Who is Jay Gatsby and What Does He Represent? A Comprehensive Literary Analysis
Author: MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE
Email: Ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Website: https://academiaresearcher.com/
Abstract
Jay Gatsby, the enigmatic protagonist of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, stands as one of the most complex and symbolically rich characters in American literature. This comprehensive analysis examines Gatsby’s multifaceted identity and his symbolic significance within the context of 1920s America and beyond. Through careful examination of his character development, background, motivations, and ultimate fate, this paper argues that Jay Gatsby represents the embodiment of the American Dream’s promise and its inherent contradictions. Gatsby symbolizes the self-made man’s potential for transformation while simultaneously exposing the moral compromises and ultimate futility of pursuing an idealized past. His character serves as Fitzgerald’s critique of American materialism, social mobility myths, and the corruption of democratic ideals in the Jazz Age. Understanding Gatsby’s symbolic significance reveals deeper truths about American society, the nature of identity construction, and the tension between aspiration and reality that continues to resonate in contemporary American culture.
Keywords: Jay Gatsby, The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald, American Dream, American literature, Jazz Age, character analysis, symbolism, social mobility, identity transformation
Introduction
- Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby presents one of American literature’s most enduring and complex protagonists in the figure of Jay Gatsby. More than simply a wealthy bootlegger obsessed with a lost love, Gatsby functions as a multidimensional symbol that embodies the contradictions and complexities of the American experience in the early twentieth century. The question “Who is Jay Gatsby?” extends far beyond biographical details to encompass fundamental questions about American identity, social mobility, and the nature of the American Dream itself.
Jay Gatsby’s significance in American literature stems from his function as both an individual character and a symbolic representation of broader cultural themes. Born James Gatz in rural North Dakota, Gatsby’s transformation into the mysterious millionaire of West Egg represents the quintessential American story of self-reinvention and upward mobility. However, Fitzgerald’s masterful characterization reveals the darker implications of this transformation, exposing the moral compromises, social barriers, and ultimately tragic consequences of pursuing an impossible dream.
The enduring fascination with Gatsby’s character reflects his embodiment of persistent American myths and realities. He represents the optimism and possibility that have long characterized American culture, while simultaneously exposing the hollowness and corruption that can underlie material success. His pursuit of Daisy Buchanan serves as a metaphor for America’s relationship with its own idealized past, revealing the destructive nature of nostalgia and the impossibility of recapturing what may never have truly existed. Through Gatsby’s character, Fitzgerald created a symbol that continues to resonate with readers nearly a century after the novel’s publication, speaking to ongoing concerns about wealth inequality, social mobility, and the sustainability of the American Dream.
Gatsby’s Identity: From James Gatz to Jay Gatsby
The Transformation of James Gatz
Jay Gatsby’s most fundamental characteristic is his complete self-transformation from James Gatz, a poor farm boy from North Dakota, into Jay Gatsby, the mysterious millionaire of West Egg. This metamorphosis represents more than a simple change of name and circumstances; it constitutes a total reconstruction of identity that goes to the heart of American beliefs about self-determination and social mobility. Fitzgerald presents this transformation as both admirable in its scope and troubling in its implications, revealing the complex relationship between American democratic ideals and social reality.
The original James Gatz represents everything that American society traditionally values: hard work, humble origins, and natural ambition. However, Gatz’s dissatisfaction with his circumstances and his rejection of his parents as “unsuccessful farm people” reveals the darker side of American individualism (Fitzgerald, 1925, p. 98). His ability to completely reinvent himself demonstrates the fluidity of American identity and the possibility of transcending birth circumstances that distinguishes American society from more rigid class systems. Yet this same transformation requires the complete rejection of his authentic self and family background, suggesting that social mobility in America demands not just economic advancement but cultural and personal betrayal.
Gatsby’s self-creation is so complete that even his closest associates know nothing of his true background. This erasure of the past represents both the promise and the danger of American reinvention. While it demonstrates the possibility of escaping limiting circumstances, it also reveals the isolation and alienation that can result from severing connections to authentic identity. Gatsby’s transformation makes him a figure of both admiration and pity, embodying the American Dream’s potential while exposing its psychological and moral costs.
The Mythology of Self-Creation
The process by which James Gatz becomes Jay Gatsby reflects broader American mythologies about self-creation and individual possibility. Gatsby’s transformation occurs through a combination of will, opportunity, and moral compromise that mirrors the American experience of westward expansion, industrialization, and social development. His decision to reinvent himself at age seventeen represents the kind of bold individual initiative that American culture traditionally celebrates, while his subsequent criminal activities reveal the moral ambiguity that often underlies rapid social advancement.
Fitzgerald’s presentation of Gatsby’s self-creation draws on distinctly American literary and cultural traditions. Like characters in Horatio Alger novels and other American success stories, Gatsby begins with nothing but ambition and transforms himself through determination and opportunity. However, Fitzgerald complicates this traditional narrative by revealing the psychological and moral costs of such transformation. Gatsby’s success requires not just hard work but criminal activity, social deception, and the complete abandonment of authentic personal relationships.
The mythology surrounding Gatsby’s transformation extends to his own self-perception and the way others view him. His elaborate parties, mysterious wealth, and carefully cultivated persona create a legend that transcends factual reality. This mythologizing process reflects the way American culture often transforms successful individuals into symbols that embody broader cultural values and aspirations. Gatsby becomes not just a wealthy individual but a representation of American possibility, making his ultimate failure all the more tragic and symbolically significant.
Gatsby as the Embodiment of the American Dream
The Promise of Unlimited Possibility
Jay Gatsby represents the American Dream in its purest and most optimistic form: the belief that any individual, regardless of background or circumstances, can achieve success and happiness through determination and hard work. His transformation from James Gatz to Jay Gatsby embodies the fundamental American promise of self-reinvention and upward mobility. This aspect of his character resonates with core American values and explains much of his enduring appeal as a literary figure.
Gatsby’s wealth and social position, achieved entirely through his own efforts, demonstrate the American Dream’s potential for material success. His magnificent mansion, elaborate parties, and expensive possessions represent the tangible rewards that American culture promises to those who pursue their dreams with sufficient determination. The fact that he achieves all this in pursuit of love rather than mere material gain adds a romantic dimension that elevates his quest above simple acquisitiveness, making him a more sympathetic and noble figure than a mere fortune-seeker.
However, Fitzgerald’s portrayal reveals the limitations and contradictions inherent in the American Dream as embodied by Gatsby. His success depends on criminal activity and moral compromise, suggesting that legitimate paths to extreme wealth may not exist for individuals from his background. His isolation and loneliness despite his material success reveal the psychological costs of pursuing the American Dream in its most extreme form. Most significantly, his ultimate failure to achieve his primary goal—winning Daisy—demonstrates the limitations of material success in securing personal happiness and authentic human connection.
The Corruption of Democratic Ideals
While Gatsby embodies the American Dream’s promise, he also represents its corruption and perversion in the context of 1920s America. His criminal associations and illegal activities reveal how the pursuit of rapid wealth can lead to moral compromise and social corruption. This aspect of his character reflects Fitzgerald’s critique of American society during the Jazz Age, when traditional values and social constraints seemed to dissolve in the face of unprecedented prosperity and social change.
Gatsby’s relationship with Meyer Wolfsheim and his involvement in bootlegging represent the criminalization of American business and politics that characterized the Prohibition era. His success depends not on the honest labor and moral behavior traditionally associated with the American Dream, but on activities that undermine social order and legal authority. This corruption extends beyond individual moral failure to represent systemic problems in American society that make legitimate success increasingly difficult for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds.
The democratic ideals supposedly embodied in the American Dream are further compromised by Gatsby’s ultimate failure to gain acceptance from established social elites. Despite his enormous wealth and careful cultivation of appropriate manners and tastes, he remains “Mr. Nobody from Nowhere” in the eyes of characters like Tom Buchanan (Fitzgerald, 1925, p. 130). This rejection reveals the persistent class barriers that contradict American democratic rhetoric, suggesting that the American Dream may be more mythology than reality for individuals seeking to transcend their birth circumstances.
Gatsby’s Pursuit of the Past and Idealized Love
The Green Light and Symbolic Longing
Jay Gatsby’s most defining characteristic may be his unwavering pursuit of an idealized past, symbolized by his nightly contemplation of the green light at the end of Daisy’s dock. This symbolic longing represents more than romantic obsession; it embodies a fundamentally American relationship with time, progress, and the possibility of recapturing lost innocence. Gatsby’s belief that he can “repeat the past” reflects both the optimism and the tragic delusion that characterize American culture’s relationship with its own history and development.
The green light serves multiple symbolic functions in relation to Gatsby’s character and what he represents. As a symbol of hope and possibility, it embodies the forward-looking optimism that has traditionally characterized American culture. The light’s green color connects it to money and material success, revealing how Gatsby’s romantic quest is inextricably bound up with economic and social aspirations. Its position across the water emphasizes the distance between Gatsby’s current reality and his desired goal, making his pursuit both heroic and futile.
Gatsby’s nightly ritual of reaching toward the green light reveals the essentially religious nature of his quest. Like a devoted worshipper, he maintains faith in his dream despite mounting evidence of its impossibility. This religious dimension of his character reflects the way the American Dream functions as a kind of secular religion, providing meaning and purpose while demanding faith in possibilities that may not exist. His devotion to this impossible dream makes him both admirable in his constancy and pitiable in his delusion.
The Impossibility of Recapturing the Past
Gatsby’s fundamental tragedy lies in his inability to accept the passage of time and the changes it brings. His famous declaration that “of course you can” repeat the past reveals a psychological and philosophical position that dooms his quest from the beginning (Fitzgerald, 1925, p. 110). This temporal obsession represents a broader American tendency to idealize the past while pursuing an ever-receding vision of perfection and innocence.
The five years that separate Gatsby’s initial meeting with Daisy from their reunion represent not just personal change but historical transformation. The America of 1917, when their romance began, differs fundamentally from the America of 1922, when Gatsby attempts to recapture their love. The intervening years brought World War I, economic boom, social upheaval, and cultural transformation that make their reunion impossible on the terms Gatsby desires. His failure to recognize these changes reflects a broader American tendency to deny historical complexity in favor of simplified narratives about national development and personal possibility.
Gatsby’s temporal delusion extends beyond his relationship with Daisy to encompass his entire approach to life and identity. His self-transformation into Jay Gatsby represents an attempt to escape not just his social circumstances but his personal history. However, the past continues to influence the present despite his efforts to transcend it. His ultimate destruction results from the collision between his idealized vision and the reality of unchangeable historical circumstances, making him a tragic figure whose downfall illustrates fundamental limitations in American approaches to time, change, and personal development.
Gatsby as a Symbol of American Materialism
Wealth as Identity and Performance
Jay Gatsby’s relationship with wealth extends far beyond simple accumulation or enjoyment of material possessions. For Gatsby, wealth functions as both identity and performance, serving as the foundation for his self-transformation and his primary means of communicating his worth to others. His elaborate parties, expensive cars, and magnificent mansion represent not just personal luxury but calculated attempts to create a persona worthy of Daisy’s love and social acceptance. This performative aspect of wealth reveals deeper truths about American materialism and its relationship to identity construction.
Gatsby’s parties serve as perhaps the most powerful symbol of his relationship with wealth and its role in American society. These elaborate gatherings, attended by hundreds of guests who barely know their host, represent the way material display functions as social communication in American culture. The parties’ excess and spectacle demonstrate Gatsby’s wealth while simultaneously revealing its limitations as a means of achieving genuine human connection. Most guests attend for entertainment rather than friendship, and their gossiping about Gatsby’s background reveals the superficiality of relationships based primarily on material attraction.
The meaninglessness of Gatsby’s wealth without Daisy’s presence demonstrates the emptiness of purely material success. When Daisy fails to attend his parties or call after their reunion, Gatsby’s wealth loses its significance and purpose. His decision to dismiss his servants and abandon his parties after Daisy’s rejection reveals how completely his material display was oriented toward winning her love rather than providing personal satisfaction. This aspect of his character reveals the psychological emptiness that can underlie material success and the way American materialism often serves emotional and social needs that it cannot ultimately fulfill.
The Critique of Consumer Culture
Through Gatsby’s character, Fitzgerald presents a sophisticated critique of emerging consumer culture in 1920s America. Gatsby’s carefully curated lifestyle, from his pink suits to his cream-colored car, represents the way material possessions function as symbols of identity and status in consumer society. His transformation from James Gatz to Jay Gatsby depends not just on accumulating wealth but on learning to consume appropriately, demonstrating the skills and knowledge required for successful performance of upper-class identity.
Gatsby’s consumer choices reveal both his understanding of symbolic communication and his outsider status within established social hierarchies. His pink suits and elaborate parties display wealth but also reveal his imperfect understanding of elite taste and behavior. The nouveau riche ostentation of his lifestyle contrasts with the more understated wealth of characters like Tom and Daisy Buchanan, revealing persistent class distinctions that cannot be overcome through material display alone. This aspect of his character anticipates later critiques of American consumer culture and its relationship to social mobility and authentic identity.
The ultimate failure of Gatsby’s material strategy reveals the limitations of consumer culture as a means of achieving personal fulfillment and social acceptance. Despite his perfect understanding of wealth’s symbolic functions and his successful accumulation of appropriate possessions, he remains excluded from the social world he seeks to enter. His death represents not just personal tragedy but the failure of material culture to deliver on its promises of transformation and acceptance, making him a prophetic figure whose experience anticipates later disillusionment with American consumer society.
Gatsby’s Moral Ambiguity and Ethical Complexity
Criminal Activities and Moral Compromise
One of the most challenging aspects of Jay Gatsby’s character is his involvement in criminal activities and the moral compromises that enable his transformation and success. Fitzgerald deliberately obscures the exact nature of Gatsby’s criminal associations, but his connection to Meyer Wolfsheim and his involvement in bootlegging clearly establish his participation in illegal enterprises. This criminal dimension of his character complicates simple interpretations of him as either hero or villain, creating the moral ambiguity that makes him such a compelling and complex figure.
Gatsby’s criminal activities serve multiple symbolic functions within the novel’s broader critique of American society. They reflect the widespread corruption of American business and politics during the Prohibition era, when legal restrictions on alcohol created enormous opportunities for illegal profit. His success through criminal means reveals the hypocrisy of American moral rhetoric and the way legal systems can create conditions that reward illegal behavior. The fact that his criminal activities enable his pursuit of idealized love creates additional moral complexity by mixing noble motives with corrupt means.
The moral ambiguity surrounding Gatsby’s character reflects broader questions about means and ends in American culture. His criminal activities are clearly wrong by legal and conventional moral standards, yet they serve the sympathetic goal of winning love and achieving social acceptance. This tension between corrupt means and romantic ends mirrors larger American debates about the relationship between individual success and social responsibility, making Gatsby a figure who embodies persistent moral contradictions in American culture rather than providing clear ethical guidance.
The Question of Gatsby’s Essential Nature
Despite his criminal associations and moral compromises, Gatsby retains a kind of essential innocence and idealism that distinguishes him from purely corrupt characters like Meyer Wolfsheim or morally bankrupt figures like Tom Buchanan. Nick Carraway’s final judgment that Gatsby is “worth the whole damn bunch put together” reflects this perception of Gatsby’s fundamental decency despite his surface corruption (Fitzgerald, 1925, p. 154). This moral complexity makes Gatsby a tragic rather than merely pathetic figure, suggesting that his corruption serves higher purposes than mere self-advancement.
Gatsby’s essential nature reveals itself most clearly in his unwavering devotion to his idealized vision of love with Daisy. Unlike characters motivated purely by material gain or social advancement, Gatsby’s criminal activities serve his romantic quest, making him a kind of criminal romantic whose corruption serves idealistic rather than selfish purposes. His willingness to sacrifice his life for Daisy, taking responsibility for the accident that kills Myrtle Wilson, demonstrates the nobility that coexists with his moral compromise.
The question of Gatsby’s essential nature extends beyond individual character analysis to encompass broader questions about American character and moral development. Like America itself, Gatsby combines idealistic aspirations with morally questionable methods, creating a character who embodies both the promise and the problems of American culture. His essential decency, despite his corrupt activities, suggests that moral compromise may be inevitable in the pursuit of American dreams, making him a tragic figure whose downfall reveals systemic rather than merely personal moral failures.
Gatsby as a Symbol of American Optimism and Failure
The Persistence of Hope Against Evidence
Perhaps Jay Gatsby’s most defining characteristic is his extraordinary capacity for hope and optimism in the face of mounting evidence that his dreams are impossible to achieve. This persistent hopefulness represents one of the most distinctly American traits, reflecting the national tendency to believe in possibility and progress despite historical evidence of limitation and failure. Gatsby’s ability to maintain faith in his dream of recapturing the past with Daisy demonstrates both the power and the tragedy of American optimism.
Gatsby’s optimism manifests itself most clearly in his preparation for Daisy’s return to his life. His elaborate parties, carefully maintained mansion, and patient waiting all demonstrate his faith that persistence and preparation will eventually be rewarded with success. This behavior reflects the American work ethic and the belief that proper effort and dedication will inevitably lead to desired outcomes. His willingness to wait five years for the opportunity to reunite with Daisy demonstrates the kind of long-term commitment and delayed gratification that American culture traditionally values.
However, Gatsby’s optimism also reveals the potentially destructive nature of hope when it becomes disconnected from reality. His inability to recognize Daisy’s limitations and the impossibility of his quest demonstrates how optimism can become a form of delusion that prevents realistic assessment of circumstances and possibilities. This aspect of his character serves as Fitzgerald’s critique of American optimism and its tendency to ignore evidence that contradicts desired beliefs about progress and possibility.
The Tragic Dimensions of American Failure
Gatsby’s ultimate failure and death represent not just personal tragedy but the failure of fundamental American promises and beliefs. His destruction occurs despite his complete embodiment of American values: self-reliance, optimism, hard work, and unwavering commitment to his dreams. The fact that these traditionally successful American traits lead to his downfall suggests that the American system itself may be fundamentally flawed or that historical circumstances have made traditional paths to success impossible.
The specific nature of Gatsby’s failure reveals the limitations of individual effort in the face of systemic social and economic barriers. Despite his enormous wealth and careful preparation, he cannot overcome the class distinctions that separate him from Daisy’s world. His rejection by established social elites demonstrates the persistence of aristocratic values in supposedly democratic American society, revealing the gap between American rhetoric and reality that continues to characterize debates about social mobility and equality.
Gatsby’s death at the hands of George Wilson represents the collision between different versions of American failure. Wilson, like Gatsby, represents the struggling individual trying to achieve success and happiness through hard work and determination. However, Wilson’s failure takes the form of economic desperation and social powerlessness rather than criminal success and social pretension. Their mutual destruction suggests that American society during the 1920s offered no viable path to authentic success for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds, making both characters victims of systemic rather than personal failures.
Gatsby’s Legacy and Contemporary Relevance
Enduring Symbolism in American Culture
Jay Gatsby’s significance extends far beyond his role in Fitzgerald’s novel to encompass his function as an enduring symbol in American culture. The term “Gatsby” has entered common usage to describe individuals who embody similar combinations of wealth, mystery, and romantic obsession. This cultural appropriation of his character demonstrates his archetypal significance and his ability to represent persistent themes in American experience that transcend the specific historical context of the 1920s.
Contemporary references to Gatsby in popular culture, politics, and social commentary reveal his continued relevance as a symbol of American aspiration and failure. Politicians invoke his story to discuss social mobility and economic opportunity, while critics use his example to analyze contemporary wealth inequality and social stratification. His character serves as a touchstone for debates about the American Dream’s viability and the relationship between individual effort and systemic barriers to success.
The persistence of Gatsby’s cultural significance reflects his embodiment of contradictions that continue to characterize American society. His combination of idealism and corruption, success and failure, optimism and tragedy provides a complex symbol that can be applied to various contemporary situations and individuals. This symbolic flexibility ensures his continued relevance and explains why new generations of readers continue to find meaning in his story decades after the novel’s publication.
Lessons for Contemporary American Society
Gatsby’s story offers important lessons for contemporary American society, particularly regarding the relationship between material success and personal fulfillment. His inability to achieve happiness despite enormous wealth serves as a cautionary tale about the limitations of purely material approaches to life satisfaction. This lesson seems particularly relevant in an era of increasing wealth inequality and continued emphasis on material success as the primary measure of individual achievement.
The moral compromises required for Gatsby’s success also provide relevant commentary on contemporary American business and political culture. His criminal associations and corrupt activities reflect ongoing concerns about the relationship between success and ethical behavior in American society. The fact that legitimate paths to extreme wealth may not exist for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds remains a relevant concern in discussions of economic opportunity and social mobility.
Perhaps most importantly, Gatsby’s tragic end serves as a warning about the dangers of allowing optimism and determination to become disconnected from realistic assessment of circumstances and possibilities. His failure to recognize the limitations imposed by social structure and historical change offers lessons about the importance of balancing American idealism with practical recognition of constraints and obstacles. This balance between hope and realism remains crucial for individuals and society seeking to pursue authentic success and fulfillment in contemporary America.
Conclusion
Jay Gatsby emerges from this comprehensive analysis as one of the most complex and symbolically rich characters in American literature, representing both the promise and the tragedy of the American experience. His transformation from James Gatz to Jay Gatsby embodies the American Dream’s potential for individual reinvention and social mobility, while his ultimate failure reveals the moral compromises, systemic barriers, and psychological costs that can undermine such transformation.
Gatsby’s character functions on multiple symbolic levels, representing American optimism and materialism, the corruption of democratic ideals, and the persistent tension between individual aspiration and social reality. His pursuit of Daisy serves as a metaphor for America’s relationship with its own idealized past, revealing the destructive nature of nostalgia and the impossibility of recapturing what may never have truly existed. His criminal activities and moral compromises reflect the systemic corruption that can result when legitimate paths to success are blocked or inadequate.
The moral ambiguity that characterizes Gatsby’s character—his combination of essential decency with corrupt activities, noble motives with criminal means—reflects broader contradictions in American culture that continue to generate debate and discussion. His capacity for hope and optimism, maintained despite mounting evidence of failure, embodies both the strength and the potential destructiveness of American idealism when it becomes disconnected from realistic assessment of circumstances and possibilities.
Gatsby’s enduring significance in American culture demonstrates his effectiveness as a symbol that transcends the specific historical context of the 1920s to speak to persistent concerns about wealth, success, social mobility, and the relationship between individual effort and systemic barriers. His story provides both inspiration and warning, celebrating the human capacity for transformation and dedication while revealing the tragic consequences that can result when dreams become disconnected from moral and practical considerations.
Understanding Jay Gatsby’s character and symbolic significance provides insight not only into Fitzgerald’s masterful creation but into fundamental aspects of American culture and identity that continue to shape contemporary society. His story remains relevant because it addresses eternal questions about the relationship between material success and personal fulfillment, the possibility of authentic human connection across social barriers, and the balance between optimism and realism necessary for both individual and social well-being. In Jay Gatsby, Fitzgerald created not just a memorable character but an enduring symbol of American aspiration and tragedy that continues to resonate with readers seeking to understand both the promise and the limitations of the American experience.
References
Bruccoli, M. J. (1985). Some Sort of Epic Grandeur: The Life of F. Scott Fitzgerald. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Callahan, J. F. (1972). F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Evolving American Dream. Twentieth Century Literature, 18(4), 251-265.
Donaldson, S. (1983). Possessions in The Great Gatsby. Southern Review, 19(2), 187-203.
Fitzgerald, F. S. (1925). The Great Gatsby. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Godden, R. (1997). The Great Gatsby: Glamour on the turn. Journal of American Studies, 31(3), 343-376.
Hoffman, F. J. (1955). The Great Gatsby: A Study. New York: Scribner Research Anthology.
Lathbury, R. (2000). Literary Masterpieces: The Great Gatsby. Detroit: Gale Group.
Lehan, R. D. (1990). The Great Gatsby: The Limits of Wonder. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
Pauly, T. H. (1970). Gatsby as Gangster. Studies in American Fiction, 21(2), 225-236.
Stallman, R. W. (1955). Gatsby and the hole in time. Modern Fiction Studies, 1(4), 2-16.
Trilling, L. (1951). The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society. New York: Viking Press.
Way, B. (1980). F. Scott Fitzgerald and the Art of Social Fiction. London: Edward Arnold.
Word Count: 4,287 words
About the Author:
MARTIN MUNYAO MUINDE is an academic researcher specializing in American literature and literary criticism. For more scholarly content and research papers, visit https://academiaresearcher.com/ or contact Ephantusmartin@gmail.com.