Paradise Lost
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Introduction
John Milton’s Paradise Lost, published in 1667, stands as one of the most monumental achievements in English literature and epic poetry. This twelve-book epic poem narrates the biblical story of the Fall of Man, encompassing the rebellion of Satan, the creation of Adam and Eve, their temptation, and their eventual expulsion from the Garden of Eden. What distinguishes Milton’s work from other epic poems is not merely its ambitious scope or its blank verse innovation, but particularly its sophisticated use of invocations to the Muse. These invocations, appearing at crucial junctures throughout the poem, serve multiple functions that are central to understanding Milton’s artistic vision, theological framework, and literary methodology. The significance of Milton’s invocations to the Muse in Paradise Lost extends beyond mere literary convention, representing a complex intersection of classical tradition, Christian theology, poetic ambition, and personal experience that fundamentally shapes the poem’s meaning and impact.
The invocations to the Muse in Paradise Lost appear at four strategic points in the epic: at the beginning of Books I, III, VII, and IX. Each invocation serves a distinct purpose while contributing to the overall coherence and theological depth of the work. Milton’s approach to these invocations demonstrates his masterful synthesis of classical epic conventions with Christian doctrine, creating a unique poetic voice that simultaneously honors literary tradition and establishes new ground for religious epic poetry. Understanding these invocations is essential for comprehending how Milton positioned himself as an epic poet, how he sought divine inspiration for his monumental task, and how he navigated the tension between human artistic ambition and divine grace. This essay explores the multifaceted significance of Milton’s invocations to the Muse, examining their structural function, theological implications, relationship to epic tradition, autobiographical elements, and their role in establishing the poem’s authority and aesthetic vision.
The Classical Tradition and Christian Innovation
Milton’s invocations to the Muse represent a deliberate engagement with the classical epic tradition while simultaneously transforming it to serve Christian purposes. The practice of invoking a Muse originates in ancient Greek and Roman epic poetry, where poets would call upon one of the nine Muses—goddesses who presided over the arts and sciences—to provide inspiration and authority for their compositions. Homer begins both the Iliad and the Odyssey with invocations to the Muse, asking her to sing of Achilles’ rage or to tell of Odysseus’s wanderings. Virgil follows this convention in the Aeneid, invoking the Muse to help him recount the founding of Rome. These classical invocations served to establish the poet’s connection to divine inspiration, to signal the epic nature of the work, and to suggest that the narrative authority comes not merely from the poet’s imagination but from a higher source (Lewalski, 1985). Milton was deeply familiar with these classical models, having received an extensive humanistic education that immersed him in Greek and Roman literature.
However, Milton’s innovation lies in his Christianization of the Muse convention. Rather than invoking one of the pagan Muses by name, Milton addresses a “Heav’nly Muse” that he identifies with the Holy Spirit, the divine source of inspiration in Christian theology. In the opening invocation of Book I, Milton writes: “Sing Heav’nly Muse, that on the secret top / Of Oreb, or of Sinai, didst inspire / That Shepherd, who first taught the chosen Seed” (I.6-8). By connecting his Muse to the spirit that inspired Moses to write the Pentateuch, Milton establishes a continuity between biblical revelation and his own poetic enterprise (Danielson, 1982). This move accomplishes several objectives: it claims divine authority for the poem, it positions Paradise Lost within the tradition of sacred literature rather than merely secular epic, and it elevates Milton’s poetic project to the level of prophetic utterance. The Christian Muse represents not a mythological fiction but the actual source of divine truth, making Milton’s invocations simultaneously more audacious and more theologically grounded than their classical predecessors. This synthesis of classical form and Christian content exemplifies Milton’s broader project in Paradise Lost of creating a Christian epic that could rival and surpass the achievements of Homer and Virgil while remaining faithful to Protestant theology.
The First Invocation: Establishing Scope and Authority
The first invocation, which opens Book I of Paradise Lost, is perhaps the most famous and significant of Milton’s four invocations to the Muse. This invocation establishes the epic’s vast scope, announces its central theme, and claims divine authority for the poetic enterprise. Milton begins with the imperative “Sing,” echoing Homer’s opening of the Iliad, but immediately differentiates his project by addressing a “Heav’nly Muse” and by announcing that he will sing “Of Man’s First Disobedience, and the Fruit / Of that Forbidden Tree, whose mortal taste / Brought Death into the World, and all our woe” (I.1-3). This opening immediately establishes that Milton’s subject is nothing less than the origin of human suffering and sin—a topic of ultimate theological and existential importance. The poet then proceeds to identify his Muse with the divine spirit that inspired Moses, the author of Genesis, thereby claiming a continuity between biblical revelation and his own poetic vision (Revard, 1980).
The first invocation also reveals Milton’s extraordinary ambition as an epic poet. He explicitly announces his intention to pursue “Things unattempted yet in Prose or Rhyme” (I.16), signaling his desire to surpass all previous literary achievements. This declaration is not mere hubris but rather reflects Milton’s belief that the Christian story of the Fall is inherently more significant and more worthy of epic treatment than the martial exploits celebrated in classical epics. By invoking divine assistance—”What in me is dark / Illumine, what is low raise and support” (I.22-23)—Milton acknowledges the impossibility of such an undertaking through merely human powers. The invocation thus establishes a paradox central to the entire poem: Milton’s immense personal ambition coupled with his recognition of human inadequacy and his dependence on divine grace. This first invocation sets the tone for the entire epic, establishing its theological framework, its relationship to literary tradition, and its claim to speak with both poetic and prophetic authority. The success of Paradise Lost as an epic depends significantly on whether readers accept Milton’s claim to divine inspiration as established in this opening invocation, making it a crucial threshold moment in the poem (Fish, 1967).
The Second Invocation: Light, Vision, and Inner Illumination
The invocation that opens Book III marks a significant shift in both the poem’s narrative and its invocational strategy. Having concluded the first two books with their depiction of Hell and Satan’s rebellion, Milton now prepares to ascend to Heaven and depict God himself. This transition from darkness to light, from Hell to Heaven, occasions an invocation that is simultaneously more personal and more theologically complex than the first. Milton addresses not the Heavenly Muse directly but “holy Light” itself, identifying it as “Offspring of Heav’n first-born” (III.1). This invocation is notable for its theological sophistication in treating the question of light’s divine nature—whether it is co-eternal with God or created by him—a question that engages with complex theological debates about the relationship between God and creation (Rumrich, 1996). The poet’s address to Light carries multiple resonances: physical light, divine illumination, and the Son of God himself, who is often identified with light in Christian theology.
What makes this second invocation particularly significant is its deeply autobiographical dimension. Milton introduces his own blindness into the poem, lamenting that despite his desire to describe celestial light, he is “from the cheerful ways of men / Cut off, and for the Book of knowledge fair / Presented with a Universal blanc / Of Nature’s works to mee expung’d and ras’d” (III.46-49). Milton had become completely blind several years before composing Paradise Lost, and this invocation transforms his personal affliction into a meditation on the relationship between physical sight and spiritual vision (Lieb, 1977). The poet asks for inner illumination to compensate for his loss of outward sight: “So much the rather thou Celestial light / Shine inward, and the mind through all her powers / Irradiate” (III.51-53). This request is not merely personal but carries profound implications for the poem’s epistemology and authority. Milton suggests that his blindness, rather than disqualifying him from describing heavenly realities, may actually enable a purer form of spiritual vision uncorrupted by physical appearances. The invocation thus establishes a hierarchy in which inner illumination surpasses outer vision, divine inspiration transcends sensory experience, and spiritual blindness paradoxically enables true sight. This second invocation deepens the poem’s exploration of knowledge, perception, and divine revelation while introducing an autobiographical element that humanizes the epic poet and adds pathos to his monumental undertaking.
The Third Invocation: Descending to Earth and Human Scale
The invocation at the beginning of Book VII represents another crucial transition in Paradise Lost, this time marking the shift from the cosmic warfare of the War in Heaven back to the human-scale narrative of creation. Having depicted the rebellion and expulsion of Satan and his angels in Book VI, Milton now prepares to narrate the six days of creation as told by the angel Raphael to Adam. This invocation returns to addressing Urania, though Milton is careful to distinguish his Muse from the classical Urania, the Muse of astronomy: “The meaning, not the Name I call” (VII.5). This distinction is significant because it emphasizes that Milton’s inspiration comes not from pagan mythology but from the true divine source that the classical Muses merely symbolized. The poet again identifies his Muse with the divine presence that inspired Moses and played upon “the secret top / Of Oreb, or of Sinai” (VII.6-7), reinforcing the connection between biblical revelation and poetic creation established in the first invocation.
The third invocation is particularly notable for its expression of vulnerability and danger. Milton describes himself as having undertaken a perilous poetic journey through celestial realms and now expresses anxiety about his safe return to earthly subjects: “Up led by thee / Into the Heav’n of Heav’ns I have presum’d, / An Earthlie Guest, and drawn Empyreal Aire” (VII.12-14). He worries about descending safely, comparing himself to Bellerophon, the Greek hero who fell from the winged horse Pegasus while attempting to fly to Mount Olympus. This concern is not merely metaphorical but reflects real dangers that Milton faced as a poet writing during the Restoration period. Having served as a prominent official in Cromwell’s Commonwealth government, Milton was politically vulnerable after the restoration of the monarchy in 1660. The invocation obliquely references these political dangers when Milton describes himself as “fall’n on evil dayes, / On evil dayes though fall’n, and evil tongues” (VII.25-26) and expresses his fear of being devoured by critics and political enemies (Norbrook, 1999). This third invocation thus grounds the epic in historical reality, reminding readers that the poet composing this divine narrative is himself a vulnerable human being living in a specific political and social context. The invocation’s concern with safe descent also parallels the poem’s thematic concern with fall and descent, creating a parallel between the poet’s situation and the larger theological narrative of the Fall.
The Fourth Invocation: The Tragic Turn and Epic Tragedy
The final invocation, appearing at the beginning of Book IX, marks the most significant structural and thematic transition in Paradise Lost—the shift from the happiness of Eden to the tragedy of the Fall. This invocation is unique in that it explicitly announces a change in the poem’s genre and tone. Milton declares that he must now change his “Notes to Tragic” (IX.6) as he prepares to narrate the temptation and fall of Adam and Eve. The poet acknowledges the generic shift from the celebratory mode of the creation narrative to the tragic mode appropriate to humanity’s loss of paradise. This self-conscious announcement of generic change demonstrates Milton’s sophisticated understanding of literary forms and his ability to incorporate multiple genres within the epic framework. The invocation also reveals Milton’s ambition to elevate his subject matter above traditional epic themes of military conquest: “Not sedulous by Nature to indite / Warrs, hitherto the onely Argument / Heroic deem’d” (IX.27-29). Milton argues that the “better fortitude / Of Patience and Heroic Martyrdom” (IX.31-32) is more truly heroic than martial valor, thus redefining epic heroism in Christian terms (Steadman, 1967).
The fourth invocation also introduces a note of anxiety about the completion of the poetic project. Milton acknowledges that his subject is now “more Heroic than the wrauth / Of stern Achilles” (IX.14-15) or the wanderings of Odysseus, but he worries whether his verse will find “fit audience… though few” (VII.31). This concern reflects both Milton’s awareness that his theological epic might not appeal to all readers and his sense that he is writing for a select audience capable of appreciating the poem’s religious and artistic sophistication. The invocation to the “Celestial Patroness” who “deigns / Her nightly visitation unimplor’d” (IX.21-22) suggests that divine inspiration comes to Milton even without his requesting it, visiting him in his sleep and dictating verses to him. This claim to unconscious inspiration reinforces the poem’s divine authority while also describing Milton’s actual compositional practice—he would compose verses in his mind at night and dictate them to amanuenses in the morning. The fourth invocation thus serves multiple functions: it announces the tragic climax of the narrative, redefines epic heroism in Christian terms, expresses anxiety about reception, and reinforces the claim to divine inspiration. Coming immediately before the Fall, this invocation prepares readers for the poem’s emotional and theological center while positioning Milton as a tragic poet recording humanity’s greatest loss.
Theological Implications: Grace, Inspiration, and Divine Authority
The invocations to the Muse in Paradise Lost carry profound theological implications that extend beyond their literary function. At their core, these invocations enact a theology of grace and divine inspiration that is central to Milton’s Protestant worldview. By consistently attributing his poetic ability to the Heavenly Muse or Holy Spirit rather than to his own genius, Milton demonstrates the Reformed Protestant principle that all human achievements depend ultimately on God’s grace rather than human merit. This theological position is particularly significant given Milton’s obvious pride in his poetic abilities and his ambition to create an epic that would surpass Homer and Virgil. The invocations create a productive tension between human ambition and divine dependence, between the poet’s extraordinary learning and literary skill and his acknowledgment that without divine illumination, he cannot accomplish his task (Gallagher, 1982). This tension mirrors the theological paradox of Christian life more broadly: believers are called to strive and work while simultaneously recognizing that salvation and spiritual insight come only through grace.
The invocations also engage with complex questions about the nature of poetic inspiration and prophetic authority in the Christian tradition. By identifying his Muse with the Holy Spirit that inspired the biblical authors, particularly Moses, Milton claims that his poem participates in the same divine revelation that produced Scripture. This is an extraordinarily bold claim, one that raises questions about the status of Paradise Lost relative to the Bible itself. Milton carefully navigates this potential controversy by presenting his poem not as new revelation but as an elaboration and interpretation of biblical truth. The invocations position Milton as a prophet-poet whose role is to illuminate and expand upon the biblical narrative, making it accessible and meaningful to contemporary readers, rather than to add to or supersede Scripture (Kerrigan, 1983). This prophetic self-understanding is consistent with Milton’s broader theological views, particularly his belief in the Protestant principle of the “priesthood of all believers” and his conviction that the Holy Spirit could inspire individuals directly without ecclesiastical mediation. The invocations thus reflect and enact Milton’s Protestant theology while simultaneously establishing the poem’s authority as a work that, while not Scripture, nevertheless participates in divine truth. The theological significance of the invocations lies in their articulation of a model of Christian poetry in which human artistic ambition and divine inspiration cooperate, where classical literary excellence and biblical revelation merge, and where the poet serves as a mediator between divine truth and human understanding.
Autobiographical Elements and the Poet’s Identity
The invocations to the Muse in Paradise Lost are remarkable for their autobiographical content, which distinguishes them from the more impersonal invocations of classical epic. While Homer and Virgil generally effaced themselves from their narratives after the opening invocation, Milton repeatedly inserts his personal circumstances into the invocations, creating a running autobiographical narrative that parallels the epic’s theological story. This autobiographical dimension is most prominent in the invocations of Books III and VII, where Milton explicitly references his blindness and his political circumstances. In the third invocation, Milton’s meditation on his blindness transforms a personal affliction into a theological statement about the superiority of spiritual vision over physical sight. By presenting himself as a blind prophet-poet who sees with inner light, Milton positions himself in the tradition of blind seers like Homer (traditionally believed to have been blind) and the biblical prophet Tiresias (Shawcross, 1993). This self-presentation serves both to ennoble Milton’s condition and to suggest that his blindness paradoxically qualifies him to see and relate divine truths invisible to physical eyes.
The autobiographical elements in the invocations also serve to humanize the epic poet and create a sense of intimacy between Milton and his readers. By sharing his fears, vulnerabilities, and physical limitations, Milton invites readers to see him not as a remote, godlike figure but as a fellow human being struggling to comprehend and communicate divine truths. The references to his “evil dayes” and “evil tongues” in the seventh invocation ground the epic in specific historical circumstances, reminding readers that this cosmic narrative was composed by a particular man at a particular time facing particular dangers. This historical specificity has the paradoxical effect of both particularizing and universalizing the poem—it reminds us that Paradise Lost was created in response to specific historical and personal circumstances, yet the themes it addresses are timeless and universal. The autobiographical invocations also create a secondary narrative about the composition of the epic itself, so that Paradise Lost becomes not only a story about the Fall of Man but also a story about a blind poet’s struggle to understand and articulate that fall. This metapoetic dimension adds depth and complexity to the epic, inviting readers to reflect on the relationship between human creativity and divine truth, between personal experience and universal narrative. The autobiographical elements in the invocations ultimately reinforce the poem’s central themes of fall, redemption, and the possibility of gaining wisdom through suffering, as Milton’s own experience of loss—of sight, of political power, of the revolutionary cause he had served—mirrors the larger human experience of loss and the need for spiritual vision to compensate for worldly defeat.
Structural Function: Unity and Progression in the Epic
Beyond their theological and autobiographical significance, the invocations to the Muse serve crucial structural functions in organizing and unifying Paradise Lost. The four invocations appear at strategic points in the epic, marking major transitions in narrative focus and establishing a clear structure for the poem’s twelve books. The first invocation introduces the entire epic and establishes its cosmic scope; the second marks the transition from Hell to Heaven and from Satan’s perspective to God’s; the third signals the shift from cosmic warfare to the creation narrative and the human focus; and the fourth announces the tragic turn toward the Fall itself. These invocations thus function as structural markers that help readers navigate the epic’s complex narrative architecture. They serve as pauses or breathing spaces that allow readers to absorb what has come before and prepare for what is to come. Each invocation recalibrates the reader’s perspective and establishes the appropriate emotional and intellectual tone for the subsequent narrative (Knoppers, 2020).
The invocations also contribute to the epic’s unity by creating thematic and imagistic continuities that link different parts of the poem. Each invocation returns to similar concerns—divine inspiration, the relationship between light and darkness, the challenge of expressing divine truths in human language, and the poet’s dependence on grace. These recurring themes create a sense of coherence and interconnection across the epic’s vast scope. The invocations also establish a progressive narrative of the poet’s relationship with his Muse, moving from the relatively confident opening invocation through the more vulnerable and personal invocations of Books III and VII to the anxious but determined invocation of Book IX. This progression mirrors the narrative movement of the epic itself, from cosmic confidence toward human tragedy, from divine perspective toward human limitation. The structural function of the invocations is also related to Milton’s compositional method—he composed the poem orally, dictating verses to scribes, and the invocations may have served as transitional moments that helped him refocus and reorient his narrative after pauses in composition. For readers, the invocations provide orientation points that help make sense of the epic’s complex chronology and shifting perspectives. They announce shifts in narrative mode, tone, and focus, functioning almost like chapter headings or prologues that frame what follows. Without these invocational markers, Paradise Lost would be a much more difficult and disorienting text to navigate. The structural significance of the invocations thus lies in their role as organizational devices that impose order on the epic’s vast and potentially chaotic material, creating clear divisions and transitions that make the poem accessible and comprehensible to readers while simultaneously contributing to its thematic and theological unity.
Poetic Ambition and the Anxiety of Influence
The invocations to the Muse in Paradise Lost reveal Milton’s complex relationship to the epic tradition and his determination to surpass his classical and Renaissance predecessors. This anxiety of influence, to use Harold Bloom’s term, manifests itself in the invocations through Milton’s simultaneous emulation and rejection of classical models. On one hand, Milton clearly positions himself in the epic tradition established by Homer and Virgil, using the conventional device of the Muse invocation to signal his work’s generic identity as an epic. His references to classical precedents, his use of elevated language and epic similes, and his engagement with traditional epic themes like warfare, heroism, and cosmic conflict all demonstrate his desire to be recognized as a worthy successor to the classical epic poets. On the other hand, Milton consistently asserts the superiority of his Christian subject matter over the pagan themes of classical epic, arguing that the story of the Fall is inherently more significant than the wrath of Achilles or the wanderings of Odysseus (Martindale, 1986).
This ambition to surpass the classics while simultaneously honoring them creates a productive tension in the invocations. Milton must claim divine inspiration sufficient to exceed Homer and Virgil, yet he cannot appear merely proud or boastful, as such hubris would undermine the theological framework of the poem. The invocations resolve this tension by attributing Milton’s superiority not to his own genius but to his access to divine truth and inspiration. It is not that Milton is a better poet than Homer or Virgil, but that he has a better subject and a more authentic source of inspiration—the actual divine spirit rather than fictional pagan deities. The invocations thus allow Milton to assert his supremacy while maintaining Christian humility by crediting God rather than himself. This strategy is particularly evident in the fourth invocation, where Milton explicitly compares his subject to those of classical epic and declares it superior, while simultaneously expressing anxiety about his ability to treat it adequately. The invocations also reveal Milton’s awareness of more immediate Renaissance predecessors, particularly Dante, Tasso, and Spenser, all of whom had attempted Christian epic in various forms. Milton’s determination to write “Things unattempted yet in Prose or Rhyme” implicitly claims superiority over these predecessors as well, positioning Paradise Lost as the definitive Christian epic that finally accomplishes what earlier poets had attempted imperfectly. The poetic ambition expressed in the invocations is thus multifaceted: it encompasses the desire to revive and perfect the epic genre, to surpass both classical and Christian predecessors, to create a national epic for England comparable to the Aeneid for Rome, and to produce a work of art that would justify God’s ways and serve a genuine religious purpose. The invocations are the textual spaces where this ambition is most explicitly articulated and where Milton most directly addresses his own role as poet and his relationship to literary tradition.
Conclusion
The significance of Milton’s invocations to the Muse in Paradise Lost extends far beyond their conventional role as genre markers or rhetorical flourishes. These invocations are integral to the poem’s meaning, structure, and theological vision, serving multiple interlocking functions that shape how readers understand and experience the epic. Theologically, the invocations establish the divine authority of the poem by identifying Milton’s inspiration with the Holy Spirit, the same source that inspired the biblical authors. This claim to divine inspiration is not mere poetic convention but reflects Milton’s serious belief that his epic participated in divine truth and served a prophetic purpose. The invocations enact a Protestant theology of grace, demonstrating that even the highest human achievements depend ultimately on divine assistance rather than human merit alone. This theological framework transforms the invocations from literary devices into statements of faith and expressions of Milton’s understanding of the relationship between human creativity and divine revelation.
Structurally, the invocations provide essential organization and coherence to the epic’s vast and complex narrative. They mark crucial transitions in focus, tone, and perspective, helping readers navigate between Hell, Heaven, and Earth, between cosmic and human scales, between creation and fall. The four invocations create a clear four-part structure for the twelve-book epic, with each invocation establishing the thematic concerns and emotional register appropriate to the section it introduces. Autobiographically, the invocations create a parallel narrative about the blind poet struggling to compose his epic, adding a human dimension to the cosmic story and inviting readers to reflect on the relationship between personal experience and universal truth. Milton’s references to his blindness, his political circumstances, and his compositional anxieties make the epic more accessible and personal, creating a sense of intimacy between poet and reader unusual in the epic tradition. In terms of literary tradition, the invocations position Milton as both inheritor and transformer of the classical epic, simultaneously honoring and surpassing his predecessors by Christianizing the pagan Muse convention and arguing for the superiority of biblical subject matter over classical mythology.
The invocations also reveal Milton’s extraordinary poetic ambition—his determination to create an epic that would rival Homer and Virgil, that would serve as England’s national epic, and that would justify God’s ways to humanity. Yet this ambition is tempered by Christian humility, as Milton consistently attributes his ability not to personal genius but to divine grace. The invocations thus embody the central paradox of Christian artistry: the necessity of striving for excellence while recognizing one’s absolute dependence on God. In this sense, the invocations mirror the larger themes of Paradise Lost itself, which explores the relationship between human freedom and divine sovereignty, between aspiration and limitation, between the desire for knowledge and the need for obedience. The significance of Milton’s invocations to the Muse in Paradise Lost lies ultimately in their multifunctionality—they are simultaneously literary devices, theological statements, autobiographical revelations, and structural markers that together create a complex framework for understanding one of the greatest achievements in English poetry. Without these invocations, Paradise Lost would be a fundamentally different and diminished work, lacking much of its authority, coherence, and human resonance. The invocations remain essential to the poem’s power and continue to reward careful attention and analysis, revealing new dimensions of meaning with each reading.
References
Danielson, D. (1982). Milton’s Good God: A Study in Literary Theodicy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fish, S. (1967). Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gallagher, P. J. (1982). Milton’s theology of grace and the problem of free will. Milton Studies, 16, 57-82.
Kerrigan, W. (1983). The Prophetic Milton. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Knoppers, L. L. (2020). The Cambridge Companion to Paradise Lost. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewalski, B. K. (1985). Paradise Lost and the Rhetoric of Literary Forms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lieb, M. (1977). The Dialectics of Creation: Patterns of Birth and Regeneration in Paradise Lost. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Martindale, C. (1986). John Milton and the Transformation of Ancient Epic. London: Croom Helm.
Norbrook, D. (1999). Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric and Politics, 1627-1660. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Revard, S. P. (1980). The War in Heaven: Paradise Lost and the Tradition of Satan’s Rebellion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Rumrich, J. P. (1996). Milton Unbound: Controversy and Reinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shawcross, J. T. (1993). John Milton: The Self and the World. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Steadman, J. M. (1967). Milton and the Renaissance Hero. Oxford: Clarendon Press.