Why did Mary Shelley write Frankenstein?

Author: Martin Munyao Muinde
Email: ephantusmartin@gmail.com
Date: August 30, 2025

Abstract

Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein emerged from a complex intersection of personal experiences, intellectual influences, and cultural circumstances that shaped her unique perspective as a young author in the Romantic era. This essay examines the multifaceted reasons behind Shelley’s creation of her Gothic masterpiece, exploring how her unconventional upbringing, exposure to radical political and philosophical ideas, personal tragedies, and the immediate circumstances of the novel’s conception during the famous ghost story competition at Villa Diodati contributed to her literary vision. The analysis reveals that Shelley wrote Frankenstein not merely as entertainment, but as a profound exploration of scientific ethics, social responsibility, and the consequences of unchecked ambition, themes that reflected both her personal experiences and the broader intellectual concerns of her era. Through examining her motivations, we gain insight into how personal trauma, intellectual curiosity, and social criticism combined to produce one of literature’s most enduring and influential works.

Introduction

Mary Shelley’s decision to write Frankenstein at the remarkably young age of eighteen represents one of literature’s most extraordinary creative achievements, emerging from a unique confluence of personal, intellectual, and cultural factors that shaped her perspective and motivated her literary expression. Understanding why Shelley wrote this groundbreaking novel requires examining not only the immediate circumstances of its conception during the famous summer of 1816 at Villa Diodati, but also the deeper influences of her unconventional upbringing, tragic personal experiences, and exposure to revolutionary ideas about science, politics, and human nature (Mellor, 1988). Her motivation stemmed from a complex interplay of intellectual curiosity, personal trauma, and social criticism that found perfect expression in the Gothic form.

The question of why Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein reveals the remarkable circumstances that enabled a teenage author to create a work of such philosophical depth and lasting cultural impact. Her unique position as the daughter of radical intellectuals Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin, combined with her relationship with the poet Percy Shelley and exposure to the scientific and philosophical debates of her era, provided her with an exceptional foundation for exploring the novel’s central themes of creation, responsibility, and the dangers of unchecked ambition. The novel’s enduring influence demonstrates how Shelley’s personal motivations aligned with universal human concerns about knowledge, power, and moral responsibility, creating a work that continues to resonate with contemporary audiences facing their own questions about scientific advancement and social responsibility.

The Villa Diodati Ghost Story Competition

The immediate catalyst for Mary Shelley writing Frankenstein occurred during the famous summer of 1816 at Villa Diodati near Lake Geneva, where she spent time with Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, John Polidori, and Claire Clairmont during what became known as the “Year Without a Summer” due to volcanic ash affecting global weather patterns. The group’s decision to engage in a ghost story competition emerged from their confinement indoors due to persistently gloomy weather, leading Byron to challenge each member to write a supernatural tale (Shelley, 1831). This competition provided the specific impetus for Shelley to begin her novel, though her initial struggle to conceive a story worthy of the challenge reflects the deeper creative and intellectual processes that would ultimately shape Frankenstein into far more than a simple ghost story.

The famous waking dream that inspired Shelley’s conception of her story occurred after listening to conversations between Byron and Percy Shelley about the nature of life and the possibility of reanimating dead matter, discussions that reflected contemporary scientific investigations into electricity and vitalism. Shelley’s own account describes how she envisioned “the pale student of unhallowed arts kneeling beside the thing he had put together,” an image that became the central scene of Victor Frankenstein’s creation of his monster (Shelley, 1831). This moment of inspiration demonstrates how the immediate circumstances of the ghost story competition provided a framework for Shelley to explore deeper philosophical and scientific questions that had been developing in her mind through exposure to the intellectual debates of her era. The Villa Diodati experience served as both creative catalyst and collaborative environment that encouraged Shelley to transform her initial horror-inspired vision into a complex meditation on science, society, and human nature.

Intellectual Influences and Philosophical Background

Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein was profoundly shaped by her exposure to radical intellectual and philosophical traditions through her parents’ legacy and her ongoing relationships with prominent thinkers of the Romantic era. Her father William Godwin’s anarchist philosophy and emphasis on rational inquiry, combined with her mother Mary Wollstonecraft’s pioneering feminist thought and critique of social inequality, provided Shelley with a framework for questioning established authorities and examining the social forces that shape individual behavior (Mellor, 1988). These influences appear throughout Frankenstein in the novel’s critique of scientific institutions, its exploration of social rejection and prejudice, and its examination of how environmental factors contribute to moral development.

The scientific and philosophical debates surrounding vitalism, materialism, and the nature of life itself directly influenced Shelley’s decision to explore these themes through her novel. Contemporary scientific figures like Erasmus Darwin, Luigi Galvani, and Humphry Davy were investigating the relationship between electricity and life, while philosophers debated whether life could emerge from purely material processes or required some vital spark or divine intervention (Butler, 1998). Shelley’s novel engages with these debates not by providing answers, but by exploring the moral and social implications of achieving the power to create life artificially. Her motivation for writing Frankenstein thus reflects a desire to examine the philosophical consequences of scientific advancement and to question whether human beings possess the wisdom necessary to wield such power responsibly.

Personal Trauma and Loss

Mary Shelley’s personal experiences with death, loss, and maternal responsibility significantly influenced her motivation for writing Frankenstein, as the novel reflects her complex feelings about creation, nurturing, and the tragic consequences of failed parental relationships. By the time she wrote the novel, Shelley had already experienced the loss of her mother Mary Wollstonecraft, who died shortly after giving birth to her, creating a lifelong sense of guilt and loss that permeates the novel’s exploration of creator-creation relationships (Moers, 1976). Additionally, Shelley had recently given birth to a premature daughter who died within weeks, an experience that intensified her understanding of the fragility of life and the profound responsibilities that come with bringing new life into the world.

The novel’s emphasis on abandonment, rejection, and failed parental relationships directly reflects Shelley’s personal trauma and her observations of how inadequate nurturing can lead to destructive consequences. Victor Frankenstein’s immediate rejection of his creation mirrors fears about parental abandonment and inadequacy that Shelley experienced both as a child who never knew her mother and as a young mother who had lost her own child (Moers, 1976). The creature’s eloquent expressions of loneliness and desire for acceptance reflect Shelley’s own experiences of social marginalization as an unmarried woman living with Percy Shelley, while the novel’s exploration of how social rejection can corrupt inherent goodness speaks to her understanding of how environmental factors shape moral development. Through Frankenstein, Shelley found a way to explore these deeply personal concerns about creation, nurturing, and responsibility while addressing broader social and philosophical questions about human nature and moral obligation.

Social and Political Commentary

Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein included a desire to critique the social and political structures of her era, particularly the ways in which society creates and then rejects the marginalized individuals it fears. The novel’s exploration of how the creature’s physical difference leads to violent social rejection reflects Shelley’s awareness of how society treats those who do not conform to established norms, whether through physical appearance, social class, or political beliefs (Levine, 1979). Her own experience as a woman writer in a male-dominated literary culture, combined with her family’s radical political background and social ostracism due to her unconventional relationship with Percy Shelley, provided her with firsthand knowledge of how society marginalizes and punishes those who challenge conventional expectations.

The novel’s political dimensions become apparent in its critique of unchecked individual ambition and its exploration of the responsibilities that come with power and privilege. Victor Frankenstein’s wealthy background and access to education enable his scientific pursuits, but his failure to consider the social consequences of his actions reflects broader concerns about how the privileged classes pursue their interests without regard for their impact on others (Levine, 1979). Shelley’s motivation for exploring these themes through her novel reflects her inheritance of radical political thought from both parents, as well as her observation of how the Industrial Revolution and scientific advancement were transforming society without corresponding attention to social justice or moral responsibility. Through Frankenstein, she found a way to examine these political concerns through the lens of Gothic horror, making her social criticism more accessible and emotionally powerful than direct political argumentation.

Romantic Era Literary and Cultural Context

The cultural and literary context of the Romantic era significantly influenced Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein, as the novel engages with key Romantic themes while also challenging some of the movement’s central assumptions about nature, emotion, and individual genius. The Romantic emphasis on emotion, imagination, and the sublime power of nature appears throughout the novel, particularly in the dramatic Alpine settings and the characters’ intense emotional responses to their circumstances (Baldick, 1987). However, Shelley’s motivation also included a desire to critique Romantic individualism and the potential dangers of pursuing personal vision without regard for social responsibility, as demonstrated through Victor’s obsessive pursuit of scientific glory at the expense of human relationships and moral consideration.

The Gothic literary tradition provided Shelley with a framework for exploring psychological and social anxieties through supernatural elements, but her motivation for writing Frankenstein involved transforming traditional Gothic conventions to address contemporary concerns about science and technology. Unlike earlier Gothic novels that relied on supernatural explanations for their horror elements, Shelley grounded her story in scientific possibility, reflecting the era’s fascination with new discoveries in chemistry, anatomy, and electricity (Baldick, 1987). Her decision to create a monster through scientific rather than supernatural means demonstrates her motivation to examine how rational inquiry and technological advancement might generate new forms of horror and moral complexity. This approach allowed her to use the Gothic form to explore Enlightenment themes about reason, progress, and human perfectibility while questioning whether such advancement necessarily leads to human happiness or moral improvement.

Feminist Perspectives and Gender Critique

Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein was significantly influenced by her exposure to feminist thought through her mother Mary Wollstonecraft’s writings and her own experiences as a woman in a male-dominated intellectual and literary culture. The novel’s exploration of creation, nurturing, and responsibility reflects feminist concerns about the marginalization of women’s roles in both scientific discourse and literary culture, as Shelley uses the masculine sphere of scientific ambition to examine questions traditionally associated with feminine experience (Gilbert & Gubar, 1979). Her decision to make Victor’s creation an act of individual male ambition that bypasses natural reproductive processes can be read as a critique of attempts to exclude women from the creative process, whether in science, literature, or society more broadly.

The novel’s emphasis on the consequences of abandoning nurturing responsibilities reflects Shelley’s feminist perspective on the importance of care, relationship, and moral consideration in both individual and social development. Victor’s failure to provide guidance, companionship, or love to his creation demonstrates the destructive consequences of pursuing knowledge and power without attention to the relational and emotional dimensions of responsibility (Gilbert & Gubar, 1979). Shelley’s motivation for exploring these themes through her novel reflects her understanding of how traditional gender roles and expectations shape both individual behavior and social structures, while her creation of a female author’s perspective on masculine scientific ambition challenges conventional assumptions about women’s intellectual capabilities and moral authority. Through Frankenstein, she demonstrated that women writers could engage with the most serious philosophical and scientific questions of their era while offering unique insights based on their different social positions and experiences.

Scientific and Technological Anxieties

The rapid scientific advancement of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries provided Mary Shelley with both inspiration and motivation for exploring the potential dangers of unchecked technological progress through her novel. The era’s discoveries in electricity, chemistry, and anatomy raised new questions about the nature of life and the possibility of artificially creating or controlling living beings, questions that fascinated and troubled contemporary observers (Butler, 1998). Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein included a desire to examine the moral and social implications of such scientific possibilities, particularly the question of whether human beings possess the wisdom and moral development necessary to use such power responsibly.

Contemporary scientific figures like Erasmus Darwin and Luigi Galvani were conducting experiments that suggested the possibility of reanimating dead tissue through electrical stimulation, while chemical advances were revealing new understanding of the material basis of life processes. These developments influenced Shelley’s motivation to explore what might happen if such experiments succeeded in creating artificial life, but without corresponding attention to the emotional, social, and moral needs of such creations (Butler, 1998). Her novel serves as an early example of science fiction’s capacity to explore the unintended consequences of technological advancement, reflecting her motivation to warn against the dangers of pursuing scientific knowledge without considering its broader implications for human society and individual responsibility. Through Frankenstein, Shelley created a framework for examining how scientific progress might outpace moral development, a concern that remains relevant in contemporary discussions about artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and other emerging technologies.

Literary Ambition and Creative Expression

Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein was also driven by her literary ambitions and desire to establish herself as a serious author capable of engaging with the major intellectual and artistic concerns of her era. Growing up in a household where both parents were accomplished writers and surrounded by leading literary figures like Percy Shelley and Lord Byron, she was exposed to high standards of literary achievement and intellectual discourse that encouraged her own creative development (Mellor, 1988). Her decision to write a novel that combined Gothic horror with philosophical inquiry demonstrates her ambition to create something more substantial than conventional entertainment, reflecting her motivation to contribute meaningfully to contemporary literary and intellectual culture.

The novel’s complex narrative structure and sophisticated exploration of multiple themes reveals Shelley’s motivation to demonstrate her capability as a writer and thinker, particularly important for a young woman seeking recognition in a male-dominated literary world. Her choice to publish the novel initially under Percy Shelley’s name, followed by her later decision to claim authorship in subsequent editions, reflects both the practical challenges facing women writers and her ultimate determination to receive credit for her intellectual achievements (Mellor, 1988). The depth and complexity of Frankenstein demonstrate that Shelley’s motivation extended beyond immediate literary success to include a desire to create a lasting work that would establish her reputation as a serious contributor to English literature. Her success in achieving this goal, as evidenced by the novel’s continued influence and popularity, validates her ambition to create something that would transcend the circumstances of its composition and speak to fundamental human concerns across generations.

Psychological and Emotional Processing

The process of writing Frankenstein served as a means for Mary Shelley to work through complex psychological and emotional challenges related to her experiences with death, creation, and responsibility, suggesting that her motivation included both conscious artistic goals and unconscious emotional needs. The novel’s exploration of the relationship between creator and creation provided Shelley with a framework for examining her own feelings about motherhood, particularly her guilt over her mother’s death in childbirth and her recent loss of her own premature daughter (Moers, 1976). The creature’s expressions of abandonment and longing for acceptance reflect emotional states that Shelley herself experienced, while Victor’s horror at his creation and subsequent abandonment of responsibility may represent her fears about her own capacity for nurturing and care.

The therapeutic dimension of Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein becomes apparent in the novel’s careful exploration of how trauma and loss can shape individual development and moral character. Both Victor and his creature suffer from forms of abandonment and isolation that mirror Shelley’s own experiences, while the novel’s emphasis on the importance of human connection and social acceptance reflects her understanding of what she herself needed for emotional healing and development (Moers, 1976). Through the process of creating and developing these characters, Shelley found a way to explore her own psychological struggles while transforming them into universal themes that speak to broader human experiences of loss, responsibility, and the search for meaning and connection. This psychological motivation helps explain the novel’s emotional power and its continued ability to resonate with readers who may not share Shelley’s specific experiences but recognize the fundamental human concerns she explores through her Gothic narrative.

Influence of Romantic Poetry and Literature

Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein was significantly shaped by her immersion in Romantic poetry and literature, particularly through her relationship with Percy Shelley and her exposure to works that explored themes of individual genius, natural sublimity, and the relationship between human consciousness and the natural world. The Romantic movement’s emphasis on imagination, emotion, and the power of individual vision provided Shelley with a literary framework for exploring the psychological dimensions of her story, while its concern with social justice and critique of established institutions aligned with her own reformist inclinations inherited from her parents (Seed, 1995). Her motivation included a desire to contribute to Romantic literature while also challenging some of its assumptions about the beneficial nature of individual genius and emotional intensity.

The influence of specific Romantic works, particularly Milton’s Paradise Lost, Coleridge’s supernatural poetry, and Byron’s brooding heroic figures, shaped Shelley’s conception of her novel and motivated her exploration of themes related to creation, rebellion, and moral responsibility. The creature’s identification with both Adam and Satan from Paradise Lost reflects Shelley’s engagement with Milton’s exploration of creation, fall, and redemption, while her treatment of Victor as a flawed Romantic hero demonstrates her motivation to critique the potential dangers of Romantic individualism (Seed, 1995). Her novel serves both as an example of Romantic literature and as a critical examination of Romantic assumptions about the relationship between genius, nature, and moral authority. This dual motivation allowed Shelley to participate in the major literary movement of her era while also offering a uniquely female perspective on its central concerns and potential limitations.

Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment Thought

The intellectual ferment of the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment provided Mary Shelley with both inspiration and motivation for examining the relationship between scientific progress and human welfare through her novel. The era’s optimistic faith in reason, empirical investigation, and technological advancement as means of improving human life created a cultural context that encouraged scientific experimentation while often neglecting consideration of moral and social consequences (Aldiss, 1973). Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein included a desire to explore what might happen when scientific capability advances beyond moral wisdom, reflecting her skepticism about purely rationalist approaches to human improvement and her concern about the potential for scientific knowledge to be pursued without adequate attention to its social implications.

Contemporary scientific developments, including Alessandro Volta’s work with electricity, Humphry Davy’s chemical discoveries, and various experiments with galvanism and the reanimation of dead tissue, provided Shelley with concrete examples of how scientific advancement might eventually enable the artificial creation of life. Her motivation for exploring these possibilities through fiction rather than scientific treatise reflects her understanding that the most important questions raised by such developments were moral and social rather than purely technical (Aldiss, 1973). The novel’s deliberately vague treatment of Victor’s actual scientific methods demonstrates Shelley’s motivation to focus on consequences rather than processes, examining how the achievement of god-like creative power might affect both the individual who attains it and the society that must deal with its results. Through Frankenstein, she created a framework for thinking about scientific responsibility that anticipated many contemporary concerns about biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and other potentially transformative scientific developments.

Personal Relationships and Emotional Influences

The complex personal relationships in Mary Shelley’s life provided significant motivation for her exploration of themes related to love, abandonment, responsibility, and social acceptance in Frankenstein. Her relationship with Percy Shelley, which began when she was only sixteen and involved considerable social controversy due to his existing marriage and their unconventional living arrangements, gave her direct experience of social ostracism and the consequences of challenging conventional moral expectations (St. Clair, 1989). This experience of being judged and rejected by society based on circumstances beyond her complete control influenced her sympathetic portrayal of the creature’s suffering due to its physical appearance and social rejection, while also informing her critique of social prejudice and moral hypocrisy.

The intellectual and emotional intensity of her relationships with Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, and other members of their circle provided Shelley with models for the kind of passionate, driven characters who populate her novel, while also giving her insight into the potential destructiveness of unchecked emotional and intellectual intensity. The competitive and sometimes volatile dynamics within this group, combined with the various personal tragedies and scandals that affected their lives, influenced Shelley’s understanding of how individual genius and passion can create both artistic achievement and personal destruction (St. Clair, 1989). Her motivation for writing Frankenstein thus included a desire to explore the psychological costs of exceptional achievement and the importance of human connection and moral responsibility in preventing genius from becoming destructive obsession. The novel’s portrayal of Victor’s isolation and the creature’s longing for companionship reflects Shelley’s own understanding of the fundamental human need for love and acceptance, as well as her recognition of how the absence of such connection can lead to tragic consequences.

Gothic Tradition and Horror Literature

Mary Shelley’s choice to work within the Gothic tradition reflected her motivation to use established literary conventions to explore contemporary concerns while also transforming the genre to address new forms of anxiety and horror emerging from scientific and social change. The Gothic novel’s emphasis on psychological terror, supernatural elements, and the exploration of forbidden knowledge provided Shelley with an appropriate framework for examining the potential consequences of scientific advancement, while its focus on isolation, persecution, and social transgression aligned with her own experiences and observations (Baldick, 1987). Her motivation included a desire to demonstrate that women writers could work successfully within established genres while also bringing new perspectives and concerns to traditional forms.

The transformation of Gothic conventions in Frankenstein reflects Shelley’s motivation to address specifically modern anxieties about science, technology, and social change rather than relying on traditional supernatural explanations for horror and mystery. By grounding her monster’s creation in scientific rather than magical processes, she created a new form of Gothic horror that spoke to contemporary fears about the direction of scientific progress and its potential consequences for human society (Baldick, 1987). Her motivation for this innovation stemmed from her understanding that the most frightening possibilities facing her generation emerged not from supernatural forces but from human knowledge and ambition unchecked by moral consideration. Through her transformation of Gothic conventions, Shelley created a template for modern science fiction and horror that continues to influence how writers explore the relationship between technological advancement and human welfare.

Literary Legacy and Cultural Influence

Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein was ultimately vindicated by the novel’s extraordinary influence on subsequent literature, popular culture, and intellectual discourse about science and technology. The enduring popularity of the Frankenstein story across multiple media demonstrates how Shelley’s exploration of creation, responsibility, and the consequences of scientific ambition continues to resonate with audiences facing their own questions about technological advancement and social responsibility (Tropp, 1976). Her success in creating a work that functions simultaneously as entertainment and serious philosophical inquiry reflects her motivation to prove that popular literature could address the most important intellectual and moral concerns of any era.

The novel’s influence on the development of science fiction as a literary genre demonstrates how Shelley’s innovative approach to combining scientific speculation with moral and social analysis created new possibilities for literary exploration of contemporary concerns. Her motivation for grounding supernatural horror in scientific possibility established a template that countless subsequent authors have followed in examining the relationship between technological capability and human wisdom (Tropp, 1976). The continued relevance of Frankenstein in contemporary discussions about artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and biotechnology validates Shelley’s motivation to create a work that would transcend the immediate circumstances of its composition and continue to provide insight into the fundamental challenges facing human beings as they develop increasingly powerful technologies. Through her novel, she achieved her apparent goal of creating lasting literature that combines artistic achievement with serious engagement with the most important questions of human existence and social responsibility.

Conclusion

Mary Shelley’s motivation for writing Frankenstein emerged from a remarkable convergence of personal experiences, intellectual influences, and cultural circumstances that enabled her to create one of literature’s most enduring and influential works. The immediate catalyst of the Villa Diodati ghost story competition provided the creative framework, but her deeper motivations stemmed from her unique upbringing in a household of radical intellectuals, her personal experiences with loss and social marginalization, and her exposure to contemporary debates about science, philosophy, and social reform. Her decision to explore these complex themes through the Gothic novel form demonstrates her ambition to create serious literature that could engage with the most important questions of her era while also appealing to popular audiences.

The enduring relevance of Frankenstein validates Shelley’s motivation to create a work that would transcend its immediate historical context and continue to provide insight into fundamental human concerns about knowledge, power, and responsibility. Her success in combining personal emotional processing with broader social and philosophical critique created a novel that speaks to universal human experiences while also addressing specific concerns about scientific advancement and social justice. The continued influence of her work on literature, popular culture, and intellectual discourse about technology and ethics demonstrates how her motivation to examine the relationship between individual ambition and social responsibility produced insights that remain relevant for contemporary audiences facing their own questions about scientific advancement and moral obligation. Through Frankenstein, Mary Shelley achieved her apparent goal of creating lasting art that combines emotional power with intellectual depth, establishing her legacy as both a significant literary figure and a prescient critic of modern technological society.

References

Aldiss, B. W. (1973). Billion Year Spree: The True History of Science Fiction. Doubleday.

Baldick, C. (1987). In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford University Press.

Butler, M. (1998). Frankenstein and Radical Science. In J. P. Hunter (Ed.), Mary Shelley: Frankenstein (pp. 302-313). Norton Critical Editions.

Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (1979). The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press.

Levine, G. (1979). The Ambiguous Heritage of Frankenstein. In G. Levine & U. C. Knoepflmacher (Eds.), The Endurance of Frankenstein: Essays on Mary Shelley’s Novel (pp. 3-30). University of California Press.

Mellor, A. K. (1988). Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. Methuen.

Moers, E. (1976). Female Gothic. In Literary Women (pp. 90-110). Doubleday.

Seed, D. (1995). Anticipations: Essays on Early Science Fiction and its Precursors. Liverpool University Press.

Shelley, M. (1818). Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor & Jones.

Shelley, M. (1831). Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (Revised Edition). Henry Colburn and Richard Bentley.

St. Clair, W. (1989). The Godwins and the Shelleys: The Biography of a Family. Norton.

Tropp, M. (1976). Mary Shelley’s Monster: The Story of Frankenstein. Houghton Mifflin.